Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Original papers
abstract
article
info
The spatial variability of soil parameters such as salinity and sodicity is very effective in determining the
Article history:
Received 23 June 2015
Received in revised form 17 November 2015
Accepted 20 December 2015
Keywords:
Spatial variability
Geochemical simulation
Sodic water
PHREEQC
suitable areal cropping pattern and appropriate management of agricultural lands. To conduct this study,
a grid sampling at 100 m was carried out in an agricultural area of 30 ha located in Tajarak of Hamedan,
western Iran. After physicochemical analyses of soil samples, soil properties which had significant correlations with the exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) were identified using the statistical analysis. The
ESP was significantly positively correlated with the clay content, pH, electrical conductivity (EC), cation
exchange capacity (CEC), and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), while it showed a significant negative correlation with the silt content. The spatial variability of ESP and its related parameters investigated by the
geostatistical analysis showed that pH, EC, CEC, SAR, and ESP were strongly spatially dependent, while
the clay and silt contents had a moderate spatial dependency. The distribution maps indicated that most
soils in the study area did not have a sodicity problem, while ESP of soils in some parts was more than
15%. The long-term impact of the application of saline-sodic and non-saline-sodic irrigation waters on
some chemical properties of a saline sodic soil under 20 years of the continuous cultivation of wheat
and alternate cultivation of wheat and sugar beet was simulated using the geochemical PHREEQC program. The results showed that the chemical quality of the soil was significantly improved after 20 years
of irrigation with non-saline-sodic water. On the other hand, the problem of the soil salinity was accelerated after 20 years of irrigation with saline-sodic water, while ESP remained unchanged. Due to the
high water requirement of sugar beet, the effect of its cultivation was not significant in reducing soil sodicity despite the removal of Na + from the soil by this crop. Therefore, it is recommended that the cropping
pattern should be changed by planting crops with low water requirements or rainfed crops if sodic irrigation water is applied.
2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Salinity and sodicity are two of the most destructive processes in
soils, particularly in arid and semi-arid areas. The investigation of
changes in the soil salinity and sodicity, especially in large areas, is
expensive and time-consuming. Hence, it is necessary to use
techniques that can easily monitor a wide range of areas and
examine the changes in the soil salinity and sodicity.
One of the key characteristics of soils is the spatial and temporal
variability. There are several factors involved in the process of the
soil formation that vary over the time and influence soil properties.
On the other hand, the management of agricultural lands is impossible based on a set of discrete sampled points as these data must
be converted to a continuous format of information. Therefore, it is
necessary to apply the mathematical and statistical data analyzing
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: f_ranjbar1980@yahoo.com (F. Ranjbar).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.12.010
0168-1699/ 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
302
ch 2Nh
Zxi Zxi h 2
i1
303
Table 1
The chemical composition of irrigation waters (Jalali, 2007b) used in simulations.
Irrigation water
Non-saline-sodic
Saline-sodic
pH
6.50
8.76
EC
dS m
0.39
8.90
Ca2+
mM
Mg2+
mM
K+
mM
Na+
mM
SAR
(mM)1/2
Cl
mM
CO2
mM
HCO3
mM
SO2
mM
1.00
11.30
0.35
9.25
0.00
4.54
0.35
63.13
0.30
13.93
0.40
54
0.00
1.50
0.80
11.70
0.10
20.00
304
Table 2
Input file in PHREEQC for modeling the long-term effect of the application of saline-sodic irrigation water for the first wheat cropping season.
305
306
m ha
10
NU kg ha
m h
105
hs
where m is the atomic mass of the element (g mol 1), h is the soil
depth (cm) and hs is the soil porosity. The soil depth was considered to
be 30 cm. The porosity is defined as follows (Danielson and
Sutherland, 1986):
qb
hs 1
qs
where qb and qs are the average soil bulk density and particle density, respectively. The values of qb and qs were 1.31
and
2.65 g cm 3, respectively, so the soil porosity was equivalent to
0.51.
The seasonal nutrient uptake by crops (mmol L 1) was divided by
the number of irrigations considered in wheat and sugar beet
cropping seasons, equivalent to 6 and 7, respectively and removed
numerically from the irrigation water composition using the
REACTION keyword.
Since non-saline-sodic water was K + free (Table 1), potassium
sulfate fertilizer was added to the composition of irrigation water in
order to compensate the nutritional requirement of crops.
However, due to the presence of sufficient K + in the composition of
saline-sodic irrigation water to meet the requirement of both crops,
the addition of excess K+ to the composition of this type of irrigation
water was ignored.
The mix of precipitation or irrigation water and the soil solution
in the root zone was performed in their respective proportions of
0.5 and 0.5 for wheat cropping seasons and 0.7 and 0.3 for sugar
beet cropping seasons. In order to determine these ratios, the
leaching fraction (LF) was calculated using the following equation
(Oster et al., 1984):
LF Dd
Di
Viw Vpwr
1 LF
106
Viw L Viw
NU mmol L 1
108
PV
hs
where PV is the pore volume (L) and h and hs are the parameters
described in the Eq. (2). By subtracting the amount of Viw (L) from
1, the mixing ratio of the precipitation or irrigation water and the
soil solution at each mixing step was obtained.
As mentioned before, the amount of water use by drip-irrigated
sugar beet in every cropping season (V iw) is 7301 m3 ha 1 in the
study area. So, there was no need to use the Eq. (5) in this case,
but the sum of this value and the average annual precipitation
(i.e., 10,478 m3 ha 1) was placed in the Eq. (6) and then divided
by 10 (i.e., the number of irrigations and precipitation events during a sugar beet cropping season) to achieve the amount of water
(L) needed to be added to the soil solution at each mixing step. By
subtracting this value from 1, the contribution of the soil
solution at each mixing step was determined.
The partial CO2 pressure in irrigation water was considered to
be equal to the atmospheric value (log pCO2 =
3.5 atm), whereas
it was considered to be 10-fold and constant at log pCO2 =
2.5 atm in the soil solution. The soil solution was concentrated at
the end of each cropping season as a result of the evaporation. The
program written in PHREEQC to simulate the long-term effect of the
application of saline-sodic irrigation water on exchange and solution
phases of the soil is given in Table 2. This input file is for the first
season which soil is under the wheat cultivation. By repeating
the mixing steps, the simulation was performed for 20 consecutive
wheat cropping seasons. The mixing ratios for cropping seasons related to alternate cultivations of wheat and sugar
beet were different as explained above.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Descriptive statistics
Table 3 indicates that ESP was significantly positively correlated
with the clay content, pH, EC, SAR, and CEC, while it had a significant negative correlation with the silt content. Although there is an
inverse relationship between ESP and CEC based on the calculating
equation, the statistical analysis showed that they were positively
correlated. In other words, an increase in the exchangeable Na +
was in line with increasing CEC in soil samples studied. Shifteh
Somee et al. (2011) reported that ESP was significantly positively
correlated with pH and EC. The descriptive statistics of these
parameters are given in Table 4. Skewness and kurtosis coefficients
are used to describe the shape of the data distribution (Duffera
et al., 2007). The distribution of clay and silt contents was negatively skewed, while the other parameters had a positive skewness.
On the other hand, clay, pH, and CEC showed a positive kurtosis,
whereas the others had a negative one. According to values of
the standard deviation (SD), it can be said that the maximum
and minimum variations in data were respectively observed in
ESP and EC. The values of EC measured in the 1:5 soil to water
extract (EC1:5) varied from 0.24 to 0.70 dS m 1 and averaged
0.43 dS m 1. On the basis of empirical equations given by He
et al. (2013), EC1:5 can be converted to EC in the saturated paste
extract (ECe):
307
Table 3
Pearson correlation coefficients for some soil properties.
*
**
Variables
Clay
Clay
Sand
Silt
pH
EC
CEC
SAR
ESP
Sand
0.670**
0.197
0.588**
0.497**
0.854**
0.504**
0.554**
Silt
pH
EC
CEC
SAR
ESP
1
0.722**
0.751**
0.707**
0.849**
1
0.720**
0.702**
0.830**
1
0.709**
0.795**
1
0.918**
1
0.595**
0.004
0.099
0.447**
0.045
0.023
1
0.642**
0.407**
0.334*
0.486**
0.569**
Table 4
Descriptive statistics of some soil properties.
Soil properties
Min.
Max.
Mean
Median
SD
CV (%)
Clay (%)
Silt (%)
pH
EC (dS m 1)
SAR (mmol L 1)1/2
CEC (cmolc kg 1)
ESP (%)
21.24
15.28
8.00
0.24
0.16
17.90
0.43
39.60
31.28
9.01
0.70
4.95
28.40
26.62
34.38
24.40
8.38
0.43
1.67
23.26
7.50
34.88
24.56
8.32
0.43
1.25
23.10
3.85
4.20
3.88
0.28
0.12
1.22
2.34
7.74
12.22
15.90
3.32
26.80
73.23
10.07
103.24
ECe 12:49
0:19
7
8
Skewness
1.05
0.50
1.00
0.39
0.75
0.14
1.03
Kurtosis
1.98
0.07
0.11
0.53
0.37
0.46
0.13
308
is given by the geostatistical range of the semi-variogram (LopezGranados et al., 2002). The values of the range varied from 106 m
for CEC to 1282 m for the clay content which indicated that the
grid spacing (100 m) was adequate for the characterization of the
spatial variability of soil properties. Big differences among ranges
309
Table 5
The parameters of isotropic semi-variogram models of soil properties.
*
**
Variable
Best-fit model
Nugget (C0)
Sill (C0 + C)
Range (A0)
(m)
Nugget/sill
(%)
R2
RSS
Clay (%)
Silt (%)
sian
pH
EC (dS m 1)
CEC (cmolc kg 1)
SAR (mmolc L 1)1/2
ESP (%)
Gaussian
Gaus
8.96
Spherical
Spherical
Exponential
Spherical
Spherical
14.20
49.40
1282
28.7
1.874
0.901**
6.61
1.71
0.968**
0.987**
0.826*
0.907*
0.972**
10 2
2.28
3.36
0.44
3.24
6.12
24.95
2.62 10
2.76 10
0.57
10 3
10 3
4
3
525
1.40 10 3
1.49 10 2
5.51
10.38 10 1
2.52
35.9
645
314
106
450
458
1.766
18.7
18.5
10.4
0.10
0.04
**
1
1.754
1.837
1.875
1.666
1.643
10
10
10
10
310
Fig. 3. The distribution maps of clay (a), silt (b), pH (c), EC (d), CEC (e), SAR (f), and ESP (g) in the investigated area.
of wheat and alternate cultivation of wheat and sugar beet irrigated with non-saline-sodic water. Furthermore, the values of
pH, EC, and concentrations of cations and anions in the solution
phase at the end of simulation were close to the values of these
Unit
Quantity
Sand
Silt
Clay
Textural class
pH
EC
Soluble Ca2+
Soluble Mg2+
Soluble K+
Soluble Na+
Soluble HCO3
Soluble Cl
Exchangeable Ca2+
Exchangeable Mg2+
Exchangeable K+
Exchangeable Na+
CEC
ESP
SAR
CaCO3
%
%
%
dS m 1
mM
mM
mM
mM
mM
mM
cmolc kg
cmolc kg
cmolc kg
cmolc kg
cmolc kg
%
(mM)1/2
%
39.48
22.92
37.60
Clay loam
9.01
0.62
0.50
0.20
0.40
3.26
1.20
2.80
11.60
6.20
1.50
7.00
26.30
26.60
3.90
15.00
1
1
1
1
1
pH, EC, and soluble cations and anions were determined in the 1:5 soil to water
extract.
results confirmed that a saline-sodic soil can be modified to a nonsaline-sodic one by changing irrigation water quality. In addition, the
application of this type of water led ESP to fall below 5% at the end of
the first cropping season (data not shown).
The simulation results of the application of saline-sodic water
indicated that the composition of the soil solution phase was similar to the chemical composition of irrigation water used for
20 years. Sugar beet is a sodium-tolerant crop and requires Na +
to complete the life cycle. However, due to the high water requirement, the cultivation of this crop cannot be considered as an
appropriate strategy to avoid or to reduce the soil sodification as
a result of the application of sodic waters. Hence, when the application of sodic water is inevitable, crops with lower water requirements or rainfed crops can be used in the crop rotation. The quality
of irrigation water used in this simulation was according to an
investigation by Jalali (2007b) on the well water samples using
for irrigation of agricultural lands of Tajarak. In fact, the minimum
and maximum values for pH, EC, and concentrations of cations and
anions reported by Jalali (2007b) were used as two completely different types of the irrigation water quality in this study. An
insignificant change in ESP after a-20 year application of salinesodic irrigation water showed that the concentration of Na + in this
type of irrigation water which corresponded to the highest concentration of Na+ in well water samples of Tajarak (Jalali, 2007b) was
nearly similar to the value in the composition of water used for the
irrigation of this soil in real conditions. However, the initial EC e of
the soil was less than the final ECe after 20 years of the application
311
of saline-sodic water. So, it can be concluded that the concentrations of other cations and anions in irrigation water used in this
soil in real conditions are less than the values considered in the
simulation. In other words, despite an unremarkable change in
the sodicity of this soil, the salinity problem has significantly been
increased. Furthermore, the results indicated that in all four scenarios considered in the simulation, Ca2+ was the dominant cation
in the exchange complex, whereas K + had the lowest contribution
among exchangeable cations. The comparison of Tables 6 and 7
indicates that the application of both saline-sodic and nonsaline-sodic irrigation waters and both cropping patterns led to
an increase in the exchangeable Ca 2+ but a decrease in the
exchangeable Mg2+. The extent of increment in the exchangeable
Ca2+ was greater after the long-term application of non-salinesodic water. In addition, the exchangeable K + and Na+ declined
sharply after 20 years of the irrigation with non-saline-sodic water
in both cropping patterns. Since the composition of this type water
was K+ free (Table 1), potassium sulfate fertilizer was added only
enough to provide the crop requirement. Therefore, the mix of this
water and the soil solution phase caused a decreased soluble K +
concentration. Hence, in order to establish a balance between
soluble and exchangeable phases, the exchangeable K + was
released to compensate the reduced concentration of this cation
in the solution phase.
The saturation indices of aragonite, calcite, and dolomite after
the application of saline-sodic water were positive indicating the
precipitation of these minerals in the soil due to greater activity
products of calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate, and carbonate ions
in the soil solution than solubility products of these minerals. On
the other hand, because of low concentrations of cations and
anions in the non-saline-sodic irrigation water, the saturation
indices of these minerals and the others which may be present in
arid and semi-arid areas, e.g., gypsum, anhydrite, halite, and sylvite
were all negative representing their dissolution in the soil.
Hammecker et al. (2009) simulated the evolution of the soil solution in irrigated rice soils over 60 cropping cycles using PHREEQC.
They indicated that the long-term application of non-saline-sodic
waters led to a decrease in the concentration of Ca 2+ in the solution
phase as calcite precipitated. So, the exchange complex reacted to
compensate this trend, providing Ca2+ to the soil solution. Consequently, the proportion of exchangeable Ca 2+ decreased and
exchangeable Mg2+ became dominant. However, simulation results
in our study showed that the saturation index of calcite was negative when non-saline-sodic water was applied, so, the exchangeable Ca2+
increased in comparison with the initial value.
Furthermore, the concentration of Ca 2+ in the composition of
non-saline-sodic irrigation water was more likely to be greater
than that in the composition of irrigation water applied in real
conditions.
According to results of this study, it can be said that the quality
of irrigation water in the north east part of the study area is needed
to be changed by replacing or mixing with good-quality ones in
Table 7
Some chemical properties of the saline-sodic soil after 20 years of the cultivation and irrigation with saline-sodic and non-saline-sodic waters.
Soluble cations and anions
Scenariosa
1
2
3
4
pH
6.78
8.27
6.78
8.29
EC
dS m
0.19
8.64
0.13
9.30
Ca2+
mM
Mg2+
mM
0.76
8.90
0.66
9.98
0.30
8.13
0.25
9.02
K+
mM
0.14
4.24
0.10
4.29
Exchangeable cations
Na+
Cl
mM
mM
0.36
60.18
0.15
64.86
SO2
mM
0.36
48.88
0.00
53.38
HCO3
mM
0.07
18.15
0.10
19.90
0.30
11.48
0.30
11.92
SAR
(mM)1/2
Ca2+
cmolc kg
0.35
14.58
0.16
14.88
21.71
12.18
21.98
12.14
Mg2+
cmolc kg
4.24
5.61
4.09
5.55
K+
cmolc kg
0.20
1.82
0.15
1.74
Na+
cmolc kg
0.13
6.68
0.06
6.84
ESP
%
0.50
25.40
0.23
26.03
a
This column indicates the different scenarios considered in simulations as follows: 20 years of (1) the consecutive cultivation of wheat irrigated with non-saline-sodic
water, (2) the consecutive cultivation of wheat irrigated with saline-sodic water, (3) the alternate cultivation of wheat and sugar beet irrigated with non-saline-sodic water, and
(4) the alternate cultivation of wheat and sugar beet irrigated with saline-sodic water.
312
Gee, G.W., Bauder, J.W., 1986. Particle-size analysis. In: Klute, A. (Ed.), Methods of
Soil Analysis. Part 1, 2nd ed. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, pp.
383-411.
Gu, F.X., Zhang, Y.D., Pan, X.L., 2003. Interaction of land use change and spatial and
temporal dynamics of soil moisture and salinity in arid land. Acta Geogr. Sin. 58
(6),845-853.
Hammecker, C., van Asten, P., Marlet, S., Maeght, J., Poss, R., 2009. Simulating the
evolution of soil solutions in irrigated rice soils in the Sahel. Geoderma 150,
129-140.
He, Y., DeSutter, T., Hopkins, D., Jia, X., Wysocki, D.A., 2013. Predicting EC e of the
saturated paste extract from value of EC1:5. Can. J. Soil Sci. 93, 585-594.
Isaaks, E.H., Srivastava, R.M., 1989. An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. Oxford
Univ Press, New York, 561p.
Jalali, M., 2007a. Spatial variability in potassium release among calcareous soils of
western Iran. Geoderma 140, 42-51.
Jalali, M., 2007b. Salinization of groundwater in arid and semi-arid zones: an
example from Tajarak, western Iran. Environ. Geol. 52, 1133-1149.
Lee, B.D., Graham, R.C., Laurent, T.E., Amrhein, C., Creasy, R.M., 2001. Spatial
distributions of soil chemical conditions in a serpentinitic wetland and
surrounding landscape. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65, 1183-1196.
Liu, G., Yang, X., 2008. Spatial variability analysis of soil properties within a field. In:
Li, D. (Ed.), Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture. China, pp.
1341-1344.
Liu, W., Su, Y., Yang, R., Yang, Q., Fan, G., 2011. Temporal and spatial variability of
soil organic matter and total nitrogen in a typical oasis cropland ecosystem in
arid region of Northwest China. Environ. Earth Sci. 64, 2247-2257.
Lopez-Granados, F., Jurado-Exposito, M., Atenciano, S., Garcia-Ferrer, A., Sanchez de
la Orden, M., Garcia-Torres, L., 2002. Spatial variability of agricultural soil
parameters in southern Spain. Plant Soil 246, 97-105.
Newman, S., Reddy, K.R., DeBusk, W.F., Wang, Y., Shih, G., Fisher, M.M., 1997. Spatial
distribution of soil nutrients in a northern Everglades Marsh: water
conservation area. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61, 1275-1283.
Oster, J.D., van Schilfgaarde, J., Russso, D., 1984. Irrigation management and field
salt balance. In: Shainberg, I., Shalhevet, J. (Eds.), Soil Salinity Under Irrigation:
Processes and Management. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 175-219.
Parkhurst, D.L., Appelo, C.A.J., 1999. Users Guide to PHREEQC (Version 2): A
Computer Program for Speciation, Batch-Reaction, One-Dimensional Transport,
and Inverse Geochemical Calculations. United States Geological Survey, Water
Resources Investigations Report 99-4259, Washington, DC, 326p.
Parkin, T.B., 1993. Spatial variability of microbial processes in soil: a review. J.
Environ. Qual. 22, 409-417.
QDAFF (Queensland Department of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Forestry), 2012.
Plants, Field crops and pastures, Broadacre field crops, Wheat production,
Wheat nutrition.
Ranjbar, F., Jalali, M., 2015. The effect of chemical and organic amendments on
sodium exchange equilibria in a calcareous sodic soil. Environ. Monit. Assess.
187 (11),683. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4894-7.
Rao, P.S.C., Wagenet, R.J., 1985. Spatial variability of pesticides in field soils:
methods for data analysis and consequences. Weed Sci. 33, 18-24. Rengel, Z.,
2003. Handbook of Soil Acidity. CRC Press, New York, 512p. Rowell, D.L., 1994. Soil
Science: Methods and Applications. Longman Group,
Harlow, 360p.
Shifteh Somee, B., Hassanpour, F., Ezani, A., Miremadi, S.R., Tabari, H., 2011.
Investigation of spatial variability and pattern analysis of soil properties in the
northwest of Iran. Environ. Earth Sci. 64, 1849-1864.
Truesdell, A.H., Jones, B.F., 1974. WATEQ, A computer program for calculating
chemical equilibria of natural waters. J. Res. US Geol. Surv. 2, 233-274.
Webster, R., 1985. Quantitative spatial analysis of soil in the field. Adv. Soil Sci. 3, 170.
Wei, Y.C., Bai, Y.L., Jin, J.Y., Zhang, F., Zhang, L.P., Liu, X.Q., 2009. Spatial variability of
soil chemical properties in the reclaiming marine foreland to Yellow Sea of
China. Agric. Sci. China 8 (9), 1103-1111.
Wilding, L.P., 1985. Spatial variability: its documentation, accommodation, and
implication to soil surveys. In: Nielsen, D.R., Bouma, J. (Eds.), Soil Spatial
Variability. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp. 166-194.
Xing-Yi, Z., Yue-Yu, S., Xu-Dong, Z., Kai, M., Herbert, S.J., 2007. Spatial variability of
nutrient properties in black soil of northeast China. Pedosphere 17 (1), 19-29.
Yan, J.F., Chen, X., Luo, G.P., Guo, Q.J., 2006. Temporal and spatial variability
response of groundwater level to land use/land cover change in oases of arid
areas. Chin. Sci. Bull. 51 (1), 51-59.