Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CIVIL ENGINEERING
a,*
, Said M. Easa
Department of Irrigation and Reclamation Engineering, University College of Agriculture and Natural Resources,
University of Tehran, P.O. Box 4111, Karaj 31587-77871, Iran
b
Department of Civil Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5B 2K3
Received 12 October 2012; revised 13 January 2013; accepted 24 January 2013
Available online 7 March 2013
KEYWORDS
Gradually varied ow;
Circular channels;
Analytical solution;
Dimensionless variables
Abstract The paper presents an accurate approximation of the Froude number (F) for circular
channels which is part of the gradually varied ow (GVF) equation. The proposed approximation
is developed using optimization technique to minimize the relative error between the exact and estimated values, resulting in a maximum error of 0.6% compared with 14% for the existing approximate method. The approximate F is used in the governing GVF equation to develop an exact
analytical solution of this equation using the concept of simplest partial fractions. A comparison
of the proposed and approximate solutions for backwater length shows that the error of the existing
approximate solution could reach up to 30% for large normal ow depths.
2013 Ain Shams University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.
All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Accurate estimation of the water surface prole in gradually
varied ows is important in the planning and design of water
works. Numerous studies on gradually varied ow (GVF) have
been conducted for different types of open channels [111].
However, analytical and semi-analytical studies of GVF related to circular open channels are limited. Chow [12] developed a semi-analytical solution for circular channels using
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +98 02632221119.
E-mail addresses: arvatan@ut.ac.ir (A.R. Vatankhah),
@ryerson.ca (S.M. Easa).
Peer review under responsibility of Ain Shams University.
seasa
2090-4479 2013 Ain Shams University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2013.01.005
626
dx
1 F2
F2
Q2 4
g ;
gD5
Hagers model
A D h sinh=8
h 2 cos1 1 2g
Figure 1
exact model
Q2
ag5 bg3 cg4
gD5
10a
where a, b, and c are coefcients determined by optimization. Noting that h of Eq. (9) is a function of g, different values of g ranging
from 0.1 to 0.92 were used and the coefcients that minimized the
maximum absolute relative error between the exact and approximate Froude numbers of Eqs. (9) and (10a), (Fe F)/Fe, were
determined. The approximate formula is given by
F2
Q2
0:64g5 0:405g3
gD5
0:834g4 ;
10b
Q2 T
gA3
Q2 sinh=2
gD5 hsin h 3
8
where g = dimensionless ow depth (y/D). The maximum relative error, e, of Eq. (5) is about 14% in the range
0.1 < g < 0.92 (Fig. 2), where e = 100(Fe F)/Fe. Clearly,
the approximation of Eq. (4) is inaccurate.
F2e
Using an approximate formula for the cross section area, Hager [20] approximated the Froude number as
Q2
4
0:64g5c 0:405g3
c 0:834gc
5
gD
11
Accurate gradually varied ow model for water surface prole in circular channels
627
p 2
7
7 p 2
dg 1 g2 1
dg x1 g2 x2
12
12
p 2
7
7 p 2
dg x3 g2 x4
dg 1 g2 1
12
12
18
19
where
n 2
y2
20
x2
6
7
21
x3
6
7
x4
6
7
o2
S0 9D16=3 Dy 2 1 127 D2
dy
12
16n2 Q2 x
9D19=3
9S0 D16=3
d
16n2 Q2
4
j 0:64g5c 0:405g3
c 0:834gc
22
23
13
s!
7
1 p
3 d
s!
7
1 1 p
3 d
s!
7
1 1 p
3 d
s!
7
1 1 p
3 d
6
1
x1
7
14
g2 x2
x1 x2
jx23 0:8347x3 122
1
x3 x4
g2 x3
jx24 0:8347x4 122
1
x3 x4
g2 x4
0:64x41 0:4057x1 122
g
g2 x1
x1 x2
0:64x42 0:4057x2 122
g
g2 x2
x1 x2
0:64x43 0:4057x3 122
g
g2 x3
x3 x4
0:64x44 0:4057x4 122
g
g2 x4
x3 x4
15
16
2jdv
dg
dg2 1 127 g2 1
2
0:64g9 jg4 0:405g 0:834 1 127 g2
p
dg 17
dg2 1 127 g2 1
Since the denominators of the integrand are polynomials of degree 4, the two denominators can be factorized, respectively, as
j
107:52
168 p p g5
d
d
Substituting Eq. (25) into Eq. (24) and integrating yields
25
628
p
p
g x2
2x1 x2 x2
p
jx23 0:8347x3 122 g x3
ln
p
p
2x3 x4 x3
g x3
jx24 0:8347x4 122
g
1
tan
p
p
x3 x4 x4
x4
p
jx21 0:8347x01 122
168 djv
x1 x2
Z
1
dg
g2 x1
jx22 0:8347x02 122
x1 x2
Z
1
dg
g2 x2
jx24 0:8347x4 12
x3 x4
Z
1
dg
g2 x4
0:64x41 0:4057x1 122 2
ln g x1
2x1 x2
0:64x42 0:4057x2 122 2
ln g x2
2x1 x2
0:64x43 0:4057x3 122 2
ln g x3
2x3 x4
0:64x41
Z
0:4057x1 12
x1 x2
g
dg
g2 x1
v v0 I1 g I1 g0
p
dg
ln
g2 x
2 x g x
For negative values of x, one gets
Z
1
1
g
1
p
dg
tan
g2 x
x
x
26
27
jv I2 g constant
28
1
p I1 g constant
168j d
32
1
31
30
34
6400
5
24000
1600
973 3
81 2 417
g
g
g
3000
400
500
I2 g
35
Accurate gradually varied ow model for water surface prole in circular channels
Figure 3
629
1
2
3
Channel variables
gn
So
gc
0.7014
0.7500
0.8022
1.25
1.25
1.25
0.0111
0.0111
0.0111
0.96
1.05
1.1
0.0005
0.000515
0.0005
0.4189
0.4381
0.4484
630
1
Y 1 Yr 1
X Xr Y Yr 1 Y4c ln
4
Y 1 Yr 1
2arctan Y arctan Yr
X 1
1:1y2N 1=2 X;
yN < 0:9
36
37
where
Y = y/yn, Yc = yc/yn, yN = yn/D, X = Sox/yn, and
Xr ; Yr = boundary conditions which equal (0, 1.01) for backwater curves and (0, 0.99) for drawdown curves. Note that
some dimensionless variables are dened differently from
those of the proposed solution.
For comparison, the backwater length was calculated for
different values of g for three cases with gn = 0.70, 0.75, and
0.80 using the proposed accurate solution of Eq. (32) and
the approximate solution of Eq. (36). The corresponding values of the other variables are shown in Table 1. The percentage
difference in backwater lengths of the proposed and approximate solutions is shown in Fig. 4. As noted, the error of the
approximate method increases as the value of gn increases
and could reach up to about 30%, where the existing approximate solution underestimates the backwater length. The error
also increases as the control ow depth g increases. For example, for gn = 0.75 the error ranges from 17% to 22%. For this
case, for g = 0.90 for example, the lengths of the proposed
accurate approximate solutions are 2954.00 m and
2339.21 m, respectively, representing a difference of 20.8%.
The respective backwater proles are shown in Fig. 5. For verication, the exact backwater length was calculated using
numerical integration of Eq. (13) as 2954.00 m which is identical to the value of the proposed solution. The backwater
curves for g = 0.85 are also shown in Fig. 5. As noted, the error in the estimated backwater length decreases for smaller
control ow depths.
For g = 0.90, the steps of applying the proposed accurate
solution are as follows: (a) yn = 0.9375 m from Eq. (3), thus
gn = 0.9375/1.25 = 0.7500, (b) j = 27.4541 from Eq. (16),
(c) d = 7.0013 from Eq. (15), (d) g0 = 1.01 0.7500 =
0.7575, (e) I1(0.90) = 864.12 and I1(0.7575) = 1258.75 from
Eq. (31), and (f) v = 0.0708 and v0 = 0.1031 from Eq. (30),
thus, v v0 = 0.17395 and from Eq. (14), x = 2954.00 m.
5. Comparison with the Direct Step Method
E2 Eb
S0 12 Sf2 Sfb
38
in which
Z
D
E y F2 dy Dg 0:106667g6 0:2025g2 0:278g3 39
j
2
n2 Q2 3
7
40
Sf 16=3 g2 1 g2
4
12
D
Accurate gradually varied ow model for water surface prole in circular channels
(
)
3
0:106667g62 0:2025g2
2 0:278g2
1
g2 gb j
3
0:106667g6b 0:2025g2
b 0:278gb
n
o
v2 vb
2 3 2
2
4 gb 1 127 g2b
d 329 34 g22 1 127 g22
41
In this example, equal decrements of the dimensionless ow
depth are used, where the decrement size equals the difference
between the starting and ending depths divided by the number
of segments per prole J, that is (0.9 0.7575)/J. Increasing J
will increase the accuracy of the prole calculation, but will increase the calculation time. Fig. 6 shows variation of the total
length of the backwater curve with the number of segments.
The results show that the near exact solution x = 2954.00 requires 500 segments, clearly representing a huge computational
effort.
6. Conclusions
A very accurate approximation of the Froude number of circular channels having an error in the order of less than 1%
is presented in this paper. The Froude number was used in
the governing GFV equation to develop an exact analytical
solution of the water surface prole. The proposed solution
has substantially improved the accuracy of estimating the
water surface prole compared with the existing approximate method which underestimates the backwater length.
The characteristics of the water surface prole based on
the proposed solution have been illustrated using sample
analysis graphs that may be useful for practical purposes.
The optimization concept underlying the proposed approximation of the Froude number may be used for other types
of open channels.
References
[1] Gunder DF. Prole curves for open-channel ow. Trans Am Soc
Civ Eng 1943;108:4818.
[2] Gill MA. Exact solution of gradually varied ow. J Hydraul Div
ASCE 1976;102(HY9):135364.
[3] Kumar A. Integral solutions of the gradually varied equation for
rectangular and triangular channels. Proc Inst Civ Eng ASCE
1978;65(2):50915.
[4] Dubin JR. On gradually varied ow proles in rectangular open
channels. J Hydraul Res 1999;37(I):99105.
[5] Ramamurthy AS, Saghravani SF, Balachandar R. A direct
integration method for computation of gradually varied ow
proles. Can J Civ Eng 2000;27(6):13005.
[6] Venutelli M. Direct integration of the equation of gradually varied
ow. J Irrigat Drain Eng ASCE 2004;130(1):8891.
[7] Vatankhah AR. Exact sensitivity equation for one-dimensional
steady-state shallow water ow (application to model calibration).
J Hydrol Eng 2010;15(11):93945.
[8] Vatankhah AR. Analytical integration of the equation of gradually varied ow for triangular channels. Flow Meas Instrum
2010;21(4):5469.
[9] Vatankhah AR. Direct integration of gradually varied ow
equation in parabolic channels. Flow Meas Instrum 2011;22(3):
23541.
631
632
Wellington Prize from American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE),
2010 James A. Vance Award and 2003 Sandford Fleming Award from
Canadian Society for Civil Engineering (CSCE), and 2010 Award of
Academic Merit from Transportation Association of Canada. He is