Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shah, S. Z. A. & Butt, S. (2011) PDF
Shah, S. Z. A. & Butt, S. (2011) PDF
Abstract. The study has been conducted to have a detailed view on creative accounting. A very important
question has been tried to be answered in this study that why managers do creative accounting and how they
become successful in performing such practice in the presence of stringent rules and procedures. Another
aspect of creative accounting has been tried to be explored that whether this creative accounting practice is
good for the companies or it brings companies in crises situation. Discussion based model has been used on
the basis of past references and experiences. Link of governance with creative accounting practices has also
been tried to be explored in the study. At the end it is concluded that the complex and diverse nature of the
business transactions and the latitude available in the accounting standards and policies make it difficult to
handle the issue of creative accounting. It is not that creative accounting solutions are always wrong. It is the
intent and the magnitude of the disclosure which determines its true nature and justification.
KeyWords: Creative Accounting, Earnings management, Corporate Governance
1. Introduction
Subject of Creative Accounting is normally portrayed maligned and negative act. As soon as these words
Creative Accounting are mentioned, the image that emerges in ones mind is that of manipulation,
dishonesty and deception. I wish to propose today that creative accounting is a tool which is much like a
weapon. If used correctly, it can be of great benefit to the user; but if it is mishandled or goes into the hands
of the wrong person, it can cause much harm. Creative Accounting has helped more companies to get out of
a crisis than land them into a crisis. The weapon is almost always innocent; the fault whenever it emerges
lies with the user. Coming from a developing country where stock exchanges listings often fail to reflect the
true credentials of a company, I have seen many cases where companies have benefited tremendously by
using creative accounting techniques and remained afloat during difficult times.
Before jargon and intricacies of the subject are explored, lets relate an episode from Pakistans cement
industry. In mid-nineties, the country suffered an acute shortage of cement. The government announced a
number of incentives for new cement plants and as a result a number of new plants were planned seven to
be precise. The combined production of these and existing plants was expected to meet the demands of
cement for the country as well as leave a surplus for export to its neighbors like Afghanistan and India who
are always short of this product. It takes three years for a cement plant to start production. By the time the
new plants came into production in late nineties, the countrys economic scenario had changed. The
government had no money for development, the economy was generally in recession, and construction had
virtually come to a halt. With tremendous overcapacity, the cement prices started falling precariously. The
companies got together and slashed production. Plants started operating at an average of around 22%
production capacity to ensure that prices do not fall. The prices drop stopped but still it did not help much.
*
Now cement is one industry where the largest slice of costs is fixed and time related, rather than operations
related. As much as 72% of annual costs of a new cement plant may comprise of only two items namely
depreciation and interest. Both of these are fixed and computed on the basis of time. As a result, a low
capacity utilization meant higher cost per ton of cement produced in any period, leading to huge losses. One
creative way found around this situation was to convert the depreciation cost from a fixed time related cost to
a variable charge. To achieve this end, the method of computing annual depreciation by dividing the total
plant cost over the number of plants useful life was abandoned. Instead, the total cost of plant was divided
over the total cement production to be expected from the plant over its entire life thereby computing
depreciation cost per ton of cement produced. This drastically curtailed the periodic charge to the Income
Statement and improved the profitability figures. This had no implication for corporation taxes as
depreciation is not a tax allowable expense virtually anywhere in the world. So using a creative accounting
tool, the companies were able to show profits, or minimize losses, during a difficult period when the capacity
utilization was low. This enabled them to keep the investors reasonably comforted and the staff relaxed. The
interesting thing is that when the demand rose and companies started operating at higher capacity, they did
not need to change their accounting policy. Hence, without any deception, ill-will or dishonesty, the directors
of cement plants were able to pull through a crisis.
Now let's have a view on some technical aspects of this phenomenon.
The managers are motivated for fixing financial statements for either managing position or profits.
Following are important concerns for managers
3.1.
The managers want to cook the books for meeting internal targets set by higher management with respect
to sales, profitability and share prices.
3.2.
Company has to face many expectations from its stakeholders. The Employees and customers want long
term survival of the company for their interests. Suppliers want assurance about the payment and long term
relationships with the company. Company also wants to meat analysts forecasts and dividend payout pattern.
3.3.
Companies want to show steady income stream to impress the investors and to keep the share prices
stable. Advocates of this approach favor it on account of measure against the 'short-termism' of evaluating an
investment on the basis of the immediate yields. It also avoids raising expectations too high to be met by the
management.
3.4.
The window dressing can be done before corporate events like IPO, acquisition or before taking a loan.
(Sweeney (1994) reports the tendency of companies nearing violation of debt covenants is twice or thrice to
make income increasing accounting policy changes than other companies);
3.5.
Taxation
The creative accounting may also be a result of desire for some tax benefit especially when taxable
income is measured through accounting numbers.
3.6.
Change in management
There is another important tendency of new managers to show losses due to poor management of old
management by some provisions Dahi (1996) found this tendency in US bank managers.
4. Importance
Creativity in accounting can be bad, that doesn't mean that it must be bad. If creative accounting coheres
with ethical and legal standards as well as the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), they can
yield immense benefits to the company and its stakeholders.
Creative accounting may help maintain or increase the share price by decreasing debt level to lower risk
and by showing improved profits. The high share price can help the company in raising new capital and in
takeover attempts.
Some authors believe that if management delays the release of financial information to the market, with
an intention of taking some advantage from the delay, that also falls within the meaning of creative
accounting. Once again, if the intentions are not to harm any stakeholders interest, this can hardly be
described as dishonest.
According to Beidleman [1973] and Lipe [1990] earning management techniques reduce the variability
of earnings and, therefore, shareholders benefit because the reduced uncertainty and improved predictability
of future earnings help in enhancing price/earning multiples. However, they claim that abnormal accruals
over time tend to reverse and are readily detected by investors. This clearly calls for moderation in using
even healthy techniques for managing earnings.
98
Table 1: Rewards of the managing Profits (Earnings Management) & Financial Position
Category
Share-Price Effect
Management
Performance
Evaluation Effects
Decreased Regulations
Avoidance of Higher Taxes
Source: The Financial Number Game by Charles W. Mulford & Eugene E. Comiskey, 2002 (John Wiley & Sons
6.1.
As stated above, the accounting standards and policies cannot cover every aspect of business transactions.
Therefore considerable latitude is available to companies to play within the legal ring. The commonly cited
example of misuse of accounting policies includes exploiting the loopholes in revenue recognition standards.
There is a wide debate on this issue among accounting policy makers, standard setters and practicing
companies as when to recognize and record the revenue in the book of accounts.
So, it is a common practice to book revenue even before recognizing it to increase the profits. Sometimes
companies do no wants to show a profit above a certain level, in that case companies defer revenue to reduce
their profits.
Timing of expense recognition is used in the similar manner to achieve the desired objectives i.e. either
to show increased profits or decreases profits.
6.2.
Due to the latitude available in accounting policies, companies can alter their profit figures by changing
the accounting policy and deliberately omit to mention the change of policy in notes or omit to give correct
impact of the change. For example
Changing the closing stock valuation method and do not inform the readers of the financial statements
that what impact either positive or negative it could have on earnings.
99
Change the rate of depreciation method or change the method itself to increase or decrease the
depreciation expense.
Increase is Recorded By
Debit
Debit
Credit
Credit
Credit
Decrease is Recorded By
Credit
Credit
Debit
Debit
Debit
The foundation of the entire accounting edifice stands on these two simple words: debits and credits.
Debits are used to record expenses (or reduction in revenue) and to record assets (or reduction in liabilities or
capital). Similarly, credits are used to record revenues (or reduction in expenses and to record liabilities (or
reduction in assets). A debit will either end up in the Income Statement (i.e. if it is treated as an expense) or
in the Balance Sheet (i.e. if it is treated as an asset). Quite similarly, a credit will end up in Income Statement
if it is treated as revenue or in Balance Sheet if it is treated as a liability. Now, a creative accountant can
mischievously play with these basic rules to procure his desired result. Accountants on demand of
management or owners artistically manipulate these instruments to get the desired results. An expense may
be treated as an asset to improve book profits, or alternatively an asset may be expensed to show lower
profits. Similarly, a revenue may be transferred to a liability (through provisioning) to reduce book profits, or
a liability may be dressed up as a revenue to show higher book profits virtually at the whims of the
accountant.
Big bath charges
In this technique, instead of showing losses for a couple of years, a big loss is shown for a single year by
charging all expenses in that year. This may be done if there are apparent reasons for poor profitability in
that year and the management feels that by lumping all expenses in one bad year, they can start showing
better profits in following years.
100
IFRS 3 provides extensive guidelines on how the purchase price of business acquisitions should be
allocated. The SEC also has a check on allocation of R& D costs. Yet it leaves room for manipulation of
amortizing levels.
Over-provisioning for accrued expenses when revenues are high helps to bring down profits to a level
that is safe to maintain in the future. Similarly, failure to provide all the accrued expenses can help show
larger profits during tougher times when such is the need of the hour.
Materiality
A change in an immaterial item can help the firm billions of dollars. For example, some companies do
not recognize an expenditure under say $5000 as an asset, even if its benefits is likely to be spread over
several years. Varying this limit to say $2,000 can easily increase profits while hiking up this limit may lead
to lower profits.
Revenue recognition
Firms virtually have a free hand in timing the booking of their revenues at any stage starting from the
moment sales contracts are signed till the promised product or service has been fully delivered to and
accepted by the clients. For this we can refer to a classic example of Microsoft which was heavily fined by
US SEC for its manipulative revenue recognition policy. Microsoft recognized only a small percentage (2030%) as revenue at the time of the sale and remaining amount was kept as provision for future after sales
services. Why Microsoft adopted that strategy. The answer is to (1) hide substantial profits, (2) signaling
effects, (3) avoiding complacency and last but not the least (4) to report smoothed earnings to its
shareholders & stakeholders.
8.1.
Current accounting rules under International Accounting Standards and U.S. GAAP allow managers
some choice in determining the methods of measurement and criteria for recognition of various financial
reporting elements. The potential exercise of this choice to improve apparent performance increases the
information risk for users. Financial reporting fraud, including non-disclosure and deliberate falsification of
values also add to users' information risk. To reduce these risks and to enhance the perceived integrity of
financial reports, corporation financial reports must be audited by an independent external auditor who issues
a report that accompanies the financial statements. In addition, the audit committee of the Board, comprising
of independent non-executive directors, can play an effective role to prevent misuse of creative accounting
techniques and observance of ethical standards in financial reporting.
Jean C. studied the impact of Corporate Governance on creative ccounting for Chinese companies. His
study showed a decrease in earning management after the regulation of code of corporate governance. With
respect to ownership concentration, state ownership is more involved in dressing up the books than the
privately owned firms. Independent non-executive directors on the board and the audit committee and the
accounting/financial experts sitting on the audit committee also helped in checking the manipulation of
accounts..
9. Conclusion
To sum up the discussion on creative accounting practices, it is an unfortunate situation that we cannot
completely restrict or stop the misuse or abuse of creative accounting practices. The improper use of such
creative accounting practices had fooled both auditors and regulators in the past (e.g. Enron, Bank of Punjab
etc) and it continues to do the same. The complex and diverse nature of the business transactions and the
latitude available in the accounting standards and policies make it difficult to handle the issue of creative
101
accounting. It is not that creative accounting solutions are always wrong. It is the intent and the magnitude of
the disclosure which determines its true nature and justification.
10. References
[1] Albert, M. (1994), Lirruption du corporate governance, Revue deconomie financiere, no. 31/1994
[2]
Amat O., Blake J., Dowds J.,(1999), The Ethics of Creative Accounting, Economics Working Paper
[3] Dahi, D.. (1996) 'Managerial turnover and successor accounting discretion: bank loan loss provisions after
resignation, retirement, or death', Research in Aa'ounting Regulation, 10: 95-110.
[4] Jean C. The Impact of the Corporate Governance Code on Earnings Management: Evidence from Chinese Listed
Companies
[5] Naser, K. (1993) Creative Financial Accounting: Its Nature and Use, Hemel Hempstead:Prentice Hall.
102