Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Schwaner v. Dept of The Army, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    1) Jack Schwaner appealed a district court ruling granting summary judgment to the Department of the Army regarding a ban on commercial solicitation of students at Fort Eustis. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision. 3) The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-01-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-1772

    Original Title

    Schwaner v. Dept of the Army, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Jack Schwaner appealed a district court ruling granting summary judgment to the Department of the Army regarding a ban on commercial solicitation of students at Fort Eustis. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision. 3) The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Schwaner v. Dept of The Army, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Jack Schwaner appealed a district court ruling granting summary judgment to the Department of the Army regarding a ban on commercial solicitation of students at Fort Eustis. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision. 3) The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-1772

    JACK A. SCHWANER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, FORT EUSTIS, VIRGINIA,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Newport News.
    Rebecca Beach Smith,
    District Judge. (CA-03-125-4)

    Submitted:

    October 22, 2004

    Decided:

    January 28, 2005

    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jack A. Schwaner, Appellant Pro Se. Anita K. Henry, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Jack A. Schwaner appeals the district courts order
    granting summary judgment to the Department of the Army on his
    civil action challenging a ban on commercial solicitation of
    students attending Advanced Individual Training at Fort Eustis. We
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    See Schwaner v. Dept of the Army, No. CA-03-125-4 (E.D.

    Va. May 28, 2004).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like