Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Meaders v. Lee, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Franklin Delynn Meaders' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its May 3, 2004 order. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-10-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-7027

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Franklin Delynn Meaders' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its May 3, 2004 order. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Meaders v. Lee, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Franklin Delynn Meaders' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its May 3, 2004 order. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-7027

    FRANKLIN DELYNN MEADERS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    RANDALL LEE; J. BOYD BENNETT; THEODIS BECK;
    JANE DOE; MR. WHITE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Malcolm J. Howard,
    District Judge. (CA-03-880-5-CT-H)

    Submitted:

    October 14, 2004

    Decided:

    October 21, 2004

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Franklin Delynn Meaders, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Franklin Delynn Meaders appeals the district courts
    order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    See Meaders v. Lee, No. CA-03-880-5-CT-H (E.D.N.C. May 3,

    2004).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like