Acceptance Control Sheets Feb2015

SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY SOC LIMITED
Acceptance Control Work Sheet for Lime/Cement Stabilized Layers

CONTRACT:
LAYER:
LANE:
CHAINAGE:
SECTION
WIDTH:
SECTION
LENGTH:
CARRIAGEWAY:
km
to
m
RELATIVE COMPACTION
RELATIVE COMPACTION:
Ls =
km
DATE:
Y M M D D
% RELATIVE COMPACTION
Sample size (n)

ka
4
0.220
5
0.300
6
0.358
7
0.403
8
0.440
9
0.470
1
2
4
5
7
8
kad
0.061
0.163
0.235
0.290
0.334
0.370
1.46
1.67
1.82
1.94
2.03
2.11
RELATIVE COMPACTION:
La
Xn
Sn
=
OUTLIER TEST:
JUDGEMENT LIMITS:
Sample No
Value ( Xo )
To
Xo Xn
Sn
Xo
Sn
Xn
La
Ls
Lr
La
fr
STABILIZER CONTENT:
Sample size (n)
10
Ls
=
12
14
16
2%
{ 0.67 + 0.3
If To is bigger than T, result is an outlier. Analyse reasons.
kaSn
{ 0.67 + 0.3
STABILIZER CONTENT
%
n
18
20
1
Ls
La
Xn
La
Lr
Lr
Xn
Lr
La
Lr
n
5
kaSn
2
=
=
}
}
n
9
n
13
ka
0.713
0.755
0.789
0.817
0.840
0.860
10
14
18
kad
0.617
0.666
0.706
0.738
0.764
0.787
11
15
19
2.18
2.29
2.37
2.44
2.50
2.56
12
16
20
STABILIZER CONTENT:
La
La
SnXn
=
=
OUTLIER TEST:
JUDGEMENT LIMITS:
Sample No
Value (Xo)
To
n
17
Xo Xn
Sn
Xo
Xn
Sn
La
Ls
La
Ls
Lr
0.8
fr
ASSESSMENT: RELATIVE COMPACTION

Accept
Ls
kadSn
Ls
kadSn
La
0.8
La
{ 0.67 + 0.3
La Xn La
kaSn
{ 0.67 + 0.3
Xn La
kaSn
Xn
La
Lr
Lr
Xn
Lr
La
Lr
}
}
ASSESSMENT: STABILIZER CONTENT

Accept
Lr Xn La
Accept Payment
Lr Xn La
% Payment
Xn Lr
Reject
Xn Lr
Reject
VISUAL ASSESSMENT:
Stabiliser spread rate checked: tanker/bags
Moisture content at compaction (%)
Completion within allowed time
Wet areas/Soft spots

Layer thickness, Dmax: Dave: D90 within tolerances
hours
Surface tolerances: Grade and level
Segregation evident: Yes/no
Curing adequate: No rapid drying out
Signature Inspector
Signature Resident Engineer
Date:
Date:
Y M M D D
Y M M D D

Acceptance Control Work Sheet for G1 - G3 Granular Layers
CONTRACT:
LAYER:
LANE:
CHAINAGE:
SECTION
WIDTH:
CARRIAGEWAY:
km
to
SECTION
LENGTH:
km
DATE:
Y M M D D
INDICATOR TESTS
Percentage Passing Sieve
Property
Sieve Size (mm)
37.5
Sample
28
20
14
0.425
PI
0.075
Test Values: Xo
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
RELATIVE COMPACTION
SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS: RELATIVE COMPACTION
Ls
Sample size (n)

ka
6
0.358
7
0.403
8
0.440
9
0.470
10
0.496
n
1
n
4
1.820
1.940
2.030
2.110
2.180
11
14
12
15
OUTLIER TEST:
Value ( Xo )
Xo Xn
Sn
Xo
Xn
Sn
n
7
n
10
Xn
Sn
ka
La
Ls
ka
Sn
Ls
ka

Xn La
ACCEPT
REJECT
VISUAL ASSESSMENT
Previous layer still acceptable
Segregation evident
Wet areas
Layer thickness, Dmax:Dave:D90 within tolerance
Excess fines brought to the surface
Excess fines swept from surface
In situ moisture 50% of OMC
Layer firm and stable in mosaic
Actual in situ moisture content
Signature Inspector
Date:
Date:
Y M M D D
n
13
JUDGEMENT LIMITS:
Sample No
To
Y M M D D
Sn

Acceptance Control Work Sheet for G4 - G9 Granular Layers
CONTRACT:
LAYER:
LANE:
CHAINAGE:
SECTION
WIDTH:
CARRIAGEWAY:
km
to
SECTION
LENGTH:
km
DATE:
INDICATOR TESTS
Property
Sieve Size (mm)
50
Sample
37.5
20
0.425
Y M M D D
GM
0.075
PI
Test Values: Xo
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
RELATIVE COMPACTION
Factors
5
Sample size (n)
ka
0.220
1.460
15
10
0.300
0.358
0.403
0.440
0.470
0.496
1.670
1.820
1.940
2.030
2.110
2.180
OUTLIER TEST:
Value ( Xo )
Xo Xn
Sn
Xo
Xn
Sn
JUDGEMENT LIMITS:
Sample No
To
% Relative Compaction
n
%
n
Xn
Sn
ka
La
Ls
ka
Sn
Ls
ka
Sn

Xn La
MDD
(kg/m3)
ACCEPT
OMC
(%)
98%
Xn < La
CBR @ Specified Density
95%
REJECT
Swell
93%
%
%
%
VISUAL ASSESSMENT:
Yes
Previous layer still acceptable
Presence of biscuit layers
Segregation evident
Wet areas / Soft spots
Over size removed
Layer thickness, Dmax : Dave : D90 within tolerances
Firm well-knit surface obtained

Excess fine swept from surface
Signature Inspector
Date:
Date:
Y M M D D
Y M M D D
No

Acceptance Control Work Sheet for G10 Earthworks
CONTRACT:
LAYER:
LANE:
CHAINAGE:
SECTION
WIDTH:
CARRIAGEWAY:
km
to
SECTION
LENGTH:
km
DATE:
INDICATOR TESTS
Property
Sieve Size (mm)
Sample
63
50
37.5
20
0.425
Y M M D D
GM
0.075
PI
Test Values: Xo
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
RELATIVE COMPACTION
Factors
5
Sample size (n)
ka
0.220
1.460
15
10
0.300
0.358
0.403
0.440
0.470
0.496
1.670
1.820
1.940
2.030
2.110
2.180
OUTLIER TEST:
Value ( Xo )
Xo Xn
Sn
Xo
Xn
Sn
Xn
Sn
ka
La
Ls
ka
Sn
Ls
ka

Xn La
MDD
(kg/m3)
ACCEPT
OMC
(%)
100%
Xn < La
CBR @ Specified Density
95%
93%
REJECT
Swell
90%
%
%
%
VISUAL ASSESSMENT:
Moisture content at compaction
Oversize material removed
Wet area
Biscuit layers
Signature Inspector
Date:
Date:
Y M M D D
JUDGEMENT LIMITS:
Sample No
To
% Relative Compaction
n
%
n
Y M M D D
Sn

Acceptance Control Work Sheet for Asphalt: Binder Content and Percent Voids
CONTRACT:
LAYER:
LANE:
CHAINAGE:
SECTION
WIDTH:
CARRIAGEWAY:
km
to
SECTION
LENGTH:
Factors
km
DATE:
Voids
%
Y M M D D
% Binder Content
Sample size (n)
ka
0.220
0.300
0.358
0.403
0.440
kad
T
0.061
1.46
0.163
1.67
0.235
1.82
0.290
1.94
0.334
2.03
2
3
5
6
2
3
5
6
BINDER CONTENT SPECIFICATION

Ls
Ls
Sn
=
=
Standard deviation
Sn
Sample No
Value ( Xo )
Value ( Xo )
Sn
Xn
To
Xo Xn
Sn
Xo
Sn
Xn
JUDGEMENT LIMITS:
JUDGEMENT LIMITS:
La
Ls
L'a
Ls
Lr
La
L'r
La
fru
Xo
=
OUTLIER TEST:
Sample No
frl
OUTLIER TEST:
Xo Xn
Sn
Ls'
Xn
=
=
Standard deviation
% VOIDS SPECIFICATION
Ls'
Xn
To
kaSn
Ls
kadSn
Ls
0.2%
La
0.2%
La
{ 0.67 + 0.3
{ 0.67 + 0.3
{ 0.67 + 0.3
{ 0.67 + 0.3
La Xn L'a
Lr Xn La
Xn
La
Lr
Lr
Xn
Lr
La
Lr
L'r
L'r
Xn
L'a
L'r
Xn
L'r
L'a
kaSn
La
Ls
kadSn
L'a
Ls
0.2
Lr
La
0.2
L'r
L'a
frl
}
}
fru
}
}
ASSESSMENT: BINDER CONTENT

Accept
kaSn
Ls
kadSn
Ls
kadSn
0.2%
La
0.2
0.2%
L'a
0.2
{ 0.67 + 0.3
{ 0.67 + 0.3
{ 0.67 + 0.3
{ 0.67 + 0.3
Xn
La
Lr
Lr
Xn
Lr
La
Lr
L'r
L'r
Xn
L'a
L'r
Xn
L'r
L'a
% Payment
L'a Xn L'r
% Payment
L'a Xn L'r
% Payment
Lr Xn L'r
Reject
Lr Xn L'r
Reject
% Payment
Signature Inspector
Date:
Date:
Y M M D D
}
}
}
}
ASSESSMENT: % VOIDS
Accept
La Xn L'a
Lr Xn La
kaSn
Y M M D D

Acceptance Control Work Sheet for Asphalt: Compaction and Layer Thickness
CONTRACT:
LAYER:
LANE:
CHAINAGE:
SECTION
WIDTH:
CARRIAGEWAY:
km
to
SECTION
LENGTH:
km
DATE:
Y M M D D
COMPACTION
Ls
= 97% - Design mix voids
Factors
=
n
15
%
%
Sample size (n)

ka
4
0.220
5
0.300
6
0.358
7
0.403
8
0.440
9
0.470
10
0.490
1
2
4
5
7
8
1.46
1.67
1.82
1.94
2.03
2.11
2.18
La
=
Xn
=
Standard deviation Sn
=
OUTLIER TEST:
JUDGEMENT LIMITS:
Sample No
La
Ls
Lr
La
Value ( Xo )
To
Xo Xn
Sn
Xo
Xn
Sn
fr
D90
Base
-15
Surfacing
-15
Actual
kaSn
1.0%
{ 0.67 + 0.3
{ 0.67 + 0.3
LAYER THICKNESS
Dmax
Ls
La
Xn
Lr
La
Xn
Lr
Lr
La
Lr
Actual
1.0
=
=
}
}
Actual
-5
-8
-2
Sample Size (n)
10
ka
T
0.220
1.46
0.300
1.67
0.358
1.82
0.403
1.94
0.440
2.03
0.470
2.11
0.490
2.18
Mean
Standard deviation
Xn
Sn
mm
=
=
OUTLIER TEST:
JUDGEMENT LIMITS:
Sample No
Value ( Xo )
kaSn
Dave
-20
Specification Requirements: Layer thickness
To
Xo Xn
Sn
Xo
Xn
Sn
D90
Dmax
Dave

ASSESSMENT: LAYER THICKNESS
Xn La
Lr Xn La
Accept
Accept Pay
D90
Dmax
Accept
Accept
Xn Lr
Reject
Dave
Reject
VISUAL ASSESSMENT:
Yes
Segregation evident
Mix temperature on delivery
Binder rich spots

Layer thickness within tolerances
Mat temperature during rolling
Tearing of mat behind screed
Uniform application of precoated chips
Signature Inspector
Date:
Date:
Y M M D D
Y M M D D
No

Acceptance Control Work Sheet for Concrete Pavement
CONTRACT:
LAYER:
LANE:
CHAINAGE:
SECTION
WIDTH:
SECTION
LENGTH:
Specification Requirements: 28 Day Strength

Sample size (n)
4
5
6
CARRIAGEWAY:
km
to
m
DATE:
10
11
=
12
14
15
0.961
0.993
1.020
1.065
1.101
1.131
1.155
1.177
1.46
1.67
1.82
1.94
2.03
2.11
2.18
2.29
2.37
2.44
2.5
2.56
MPa
MPa
Sample No
MPa
Xn
Standard deviation
Sn
Standard deviation
Sn
OUTLIER TEST:
Sample No
Value ( Xo )
Value ( Xo )
Xo
Sn
Xn
To
Xo Xn
Sn
Xo
La
Ls
Lr
0.85
Ls
{ 0.67 + 0.3
{ 0.67 + 0.3
Ls
0.85
Xn
Lr
La
Lr
Xn
Lr
La
Lr
Sn
Xn
JUDGEMENT LIMITS:
kaSn
Ls
La
Ls
Lr
0.85
}
}
fr
kaSn
Ls
{ 0.67 + 0.3
{ 0.67 + 0.3
ASSESSMENT: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
Ls
0.85
Xn
La
Lr
Lr
Xn
Lr
La
Lr
Accept
Xn La
Accept
Lr Xn La
% Payment
Lr Xn La
% Payment
Xn Lr
Reject
Xn Lr
Reject
VISUAL ASSESSMENT:
Segregation evident
Curing texture to specification
Time lapse from mixing to placement, max 60 mins
Curing as specified
Bleeding evident
Joints, formed within time period

Joints, washed out and sealed
Signature Inspector
Date:
Date:
Y M M D D
kaSn
Ls
=
=
}
}
ASSESSMENT: FLEXURAL STRENGTH
Xn La
MPa
JUDGEMENT LIMITS:
kaSn
Sample No
OUTLIER TEST:
Sample No
Xo Xn
Sn
13
FLEXURAL STRENGTH
Sample No
Ls
=
Mean
0.923
Y M M D D
0.878
Xn
0.821
Ls
=
Mean
fr
0.745
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
ka
Sample No
To
km
Y M M D D

Acceptance Control Sheets Feb2015

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Acceptance Control Sheets Feb2015

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY SOC LIMITED

Acceptance Control Work Sheet for Lime/Cement Stabilized Layers

Sample size (n)

If To is bigger than T, result is an outlier. Analyse reasons.

If To is bigger than T, result is an outlier. Analyse reasons.

ASSESSMENT: RELATIVE COMPACTION

ASSESSMENT: STABILIZER CONTENT

Wet areas/Soft spots

Surface tolerances: Grade and level

Segregation evident: Yes/no

Curing adequate: No rapid drying out

Signature Resident Engineer

SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY SOC LIMITED

Sample size (n)

If To is bigger than T, result is an outlier. Analyse reasons.

Excess fines brought to the surface

Surface tolerances: Grade and level

Excess fines swept from surface

In situ moisture 50% of OMC

Layer firm and stable in mosaic

Actual in situ moisture content

Signature Resident Engineer

SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY SOC LIMITED

Sample size (n)

If To is bigger than T, result is an outlier. Analyse reasons.

Previous layer still acceptable

Presence of biscuit layers

Wet areas / Soft spots

Over size removed

Layer thickness, Dmax : Dave : D90 within tolerances

Firm well-knit surface obtained

Surface tolerances: Grade and level

Signature Resident Engineer

SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY SOC LIMITED

Sample size (n)

If To is bigger than T, result is an outlier. Analyse reasons.

Oversize material removed

Signature Resident Engineer

SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY SOC LIMITED

Sample size (n)

BINDER CONTENT SPECIFICATION

If To is bigger than T, result is an outlier. Analyse reasons.

If To is bigger than T, result is an outlier. Analyse reasons.

ASSESSMENT: BINDER CONTENT

Signature Resident Engineer

SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY SOC LIMITED

= 97% - Design mix voids

Sample size (n)

If To is bigger than T, result is an outlier. Analyse reasons.

Sample Size (n)

Specification Requirements: Layer thickness

If To is bigger than T, result is an outlier. Analyse reasons.

ASSESSMENT: LAYER THICKNESS

Binder rich spots

Mat temperature during rolling

Surface tolerances: Grade and level

Tearing of mat behind screed

Uniform application of precoated chips

Signature Resident Engineer

SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY SOC LIMITED

Specification Requirements: 28 Day Strength

If To is bigger than T, result is an outlier. Analyse reasons.

ASSESSMENT: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH