Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Monetizing mobile:
Making data pay
By: David Arcelus // Miguel Fonseca // Joao Leonardo //
Jos Miguel Novo // Pierre Pont
June 2014
Copyright McKinsey & Company, Inc.
Mobile data usage is booming, but revenues from digital trac are
not. Operators can capture more of datas full value by giving customers what they really want.
Mobile datas strong growth continues to be
impressive, but the revenues generated by this
tidal wave of digital trafc are less inspiring. While
global mobile data trafc increased 40 times from
2008 to 2013, the revenues associated with it
barely tripled (Exhibit1). Mobile data nevertheless
represents the strongest revenue growth opportunity for operators, especially since the mobile
voice business continues to decline as operators
move toward at-rate pricing and are disintermediated by over-the-top (OTT) attackers.
One trend supporting mobile datas growth
involves the increase in multi-device ownership,
which is causing the mobility needs of consumers to expand into OTT, video, social networking,
transactions, news, and other applications. On
top of this, many
operators have yet
Less than 70% of
to tap into the digital
SIM cards in Germarkets full potenmany are used in
tial. One analysis of
the German market
smartphones with
shows that, out of a
data plans
total SIM card base
that equals 100percent, customers use less than
70percent of them in Internet-enabled handsets
with data plans. Only half of these saw monthly
trafc that exceeded 0.1gigabyte (GB) and just a
third had trafc greater than 0.5GB.
Consequently, operators need to understand in
detail how to boost their data monetization efforts,
achieve greater protability and accelerate growth.
To this end, McKinsey initiated a global conjoint
analysis to determine what customers really want
(and are willing to pay for) when it comes to data.
This research draws heavily on McKinseys extensive experience in conducting pricing and portfolio
reviews. The objective was to chart the similarities
7.9
Growth factor,
2008 - 2013
Data traffic
(TB millions)
46x
6.7
(MBQD@RHMFF@OADSVDDM
SQ@EjB@MCQDUDMTDR
97
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
18%
17%
16%
16%
17%
16%
66
Data revenues
(EUR billions)
3x
Exhibit 1
Regions fall into three categories regarding data importance and supply
Relative data
importance1
High
Singapore
Heavy data
markets
Australia
Malaysia
Mature data
markets
Spain
Germany
Brazil
Russia
Chile
Low
Emerging
markets
markets
Mexico
Low
High
Data supply2
#DL@MCHMSDQDRSLD@RTQDCVHSGC@S@ODMDSQ@SHNMSHLDRSGDQDKDU@MBDNEC@S@@SSQHATSDODQBNTMSQXEQNLSGDBNMINHMS@M@KXRHR
2TOOKXLD@RTQDCVHSG@MCHMCDWA@RDCNMRL@QSOGNMDODMDSQ@SHNM@MCPT@KHSXNEMDSVNQJR@UDQ@FDADSVDDM"#1@MC&BNUDQ@FD
2.41"$,B*HMRDXOQNOQHDS@QXLTKSHBNTMSQXBNMINHMS@M@KXRHR-DSVNQJ0T@KHSX!DMBGL@QJ2SQ@SDFX M@KXSHBR/XQ@LHC1DRD@QBG
Exhibit 2
More than 40% of the population considers data a key factor in the buying decision
Percent of population
Segment
Data importance
Pure price seekers (20)
Data-relevant segments
7
31
48
29
32
Data is a relevant
decision factor for
43% of the population
12
19
25
16
Avg. 21
2.41"$,B*HMRDXOQNOQHDS@QXLTKSHBNTMSQXBNMINHMS@M@KXRHR
Exhibit 3
Customers highly value having at least 1 GB, but unlimited data does not make a
big difference for most of them
$PTHU@KDMSLNMSGKX
LNMDS@QXU@KTD$41
,TKSHCDUHBDC@S@KNUDQR
#@S@@MCAQ@MCCQHUDM
'D@UXC@S@@S@MXOQHBD
5@KTDENQLNMDXC@S@
UDQ@FDQDRS
6
,!
,!
&!
&!
&!
&!6
4MKHLHSDC
Data
capacity
%QNL@$41SNLNMSGKXQ@SD
,!"GHKD@MC,DWHBN
,!"GHKD@MC,DWHBN
&!"GHKD@MC,DWHBN
&!"GHKD@MC,DWHBN
&!"GHKD@MC&!HM,DWHBN
Exhibit 4
David Arcelus
is an Associate Principal in McKinseys
Kuala Lumpur ofce.
david_arcelus@mckinsey.com
Miguel Fonseca
is a Principal in McKinseys
Lisbon ofce.
miguel_fonseca@mckinsey.com
Joao Leonardo
is an Associate Principal in McKinseys
Lisbon ofce.
joao_leonardo@mckinsey.com
Pierre Pont
is an Associate Principal in McKinseys
London ofce.
pierre_pont@mckinsey.com