Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2
Seminar Document- REDECON 2010
K.S. Vipin,
Research scholar,
Department of Civil Engineering,
Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bangalore.
email - ks.vipin@gmail.com,
Abstract
The natural hazards like earthquakes can neither be predicted nor be
prevented. The only possible bay is to mitigate the seismic hazard. Till
now lots of research has gone into identifying the source mechanism
and analysis of wave propogation in seismic bed rocks. However, when
these seismic waves travel through the overlying soil its properties will
get modified. There has not been much attention given to these
aspects of seismic hazard analysis. However in the recent decades lots
of research work was done in the area and it has led to a new branch
in engineering Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. This paper
presents an over view of some of the aspects of earthquake
geotechnical engineering along with two case studies.
Introduction
Analysis of the past earthquake damages clearly shows that the
damages due to an earthquake and its severity are controlled mainly
by three factors i.e., earthquake source and path characteristics; local
geological and geotechnical characteristics; structural design and
construction features. Seismic ground response at a site is strongly
influenced by local geological and soil conditions. The exact
information of the geological, geomorphological and geotechnical data
along with seismotectonic details are necessary to evaluate the ground
response. The geometry of the subsoil structure, the soil type, the
lateral discontinuities and the surface topography will influence the site
response of a particular location. In order to get a better estimate of
these factors, the details of the soil profile have to be collected using
the geotechnical or geomorphological methods. The severe effects of
site amplification were reported during the Bhuj earthquake in 2001.
The two of the most important geotechnical aspects of seismic
hazard is the site response and liquefaction. When the seismic waves
pass through the overlying soil, it may get amplified or de-amplified.
This phenomenon is known as the site response. The term liquefaction
can be defined, in a broad manner, as the loss of strength of saturated
1
Seminar Document- REDECON 2010
2
Seminar Document- REDECON 2010
Site Class D
Site Class C
Site Class B
Site Class A
Rock
0.40
0.35
Sa (g)
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
3
Seminar Document- REDECON 2010
0.50
Site Class C
Site Class B
0.40
Site Class A
Sa (g)
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
Period of oscillation (Sec)
1.50
1.75
2.00
Site Class D
Site Class C
0.4
Site Class B
Site Class A
Sa (g)
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
Period of oscillation (Sec)
1.50
1.75
2.00
4
Seminar Document- REDECON 2010
0.5
Soft Soil
0.4
Medium Soil
Rock and Hard Soil
Sa (g)
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
Period of oscillation (Sec)
1.50
1.75
2.00
5
Seminar Document- REDECON 2010
7
Seminar Document- REDECON 2010
4.
5.
6.
9
Seminar Document- REDECON 2010