Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Various Proofs of The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality: Hui-Hua Wu and Shanhe Wu
Various Proofs of The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality: Hui-Hua Wu and Shanhe Wu
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Longyan University, Longyan, Fujian 364012, P. R. China
E-mail: wushanhe@yahoo.com.cn
Corresponding Author
Abstract: In this paper twelve different proofs are given for the classical Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.
Keywords: Cauchy-Schwarz inequality; arithmetic-geometric means inequality; rearrangement inequality;
mathematical induction; scalar product
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 26D15
Introduction
The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality is an elementary inequality and at the same time a powerful inequality,
which can be stated as follows:
Theorem. Let (a1 , a2 , . . . , an ) and (b1 , b2 , . . . , bn ) be two sequences of real numbers, then
n
X
n
X
a2i
i=1
!
b2i
i=1
n
X
!2
ai bi
(1)
i=1
with equality if and only if the sequences (a1 , a2 , . . . , an ) and (b1 , b2 , . . . , bn ) are proportional, i.e., there is a
constant such that ak = bk for each k {1, 2, . . . , n}.
As is known to us, this classical inequality plays an important role in different branches of modern
mathematics including Hilbert spaces theory, probability and statistics, classical real and complex analysis,
numerical analysis, qualitative theory of differential equations and their applications (see [1-12]). In this
paper we show some different proofs of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.
(ai bj aj bi ) =
n
X
a2i
i=1
=2
n
X
b2j
j=1
n
X
!
a2i
i=1
n
X
b2i
i=1
n
X
n
X
a2j
j=1
!
b2i
i=1
n
X
ai bi
i=1
n
X
n
X
bj aj
j=1
!2
ai bi
i=1
Because the left-hand side of the equation is a sum of the squares of real numbers it is greater than or
equal to zero, thus
n
X
i=1
!
a2i
n
X
!
b2i
i=1
n
X
i=1
!2
ai bi
i=1
i=1
i=1
Since f (x) 0 for any x R, it follows that the discriminant of f (x) is negative, i.e.,
!2
n
X
n
X
ai bi
i=1
n
X
a2i
i=1
!
b2i
0.
i=1
n
P
i=1
a2i = 0 or
n
P
i=1
n
X
a2i 6= 0,
Bn =
i=1
n
X
b2i 6= 0,
i=1
bi
yi =
Bn
ai
xi = ,
An
(i = 1, 2, . . . , n),
then
n
X
n
X
x2i =
i=1
yi2 = 1.
i=1
AB
n
X
1 a2
i=1
i
A2
b2
+ i2
B
= 1,
so that
n
X
ai bi AB =
q
q
a21 + a22 + + a2n b21 + b22 + + b2n .
i=1
Thus
n
X
!2
ai bi
i=1
n
X
!
a2i
i=1
n
X
!
b2i
i=1
X a2 Cn X b2
X
An Cn
i
i
+
1
=
+
=
Bn2
Bn2
Cn
i=1
i=1
i=1
2
a2i Cn
b2i
+
Bn2
Cn
2
n
X
ai bi
i=1
Bn
= 2,
therefore
An Cn Bn2 ,
that is
(a21 + a22 + + a2n )(b21 + b22 + + b2n ) (a1 b1 + a2 b2 + + an bn )2 .
Proof 6. Below, we prove the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality by mathematical induction.
Beginning the induction at 1, the n = 1 case is trivial.
Note that
2
(a1 b1 + a2 b2 ) = a21 b21 + 2a1 b1 a2 b2 + a22 b22 a21 b21 + a21 b22 + a22 b21 + a22 b22 = (a21 + a22 )(b21 + b22 ),
which implies that the inequality (1) holds for n = 2.
Assume that the inequality (1) holds for an arbitrary integer k, i.e.,
k
X
!2
ai bi
i=1
k
X
k
X
a2i
i=1
!
b2i
i=1
i=1
i=1
i=1
v
v
u k
u k
uX
uX
t
2
a t
b2 + |a
i=1
k
X
k+1 bk+1 |
i=1
i=1
k+1
X
|ai bi |.
i=1
It means that the inequality (1) holds for n = k + 1, we thus conclude that the inequality (1) holds for
all natural numbers n. This completes the proof of inequality (1).
Proof 7. Let
A = {a1 b1 , a1 bn , a2 b1 , , a2 bn , , an b1 , an bn }
B = {a1 b1 , a1 bn , a2 b1 , , a2 bn , , an b1 , an bn }
C = {a1 b1 , a1 bn , a2 b1 , , a2 bn , , an b1 , an bn }
D = {a1 b1 , an b1 , a1 b2 , , an b2 , , a1 bn , an bn }
It is easy to observe that the set A and B are similarly sorted, while the set C and D are mixed sorted.
Applying the rearrangement inequality, we have
(a1 b1 )(a1 b1 ) + + (a1 bn )(a1 bn ) + (a2 b1 )(a2 b1 ) + + (a2 bn )(a2 bn ) + + (an b1 )(an b1 ) + + (an bn )(an bn )
(a1 b1 )(a1 b1 )+ +(a1 bn )(an b1 )+(a2 b1 )(a1 b2 )+ +(a2 bn )(an b2 )+ +(an b1 )(a1 bn )+ +(an bn )(an bn ),
which can be simplified to the inequality
(a21 + a22 + + a2n )(b21 + b22 + + b2n ) (a1 b1 + a2 b2 + + an bn )2
as desired.
Proof 8. By the arithmetic-geometric means inequality, one has for > 0,
3
1
|ai bi |
2
s
Choosing =
n
P
i=1
b2i
n
P
i=1
a2i
b2
+ i
.
uP
uP
u n b2
u n a2
u
u
i
u i=1 i 2
u
2
u
|ai bi | u i=1
a
+
b
.
i
i
n
n
tP
t P
a2i
b2i
i=1
i=1
Hence
v
v
uP
uP
u n b2
u n a2
n
n
n
u
u
i X
X
1
u i=1 i X 2
u
2
u
|ai bi | u i=1
a
+
b
i
i,
n
n
tP
2 t P
i=1
a2i i=1
b2i i=1
i=1
i=1
or equivalently
v
v
v
v
u n
u n
u n
u n
n
n
X
X
X
X
X
u
u
u
uX
1
|ai bi | t
b2i
a2i + t
a2i
b2i = t
a2i t
b2i .
2
i=1
i=1
i=1
i=1
i=1
i=1
i=1
n
X
|| + 2 ( ) t + || t2 = | + t| 0.
Thus
2
( ) || || 0.
Using the expressions
= a1 b1 + a2 b2 + + an bn ,
|| =
n
X
a2i ,
|| =
i=1
n
X
i=1
we obtain
n
X
i=1
!2
ai bi
n
X
!
a2i
n
X
i=1
!
b2i
= (b1 , b2 , , bn ).
= || || cos (, ) ,
we deduce that
|| || .
4
0.
i=1
b2i ,
|| =
n
X
n
X
a2i ,
|| =
i=1
b2i ,
i=1
(2)
a1 b1 + a2 b2 + + an bn
b21 + b22 + + b2n
2
that is
(a1 b1 + a2 b2 + + an bn )2 (a21 + a22 + + a2n )(b21 + b22 + + b2n ).
Case II. If there exists bi1 = bi2 = = bik = 0, one has
n
X
ai bi
i=1
!2
ai bi
a2i
b2i
n
X
i=1
!
a2i
n
X
!
b2i
i=1
b21 + b22 + + b2n .
Then
2
Sn+1 Sn = (a1 b1 + a2 b2 + + an+1 bn+1 ) a21 + a22 + + a2n+1 b21 + b22 + + b2n+1
2
(a1 b1 + a2 b2 + + an bn ) + a21 + a22 + + a2n b21 + b22 + + b2n ,
which can be simplified to
h
i
2
2
2
Sn+1 Sn = (a1 bn+1 b1 an+1 ) + (a2 bn+1 b2 an+1 ) + + (an bn+1 bn an+1 ) ,
so
Sn+1 Sn
(n N).
We thus have
Sn Sn1 S1 = 0,
which implies the inequality (1).
Acknowledgements. The present investigation was supported, in part, by the innovative experiment
project for university students from Fujian Province Education Department of China under Grant No.214,
and, in part, by the innovative experiment project for university students from Longyan University of China.
References
[1] S. S. Dragomir, Discrete inequalities of the Cauchy-Bunyakovsky-Schwarz type, Nova Science Publishers,
Inc., Hauppauge, NY, 2004.
[2] D. S. Mitrinovi, J. E. Peari, A. M. Fink, Classical and New Inequalities in Analysis, Kluwer Academic
Publishers, Dordrecht, 1993.
[3] M. Masjed-Jamei, S. S. Dragomir, H.M. Srivastava, Some generalizations of the Cauchy-Schwarz and
the Cauchy-Bunyakovsky inequalities involving four free parameters and their applications, RGMIA
Res. Rep. Coll., 11 (3) (2008), Article 3, pp.112 (electronic).
[4] N. S. Barnett, S. S. Dragomir, An additive reverse of the CauchyBunyakovskySchwarz integral inequality, Appl. Math. Lett., 21 (4) (2008), 388393.
[5] E. Y. Lee, A matrix reverse CauchySchwarz inequality, Linear Algeb. Appl., 430 (2) (2009), 805810.
[6] S. S. Dragomir, A survey on CauchyBunyakovskySchwarz type discrete inequalities, J. Inequal. Pure
Appl. Math., 4 (3) (2003), Article 63, pp.1142 (electronic).
[7] S. S. Dragomir, On the CauchyBuniakowskySchwarz inequality for sequences in inner product spaces,
Math. Inequal. Appl., 3 (2000), 385398.
[8] A. De Rossi, L. Rodino, Strengthened CauchySchwarz inequality for biorthogonal wavelets in Sobolev
spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 299 (1) (2004), 4960.
[9] Z. Liu, Remark on a Refinement of the CauchySchwarz inequality, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 218 (1) (1998),
1321.
[10] H. Alzer, On the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 234 (1) (1999), 614.
[11] H. Alzer, A refinement of the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 168 (2) (1992), 596604.
[12] W. L. Steiger, On a generalization of the CauchySchwarz inequality, Amer. Math. Monthly, 76 (1969),
815816.