Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Burgess v. United States, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    Albert Burgess filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition which was denied by the district court. Burgess appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the district court accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Burgess' petition. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-07-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6413

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Albert Burgess filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition which was denied by the district court. Burgess appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the district court accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Burgess' petition. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    12 views2 pages

    Burgess v. United States, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Albert Burgess filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition which was denied by the district court. Burgess appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the district court accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Burgess' petition. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6413

    ALBERT CHARLES BURGESS, JR.,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.
    (CA-00-809-7-19BG)

    Submitted:

    June 21, 2001

    Decided:

    July 3, 2001

    Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Albert Charles Burgess, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier
    Bowens, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Albert Charles Burgess, Jr., appeals the district courts
    order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (1994) petition.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion accepting
    the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible
    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court. Burgess v. United States, No. CA-00-809-7-19BG (D.S.C. Feb.


    9, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like