Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Louis Rychwalski, Jr. v. CMS, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views3 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment to defendants in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action brought by Louis Rychwalski, Jr. against various Maryland correctional and medical officials and entities. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The unpublished per curiam opinion dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented such that argument would not aid the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-04-13 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-7365

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment to defendants in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action brought by Louis Rychwalski, Jr. against various Maryland correctional and medical officials and entities. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The unpublished per curiam opinion dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented such that argument would not aid the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    14 views3 pages

    Louis Rychwalski, Jr. v. CMS, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment to defendants in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action brought by Louis Rychwalski, Jr. against various Maryland correctional and medical officials and entities. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The unpublished per curiam opinion dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented such that argument would not aid the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-7365

    LOUIS RYCHWALSKI, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    CMS; WARDEN KATHLEEN GREEN; CPT. ROBERT J. MOORE; PAUL
    ZIOLKOWSKI; WILLIAM MAYCOCK; ROBERT C. MCGEE; JOHN BROMLEY;
    CHARLES WESTBROOK; CRAIG REID; WILLIAM FISHER; WEXFORD
    HEALTH SOURCES, INC.; MARYAM MESSFOROSH, P.A.; JASON CLEM,
    M.D.; BRUCE FORD, P.A.; PAUL MATERA, M.D.; TERRY DAVIS,
    P.A.; CORIZON, LLC.,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge.
    (1:13-cv-02082-GLR)

    Submitted:

    January 26, 2015

    Decided:

    April 13, 2015

    Before KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
    Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Louis Rychwalski, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


    Michelle Jacquelyn
    Marzullo, MARKS, ONEILL, OBRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C.,
    Towson,
    Maryland;
    Stephanie
    Judith
    Lane-Weber,
    Assistant
    Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Gina Marie Smith, MEYERS,
    RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, PA, Riverdale, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Louis

    Rychwalski,

    Jr.,

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order granting summary judgment to Defendants in his 42 U.S.C.


    1983 (2012) civil rights action.
    and find no reversible error.
    reasons

    stated

    by

    the

    We have reviewed the record

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    district

    court.

    Rychwalski

    v.

    CMS,

    No. 1:13-cv-02082-GLR (D. Md. Aug. 25, 2014).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like