Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Diggs, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. The court dismissed Danah Diggs' appeal of a district court's denial of her motion for downward departure and motion to correct sentence. The appeals court dismissed the appeal as duplicative because it had already disposed of prior appeals from the same district court orders in an earlier, unpublished decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the existing case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-08-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-6568

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. The court dismissed Danah Diggs' appeal of a district court's denial of her motion for downward departure and motion to correct sentence. The appeals court dismissed the appeal as duplicative because it had already disposed of prior appeals from the same district court orders in an earlier, unpublished decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the existing case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    10 views2 pages

    United States v. Diggs, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. The court dismissed Danah Diggs' appeal of a district court's denial of her motion for downward departure and motion to correct sentence. The appeals court dismissed the appeal as duplicative because it had already disposed of prior appeals from the same district court orders in an earlier, unpublished decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the existing case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-6568

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    DANAH D. DIGGS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge.
    (CR-01-02)

    Submitted:

    July 28, 2004

    Decided:

    August 17, 2004

    Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Danah D. Diggs, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Lucas Hobbs, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Danah

    D.

    Diggs

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    orders

    denying her motion for downward departure and motion to correct


    sentence.

    We dismiss the appeal as duplicative because this court

    disposed of prior appeals from these same orders.

    See United

    States v. Diggs, No. 04-6193(L), 2004 WL 542478 (4th Cir. Mar. 19,
    2004) (unpublished).
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    - 2 -

    You might also like