You are on page 1of 38

Correlations and

Copulas
Chapter 9

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.1

Coefficient of Correlation

The coefficient of correlation between two


variables V1 and V2 is defined as

E (V1V2 ) E (V1 ) E (V2 )


SD(V1 ) SD(V2 )
Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.2

Independence

V1 and V2 are independent if the


knowledge of one does not affect the
probability distribution for the other
f (V2 V1 x) f (V2 )

where f(.) denotes the probability density


function
Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.3

Independence is Not the Same as


Zero Correlation

Suppose V1 = 1, 0, or +1 (equally likely)


If V1 = -1 or V1 = +1 then V2 = 1
If V1 = 0 then V2 = 0
V2 is clearly dependent on V1 (and vice
versa) but the coefficient of correlation is
zero
Correlation measures linear dependence

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.4

Types of Dependence
E(Y\X )

E(Y\X )
X

(a)

(b)

E(Y\X )
X

(c)
Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.5

Monitoring Correlation

Variance rate per day of a variable:


variance of daily returns
Covariance rate per day between two
variables: covariance between the daily
returns of the variables

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.6

X i and Yi values of two variables X


and Y at the end of day i, the returns
on day i are :
X i X i 1
Yi Yi 1
xi
, yi
,
X i 1
Yi 1
Covariance rate on day n :
cov n E ( xn yn ) E ( xn ) E ( yn )
E ( xn y n )

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.7

Monitoring Correlation Between


Two Variables X and Y
Define
varx,n: daily variance rate of X estimated on day n-1
vary,n: daily variance rate of Y estimated on day n-1
covn: covariance rate estimated on day n-1
The correlation is
cov n
varx ,n vary ,n
Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.8

Monitoring Correlation continued


EWMA:

cov n cov n1 (1 ) xn1 yn1


GARCH(1,1)
cov n xn1 yn1 cov n1

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.9

Positive Finite Definite Condition


A variance-covariance matrix, W, is
internally consistent if the positive semidefinite condition

w Ww 0
T

holds for all N1 vectors w, W positivesemidefinite


Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.10

Example
The variance covariance matrix
1

0.9

0
1
0.9

0.9

0.9

is not internally consistent

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.11

V1 and V2 Bivariate Normal

Conditional on the value of V1, V2 is normal with


mean
V1 m1
E (V2 | V1 ) m 2 rs 2
s1
and standard deviation s 2 1 r2 where m1,, m2,
s1, and s2 are the unconditional means and SDs
of V1 and V2 and r is the coefficient of
correlation between V1 and V2

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.12

Multivariate Normal

Many variables can be handled


A variance-covariance matrix defines the
variances of and correlations between
variables
To be internally consistent a variancecovariance matrix must be positive
semidefinite

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.13

Generating Random Samples for


Monte Carlo Simulation

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.14

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.15

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.16

Factor Models

When there are N variables, Vi (i=1,2,..N),


in a multivariate normal distribution there
are N(N-1)/2 correlations
We can reduce the number of correlation
parameters that have to be estimated with
a factor model

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.17

Factor Models continued

If Ui have standard normal distributions we


can set

U i ai F 1 ai2 Z i

F and Zi have independent standard


normal distributions, ai is a constant
between -1 and +1, Zi uncorrelated with

each other and F


All the correlation between Ui and Uj
arises from F

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.18

Factor Models continued

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.19

M-factor Model
U i ai1 F1 ai 2 F2 ... aiM FM 1 a a a Z i
2
i1

2
i2

2
iM

F1 ,..., FM standardized uncorrelat ed normal variables , Z i


uncorrelat ed with each other and Fi ' s
M

rij aim a jm
m 1

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.20

Gaussian Copula Models:


Creating a correlation structure for variables that are not
normally distributed

Suppose we wish to define a correlation structure


between two variable V1 and V2 that do not have normal
distributions
We transform the variable V1 to a new variable U1 that
has a standard normal distribution on a percentile-topercentile basis.
We transform the variable V2 to a new variable U2 that
has a standard normal distribution on a percentile-topercentile basis.
U1 and U2 are assumed to have a bivariate normal
distribution

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.21

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.22

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.23

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.24

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.25

The Correlation structure between the


Vs is define by that between the Us

-0.2

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.2

-0.2

0.2

0.4

V2

V1

0.6

0.8

1.2

One-to-one
mappings

-6

-4

-2

-6

-4

-2

U2

U1
Correlation
Assumption

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.26

Other Copulas

Instead of a bivariate normal distribution


for U1 and U2 we can assume any other
joint distribution
One possibility is the bivariate Student t
distribution

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.27

5000 Random Samples from the


Bivariate Normal
5
4
3
2
1
0
-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

-1
-2
-3
-4
-5

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.28

5000 Random Samples from the


Bivariate Student t
10

0
-10

-5

10

-5

-10

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.29

Multivariate Gaussian Copula

We can similarly define a correlation


structure between V1, V2,Vn
We transform each variable Vi to a new
variable Ui that has a standard normal
distribution on a percentile-to-percentile
basis.
The Us are assumed to have a
multivariate normal distribution

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.30

Factor Copula Model


In a factor copula model the correlation
structure between the Us is generated by
assuming one or more factors.

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.31

Credit Default Correlation

The credit default correlation between two


companies is a measure of their tendency to
default at about the same time
Default correlation is important in risk
management when analyzing the benefits of
credit risk diversification
It is also important in the valuation of some
credit derivatives

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.32

The Model

We map the time to default for company i, Ti, to a


new variable Ui and assume

U i ai F 1 a Z i
2
i

where F and the Zi have independent standard


normal distributions
Define Qi as the cumulative probability distribution
of Ti
Prob(Ui<U) = Prob(Ti<T) when N(U) = Qi(T)

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.33

The Model continued

U a F
i

Prob(U i U F ) N
1 ai2

Hence
N 1 Q (T ) a F
i
i

Prob(Ti T F ) N

1 ai2
Assuming the Q' s and a' s are the same for all companies
N 1 Q(T ) r F
Prob(Ti T F ) N
(*)
1 r

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.34

The Model continued


For a large portfolio of loans, equation (*)
provides a good estimate of the prercentag e
of loans defaulting by time T conditional on F,
the default rate.
1

P(F N (Y )) Y , so there is a probability of Y


that the default rate will be greater than
N 1[Q (T )] r N 1 (Y )

1
r

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.35

The Model continued


We call the default rate that we are X%
certain will not be exceeded in time T,
the " worst - case default rate". Substitute
Y 1 - X into the previous expression, then
N 1[Q(T )] r N 1 ( X )

WCDR (T , X ) N

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.36

Example

Suppose that a bank has a total of $100


million of retail exposures. The one-year
probability of default averages 2% and the
recovery rate averages 60%. The copula
correlation parameter is estimated as 0.1.
N 1 (0.02) 0.1N 1 (0.999)

WCDR(1,0.999) N

0
.
1

0.128
Losses in this case are
100 0.128 (1 0.6) $5.13 million

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.37

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.38

You might also like