Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Kipp v. WV Dept of Corr, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Carlos Kipp appealed the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his confinement by the West Virginia Department of Corrections. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Kipp's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed his appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying Kipp's habeas petition.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-06-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6582

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Carlos Kipp appealed the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his confinement by the West Virginia Department of Corrections. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Kipp's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed his appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying Kipp's habeas petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Kipp v. WV Dept of Corr, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Carlos Kipp appealed the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his confinement by the West Virginia Department of Corrections. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Kipp's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed his appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying Kipp's habeas petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6582

    CARLOS EUGENE KIPP,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-99-102-2)

    Submitted:

    June 20, 2002

    Decided:

    June 27, 2002

    Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Carlos Eugene Kipp, Appellant Pro Se.
    Daynus Jividen, Charles
    Patrick Houdyschell, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,
    Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Carlos Eugene Kipp seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West
    1994 & Supp. 2001).

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny


    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
    reasoning of the district court.

    Kipp v. West Virginia Dept of

    Corrections, No. CA-99-102-2 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 1, 2002). We dispense


    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like