Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Powell v. Keller, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Floyd Junior Powell's appeal of a district court order. The district court had dismissed Powell's civil rights complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Powell's appeal to be frivolous, so they dismissed the appeal for the same reasons provided by the district court. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-06-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6272

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Floyd Junior Powell's appeal of a district court order. The district court had dismissed Powell's civil rights complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Powell's appeal to be frivolous, so they dismissed the appeal for the same reasons provided by the district court. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Powell v. Keller, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Floyd Junior Powell's appeal of a district court order. The district court had dismissed Powell's civil rights complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Powell's appeal to be frivolous, so they dismissed the appeal for the same reasons provided by the district court. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6272

    FLOYD JUNIOR POWELL,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    TONY A. KELLER; JORGE SOSA; JASON COY REID; TIMOTHY JAMES
    BREWER; LARRY WATERS; WILLIAM A. BRAFFORD; GRETCHEN C. F.
    SHAPPERT; RICHARD L. VOORHEES; CARL HORN, III; GREGORY A.
    FOREST; JAYME MILLER; UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE; CATAWBA
    COUNTY; CATAWBA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; SHERIFF OF CATAWBA
    COUNTY;
    CATAWBA
    COUNTY
    SHERIFF'S
    DEPARTMENT;
    COLDWELL
    BANKER; BOYD HASSELL INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES;
    ELVALORIE MATTHEWS; RICHARD MCDONNELL; MARK T. CALLOWAY;
    NEWTON POLICE DEPARTMENT; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Defendants Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Statesville.
    Graham C. Mullen,
    Senior District Judge. (5:09-cv-00004-GCM)

    Submitted:

    May 29, 2009

    Decided:

    June 18, 2009

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Floyd Junior Powell, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Floyd Junior Powell appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his civil rights complaint.

    We have reviewed the

    record and find that this appeal is frivolous.

    Accordingly, we

    dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
    See Powell v. Keller, No. 5:09-cv-00004-GCM (W.D.N.C. Jan. 13,
    2009).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    DISMISSED

    You might also like