Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Last week Hanif Kureishi dismissed creative writing courses as 'a waste of time', yet
they have never been more popular. Other leading author-teachers reveal their
advice to students
The Guardian
Friday 14 March 201417.52 GMT
Philip Hensher
Good writing is a mixture of the calculated and the instinctual. No one writes
through pure dazed inspiration; questions of craft and calculation enter in quite
quickly. Last week, speaking at the Bath festival, Hanif Kureishi cast some doubt on
the existence of transferable, teachable craft in writing by witheringly classifying
99.9% of his students as "untalented" and saying that writing a story is "a difficult
thing to do and it's a great skill to have. Can you teach that? I don't think you can."
(Kureishi teaches creative writing at Kingston University, apparently ineffectually).
What lies, or ought to lie, beneath the growth of creative writing as a subject is the
conviction that a good deal of the best writing derives from conscious craft, if not all
of it. Commentators sometimes say that writing can't be taught; that beginning
writers either have "it", in which case they don't need to be taught, or they don't
have "it", in which case money and time is being wasted by the exercise. But writers
can perfectly well have native ability, a feel for language, an inventiveness and a
keen eye towards the world and still not quite understand how they can do
something well, not once, but repeatedly. A good creative writing course will explore
underlying principles of good writing not to impose invented "rules" on writing, but
to introduce ways of thinking about writing that are strong and purposeful. You
could teach yourself how to make a chair by taking a lot apart, and experimenting
with joists. A furniture-making course might school you in some unsuspected skills,
and save you some time.
Read more
A bad creative writing class will look like this. A student has submitted some work
with the words: "I don't think it's very good." The class has (mostly) read it. After a
long silence, one of the student's best friends, primed, says: "I really like the way
you " The student says: 'Thank you." Another one says: "I didn't quite understand
about the bit where " The student explains. Half the class stay silent; the student
leaves with ego intact and work unimproved.
I've seen the experience of becoming a writer from both sides. When I began, it
didn't occur to me to go on a creative writing course there were few in the late
1980s, and it seemed more pressing to do an academic PhD. I taught myself to
write. I still think, for a writer who is also an insatiable reader, there is a lot to be
said for the self-taught route. But since 2005, I've started teaching creative writing
in universities, and now teach at Bath Spa. When I look at my first novels, they
seem to me to have no idea about some technical features of the novel. I don't
think I really had a solid novelistic technique until I wrote my third or fourth novel,
and in today's publishing world, that would be a serious disadvantage in a career.
as well as emotion and experience. Is the presiding consciousness the right one?
Does he need to filter everything through his awareness? Is this the right tense?
What is this thing called free indirect style? Does enough happen? Do students say:
"I really like the part where you "? You bet your sweet bippy they don't.
Classes, at Bath Spa and elsewhere, differ greatly. With a faculty that includes very
varied authors, there is never going to be a uniform approach. But we often find
ourselves addressing recurrent issues. How can I create characters that are
memorable and engaging? (Top tip introduce them in small groups, and out of
their customary context.) There doesn't seem to be enough happening my
characters just keep telling each other how they feel about each other, and then
they have an affair or kill each other or have a baby. But then what? (Top tip;
incident has to keep coming from outside, and the unexpected illuminates
character. Try experimentally dropping a giant block of frozen piss through the
ceiling of their room and see what they do.)
Jeanette Winterson
violin, a pair of scissors have been too easily conscripted into the student's
subjective world. Others a lawnmower, a new pair of shoes unfailingly make the
writing more objective. The narrative has to find a way around it, like water has to
flow around an obstacle, and the result is that the whole enterprise is given form.
Rachel Cusk is professor of creative writing at Kingston University.
Michael Cunningham
Tessa Hadley
1) The most useful thing you can do is read someone's work and give them specific
advice regarding what is and isn't working in their particular book. That is what goes
on. It's the non-universal stuff that is the most useful. Are you using description to
cover the fact that you don't really know your characters? Have you given your
particular character a motivation that makes sense? It's not general, it's specific.
2) Another key thing you can help with is finding the writing routine that works best
for each student. For me, when I'm working on a book, it's around 800 words a
day every single day. Five hundred words a day is too few. A thousand is too many. I
can't take the weekend off; if I do the book has dissolved to mush when I get back.
So a teacher can talk to you about your process. Suggest different ways of working,
different times, places, different rituals to get you in the right mental place for it.
Again, this is very particular to the individual.
3) If you're a responsible teacher, you talk to your students about money. You say:
most novelists earn around 5,000 a year from their writing. You watch them
blench. You say: so if you're going to do this, you have to think about how you're
going to support yourself. I tell my students about journalism, about other kinds of
writing, about crowdfunding, about grants, about balancing the day job with the
novels, and the pitfalls of all of these. Most people can't make a living only from
selling their art, but almost anyone can put together a life in and around the artform
they love if that's what they really want. You help them work out how to do that.
Naomi Alderman is a professor of creative writing at Bath Spa University.
Don Paterson
At St Andrews, we tend to teach that most problems writers encounter have already
been solved by other writers: students learn to be good readers first. Often the most
useful exercise is just to compare some bad writing with some good, and then learn
how to articulate the difference between the two. This is most bracing when the bad
writing is your own. Here's Robert Frost; here's you. What's the difference? Ouch. I
teach in three ways: seminars on poetic composition (I take a fairly technical and
linguistic approach, but not everyone does); workshops, where students can hone
their editorial and critical skills; and one-to-one sessions, which address the very
personal business of "art practice". There are many useful textbooks that can help
with the first two, though very few of those are about "creative writing" (a term I try
to avoid anyway). Almost no books I've read address "practice" very satisfactorily,
though many students have benefited from reading (ex-marine!) Steven
Pressfield's The War of Art, which is basically the Allen Carr method for writers: just
do it already.
Don Paterson is a professor of poetry at the University of St Andrews.
Chang-Rae Lee
My classes are undergraduates only. Our primary activity in the workshop is to read
very closely both the workshop material and a published story, which is assigned
weekly. It's as simple as that. No use of "exercises" or discussion of "technique".
While what the pieces might "mean" to us will no doubt arise, we first and foremost
pay zealous attention to the words, going sentence by sentence, considering what's
being instituted by each clause in every way possible (language, idea, structure,
trope, tonality, perspective etc), appraising how the prose is developing its world
and characters as well as shaping our apprehension of them.
Chang-Rae Lee is a professor of creative writing at Princeton University.
Kathryn Hughes
Advertisement
1) Lots of people can write beautiful prose, it's structure that's tricky. Novelists can
afford to just start writing and see where it takes them, writers of non-fiction need
to have a plan. Draw up a list of "landing places", points in your narrative where
your reader can have a bit of a sit down and admire the view so far. Your job as
narrator is to lead them from one landing place to the next, neither chivvying them
along nor allowing them to lag behind. Make sure, though, that you don't come over
like a drill sergeant. The trick of good narrative non-fiction is to allow the reader to
feel that they have worked it all out for themselves.
2) Just because you are trying to learn how to write, it doesn't mean that you need
to employ an entirely new vocabulary. Be ruthless about cutting out any word that
you wouldn't use naturally in everyday speech. In real life no one calls a book "a
tome" or says "she descended the stairs" or refers to "my companion". A book is a
book, people walk down the stairs and a companion is actually a friend, or a lover,
or a colleague or someone you were standing next to at the bus stop. Be specific
and be real.
3) It is entirely normal in fact, it is entirely right to feel despair during the writing
process. At some point in the relationship between a creative writing tutor and a
student, there will be a conversation that runs exactly like the closing lines of
Samuel Beckett's 1953 novel, The Unnamable:
You must go on.
I can't go on.
I'll go on.
When you hear these words coming out of your mouth, the best thing to do is shut
up shop for the day and go and read someone who is writing the kind of stuff that
you would like to. You'll start work the next day with a better pair of ears. And good
ears, actually, are what good writing is all about.
Kathryn Hughes is director of UEA's MA programme in biography and creative nonfiction.
Toby Litt
Establish a writing schedule ahead of time for the coming week or month. This is
more important the less time you have. If you work full-time, you might plan to
write for an hour at 6am on Tuesday and Thursday, or at 4pm on Wednesday and
Saturday. Write this commitment down in your diary or calendar, don't schedule
anything that conflicts with it, and sit alone somewhere you can focus when the
time comes. It's OK if you don't produce sentences during that time, but don't do
anything else don't check email, don't text, don't go online (and for heaven's sake,
if you're using a computer, shut all files and windows except for the one you're
working on). If some nagging errand you need to do occurs to you, write it down,
but don't start doing it.
Advertisement
Create an outline. This will give you a roadmap to follow and make you less likely to
write yourself into a corner. It's fine to deviate from the outline, but it's very useful
to think about the overall structure of what you're trying to produce. Similarly, don't
go back and revise until you've completed a first draft. Solutions to problems tend
to reveal themselves much more clearly when the whole work is finished than they
do along the way.
If you don't enjoy the process of writing in some way, you probably shouldn't do it.
While there are people who make lots of money from books, most don't, and many
writers I know have found the experience of having a first (or subsequent) book
published disappointing and anticlimactic. I agree with some of what I understand to
be Hanif Kureishi's viewpoint, but I don't think anyone knows who does or doesn't
have talent without that person giving writing a try.
Curtis Sittenfeld has taught creative writing at the Iowa Writers' Workshop, Victoria
University in New Zealand, and St Albans School in Washington.
Blake Morrison
On the MA at Goldsmiths, I work individually with students in a range of forms
(novels, short stories, poetry, non-fiction) but also run a specialist seminar in life
writing. One key strand of the seminar is memoir, and among the exercises we've
done this term are:
1) Restricted point of view. Recounting an episode from the perspective of someone
whose eyes are sharp but whose capacity for understanding is limited. There's a
wonderful example of this in Seamus Deane's Reading in the Dark, where a small
boy recounts a traumatic episode (his dying sister being taken from the house by
ambulance-men) while hiding under a table all is revealed by what he observes in
the movement and appearance of adult feet.
2) Bearing witness. Working in pairs, student A speaks of an episode he or she
witnessed, and student B writes it up, selecting, exaggerating or even inventing key
details an exercise in how to create authenticity and demonstrate "I was there".
Orwell's essay "A Hanging" offers a brilliant precedent, as does the first chapter of
Tim Lott's The Scent of Dried Roses, which reconstructs the day of his mother's
suicide.