Capstone Project

Rating Sheet
Criteria for Oral Defense

Polytechnic University of the Philippines

Santa Rosa Campus

Grading:
Percentage
97-100
94-96
91-93
88-90
85-87
82-84
Date:

Grade
1.0
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.0
2.25

Equivalent
Excellent
Excellent
Very Good
Very Good
Good
Good

Time:

Percentage
79-81
76-78
75
70-74

Grade
2.5
2.75
3.0
4.0
5.0

Equivalent
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Passing
Poor
No Appearance

Faculty-In Charge:

System:
PUPSRC LINE QUEUING, ONLINE REGISTRATION AND E-BULLETIN SYSTEM
Members: Bares, Ryan A.
Crusina, Marc Jason D.
Felipe, Mary Grace G.
Salapare, Charmaine
Zaldivar, Onesimus B.
I. PRESENTATION

(.25)*_____=_____

Information presented are logically arranged

Visual aids are readable and organized
All team members are present and have equal participation
Members are business attire
Members can easily grasp question content
Answers to questions are clear, precise, consistent, complete
The groups shows unity and coordination in answering questions

II. SOFTWARE

III.

(.50)*_____=_____

Functionality
Expect function and capabilities are present.
System allows effective completion of tasks.
Performance
Processing speed and response time are satisfiable.
The program and database design are efficient.
The program could be accessed in a network environment.
Usability
System is simple to use.
Information provided by the system is easy to understand.
It is easy to learn and operate the system.
The system has provision for multi-users.
Reliability
The system gives error message that clearly tells how to fix the problems.
The user can recover easily and quickly whenever a mistake is made while using the
program.
The system contains enough security features against invalid and unwarranted system
failures.
DOCUMENTATION
Completeness
Conformity to Standard
Accuracy and Consistency with Software Presented
TOTAL

PANELIST

_____________________________

(.25)*_____=_____

Signature over printed name