You are on page 1of 1

A "WikiProject" is a group of contributors who want to work together as a team to improve Wikipedia.

These groups
often focus on a specific topic area (for example, women's history), a specific location or a specific kind of task (for
example, checking newly created pages). The English Wikipedia currently has over 2,000 WikiProjects and activity
varies.[241]
In 2007, in preparation for producing a print version, the English Wikipedia introduced an assessment scale of the
quality of articles.[242] Articles are rated by Wikiprojects. The range of quality classes begins with "Stub" (very short
pages), followed by "Start", "C" and "B" (in increasing order of quality). Community peer review is needed for the
article to enter one of the highest quality classes: either "A", "good article" or the highest, "featured article". Of the
about 4.4 million articles and lists assessed as of March 2015, a little more than 5000 (0.12%) are featured articles, and
a little less than 2000 (0.04%) are featured lists. One featured article per day, as selected by editors, appears on the main
page of Wikipedia.[243][244]
The articles can also be rated as per "importance" as judged by a Wikiproject. Currently, there are 5 importance
categories: "low", "mid", "high", "top", and "???" for unclassified/unsure level. For a particular article, different
Wikiprojects may assign different importance levels.
The Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team has developed a table (shown below) that displays data of all rated articles
by quality and importance, on the English Wikipedia. If an article or list receives different ratings by two or more
Wikiprojects, then the highest rating is used in the table, pie-charts, and bar-chart. The software regularly autoupdates the data.
Researcher Giacomo Poderi found that articles tend to reach featured status via the intensive work of a few editors.[245]
A 2010 study found unevenness in quality among featured articles and concluded that the community process is
ineffective in assessing the quality of articles.[246]

You might also like