PREPARED

BY
CHECKED
BY
APPROVED
BY
CERTIFIED
(PTT)
REV.
DATE
NO.
D1
18-Feb-08
D2
18-Jul-08

NA

PTT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

ONSHORE COMPRESSOR STATION 4
PROJECT

NA
REVISED
BY

APPROVED
BY
NA
NA

DESCRIPTION
ISSUED FOR ITB
REVISION ISSUED FOR ITB

SPECIFICATION FOR
3-D CAD MODEL REVIEW SPECIFICATION
SPC-0804.02-50.91 REV D1
TOTAL 22 PAGES

AREA CODE OF SITE LOCATION

GENERAL AREA: 010
PTT PLC. CONTRACT NO.

PTT PLC. PROJECT NO.

0804.02

3D CAD
MODEL REVIEW
SPECIFICATION

PTT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

SPC-0804.02-50.91
PAGE: 2 OF 22
REV: D2

CONTENTS
SECTION
1.0

GENERAL ........................................................................................... 3

2.0

3D-CAD MODEL.................................................................................. 3

3.0

STATUS OF ELECTRONIC MODEL......................................................... 4

4.0

ORGANIZATION OF A MODEL REVIEW.................................................. 6

5.0

ARCHIVING ........................................................................................ 7

APPENDIX I : Model Review Report ................................................................. 8

APPENDIX II : Checklist for the Model Review .................................................. 9

3D CAD
MODEL REVIEW
SPECIFICATION

1.0

GENERAL

1.1

Scope

PTT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

SPC-0804.02-50.91
PAGE: 3 OF 22
REV: D2

This document specifies requirement and gives recommendations for 3D-CAD

(Three Dimensional Computer Aided Design) visualization and use of 3D-CAD
features.
This document governs the procedure for conducting internal reviews (informal)
and PTT (scheduled, with PTT) formal model reviews.
PTT model reviews shall be conducted in the CONTRACTOR (hereinafter
referred to as CONTRACTOR) offices.
1.2

Related Specification
The related specifications:
1)

SPC-0804.02-50.90 : 3D-CAD Modeling

2.0

3D-CAD MODEL

2.1

General
The 3D-CAD model is a collection of graphical data which describes the facilities
of the station for visualization purposes. The 3D-CAD model can be accessed
via Review Reality (Aveva, PDMS). The graphical data is often an integral part
of an engineering database supporting the design process. An important
advantage of a 3D-CAD engineering database is the possibility to maintain
consistency between the produced documents and to assist the co-ordination of
work among different disciplines. It enables the CONTRACTOR to integrate the
different design stages and the different subjects, such as piping, foundations,
structures, equipment, electrics and instrumentation into one 3D-CAD model.
Typical deliverables of a 3D-CAD system include:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)

2.2

Detailed engineering drawings such as plan and elevation drawings,

birds-eye views, etc.
Piping Isometrics.
Material Take-off (Bills of Material).
Shaded perspective views separated in logical areas, e.g. units (model
review).
Reports such as line lists, instrument data, interference checks (clashes).

Design Criteria Aspects

The CAD system will be structured in such a way that all disciplines involved
can check whether engineering criteria have been met with respect to safety,
constructability, operability and maintenance. This should include accessibility
for maintenance and fire fighting, location of valves, convenience of
construction, process instrumentation, routing of the piping adequate for the
process, location of emergency shut-down stations, proper and safe location of

3D CAD
MODEL REVIEW
SPECIFICATION

PTT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

SPC-0804.02-50.91
PAGE: 4 OF 22
REV: D2

vents and drains, location of low point drain, location of fire protection and firefighting equipment and escape routes.
2.3

Instruction
The 3D-CAD model shall be used for training and instruction of plant operators,
construction staff, maintenance staff and emergency responsible organization.

2.4

Model Review Features with 3D-CAD Technology

The required features shall be agreed between the PTT and the CONTRACTOR
before the set-up of the 3D-CAD system and engineering database is started.
Presently, the application of 3D-CAD technology allows the following:
1)
Definition of classified 3D-shapes to indicate envelopes for:
- Safety.
- Access / escape corridors.
- Head room clearances
- Valve hand wheels.
- Reach / clearances for activities.
2)
Access envelopes for:
- Maintenance equipment.
- Operability.
3)
Identification of deviations from normal engineering practices.
4)
Modeling of foundations and underground systems.
5)
Consistency between the 3D-CAD model and the P&ID (Piping &
Instrument Diagram).

2.5

Color Code for 3D-CAD Model

Where practical the colors used in the 3D-CAD model shall be in accordance
with 3-D Cad Modeling (SPC 0804.02-50.90) Section 4 Color Code for 3D Cad
Model.

3.0

STATUS OF ELECTRONIC MODEL

3.1

General
The full scope of the model is described in Engineering Standard SPC 0804.0250.90. The model shall meet 1/3 model review and 2/3 model review content
prior to frozen. The 3D-CAD model used during the formal reviews shall be a
frozen copy of the live engineering data base being used for development of the
project. Any necessary changes shall be agreed upon and immediately recorded
and shall be marked with tag numbers, wherever possible, to avoid
misunderstanding.

3.2

Internal Reviews
Internal model reviews (multi-discipline) shall be conducted regularly. All
comments should be resolved prior to all PTT model reviews. Use Appendix IV
Readiness Assessment for Model Review during the internal review.

3D CAD
MODEL REVIEW
SPECIFICATION

3.3

PTT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

SPC-0804.02-50.91
PAGE: 5 OF 22
REV: D2

1/3 and 2/3 Model Reviews

The models for all areas shall be reviewed jointly by the PTT and
CONTRACTOR. The extent of each model review area shall be defined in a
model review index for above ground areas. The model review agenda together
with the model review area index shall illustrate the geographical coverage of
each review.
Reviews of the model should be respectively done when the model is 1/3 and
2/3 complete. But these reviews shall be scheduled so as to reflect milestone
progress as conceptual and finalized detail design advances. The items listed
below should have been completed for these model reviews:

3.3.1 1/3 Model Review

The model minimum content for the 1/3 electronic model review shall be:
(1)
8 and larger piping with in-line instruments.
(2)
Structures, Pipe racks (primary steel and concrete).
(3)
Location of access roads.
(4)
Location al all mechanical equipment.
(5)
Nozzle orientation of major equipments such inlet filter scrubber,
compressor etc.
(6)
Packaged unit location.
(7)
Escape routes defined and marked.
(8)
Stationary foundations.
(9)
Electrical and instrument main cable route on pipe rack.
(10) Building in outline, e.g. control, substation and warehouse buildings.
(11) Dropout, bundle pulling and laydown areas.
(12) Underground main piping lines of Oily drain, Fire water.
3.3.2 2/3 Model Review
The model minimum content for the 2/3 electronic model review shall be:
(1)
The actions resulting from the 1/3 model review.
(2)
90% of pipelines 3 diameter and above.
(3)
50% of pipelines 2 diameter.
(4)
Major and special pipe supports.
(5)
All lines defined as stress critical.
(6)
Packaged unit orientation.
(7)
Orientation of ladders, stairs, platforms on vessels and columns.
(8)
Utility station, Eye bath and safety shower locations.
(9)
Fire fighting equipment (hydrants, monitors).
(10) Underground branch piping with drain funnel or connection to above
ground piping.
(11) Above ground instrument and electrical tray routing.
(12) Local control panels and Junction boxes.
(13) Permanent cranes and hoisting beams.
(14) Concrete slabs and paving.
(15) All foundations and footings.
(16) In-line instruments on modeled lines.

3D CAD
MODEL REVIEW
SPECIFICATION

PTT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

4.0

ORGANIZATION OF A MODEL REVIEW

4.1

Participants

SPC-0804.02-50.91
PAGE: 6 OF 22
REV: D2

The following discipline shall review the electronic model and related
documents and shall contribute as required:

4.2

(1)

CONTRACTOR
Process and Piping Engineer, Project Engineer, Review System
Operator, Comments Writer: Full time
Instrument, Electrical, Static and Mechanical : Part time.

(2)

PTT representatives

3D-CAD Model Review

4.2.1 Collection documents to support the review

The CONTRACTOR shall give notice (approximately 2 weeks) before the review
date, inform the type of review and ensure that the necessary documents to
support the review are available at the time of the notice to PTT. These shall
include but not limited to.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)

Plot Plan
Critical Line List
Piping GA/Layout
P&ID
PDMS Key Plan
Equipment List
SP Item List
P&ID Showing status of model
Model Review Check List

4.2.2 Clash
At least one clash run shall be carried out on the relevant files and clashes
cleared before reviewing each area.
4.2.3 Review execution
(1)

Check the model against the latest issue of the P&ID.

(2)

Follow the line-up systematically and pay strict attention to details, since
many accidents are caused by seemingly minor items. Start, for
instance, with the unit feed system, then proceed to internal
circulation and product rundown circuits and conclude with a check on
safety, fire fighting and utility systems.

(3)

Mark on the P&ID the lines that come under paragraph 3.3.1 & 3.3.2,
equipment and instrumentation which have been checked and accepted.

3D CAD
MODEL REVIEW
SPECIFICATION

PTT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

SPC-0804.02-50.91
PAGE: 7 OF 22
REV: D2

(4)

Indicate the points which have not been accepted, to facilitate the review
in follow-up checks.

(5)

Ensure that a modification is proposed whether it suits its purpose, and

does not conflict with other requirements. Ensure that it is practical,
safe, in accordance with the P&ID and also economic. If in doubt, consult
the appropriate specialists of other disciplines.

(6)

Use Appendix II and III during the model review. Note that the checklist
is not exhaustive and shall not overrule sound judgment.

4.2.4 Handling of Comments

After each review, the team shall decide if the level of composition of the model
is in line with the requirements defined in paragraph 3.4. Shortcomings in the
degree of completion shall be highlighted and, after correction, checked in the
next review, or in an additional review depending on the degree of
incompleteness.
The 3D-CAD tools shall have sequence tagging facilities to describe the
comments given by review team. Comment tag shall include comments line
number, equipment number and sufficient detail to aid understanding. In
addition, each tag must be recorded as screen snapshot. The text of each
tagged shall be as complete and unambiguous as possible to avoid confusion in
a later stage of the review process. The team leader shall co-ordinate the tag
handling process. The tag items shall be reviewed with the PTT within 2 weeks
and a record shall be produced showing which tag items will be implemented or
rejected, with clearly reasoning. The relevant specialist will consult the solutions
before a tag item is deleted or significantly changed. PTT comment shall not be
deleted prior to formal agreement. Screen dumps of comments give rise to
PROJECT SPECIFICATION changes shall be confirmed by Application of
Deviation. The rolling issue of review report shall be issued on two week basis.
Formal report shall be issued on monthly basis.
5.0

ARCHIVING
All model and comments from Model review shall be recorded in Model Report
and maintain in the Model Review Workstation through the life of project. After
Mechanical completion, all models and comments from model review including
comments snap shots, resolved comments snap shots shall be kept in the CD
ROM and handed over to PTT.

3D CAD
MODEL REVIEW
SPECIFICATION

PTT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

SPC-0804.02-50.91
PAGE: 8 OF 22
REV: D2

APPENDIX I : Model Review Report

Project No. & Name:
PTT:

Review Status
1/3

Review Area (or Unit):

Page No.
Tag
No.

Category

Reviewed by
PTT
CONTRACTOR

Review Date:
Review Summary

Action Taken

Action by

- Category Code
S : Safety, M : Maintenance, O : Operation, E : Good engineering practice,
P : Not complied with project spec. / standard

Due
date

Sign

3D CAD
MODEL REVIEW
SPECIFICATION

PTT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

SPC-0804.02-50.91
PAGE: 9 OF 22
REV: D2

APPENDIX II : Checklist for the Model Review

SUMMARY
Check points in this appendix are given for the review of a 3D-CAD model. The
checklist will help to improve quality and to identify and eliminate potentially hazardous
situations. The checklist is comprehensive but should not be considered to be fully
exhaustive.

3D CAD
MODEL REVIEW
SPECIFICATION

1.1

PTT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

SPC-0804.02-50.91
PAGE: 10 OF 22
REV: D2

General Safety and Operability

No.

Checkpoint

Consider all equipment with respect to its economic aspects. This

includes safety, operability and maintenance as well as
accessibility. This applies in particular for accessibility to pump
suction and discharge valves and motor operated valves.

Check that there are no obstructions in the path of escape access.

Ensure the access is directed away from a process area. All
staircases should route at ground level to an open area to allow an
unobstructed escape access.

Check proper escape access from elevated equipment and all

platforms. Check that at least two exits are provided on every
platform which is regularly in use by operators. This applies for
platforms at structures, around and underneath air-cooled heat
exchangers, vessels, on top of furnaces and frequently used
working areas by maintenance.

Check that there are no head bumpers, shin splitters or tripping

hazards.

Check proper smooth connections between platforms and table

tops.

Are emergency/smothering steam header at a safe distance from

the equipment to be protected, e.g. in hydrogen service or
furnaces?

Check that operators manipulating drain valves of open drain

systems can see the drained effluent. Provide funnel as required.

Check that water seal trapped in goosenecks can be displaced by

hydrocarbons, i.e. ensuring enough static head of oil is available.
Check if utility stations have been provided at the main operational
platforms,

Remark

3D CAD
MODEL REVIEW
SPECIFICATION

PTT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

SPC-0804.02-50.91
PAGE: 11 OF 22
REV: D2

10

Have platforms been provided at place where work is expected

during shutdowns? Consider also access to spading at those places
where scaffolding would be a nuisance, expensive or unsafe. (In
such cases install additional platforms or adapt existing platforms).

11

Check that steam exhaust cannot cause personnel hazards, either

from spraying droplets of hot water or by wet surfaces.

12

Check that inlet valves of silencers on steam line for warming up or

start up are operable in a safe manner without risk of pouring hot
condensate from the silencer outlet on the operator below.

13

Are hot lines or other hot surfaces near walkways properly

insulated for personnel protection?

14

Check that the suction of the air blower of an analyzer container is

taken from a non-hazardous area.

3D CAD
MODEL REVIEW
SPECIFICATION

1.2

PTT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

SPC-0804.02-50.91
PAGE: 12 OF 22
REV: D2

Fire Prevention and Safety Equipment

No.

Checkpoint

Can firewater headers be safely accessed?

Check the accessibility of the unit for manual fire-fighting operations.

Does fire truck cover all areas while one road is blocked?

Can a fire truck maneuver easily?

Hydrocarbon process pumps should not be placed underneath pipe

racks or air-cooled heat exchangers.

Do firewater spray systems or monitors properly protect hot pumps?

Check location of fire hydrants, fixed, mobile and portable fire

fighting equipment. Consider this in relation to the equipment to be
protected and the likelihood of a fire.

Check whether the layout of water spray lines and nozzles are
adequate to cool vessels, if required.

Are firewater deluge manifolds safely located in relation to the

equipment they protect?

10

Check if emergency showers and eye bath showers are strategically

located, e.g. near equipment handling caustic, ammonia and
aggressive chemicals.

11

Check the location for fire and gas detectors for their coverage.

Remark

3D CAD
MODEL REVIEW
SPECIFICATION

1.3

PTT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

SPC-0804.02-50.91
PAGE: 13 OF 22
REV: D2

Piping
No.

Checkpoint

Is piping entering and leaving the plant logically grouped together at

the battery limit?

All valves, spading positions, flushing and draining and instrument

connections properly located, in relation to normal operations as well
as shutdown? Take special care of manifolds and large control
valves.

If spectacle blinds are fitted, are they accessible and can they be
turned safely? Consider additional or adapted platforms where
applicable.

Has the number of flanges been minimized? This is valid especially in

systems above auto-ignition temperature and with toxic materials.

Check the elevation of piping and its clearance to walkways and

maintenance equipment (e.g. lifting equipment). Avoid head
bumpers.

Are start-up and circulation lines short? Have dead ends been
avoided? Can the system be flushed and drained?

Do vapor lines, including steam lines, freely branch off from the top
of main lines?

Can piping subject to thermal expansion indeed expand? Check that

nozzles and branches (e.g. instruments) on expanding piping do not
touch obstructions, such as support beams.

10

Look for pockets in vapor lines where condensation may occur. Has
external heating been applied on those pockets which cannot be
avoided?

Check for adequate space and jacking facilities to remove manhole

covers, especially for those with inserts.

Remark

3D CAD
MODEL REVIEW
SPECIFICATION

PTT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

SPC-0804.02-50.91
PAGE: 14 OF 22
REV: D2

11

Have dead end sections been avoided, e.g. in steam and water lines
and in lines with high pour point material?

12

Has piping been designed for ease of drainage and/or venting?

13

Do compressor suction lines slope towards the knockout drum? Each

low point of the compressor suction should have a low point drain.

14

Check the position of eccentric reducers. Normally the straight part

is on the bottom of horizontal lines, except in pump suction lines
where vapor pockets may cause cavitations of the pump.

15

Check that small bore cooling water lines branch off from the top of
header.

16

Are stripping steam lines short and horizontal, or sloping from the
last valve?

17

Check absorber gas feed inlets for pockets near the inlet to avoid
absorbent entering the gas inlet line.

18

Is piping with instrument connections positioned such that these

connections are easily accessible? Is the measurement point in the
correct process location?

19

Is there adequate straight length upstream and downstream of a

flow meter or orifice flange?

20

Is there sufficient space around an ultrasonic flow meter to allow

proper installation of the flow meter sensor in the horizontal plane
without touching adjacent lines?

21

Have special provisions for commissioning and initial start-up been

properly addressed? (e.g. temporary large blow spools and
silencers).

3D CAD
MODEL REVIEW
SPECIFICATION

1.4

PTT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

SPC-0804.02-50.91
PAGE: 15 OF 22
REV: D2

Valves
No.
1

Checkpoint
Have valves in pipe bridges been avoided as much as possible?

Check for the presence of chain-operated valves (only allowed in

exceptional cases).

3.

Check that there are no valves installed with the stem pointing
downward, except flare lines.

Are hand wheels easily accessible for operation and not

obstructing walkways or platforms? (Consider the stems,
especially when in the open position).

Are valves operable from grade level or floor?

Are valves that need frequent attention easily accessible?

Check for valves in vertical lines which may accumulate liquid

(e.g. condensate).

Remark

3D CAD
MODEL REVIEW
SPECIFICATION

1.5

PTT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

SPC-0804.02-50.91
PAGE: 16 OF 22
REV: D2

Pumps and Compressors

No.

Checkpoint

Is valve around pumps and compressors accessible and

operable?

Can the pump and compressor safely be handled for

maintenance such as filter pulling? Pay special attention to
spading-off possibilities and draining of the casing and the
strainer.

Is removal of the pump and the electric motor practical?

Is the flow in suction piping smooth? Check for the required

straight length of the suction line for double-suction pumps.

Have high points in pump suction lines been avoided?

For pumps with a vertical suction line and an elevated strainer,

check that opening of such a strainer dose not result in spilling
flammable liquid and possible ignition on nearby hot surface.

Is location of the local compressor panel logical?

Is there space for crane to enter and maneuver?

With regards to swing check valve in pump discharge side, is it

considered avoiding slamming motion of valve disc due to its
gravitational weight? Comparatively large size swing check
valve shall be recommended to install in horizontal side to avoid
slamming.

10

Checked whether the permanent strainer can be easily removed

when required for maintenance.

Remark

3D CAD
MODEL REVIEW
SPECIFICATION

1.6
No.

PTT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

SPC-0804.02-50.91
PAGE: 17 OF 22
REV: D2

Vessels and Columns

Checkpoint
Check that manholes are within reach of hoisting equipment?

Ensure proper space on platforms for turning the manhole

covers and for entering equipment.

Are instrument tapings and local instruments and level glasses

readily accessible?

Has insulation for personnel protection been provided?

Can the lines follow the expansion of the equipment when

heating up and cooling down? Pay special attention to
supports on both hot and cold structure.

Check free movement of platforms (thermal expansion).

Check if specified elevations of vessels and columns on P&ID

are adhered to.

When differential expansion between column and connected

piping on it is big, is the piping support proper installed to
accommodate thermal expansion?

Remark

3D CAD
MODEL REVIEW
SPECIFICATION

1.7
No.

PTT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

SPC-0804.02-50.91
PAGE: 18 OF 22
REV: D2

Relief systems: Flares and Vent Systems

Checkpoint
Flare lines shall have no pockets and shall slope continuously
to the flare knockout drum. If a low point is unavoidable,
ensure a drain with adequate size is connected to a drain

If a platform is installed for spading a part of the flare line

whilst the main flare line is still in use, ensure that there is
enough space to do the work. Check that there is a proper
escape access from this platform.

Check that inlet lines to relief valves are self-draining into

process equipment. Relief valves should be located on the
main process header.

Check that outlet lines from relief valves are self-draining into
the flare header.

Check that connections are made on top or on the side of the

flare header.

Check the accessibility of relief valves sets for maintenance

and inspection. Have relief valves been installed at proper
elevations relative to the flare header? All relief valves should
be accessible for removal.

Is safety/relief valve piping as possible when discharging into a

close system?

Check relief valves discharging to atmosphere for safe

locations and direction. Ensure that hot equipment is not
located below discharge points to the atmosphere if any
hydrocarbons can be released. For a waste gas seal vessel,
i l
i
hi h k
Can relief valves be blocked-in and drained?

10

Check relief valve outlet line arrangements such that supports

can be provided to cope with reaction forces.

11

Is reactor vent gas safely routed during regeneration?

12

Ensure that flame arrestors in lines to the atmosphere can be

accessed for removal and maintenance.

Remark

3D CAD
MODEL REVIEW
SPECIFICATION

13

PTT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

SPC-0804.02-50.91
PAGE: 19 OF 22
REV: D2

Check that the spindles of flare main block valves, if gate

valves, are in a horizontal position. This prevents a blocked
flare line if the wedge should fall down.

3D CAD
MODEL REVIEW
SPECIFICATION

1.8

PTT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

SPC-0804.02-50.91
PAGE: 20 OF 22
REV: D2

Environmental Check

No.

Checkpoint

Check if any process liquid drained from equipment can be

handled in an environmentally acceptable manner, in line with
general approach of closed loops for liquid draining or vents.
If required install funnels to the oil collecting system.

Check drainage from pump casings and pump strainers.

Check drainage from process filters and coalescers.

Check drainage from fuel filters of furnaces.

Are drains from sample points of plants and storage tanks

minimized by, for example, closed loops?

Check drainage from heat exchangers when opened for

bundle cleaning or repairs.

Consider also the effect of liquid spillage when opening both

heads as well as when pulling the bundle. Check drainage of
sour or spent seal and tube oils from compressors.

Check drainage from lines at the battery limit prior to spading

the unit.

Check where vents of seal chambers of reciprocating

compressors are routed to.

10

Check that unloading and storage of chemicals, additives,

caustic, ammonia etc. can be carried out without
environmental impact.

11

Check that the distance around plants is in accordance with

any local regulations, including noise limitations.

Remark

3D CAD
MODEL REVIEW
SPECIFICATION

SPC-0804.02-50.91
PAGE: 21 OF 22
REV: D2

PTT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

APPENDIX III: Readiness Assessment

For 1/3 Model Review
Project No. & Name:

4
5

7
8

Stationary foundations shown.

Packaged unit located.

Nozzle orientation of major
equipments
such as towers, columns, reactors.
All large bore piping 6 and above
with in- line instruments on
modeled lines.
Electrical and instrument main
cable route on pipe racks.

10
11
12

Approved by Piping L/E _________________

_________________
Signature
_________________
_________________
Date
_________________
_________________

Pipe racks and structures shown.

Building in outline:
- Control room
- Analyzer shelters
- Switch rooms
Location of access roads shown.

Mechanical

Instrument

Electrical

Location of all mechanical

equipment.
Construction and maintenance
aspects verified.
Dropout, bundle pulling and
laydown areas.
Check escapes routes.

Process

Piping

Activity

Civil/Structure

Review Area (or Unit): ______________________

O
O
O
O

Approved by Project
Signature
Date

Comments

3D CAD
MODEL REVIEW
SPECIFICATION

SPC-0804.02-50.91
PAGE: 22 OF 22
REV: D2

PTT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

Operation and maintenance aspects

verified.
Dropout, bundle pulling and laydown
areas.
Final dimensions of structures and steel
constructions.
Permanent cranes and hoisting beams.

All foundations and footings shown.

Orientation of equipment nozzles.

Packaged unit orientation.

Orientation of ladders, stairs, stairs,
platforms on vessels and columns.
Utility station, Eye bath and safety
shower locations.
90% of pipelines 3 diameter and above,
50% of pipelines 2diameter

2
3
4

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Major and special pipe supports.

Stress comments incorporate for defined
as stress critical.
Fire fighting equipment (hydrants,
monitors, water spray systems, etc)
located.
All underground piping.
Underground sewer systems and
collecting and separation systems.

17

Concrete slabs and paving

18

Above ground instrument and electrical

tray routing.

19

In-line instruments on modeled lines.

20

Local panels and junction boxes.

21 Clash checks complete.

Approved by Piping L/E ______________
Signature _________________
Date _________________

Instrument

Electrical

Comments from 1/3 model review

incorporated and approved byPTT.

Civil/Structur
e
Mechanical

Piping

Activity

Process

For 2/3 Model Review

Project & Name:
Review Area (or Unit) _______________

O
O
O
O

O
O

O
O

O
O
O
O

O
O

O
O

O
O
O
O
Approved by Project ____________
Signature
_________________
Date
_________________

Comments