You are on page 1of 2

CP:

My opponents say that japan will say yes to the counter plan, but extend our
Green 10 evidence saying that they will absolutely not. Our author, green, is
senior adviser and Japan Chair at CSIS and is concurrently on the faculty at
Georgetown University. He served on the staff of the National Security Council
from 2001 through 2005 and was special assistant to the president for
national security affairs and senior director for Asian affairs from January
2004 to December 2005. You dont get much more qualified than that, so you
HAVE to accept OUR evidence here.

Ad 1:
We absolutely touched the advantage 1. Check my flows, we addressed the
following multiple times, but it seems that you fail to accept this. My
opponents say that war with China would be good, but war with China would
absolutely NOT be good AT ALL. Wiping China off the face of the planet would
absolutely tank our economy and be awful for everybody.

DA:
My opponents say that not consulting Japan would destroy our alliance and
they would never want to see us again. That is simply not true. Japan
wouldnt break off relations with one of their closest allies just because we
didnt tell them that we were going to, quite frankly, save the world. Because
of this, you must drop all impacts that they have for the DA

They are completely abusive in saying that we know absolutely nothing about
perms, that is ridiculous and abusive.

Ad 2:
My opponents say that climate change will lead to extinction, and we never
said it wouldnt. However, extend our Tao 16 and Lieven 12 card saying that
continuously surveying china would lead to GLOBAL NUKE WAR as a result of
high tension which could happen at literally any second so our impact will
happen, much faster, so we win time frame by hundreds of years, the world
would be decimated and nothing would live, so we win on magnitude, and
there is absolutely no coming back from extinction, so we win on reversibility.
Thus you absolutely must flow impact to the affirmative

Plan:

Not pressure
Engagement doesnt fail, we engage all the time

We win this round based on the fact that their counterplan doesnt work at
all, weve proven them wrong on both advantages, weve totally debunked
their disadvantage, and their impact is far inferior to ours in multiple ways.

You might also like