Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Daly v. Ashcroft, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Learie Daly filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 against Attorney General John Ashcroft which was denied by the district court. Daly appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. In a per curiam opinion, the three-judge panel affirmed the district court's denial of relief, finding no reversible error. The panel relied on the reasoning provided by the district court in its July 1, 2002 order denying the petition. The panel dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-10-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7073

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Learie Daly filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 against Attorney General John Ashcroft which was denied by the district court. Daly appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. In a per curiam opinion, the three-judge panel affirmed the district court's denial of relief, finding no reversible error. The panel relied on the reasoning provided by the district court in its July 1, 2002 order denying the petition. The panel dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Daly v. Ashcroft, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Learie Daly filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 against Attorney General John Ashcroft which was denied by the district court. Daly appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. In a per curiam opinion, the three-judge panel affirmed the district court's denial of relief, finding no reversible error. The panel relied on the reasoning provided by the district court in its July 1, 2002 order denying the petition. The panel dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7073

    LEARIE A. DALY,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-022087-AMD)

    Submitted:

    October 10, 2002

    Decided:

    October 22, 2002

    Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Learie A. Daly, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Learie A. Daly appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241 (2000). We have
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we

    affirm on the reasoning of the district court.


    Ashcroft, No. CA-02-2087-AMD (D. Md. July 1, 2002).

    See Daly v.
    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like