Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hutchinson v. Baskerville, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Christopher Hutchinson's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that denied habeas corpus relief.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-03-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-7306

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Christopher Hutchinson's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that denied habeas corpus relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Hutchinson v. Baskerville, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Christopher Hutchinson's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that denied habeas corpus relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-7306

    CHRISTOPHER M. HUTCHINSON,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden PCC, Virginia Parole
    Board,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.
    (CA-99-1675-AM)

    Submitted:

    March 8, 2001

    Decided:

    March 15, 2001

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Brent Alan Jackson, JACKSON, PICKUS & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Richmond,
    Virginia, for Appellant.
    Richard Carson Vorhis, OFFICE OF THE
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Christopher M. Hutchinson seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254
    (West 1994 & Supp. 2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the dis-

    trict courts opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly,

    we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on


    the reasoning of the district court.

    Hutchinson v. Baskerville,

    No. CA-99-1675-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 10, 2000); see Warren v. Baskerville, 233 F.3d 204, 206-08 (4th Cir. 2000).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like