Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Powell v. Keller, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views3 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Floyd Junior Powell's appeal of the district court's order dismissing his civil rights complaint. The appeals court conducted a review of the record and found Powell's appeal to be frivolous. The court dismissed the appeal for the same reasons provided by the district court in its order dismissing the complaint. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-02-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-8172

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Floyd Junior Powell's appeal of the district court's order dismissing his civil rights complaint. The appeals court conducted a review of the record and found Powell's appeal to be frivolous. The court dismissed the appeal for the same reasons provided by the district court in its order dismissing the complaint. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views3 pages

    Powell v. Keller, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Floyd Junior Powell's appeal of the district court's order dismissing his civil rights complaint. The appeals court conducted a review of the record and found Powell's appeal to be frivolous. The court dismissed the appeal for the same reasons provided by the district court in its order dismissing the complaint. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    Certiorari dismissed, June 28, 2010

    UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-8172

    FLOYD JUNIOR POWELL,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    TONY A. KELLER; JORGE SOSA; JASON COY REID; TIMOTHY JAMES
    BREWER; LARRY WATERS; WILLIAM BRADFORD; GRETCHEN C. F.
    SHAPPERT; RICHARD L. VOORHEES; CARL HORN, Magistrate Judge;
    GREGORY A. FOREST; JAYME MILLER; UNITED STATES MARSHAL
    SERVICE; CATAWBA COUNTY; CATAWBA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS;
    SHERIFF
    OF
    CATAWBA
    COUNTY;
    CATAWBA
    COUNTY
    SHERIFFS
    DEPARTMENT;
    COLDWELL
    BANKER;
    BOYD
    HASSELL
    INDUSTRIAL
    COMMERCIAL
    PROPERTIES;
    ELVALORIE
    MATTHEWS;
    RICHARD
    MCDONNELL; MARK T. CALLOWAY; NEWTON POLICE DEPARTMENT;
    CONOVER POLICE DEPARTMENT,
    Defendants Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Statesville.
    Graham C. Mullen,
    Senior District Judge. (5:09-cv-00126-GCM)

    Submitted:

    February 2, 2010

    Decided:

    February 25, 2010

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Floyd Junior Powell, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Floyd Junior Powell appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his civil rights complaint.

    We have reviewed the

    record and find that this appeal is frivolous.

    Accordingly, we

    dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
    See Powell v. Keller, No. 5:09-cv-00126-GCM (W.D.N.C. Nov. 18,
    2009).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    DISMISSED

    You might also like