GO WITH THE GOOSES AND BAN SEXISM FROM EARTH!

M. R. Pinheiro

www.geocities.com/mrpprofessional

mrpprofessional@yahoo.com

One of the most impressive women to try entering the so blessed, and so infinitely
entertaining, doors of the perfect, and fully abstract (for perfection cannot be
human), world of Mathematics was a French woman named Sophie Germain 1. She
could never have access to classes (proper) directly, only to notes, at most. Self-
learner, Germain produced extraordinary results, learning in sub-human conditions.
In her time and age, universities (could) openly forbid (!) women from attending
school. Sophie only got her results considered by Science because she lied about
her name (used fake male names and submitted her work via correspondence).

Since that century, 18th (!), things have not progressed from an actual perspective.
They progressed from a theoretical perspective, where laws and systems exist in
abundance, but nothing ever becomes real, especially by the time needed by a
female victim of sexism, for instance, so that she is able to progress in her studies,
work, life, in a normal way.

It is in publications as much as in post graduation, it is in secondary learning as

much as in tertiary learning: it is still everywhere!

Were it ever of sexual nature (affecting males), the whole World would have to stop
and make of it a `big deal’. However, as it is one more `female issue only’, who
cares? It is not AIDS, or something, the World does favor only males, and none of
them is harmed if women are out. Rather the opposite, on the top of getting paid for
leisure (doing Mathematics and Science is pleasant, and makes you important and
meaningful, socially and politically, Sophie herself did it for leisure and
entertainment), they still get a chance of exploiting all knowledge, information, and
even findings, of the `lesser beings’, the `servants’, the women…

Reality is that males are far more suitable for home work, and logically pushed to
take care of kids. Truth is that in the bee society, for instance, only one female is
chosen to give birth to the whole species. She remains there, being served by
absolutely everyone else, and all she does is procreating and directing that society.
Women who generate kids, in a logical society, which is able to be logically

1 See [1], for instance.

1
organized, therefore, are not all of the female share of the species, but only one,
chosen amongst the whole group as `able’ to generate best kids. Maternity, in a
logical society, is not seen as `a right’, but as a democratic choice, of both the
universal generator (for that small colony) and of the whole colony. Of course, in
modern terms, what should be chosen is `what sort of human beings we wish to be
generated/we need (Whites? Blacks? Why? Homos? Weak for work? Strong in their
bodies? Intelligent? Males? Etc.). All other females are then `pushed’ to have their
power of giving birth simply stopped artificially somehow, because it is a
`democratic’ choice.

Of course, for this to happen, all females in the society must be equally happy, once
that is the only way they will wish for the welfare of everyone else in that society.
The matter about life must regard natural talents, natural will, welfare of the mind,
as well as of the society. Basically, were males and females never externally
instructed, the choices would not vary that much these days: Both would do all
house work and all external work equally. Apparently, both males have developed
the share of the brains which regards old femininity and females have developed
the share of the brains which regards old masculinity, what is natural for a World `in
progress’. This way, there must be both understanding and acceptance of the male
role being that of a `house husband’, with all principles of psycholinguistics 2 applied
to the expression (so that people get emotionally used to it and accepting of the
situation), and of the female role being that of `genius of Science’, who is too busy
to do anything else apart from being served sexually, socially, house-like, and
physically, by a male, whose only reason to exist is pleasing his female partner.
Without real updating of social actions and allowances, there is no change, there is
feeling of discomfort in the `updated’ members of society, and they seem to be
`odd’, whilst they are actually pattern. Due to the academic reactionary movement,
always stuck in the past, everything else seems to bear clear conflict: words and
theory against practice and people. This way, we live in a fully schizoid 3 society,
where theory in general will never include real life individuals, or needed actions to
preserve, safeguard, and reward, their efforts in general. That basically means that
we will tend to place normal, modern, individuals, in confined environments (mental
hospitals, jail, etc), and corrupt, distorted, odd, individuals, in full freedom of action,
even regarding other people’s rights and allowances, in a full inversion of
everything which SHOULD be, and it is CLAIMED to be, by every system in place in
the World right now.

Basically, the women may be even more talented than the males, extraordinarily
talented, but the more talented they are, similar to the law of Physics we wrote

2 See [4], for instance.

3 See [5], for instance.

2
about in the previous article of ours (Action and Reaction, third law of Newton – see,
for instance, Britannica encyclopedia), the more crimes and atrocities they will
suffer.

The next few paragraphs are a real person’s set of words to describe her situation,
all super-real, and easy to be verified scientifically:

`I am currently a victim of the worst breach of human rights ever. Not only I was
always a top student for Brazilian standards, but my mind was born brighter, able to
see further, and devise alternatives, solutions, things, that nobody had thought of
before (of course I mention people I had access/contact with only, so that `nobody’
means my personal universe of people), no matter if male or female. My own brains
was attacked, in the most coward way as possible, when I visited Brazil, a place
nobody who is good should ever visit. A researcher, and my best bet is an old male,
has endeavored to design, build, and deliver, the most powerful device of human
extermination, and slave use, which has ever existed on Earth. Biotech is the share
of the Science involved. So, somewhere, in this World and time, there is a bastard
who actually designed this instrument, which allows the slowest and most painful
death of all, longest, keeping the victim under slavery use of all her human abilities,
and he (my bet) is laughing and fully enjoying the consequences of his absurd
breach of ethics, and absurd breach of human law, right now, whilst I am enduring
most painful consequences, ever, to my own organism, as well as life, in which not a
single fault, problem, or loss (with which I was unable to deal), were ever found until
end of 2001, when I spoke to (apparently) an Australian who sold himself and his
stolen information (from me) to my mortal enemies: those waiting, their whole lives,
for the right moment to attack me criminally, with full power.

I have managed to write an initial proposal of Ethics to the higher sector, hoping it is
internationally adopted, what would give me some justice finally, at least (please
visit www.geocities.com/msorfiap2 to read it).

With its adoption, all results of the fully unethical and criminal assassins, of my
entire body and life, would be erased, taken away from them (from journals, from
wherever) and, therefore, true justice in those regards would happen (what society
seeks is the elimination of the profit/gain of the criminal, as well as a physical
punishment compatible with whatever they did against society, nothing else)’.

It is actually quite impressive that there is Ethics exam for every organized class of
workers of higher level (Medicine, Engineering, Translation, etc.), but there is no
such a thing for those who `teach’ the members of those classes about how to do
their jobs (?). How more schizoid can a society be, or how more inconsistent (which
some call paraconsistent4 instead, these days), or even incoherent?
4 See [2], for instance. Paraconsistency is then defined as being a logical system (for
3
The own women, unfortunately, are also a part of this. They are fully unable to
accept that other women may have same, or more, talent than themselves, and
also be complete (beautiful, attractive, feminine, hot, etc). Because of their absence
of self-analysis, and persistent absence of search for self-improvement (why would
not all of us fight to look best, to be more complete?), they try to kill/exterminate
the women who actually challenge their beliefs, in top coward and unethical way as
possible (and are very happy with the results, as long as they are tricked as to
`belonging’, as it was possible to be heard from at least one female from the higher
sector, P.P., directly responsible, in Australia, for the life and body usurpation of the
victim whose words we above described. Basically, they cannot see beyond their
limited minds: If one of us – women- falls, we all fall, butterfly effect, as written
before. Remember males will always act like the gooses (see [3] for reference): one
will replace the other in the lead, always with objective being top gain/profit of
males in society. All women will lose if not doing the same; we are all weaker in
every possible social sense, just for starters. Sexuality is the most basic sense of all,
and we do not even have a single prostitution place with beautiful, horny males
available, at waste, and cheap, for our entertainment…where are we winning, ever,
please, doing it all contrary to the gooses way?).

It is basic thing that the more `winning’ a society is, the more logical its systems
are. The American society has chosen closest to what should be right for many
years, and `God’ has gifted them with a `first power in the World’ title.

It really does not matter the `why’ one chooses (energy which is positive, God,
righteous choices, etc), the results are always the same (allowances and gifts to
those doing the rightest things, losses and pain for those making the opposite
moves). Easy to see that whenever human kind goes against the Bible teachings
(Old Testament coherent set of instructions: by coherent, we mean with no conflict,
ever, as to other pieces of the Bible), everything becomes painful and absurd for the
own human kind as a whole (Aids came either from sexual interactions between
monkeys and men, or from spontaneous occurrence of same sort of virus in human
kind of the homosexual type, both explicitly condemned by God in the Old
Testament, for instance. God instructs human kind very clearly as to males having
to get a female permanently, and socially present, as partner, as soon as they have
erections, not giving any chances for anything else to happen, or be thought of.
Human kind avoids that rule, and even diseases never thought before, as it is
written in the Old Testament, appear: `plagues appear in abundance, and human
kind will suffer for long years, until they repent and stop it‘).

computers) in which the same assertion is finally `allowed’ (allowed here means that it is
possible for the computer, whose system is of that sort of logic, to deal with that conflicting
information in a way as to decide, with no mistake, what action to take) to be both true and
false at the same time.
4
The only way to make society `logical’ is putting women in the right spots: they
must dominate and master everyone else; they were gifted with the power, and
only they were, of either stopping the race forever (power of generation), by simply
stopping their procreative allowances, or making it infinite in terms of existence.

Women are better teachers, better lecturers, and better educators. Every possible
profession starts there: in the classroom. Therefore, the highest salaries, as well as
the most charged professions, in terms of righteousness and perfection, must be
the teachers’/lecturers‘. This is the only way to go. And, in having a choice, society
should always choose women, once they are historically better (top logical choice,
owed to a developed society).

On the other hand, it is also well known that women in research commit far less
mistakes than men (papers with almost 98% wrong information, conclusions, proofs,
are easily found amongst males). Females were gifted with better observation,
judgment, analysis, and detail. Quick statistical studies would prove that another
logical choice would always prefer women in research, both as supervisors and
researchers, than males, simply for their gender history.

It is also well proven, statistically, that women commit far less evil mistakes whilst
driving (usually, if they hold accidents, they kill and impair far less than men, even
because they usually drive slower). With this, female drivers should also be hired
with preference over male drivers. This is simple logical choice.

In a logical World, God will always gift vast majority of members of society with
happiness about themselves. This should, ultimately, be the aim of any developed
society.

As for the sexual side of things, once this is always top interest of most members of
society, women are also well known for betraying their partners less, being more
loyal, letting them more content for longer, and being better partners. Therefore, if
any prostitution must exist, the male prostitution is more logical: males for women,
once women would not choose that to beset their relationships, they would make
more rational use of it than men, who usually use that to escape needed self-
improvement as a person, as a social member, as a family member, as a work
member, etc.

So, if not for the suffering imposed to women in Science, which is inhuman, for
logical reasons, which lead to immediate rising of society as a whole, women
should, indeed, be on top of several things, with full, and legal, preference over
males.

5
REFERENCES:

[1] B. A. Case, A. M. Leggett. Complexities: Women in Mathematics.

2005. Princeton University Press.

[2] K. Tanaka. Three Schools of Paraconsistency. V. I. 2003. Australasian

Journal of Logic.

[3] L. H. Grando, E. P. Galastro, M. A. Amaral et al. Trabalhando em grupo

na pós-graduação: conciliando teoria e prática. In Proceedings of the 8.
Brazilian Nursing Communication Symposium, 2002, São Paulo (SP, Brazil),
[online] 2002 [cited 24 December 2007]. Available from:
<http://www.proceedings.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=MSC00
00000052002000100007&lng=en&nrm=iso> .

[4] M. Garman. Psycholinguistics. 1990. Cambridge University Press.

[5] N. C. Andreasen, P. Nopoulos, D. S. O’Leary, D. D. Miller, T. Wassink, M.
Flaum. Defining the Phenotype of Schizophrenia: Cognitive
Dysmetria and Its Neural Mechanisms. Biological Psychiatry. V. 46, I. 7, 1
October 1999, Pp. 908-920.