Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Buckling is a critical state of stress and deformation, at which a slight disturbance causes a gross additional deformation, or
perhaps a total structural failure of the part. Structural behavior of the part beyond 'buckling' is not evident from the normal
arguments of static. Buckling failures do not depend on the strength of the material, but are a function of the component
dimensions & modulus of elasticity. Therefore, materials with a high strength will buckle just as quickly as low strength ones. If a
structure is subject to compressive loads, then a buckling analysis may be necessary. The study presented in this paper is intended
to help designers of steel braced barrel vaults by identifying the significant differences in determining which configuration(s)
would be best in different conditions of use. The study presented is of parametric type and covers several other important
parameters like rise to span ratio, different boundary conditions, such that barrel vault acts as an arch, as a beam or as a shell,
The buckling strength of a three different configuration of a double layer braced barrel vaults are presented in this paper for
rise/span ratio varying from 0.2-0.7 and having four different types of boundary conditions. Through consideration of these
parameters, the paper presents an assessment of the effect of the vault configuration on the overall buckling strength .
Config.-1
Diagonal on square
Config.-3
Square on diagonal
Config.-2
Square on square
Config. -4
Diagonal on
diagonal
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Issue: 02 | Feb-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
558
2 BUCKLING ANALYSIS
Buckling is used as a generic term to describe the strength of
structures, generally under in-plane compressions and/or
shear. It is particularly dangerous because it is a catastrophic
failure that gives no warning. The buckling strength or
capacity can take into account the internal redistribution of
loads depending on the situation.
(B)Buckling
capacity
with
no
allowance
for
redistribution of load
This defines the lower bound value of the buckling capacity.
For slender structures, this is defined as the ideal elastic
buckling stress. This is more conservative than the upper
bound value given by Method 1 and ensures that the panel
does not suffer large elastic deflections with consequent
reduced in-plane stiffness.
Buckling loads are critical loads where certain types of
structures become unstable. Each load has an associated
buckled mode shape; this is the shape that the structure
assumes in a buckled condition. There are two primary means
to perform a buckling analysis:
2.1. Eigenvalue
Eigenvalue (bifurcation) buckling analysis is useful for finding
the load factor and corresponding buckling shape for a given
set of loads and constraints. Eigenvalue buckling analysis
predicts the theoretical buckling strength of an ideal elastic
structure. It computes the structural eigenvalues for the given
system of loading and constraints. This is known as classical
Euler buckling analysis. Buckling loads for several
configurations are readily available from tabulated solutions 4.
However, in real-life, structural imperfections and
nonlinearities prevent most real world structures from reaching
their eigenvalue predicted buckling strength; i.e. it overpredicts the expected buckling loads.
2.2. Nonlinear
Nonlinear buckling analysis is more accurate than eigenvalue
analysis because it employs non-linear, large-deflection; static
analysis to predict buckling loads. Its mode of operation is
M =0
(1)
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Issue: 02 | Feb-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
559
4 PROBLEM DESCRIPTION
The parametric study is carried out on a problem of barrel
vault, whose plan area is 40 m x 30 m. The vault is having an
arch of 40 m. and length of 30 m. The rise of the vault is taken
as per rise/span ratio, which is one of the parameters in this
study, whose value is varied from 0.2 to 0.7 in the interval of
0.05. The galvanized steel sheet is used as roofing cover
3 PARAMETRIC STUDY
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Issue: 02 | Feb-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
560
4.1 Loads
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Issue: 02 | Feb-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
561
5 CONCLUSION
1 Double Layer Barrel vault configurations that seem to offer
the best overall performance are those that have a regular and
symmetrical arrangement of longitudinal and transverse
members in all the directions in addition to strengthened edges
for example Config.-2 (SOS) offers the best buckling load
capacity approx. more than four times that of Config.-1(DOS),
Config.-3(SOD) and Cofig.-4(DOD)
2 In arch and all edges supported shell boundary conditions
Config.-3(SOD) offers less buckling load capacity than
Config.-1(DOS) but in beam and corner supported shell
boundary conditions it offers more buckling load capacity than
config.-1(DOS).
3 Loss of buckling load capacity with increase in Rise to Span
ratio is least in regular and symmetrical config.-2(SOS).
4 In config.1 (DOS) loss of buckling load capacity with
increase in Rise/Span ratio is more than config.-3(SOD)
except in case of arch boundary condition.
REFERENCES
[1]Makowski, Z S (1985), Analysis, Design and Construction
of Braced Barrel Vaults, Elsevier Applied Science Publishers,
London.
[2]Hoshyar Nooshin and Peter Disney(August 2002),Formex
Configuration Processing , Multi-science Publishing Co.
Ltd.,
[3]Ramaswamy G.S. and M. Eekhout (1999) , Analysis,
Design and Construction of Steel Space Frame, Telford
Publication, U.K.,
[4]N.Subramanian (1999),Principles of Space Structures,
Wheeler Publishing, New Delhi.
[5]Ahmed El-Sheikh(2001), Performance of Single-layer
Barrel Vaults with Different Configurations, International
Journal of Space Structures Vol.16 No.2
[5]Ahmed
El-Sheikh(2002),
Effect
of
Geometric
Imperfections on Single- Layer Barrel Vaults International
Journal of Space Structures Vol.17 No.4
[6]Nooshin, H, Disney, P and Yamamoto, C (1993), Formian:
The Programming Language of Formex Algebra, University
of Surrey Publication
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Issue: 02 | Feb-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
562
ARCH
BEAM
DOS
SOS
SOD
DOD
DOS
SOS
SOD
DOD
DOS
SOS
SOD
DOD
DOS
SOS
SOD
DOD
0.20
1.22
5.76
1.02
1.20
0.61
6.20
0.68
0.37
0.21
1.82
0.30
0.12
6.19
20.59
1.51
1.24
0.25
0.64
4.36
0.48
0.62
0.53
5.06
0.52
0.28
0.12
1.44
0.21
0.08
3.27
15.85
1.11
0.96
0.30
0.36
3.30
0.23
0.35
0.46
4.42
0.43
0.24
0.08
1.17
0.17
0.06
2.05
12.56
0.85
0.77
0.35
0.21
2.47
0.12
0.21
0.39
4.11
0.38
0.22
0.05
0.97
0.15
0.05
1.47
10.15
0.63
0.61
40
0.12
1.82
0.06
0.13
0.17
4.03
0.29
0.20
0.03
0.81
0.11
0.04
1.02
8.31
0.48
0.47
0.45
0.07
1.31
0.04
0.08
0.25
4.19
0.31
0.19
0.02
0.67
0.07
0.03
0.99
6.87
0.39
0.35
0.50
0.04
0.92
0.02
0.05
0.20
4.49
0.33
0.17
0.01
0.54
0.03
0.02
0.89
5.72
0.31
0.27
0.55
0.03
0.65
0.01
0.03
0.18
5.36
0.33
0.15
0.01
0.43
0.02
0.02
0.90
5.03
0.25
0.20
0.60
0.02
0.44
0.01
0.02
0.15
5.26
0.26
0.12
0.01
0.48
0.01
0.02
0.91
4.30
0.20
0.15
0.65
0.01
0.29
0.00
0.01
0.12
4.39
0.21
0.09
0.01
0.15
0.01
0.01
0.97
3.53
0.16
0.11
0.70
0.01
0.18
0.00
0.01
0.07
3.57
0.25
0.06
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.01
0.71
2.86
0.14
0.08
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Issue: 02 | Feb-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
563