Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Michael Romero v. Phillip Morgan, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views3 pages
    This document is the unpublished opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Michael R. Romero v. Phillip Morgan et al. affirming the district court's dismissal of claims against two defendants and granting summary judgment to four other defendants in Romero's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-07-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-6516

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is the unpublished opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Michael R. Romero v. Phillip Morgan et al. affirming the district court's dismissal of claims against two defendants and granting summary judgment to four other defendants in Romero's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views3 pages

    Michael Romero v. Phillip Morgan, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is the unpublished opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Michael R. Romero v. Phillip Morgan et al. affirming the district court's dismissal of claims against two defendants and granting summary judgment to four other defendants in Romero's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-6516

    MICHAEL R. ROMERO,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    PHILLIP MORGAN, All individually and in their official
    capacity; DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL
    SERVICES, (DPSCS), All individually and in their official
    capacity;
    WEXFORD
    HEALTH
    SOURCES,
    INCORPORATED,
    All
    individually and in their official capacity; CORIZON HEALTH
    CARE SERVICES, All individually and in their official
    capacity; SADIK ALI, MD; ASHOK KRISHNASWAMY, MD; OFFICER
    S. A.
    WILSON;
    ASRESAHEGN
    GETACHEW,
    MD;
    BON
    SECOURS
    BALTIMORE HEALTH SYSTEMS, All individually and in their
    official capacities,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt.
    Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
    Judge. (8:13-cv-00625-DKC)

    Submitted:

    July 24, 2014

    Before FLOYD and


    Circuit Judge.

    THACKER,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    and

    July 29, 2014

    DAVIS,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael R. Romero, Appellant Pro Se. Gina Marie Smith, MEYERS,


    RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, PA, Riverdale, Maryland; Jennifer E.

    Cameron, Michelle Jacquelyn Marzullo, MARKS, ONEILL, OBRIEN,


    DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael R. Romero appeals the district courts orders
    dismissing

    his

    claims

    against

    Defendants

    Phillip

    Morgan

    and

    Officer S. A. Wilson and granting summary judgment to Defendants


    Corizon

    Health

    Care

    Services,

    Sadik

    Ali,

    MD,

    Asresahegn

    Getachew, MD, and Wexford Health Sources, Incorporated, in his


    42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) civil rights action.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.


    No.

    8:13-cv-00625-DKC

    (D.

    Md.

    facts

    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    materials

    before

    court

    oral

    &

    We

    legal

    with

    Romero v. Morgan,

    Mar. 20, 2014).


    and

    dispense

    Mar.

    We have reviewed

    July

    argument

    17,

    because

    presented

    would

    2013;

    not

    the

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like