10.

Please describe when efficiency is important in a business environment, and give an example of when effectiveness is more important than
efficiency. Make sure your two examples include an aspect of information technology.
9. A colleague of yours has violated the ethics policy regarding the use of information technology. Please describe how you would address the situation.
7. As a researcher, you will examine various information sources (e.g., webpages, books, journal articles, blogs, wikis, etc.) on your chosen topic.
Explain your approach for finding and documenting relevant information about your topic.
6. A good research process involves knowing or determining the credibility of each information source. Explain the process you will use for identifying
research material sources types and determining information source credibility.
4. You are asked to troubleshoot an IT problem. Would you take a reductionist or holist approach? Explain your reasoning for selecting one versus the
other for different types of IT problems.
Ans: If I get a chance to trouble shoot an IT problem then I will select the holist approach because, The Holism methodology is the mechanism that has
been emerged to take care of the complex problems and issues. The system is built by the issues that is unpredictable and apply comprehend the
issue by planning and assessing the inclusions the expansions the system in inquiries. It offers a response to work effectively and successfully in
genuine settings. This methodology can be connected in different fields that could be financials, designing among others where the systems could be
arbitrary, non-straight, cumbersome and capricious along with bottlenecks to the changes. The system thinking technique concentrates on the criticism
associated with other system parts. The parts are generally considered as a system itself, and are composed of other parts. The system thinking
overlooks individual collaboration which gives a wide picture rather than little parcels of the system. The system is utilized to actualize a few activities
with some long term impacts. The system thinking has some advantages that has ability to effectively deal with system with no less than one actor and
their actions to simplicity them.
Reductionism is not accountable because of the complex nature of real-world problems and the more complex interactions between them.
A more holistic and integrating approach which define the boundaries of the system widely needed to be sought otherwise said a systems language
explaining clearly the concepts of system, subsystems and hierarchy, limitations, and constraints was needed.
Problem solving is a process in which we perceive and resolve a gap between a present situation and a desired goal, with the path to the
goal blocked by known or unknown obstacles. In general, the situation is one not previously encountered, or where at least a specific solution from past
experiences is not known. In contrast, decision making is a selection process where one of two or more possible solutions is chosen to reach a desired
goal. The steps in both problem solving and decision making are quite similar. In fact, the terms are sometimes used interchangeably.