Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Everett Etheridge Grubb, III v. Bliff G. Befield Jay Farmer Kevin Hightower Marvin Hartso, Defendants, 849 F.2d 605, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    22 views1 page
    Everett Etheridge Grubb, III filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants. The district court denied Grubb relief. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1988-06-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 849 F.2d 605 Docket: 88-6561

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Everett Etheridge Grubb, III filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants. The district court denied Grubb relief. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    22 views1 page

    Everett Etheridge Grubb, III v. Bliff G. Befield Jay Farmer Kevin Hightower Marvin Hartso, Defendants, 849 F.2d 605, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Everett Etheridge Grubb, III filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants. The district court denied Grubb relief. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    849 F.

    2d 605
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Everett Etheridge GRUBB, III, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Bliff G. BEFIELD; Jay Farmer; Kevin Hightower; Marvin
    Hartso, Defendants- Appellees.
    No. 88-6561.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: April 28, 1988.
    Decided: June 8, 1988.

    Everett Etheridge Grubb, III, appellant pro se.


    Tyrus Vance Dahl, Jr. (Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice), for
    appellees.
    Before WIDENER, SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Everett Etheridge Grubb, III, appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district
    court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Grubb v. Benfield, C/A No. 87173-ST-C (W.D.N.C. Feb. 16, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like