Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Globalization PB PDF
Globalization PB PDF
GLOBALIZATION OF THE
WORLD ECONOMY: POTENTIAL
BENEFITS AND COSTS AND
A NET ASSESSMENT
January 2003
Number 33
by Michael D. Intriligator
GLOBALIZATION OF THE
WORLD ECONOMY: POTENTIAL
BENEFITS AND COSTS AND
A NET ASSESSMENT
JANUARY 2003
Michael D. Intriligator
Senior Fellow, Milken Institute
Professor of Economics, Political Science, and Policy Studies
University of California, Los Angeles
All rights reserved Copyright 2003
electronics, especially the microchip and computer revolutions. Electronic mail, the
Internet, and the World Wide Web are some of the manifestations of this new
technology, where todays $2,000 laptop computer is many times more powerful than
a $10 million mainframe computer of twenty-five years ago.
A second source of globalization is trade liberalization and other forms of
economic liberalization that have led to reductions in trade protection and to a more
liberal world trading system. This process began in the last century, but the two World
Wars and the Great Depression interrupted it. It resumed after World War II through
the most-favored-nation approach to trade liberalization, as embodied in the 1946
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) that has evolved into the World
Trade Organization (WTO). As a result, there have been significant reductions in
tariffs and other barriers to trade in goods and services. Other aspects of liberalization
have led to increases in the movement of capital and other factors of production. Some
economists and historians have suggested that globalization is little more than a return
to the world economy of the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century. At that
time, borders were relatively open and there were substantial international capital flows
and migrations of people when the major nations of Europe depended critically on
international trade as part of the colonial system. This is particularly the view of some
British scholars, looking back to that period of British imperial dominance of the
world economy. While there are some similarities in terms of trade and capital
movements, the period of a century ago did not have some of the major technological
innovations that have led to a globalized world economy today that is qualitatively
different from the international economy of the last century.
Globalization of the World Economy
January 2003
www.milkeninstitute.org
roles. Overall, multinational enterprises and other such organizations, both private and
public, have become the central agents of the new international globalized economy.
A fourth reason for globalization has been the global agreement on ideology,
with a convergence of beliefs in the value of a market economy and a free trading
system. This process began with the political and economic changes in Chinas 1978
reforms and then involved a falling dominoes series of revolutions in Eastern and
Central Europe starting in 1989 that ended with the dissolution of the Soviet Union in
December 1991. This process led to a convergence of ideology, with the former
division between market economies in the West and socialist economies in the East
having been replaced by a near-universal reliance on the market system. This
convergence of beliefs in the value of a market economy has led to a world that is no
longer divided into market-oriented and socialist economies. A major aspect of this
convergence of beliefs is the attempt of the former socialist states to make a transition
to a market economy. These attempted transitions, especially those in the former Soviet
Union and in Eastern and Central Europe have, however, been only partially
successful. The nations involved and their supporters in international organizations
and advanced western market economies have tended to focus on a three-part agenda
for transition, involving: 1) stabilization of the macroeconomy, 2) liberalization of
prices, and 3) privatization of state-owned enterprise. Unfortunately, this SLP
agenda fails to appreciate the importance of building market institutions, establishing
competition and providing for an appropriate role for the government in a modern
mixed economy.
economy. The result will be even greater worldwide flows of goods, services, money,
capital, technology, people, information and ideas.
3. Impacts of Globalization on National Economies
Globalization has had significant impacts on all economies of the world, with
manifold effects. It affects their production of goods and services. It also affects the
employment of labor and other inputs into the production process. In addition, it
affects investment, both in physical capital and in human capital. It affects technology
and results in the diffusion of technology from initiating nations to other nations. It
also has major effects on efficiency, productivity and competitiveness.
Several impacts of globalization on national economies deserve particular
mention. One is the growth of foreign direct investment (FDI) at a prodigious rate, one
that is much greater than the growth in world trade. Such investment plays a key role
in technology transfer, in industrial restructuring and in the formation of global
enterprises, all of which have major impacts at the national level. A second is the
impact of globalization on technological innovation. New technologies, as already
noted, have been a factor in globalization, but globalization and the spur of competition
have also stimulated further advances in technology and speeded up its diffusion
within nations through foreign direct investment. A third is the growth of trade in
services, including financial, legal, managerial, and information services and
intangibles of all types that have become mainstays of international commerce. In
1970, less than a third of foreign direct investment related to the export of services, but
today that has risen to half and it is expected to rise even further, making intellectual
capital the most important commodity on world markets. As a result of the growth of
Globalization of the World Economy
January 2003
www.milkeninstitute.org
services both nationally and internationally, some have called this "the age of
competence," underscoring the importance of lifelong education and training and the
investment in human capital in every national economy.
4. The Benefits of Globalization Stemming from Competition
It has already been noted that globalization has both positive and negative
effects. This section focuses on the positive effects of globalization, stemming from
competition, while the next will focus on its negative effects that could lead to potential
conflicts. Finally, the last section considers the potential for international cooperation
to diminish or to offset the negative effects of globalization.
Globalization has led to growing competition on a global basis. While some
fear competition, there are many beneficial effects of competition that can increase
production or efficiency. Competition and the widening of markets can lead to
specialization and the division of labor, as discussed by Adam Smith and other
classical economists writing on the benefits of a market system. Specialization and the
division of labor, with their implications for increases in production, now exist not just
in a nation but also on a worldwide basis. Other beneficial effects include the
economies of scale and scope that can potentially lead to reductions in costs and prices
and are conducive to continuing economic growth. Other benefits of globalization
include the gains from trade in which both parties gain in a mutually beneficial
exchange, where the "parties" can be individuals, firms and other organizations,
nations, trading blocs, continents or other entities. Globalization can also result in
increased productivity as a result of the rationalization of production on a global scale
and the spread of technology and competitive pressures for continual innovation on a
worldwide basis.
Overall, these beneficial effects of competition stemming from globalization
show its potential value in improving the position of all parties, with the potential for
increased output and higher real wage levels and living standards. The result is a
potential for greater human well being throughout the world. Of course, there is the
distributional or equity issue of who does, in fact, gain from these potential benefits of
globalization.
5. The Costs of Globalization and Potential Conflicts
Globalization involves not only benefits, but also has costs or potential
problems that some critics see as great perils. These costs could lead to conflicts of
various types, whether at the regional, national or international level. One such cost or
problem is that of who gains from its potential benefits. There can be substantial equity
problems in the distribution of the gains from globalization among individuals,
organizations, nations, and regions. Indeed, many of the gains have been going to the
rich nations or individuals, creating greater inequalities and leading to potential
conflicts nationally and internationally. Some have suggested the possibility of
convergence of incomes globally based on the observation that the poor nations are
growing at a faster rate than rich nations. The reality, however, is that a small group of
nations, the "tiger economies" of East Asia, have been growing at rapid rates, while
the least developed nations of Africa, Asia, and South and Central America have been
growing at a slower rate than the rich nations. These poor nations are thus becoming
increasingly marginalized. The result has been not a convergence but rather a
Globalization of the World Economy
January 2003
www.milkeninstitute.org
10
to other entities, including the most powerful nation states, multinational or global
firms, and international organizations. The result is that some perceive national
sovereignty as being undermined by the forces of globalization. Thus, globalization
could lead to a belief among national leaders that they are helplessly in the grip of
global forces and an attitude of disaffection among the electorate. The result could be
extreme nationalism and xenophobia, along with calls for protectionism and the
growth of extremist or fundamentalist political movements, ultimately leading to
potential conflicts.
It is sometimes alleged that one cost of globalization is unemployment in the
high wage industrialized economies. The relatively low unemployment rates in many
high wage nations and their high rates in many low wage nations disprove this
allegation. National policy and technological trends are much more important
determinants of employment than global factors. A related myth is that globalization is
threatening the social welfare provisions of some states, but other factors are much
more important, including domestic fiscal policy and demographic trends. In both
cases, globalization is a convenient scapegoat for failures of national policy.
It is also important to appreciate that the economic aspects of globalization are
but one component of its effects. There are potential and very important noneconomic
impacts of globalization involving great risks and potential costs, even the possibility
for catastrophe. One is that of security, where the negative effects of globalization
could lead to conflicts, as suggested above. Indeed, the very process of globalization
leading to integration of markets could make conflicts escalate beyond a particular
region or raise the stakes of conflict, for example, from conventional weapons to
Globalization of the World Economy
January 2003
www.milkeninstitute.org
11
12
challenge is to create a new world system in the aftermath of the cold war and the
movements toward globalization that would enhance its generally beneficial effects and
that would minimize its actual or potential costs. The key to such a world system will
be cooperation among the nations of the world and dynamic innovation, including the
establishment of new institutions.
The challenge of the present globalized and post cold war economy is
comparable to the challenge facing the winning nations in World War II. The old
world had been destroyed and a new world had to be created. Not one, but two world
systems were created, one in the West and the other in the East. Both involved the
creation of new institutions to replace the ones destroyed in the war. Each side had its
own ideology and organization, that in the West being market oriented and that in the
East being socialist. Now, of course, the ideological divide has dissolved where there
is a convergence of ideology on the value of a market economy.
A small group of Americans helped create a new world system for the West
during the period from 1945 to 1955. One of the major participants was Dean
Acheson, the U.S. Secretary of State during part of this period. His memoirs are aptly
named Present at the Creation, given his role in creating this new world system.
Another was Will Clayton, who developed the blueprints for both the Marshall Plan
and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. These Americans, together with
President Truman, George Marshall, and others created the institutions that brought
the devastated nations of Europe into the world community. These institutions
included GATT, which evolved into the WTO; the United Nations; the World Bank
and the IMF; the Marshall Plan and OEEC (later to evolve into the OECD); NATO;
Globalization of the World Economy
January 2003
www.milkeninstitute.org
13
and others. These institutions and the new world system that they helped create was
most successful in bringing the nations of Europe, including both former enemies and
devastated allies, into this new world system and in promoting reconstruction and
growth.
The present post Cold War period has some similarities to the one after World
War II in that a new world system must be created. Such a system that would have to
take account of the new situation - that of a world not divided by ideology and one
becoming increasingly integrated. The sequence of revolutions that began in Eastern
Europe in 1989 led directly or indirectly to the end of the Cold War, the demise of the
Warsaw Pact, the unification of Germany, the dissolution of the Soviet Union, and the
attempted transition of the former socialist states to democracy and a market economy,
with only mixed success. The West for its part has been only partially successful in
establishing structures such as those developed after World War II to bring Russia,
other former Soviet states, and Central and Eastern Europe into the world economic
and political system. In some respects, the treatment of the former Soviet Union and its
former allies in the current period is similar to the treatment of Germany after World
War I rather than its treatment after World War II.
Overall, the challenge of globalization will require truly cooperative efforts of
the great nations, especially among the new great powers of the European Union, the
United States, Canada, Japan, Russia, China, India, Brazil and others. Their joint
activity in establishing new political arrangements and institutions could go a long way
to solving global problems, including the economic and other challenges stemming
from globalization. As was true in the earlier period of the creation of a new world, it
Globalization of the World Economy
January 2003
www.milkeninstitute.org
14
15
16
will, by itself, help political leaders to regain a sense of control over their futures and
positions in the global community. For example, the regulatory regimes of nations and
even international organizations have become more porous and more easily overcome
through advances in technology. Examples include the lack of regulation of the global
integrated capital market, of trade in information services that is widely expected to
grow enormously, and of labor and environmental safeguards. Cooperation among
nations and international organizations could offset these developments by themselves
taking advantage of recent technological advances and using them to reassert control
through cooperative activities.
Overall, there are several possible vehicles for cooperation as a way of
responding to the challenges of globalization. One is the strengthening of existing
international institutions. Another is the establishment of new institutions, as in the
case of the World Trade Organization, which has a binding dispute settlement
mechanism of a supranational character. A third is the establishment of larger entities,
such as the European Union, or loose combinations of nations to treat certain
economic issues, such as the G-8 or the Asian Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC).
Global cooperation through formal or informal institutions provides an
increasingly important mechanism to ensure the proper treatment of global problems,
including those stemming from globalization. Through such global cooperation it
should be possible to ensure equity and stability in a globalized world, leading to
economic growth for all, the transition to a market economy for former socialist states,
and economic development for the poorer nations. Such cooperation is also the way to
treat the noneconomic problems of globalization, including those of environmental and
Globalization of the World Economy
January 2003
www.milkeninstitute.org
17
health protection on a worldwide basis, freedom from political crises or instability, and
global peace and security for the planet. The challenge will be to develop new modes
of cooperation and new institutions to deal with the challenges of globalization.
18
Bibliography
Acheson, Dean, Present at the Creation: My Years in the State Department, New
York: Norton, 1969.
Agnew, John A. and Stuart Corbridge, Mastering Space: Hegemony, Territory and
International Political Economy, New York: Routledge, 1995.
Archibugi, Daniele and Michie, Jonathan, Editors, Technology, Globalisation and
Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Bauman, Zygmunt, Globalization, New York, Columbia University Press, 2000.
Berger, Peter L. and Huntington, Samuel P., Editors, Many Globalizations: Cultural
Diversity in the Contemporary World. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Bhagwati, Jagdish N., The Wind of the Hundred Days: How Washington
Mismanaged Globalization, Cambridge, MIT Press, 2002.
Brittan, Sir Leon, Globalization vs. Sovereignty? The European Response, the Rede
Lecture, Cambridge University, 20 February 1997.
Clark, Ian, Globalization and Fragmentation: International Relations in the Twentieth
Century, New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Drucker, Peter, The Global Economy and the Nation State? Foreign Affairs,
September-October, 1997.
Feenstra, Robert C. and Gordon H. Hanson, Globalization, Outsourcing, and Wage
Inequality, American Economic Review, 86: 240-251, May 1996.
Friedman, Thomas L., The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization,
1st Anchor Books Edition, New York: Anchor Books, 2000.
Giddens, Anthony, Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives,
London: Routledge, 2000.
Gray, John, False Dawn: The Delusions of Global Capitalism, New York: New
Press, 2000.
Greider, William, One World, Ready or Not: The Manic Logic of Global Capitalism,
New York: Simon & Schuster, 1997.
Griffin, Keith, Studies in Globalization and Economic Transitions, London: ICS,
1996.
Globalization of the World Economy
January 2003
www.milkeninstitute.org
19
Hertz, Noreena, The Silent Takeover: Global Capitalism and the Death of
Democracy, London: Heinemann, 2001.
Hirst, Paul Q. and Graham Thompson, Globalization in Question: The International
Economy and the Possibilities of Governance, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1996.
Hutton, Will and Anthony Giddens, Editors, Global Capitalism, New York: New
Press, 2000.
Kofman, Eleonore and Gillian Youngs, Editors, Globalization: Theory and Practice,
New York: Pinter, 1996.
James, Harold, The End of Globalization: Lessons from the Great Depression,
Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.
Krugman, Paul R. and Anthony J. Venables, Globalization and the Inequality of
Nations, Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1995, working
paper series, number 5098.
Mander, Jerry and Edward Goldsmith, Editors, The Case Against the Global
Economy, New York: Sierra Club Books, 1997.
McBride, Stephen and John Wiseman, Editors, Globalization and its Discontents,
New York: St. Martins Press, 2000.
McGrew, Anthony G., Paul G. Lewis, et al., Global Politics: Globalization and the
Nation-State, Oxford, Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers, 1992.
Micklethwait, John and Adrian Wooldridge, A Future Perfect: The Challenge and
Hidden Promise of Globalization, New York: Random House, 2000.
Mittelman, James H., The Globalization Syndrome: Transformation and Resistance,
Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.
Mittelman, James H., Editor, Globalization: Critical Reflections, Boulder: Lynne
Rienner Publishers, 1996.
Nye, Joseph S. and John D. Donahue, Editors, Governance in a Globalizing World,
Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2000.
Ohmae, Kenichi, The Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the International
Economy, New York: HarperBusiness, 1990.
Robertson, Roland, Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture, London: Sage,
1992.
20
Rodrik, Dani, Has Globalization Gone too Far? Washington, DC: Institute for
International Economics, 1997.
Saskia Sassen, Losing Control: Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization, Columbia
University Press, 1996.
Soros, George, George Soros on Globalization, New York: Public Affairs, 2002.
Stiglitz, Joseph E., Globalization and Its Discontents, New York: W.W. Norton,
2002.
Sullivan, Jeremiah J., The Future of Corporate Globalization: From the Extended
Order to the Global Village, Westport, Connecticut: Quorum Books, 2002.
Spybey, Tony, Globalization and World Society, Cambridge, Mass.: Polity Press,
1996.
Thurow, Lester C., The Future of Capitalism: How Todays Economic Focus Shapes
Tomorrows World, New York: William Morrow, 1996.
Toffler, Alvin and Heidi, Creating a New Civilization: The Politics of the Third Wave,
Atlanta: Turner Publishing, Inc., 1995.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, World Investment Report,
1997: Transnational Corporations, Market Structure and Competition Policy, New
York; Geneva: United Nations, 1997.
Waters, Malcolm, Globalization, Second Edition, London, New York: Routledge,
2001.
White, Randall, Global Spin: Probing the Globalization Debate: Where in the World
Are We Going? Toronto: Dundurn Press, 1995.
World Bank, Globalization, Growth, and Poverty: Building an Inclusive World
Economy, Washington DC: World Bank and New York: Oxford University Press,
2002.
21