Members of the jury, and to our adjudicator, Prof.

Richard Roll Talento, A pleasant afternoon to

you all.
As I go along and bring this debate to an end, I am thrilled and moved by the sweet statements of
the affirmative side proving that we, the humans are enough cause towards climate change. Are we that
capable of doing such? Is it enough to say that we destroy our own planet through climate change? We
on the negative side strongly oppose this notion. Ladies and gentleman, the proposition here is the word
SUBSTANTIAL. Which literally means in large amount or enough to satisfy. We dont deny the facts that
humans can contribute or contributes to climate change. But is it enough to cause climate change? We
take the stand that in all matters of both Political and Scientific debate, it is not enough or sufficient
grounds to cause climate change. What happened to the natural causes? Such as The Suns energy and
Orbital Change and even the shift on earths surface leaning towards oceanic natural movements?