Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.1584-1585 OF 2014
GOVINDASWAMY
...APPELLANT
VERSUS
STATE OF KERALA
...RESPONDENT
J U D G M E N T
RANJAN GOGOI,J.
1.
The
accused
appellant
has
been
He has
found
punishable
guilty
under
Besides, he has
of
Section
the
394
offences
read
with
of
the
separately
IPC
for
sentenced
which
to
he
undergo
has
been
rigorous
Page1
imprisonment
months
the
for
seven
respectively.
accused
appellant
years
and
three
The
conviction
and
the
of
sentences
High
Court.
Aggrieved,
the
present
2.
is
that
the
deceased/victim
girl,
aged
to be in the
2011.
P.W.76
along
with
his
of
the
Accordingly,
deceased
deceased
on
boarded
1st
on
February,
the
that
2011
day.
the
Ernakulam-Shornur
Page2
compartment.
There
were
other
passengers
Mulloorkara,
all
other
lady
had
alighted
and,
therefore,
hurriedly
attached
entered
just
compartment.
in
The
the
front
train
ladies
of
coach
the
reached
last
Vallathol
3.
According
accused
to
the
appellant,
offender,
noticed
prosecution,
who
that
is
the
the
habitual
deceased
was
the
train
had
left
Vallathol
Nagar
accused
entered
the
ladies
the
compartment
the
accused
had
Page3
assaulted
the
deceased
and,
in
fact,
compartment.
further
The
alleged
that
prosecution
the
deceased
has
was
prosecution
dropped/pushed
that
by
the
the
victim
accused
from
was
the
railway
line.
The
accused
appellant
he
sexually
assaulted
her.
It
is
the
further
case
of
the
P.W.
40
Abdul
traveling
in
the
attached
in
front
Shukkur
general
of
were
also
compartment
the
ladies
Page4
to
dissuaded
stop
by
the
train
but
he
was
middle-aged
man
who
was
he
that in these
should
not
take
the
reached
within
span
Shornur
of
10
Railway
minutes,
Station
P.W.4
and
guard
about
the
search,
accused.
of
the
train
incident
both,
for
which
the
Eventually,
and
complained
triggered
deceased
the
and
deceased
a
the
was
was
also
apprehended
soon
Page5
detain
the
Court.
According
to
the
local
taken
to
Hospital
the
Thrissur
whereafter
Medical
College
she
succumbed
where
she
was
Hospital,
to
her
for
which
he
has
been
found
5.
large
number
of
witnesses
(83
in
40,
64
and
70.
The
Postmortem
P-2)
would
specific
notice
and
also
the
require
relevant
part
P.W.4
and
P.W.40,
as
already
Page6
compartment
front
which
of
the
According
to
heard
sounds
the
was
attached
ladies
both
the
of
just
in
compartment.
witnesses,
woman
they
crying
and
issue
should
not
be
carried
any
and
According
brought
had
to
the
made
P.W.
matter
good
4
to
and
the
her
escape.
P.W.40,
they
attention
of
train
had
reached
Shornur
railway
then
working
as
Professor
Department
of
Forensic
Thrissur
conducted
and
Head
Medicine,
the
of
M.C.H.
postmortem
Page7
examination
of
the
deceased
with
the
of
have
the
been
deceased,
details
mentioned
by
of
him
which
in
the
not
details
be
necessary
of
each
sustained/suffered
to
of
by
the
notice
the
the
injuries
deceased,
the
and
is
require
concerned,
being
specific
notice
vital,
and,
Page8
Page9
10
descent, it is seen.
In case
she was not dazed and had alert
reflexes and fallen in such a
condition she would have moved
hands forward and the hands
would have showed the force of
the fall to some extent.
There
was no injuries of fall on
elbows,
wrists
and
inner
boarders of fore arms.
There
was no reflexes in this fall.
No.2 are injuries that may have
been caused by fall of a person
having the weight of this person
(42 kg.) from a height of 5 to 8
feet.
These injuries will be
sustained if this portion (left
cheek
bone
crosswise)
hits
against train tract. I have
visited this scene on 9-2-2011
with C.I. Chelakkara.
These 5 tracks were seen.
They
are
seen
as
intercoin
(cross).
So understood that it
can happen when fallen from a
moving train into the next near
cross tract. Usually two tracks
go Parallel. This is not such a
place. Left cheek bone has been
thoroughly pulverized. The bone
was pulverized as there are air
cells inside maxilla.
By the
force of the fall as there are
air cells inside maxilla.
8.
Page10
11
explained
that
the
aspiration
of
blood
the
victim
being
kept
in
supine
10. There
are
other
parts
of
the
which
notice
would
also
insofar
as
Section
376
IPC
accused
appellant
require
the
specific
offence
alleged
is
under
against
the
concerned.
The
Page11
12
extracted below:
Pelvic
Structures:
Urinary
bladder was empty.
Uterus and
its appendages appeared normal,
the
cavity
was
empty;
endometrium
showed
congestion
and
the
cervical
os
was
circular.
The
right
ovary
showed
polycystic
changes.
Spine was intact.
Vaginal introitus and wall
showed
contusion
all
around,
most
prominent
just
behind
urethral meatus. Hymen showed a
recent complete tear at about
5'O clock position and partial
recent tear at about 7'O clock
positions (as suggested by edema
and hyperemia of edges) and a
natural indentation at 1'O clock
position.
(Remark
recent
sexual
intercourse)
11.
Sreekumar,
holding
Joint
charge
Director
of
(Research)
Assistant
Director,
12.
stated
P.W.
that
70
in
after
his
deposition
examination
has
following
Page12
13
Item
the
seminal
stains
on
Item
No.
[Item
1(b)]
was
found
in
the
(M.O.8)],
underwear
[Item
No.14
13.
Section
So
376
consideration
far
as
IPC
is
of
the
the
offence
concerned,
postmortem
under
from
report
Page13
14
(Exhibit
P-69)
D.N.A.
Profile
(Exhibit
is
the
committed
profile,
issue
accused
the
said
extracted
and
makes
appellant
offence.
above,
the
who
The
had
D.N.A.
clinches
liability
the
of
the
or
debate
in
will
find
therefore,
the
no
matter.
We,
difficulty
in
fact
that
the
Having regard to
said
offence
was
brutal
and
justify
grotesque
the
manner
imposition
which
of
life
Page14
15
14.
Insofar
as
the
offence
under
15.
This
will
consideration
of
bring
the
the
Court
culpability
to
of
the
held
so
appropriate
liable
what
punishment
would
that
be
should
the
be
of
injury
no.1
and
2,
and
Page15
16
in
in
anoxic
the
opinion
(P.W.64),
had
that
deceased
the
position
brain
of
occurred
for
was
the
damage.
the
doctor
due
to
the
kept
in
purpose
The
fact
supine
of
sexual
certified
and
accepted
to
have
aspiration
passages
which
on
the
vital
of
blood
account
deceased
fact
of
the
was
is
responsible
for
the
the
would
whether
the
injury
air
position
kept,
that
consideration
into
in
first
require
accused
No.2
is
which
deceased
from
the
running
train.
the
Injury
liability
No.1
would
of
the
not
accused
require
for
a
Page16
17
of
P.W.64
and
the
Postmortem
the
accused
reliable
train
on
the
can
basis
evidence,
be
ascribed
of
meaning
the
to
the
cogent
and
thereby,
that
train
and
the
possibility
of
the
the
said
injury
may
not
necessary
follow.
16.
Page17
18
While
were
told
by
the
middle
aged
man,
had
made
good
circumstances
her
appearing
escape.
The
against
the
Such
conclusion
to
the
on
the
cause
of
death
of
the
Page18
19
deceased.
However,
to
hold
that
the
or
accused
knowledge
is
likely
that
to
the
cause
act
of
death.
the
The
assault.
The
requisite
knowledge
and
information
is,
in
fact,
after
in
militate
accused
the
incident
Hospital
against
to
cause
and
would
any
eventually
also
intention
death
by
the
clearly
of
act
the
of
Page19
20
above,
the
accused
cannot
keeping
position,
the
deceased
intention
to
be
Similarly,
in
cause
supine
death
or
accordingly,
of
the
view
that
the
are
of
the
view
that
the
Rather,
acts
of
more
appropriately
under
accordingly
Section
find
the
attract
325
accused
IPC.
the
We
appellant
filed
by
the
accused
appellant.
Page20
21
While
the
conviction
under
Section
376
Section
447
IPC
and
the
sentences
imposed
for
commission
of
the
offences
are
maintained,
the
conviction
under
Section
302
IPC
is
set
said
aside
and
of
death
for
commission
of
rigorous
imprisonment
for
seven
The
order
Trial
and
the
Court
of
High
the
learned
Court
is
accordingly modified.
....................,J.
(RANJAN GOGOI)
....................,J.
(PRAFULLA C. PANT)
NEW DELHI
SEPTEMBER 15, 2016
....................,J.
(UDAY UMESH LALIT)
Page21