Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Biot
M.D. Trifunac
Dept. of Civil Eng., University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2531, USA
ABSTRACT: Maurice Anthony Biot made lasting contributions to many areas of engineering and applied
science (including earthquake engineering, aeronautics, wave propagation, porous media, nonlinear elasticity,
theory of folding of geologic strata, and thermodynamics). His accomplishments are well known and recognized. To commemorate the 100-th anniversary of his birth, this paper presents a quantitative, albeit simple,
description of his journal papers in terms of publication and citation rates. It shows that Biots overall publication rate (per year) was, and that the citation rate (per year) of his papers continue to be about three times
higher than what those are today among senior engineering faculty at leading American Universities. It is remarkable that more than 60 percent (almost 6000) of all of Biots citations (more than 9200 in early 2004) result from only twenty-one papers he wrote on the subject of porous media.
1 INRODUCTION
Maurice Anthony Biot did most of his work before
the onset of the digital computer age in 1960s, and
before the information revolution through the Internet in 1990s. The impact of his work was and continues to be strong, remarkably not in one, but in
several diverse areas of engineering and applied science.
It is well known that Biot was a prolific writer,
and that his ideas have long lasting effects on the
generations of young scientists and engineers. To
learn more about his publication record and to quantify some of the bibliometric parameters, which describe his work I will describe his productivity in
terms of his journal papers and will present a brief
analysis of his citations. Through a comparison with
a group of professors in Civil Engineering and Mechanics who specialize in the field of Earthquake
Engineering, at leading universities in the U.S. I will
illustrate quantitatively the exceptionally high publication and citation rates of M.A. Biot.
Modern researchers are opting for collaboration
in their work, because this is expected to enable
them to address difficult, interdisciplinary and ambitious research topics (Bozeman and Lee, 2003). In
contrast, Biot did all of his work essentially alone.
Maurice Anthony Biot was born in Antwerp,
Belgium, on May 25, 1905. At University of Louvain, he received batchelors degrees in Thomistic
Phylosophy in 1927, in mining engineering in 1929
and in electrical engineering in 1930. In 1931 he was
200
BIOT
Normal Count
BIOT
Fractional Count
100
USMA
Normal count
10
20
30
40
300
50
For comparison, Fig. 1 also shows the mean publication trends among university professors during
the period between 1960 and 2000, derived from a
study by Bozeman and Lee (2003). Trifunac (2005a)
integrated their data on the mean number of publications per year, and computed the cumulative number
of published papers, using the data for normal count
and for fractional count. Thus computed cumulative
numbers of papers are shown in Fig. 1 and labeled
USMA (United States Male Average). The slopes of
USMA curves are xNUSMA = 3.37 papers per year, for
normal count, and xFUSMA = 1.40 papers per year for
fractional count. The average publication rates for
M. Biot are xNB = 3.40 papers per year and xFB = 3.2
papers per year. Since he wrote majority of his papers alone, it is seen that his productivity was almost
three times that of the average productivity of the
faculty analyzed by Bozeman and Lee (2003) for the
period between 1960 and 2000. The publish or perish environment of 1960s, 1970s and 1980s has
lead to progressively larger number of average journal publications per faculty per year starting around
1960, implying that for Biots contemporaries those
average rates were smaller.
USC-7
UCB-6
UCSD-1
UCB-5
UCI-1
200
UCB-4
BIOT
UCB-7
USMA
SU-2
UCB-12
UCB-1
UCB-2
USFA
UCB-3
SU-1
CIT-2
100
USC- 4
UCSD-2
SU-2
CIT-1
CIT-3
UCSD-3
USMA
Fractional count
10
20
30
40
50
gineering, who specialize in Mechanics and Earthquake Engineering. It illustrates the spread about the
mean trend (USMA) and about Biots cumulative
number of journal papers, versus years since Ph. D.
degree. It shows the trends only qualitatively, since
most of the papers are in fact abstracts reported in
the National Information Service for Earthquake
Engineering database (NISEE), and those abstracts
include reports and conference papers in addition to
the journal papers. In this figure faculty are identified by a letter code and a number. The letter code
shows the institution where the faculty work, for example USC is Univ. of Southern California, UCSD
is U.C. San Diego, UCB is U.C. Berkeley, CIT is
Caltech, and so on. To avoid clutter cumulative
number of papers is shown only for a subset of 20
professors, from a group of 51 studied by Trifunac
(2005a). NISEE stands for National Information
Service for Earthquake Engineering which during
the past 30 years has been the leading repository for
all relevant published work in Earthquake Engineering and the related fields (nisee.berkeley.edu). At
present this database has more than 100,000 abstracts. From January 2004 this data can be accessed
through Cambridge Scientific Abstracts (CSA) in
Bethesda, Maryland (www.csa.com).
Distribution function
Biot
0.5
USMA
Average
ber of corrected citations and the citations taken directly from ISI web site, without corrections, are
within a factor of about two. Consequently it will be
assumed that those two are approximately equal, and
the total number of citations, using normal count,
will be used to illustrate the trends.
1.0
Distribution Function
0.5
USMA
Biot
Average
0
10
Frequency of ocurrence
Frequency of occurrence
0
10
Histogram
Biot
0
10
20
30
40
50
Biot
UCB-1
UCI-1
USC-7
UCB-2
50
20
10
USC-9
UCSD-2
UCB-8
MIT-1
RU-1
CIT-2
USC-8
UCSD-1
TUA-1
CIT-1
USB-6
USC-4
USC-3 RPI-1
SUNYB-1
USC-6 USC-2
JH-1
SUNYB-2
CIT-3
USC-11
UT-1
UCD-1
UIU-2 CU-1
USC-13
UCI-2
USC-12
UCB-3
USC-1
UCB-4
UW-1 UIU-1
RU-2
UCSD-3
SU-1
UT-2
IC-1
UCB-5
USC-10
ULJ-1
SU-1
5
UCLA-1
USC-5
CU-2
UCB-7
As of Jan 1, 04
1985: Age 80
1975: Age 70
1965: Age 60
1955: Age 50
1945: Age 40
2500
1
2000
Fig. 5 Total ISI citations per year versus publication rates (papers per year for Biot, and abstracts per year for others).
published between 1 and 8 papers per year and received between 3 and 100 citations per year. M. Biot
who published on the average 3.4 papers per year,
received (between 1975 and 2004) about 170 citations per year. Diagonal lines in Fig. 6 labeled
1,5,10,20 and 50 show the loci of constant number
of citations per published abstract (paper). For M.A.
Biot there are 51 citations per published paper.
In the above, publication and citation rates of
Biot are compared with those of the leading faculty
in Earthquake Engineering only. This is natural and
a logical first step, because Earthquake engineering
as such could be considered to have been born with
Biots concept of a response of an idealized structure
to ground motion (Krishna, 1981), and because the
author of this paper is familiar only with the field of
Earthquake engineering. Other similar comparisons,
which are beyond the scope of this paper, can be
presented by comparing Biots productivity and citation rates with contemporary leading researchers in
poromechanics and in other fields to which Biot
contributed seminal work.
5 BIOTS HIGHLY CITED PAPERS
Figure 6 shows citations (normal count) of M.A.
Biot, plotted versus his age, at the time the cited
work was published. From 1975 to January 2004,
Biot received 9,214 citations, mainly derived from
four groups of his contributions that were published
in: (1) 1941, (2) 1956, (3) 1962 and (4) 1965, when
he was 36, 52, 57 and 60 years old. The first group
included his papers 40 and 41 (Bibliography of
1500
1000
500
30
40
50
60
70
80
Age
Fig. 6 Total ISI citations of M.A. Biot versus his age at the
time his cited work was published. Rough estimates of upper
bounds on what his total ISI citations may have been at his age
of 45, 55. and 85 are shown by different lines.
Decomposition of Biots citations into nine subject areas shows that 62% came from 21 papers on
poroelastic media, 9% from 26 papers on theory of
folding, 3% from 3 papers on wave propagation, 2%
from 2 papers in thermodynamics, 1% from 7 papers
in Nonlinear Elasticity, 1% from 6 papers on reflection of electomagnetic waves, <1% from 4 papers on
earthquake engineering, <1% from 7 papers on
aeronautic and fluid mechanics, and <1% from 4 papers on supersonic wings. The remaining 19% of citations came from 103 papers Biot wrote on various
other subjects.
6 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
Counting references to rank significance of journal
papers and of the journals publishing those papers
appears to be quite old. Since 1955 when Prof.
Eugene Garfield of the University of Pennsylvania
suggested that reference counting could also measure impact of published work, with introduction of
Science Citation Index (SCI) in 1963, and modern
development of citation databases, a major and use-
ful new tool became available to scientists and engineers. Today the data on citations is updated and distributed by the Institute of Scientific Information
(ISI) (www.isinet.com/ISI).
Modern ISI database, which contains citations
(Science Citation Index Expanded) covers the period
from 1975 to present, and has been the subject of
numerous studies aiming to find how it should be
used and interpreted. Discussion of these studies is
beyond the scope of his paper, but what should be
noted is that the citation rates vary between sciences
and engineering and among different fields. The
consequence is that the citation rates can be used to
compare researchers and journals only within a specific discipline. In the case of M. Biot the challenge
in the analysis of citations is the interdisciplinary nature of his publications. The benefit of analyzing his
citations is that his citation rates can be viewed as a
calibration point for analysis of his contemporaries
who worked in one or in several of the same subject
areas. Future studies, which may attempt to quantify
the categorical variables describing various attributes of excellence, will find the citation data for M.
Biot to be invaluable. We all know that the regression models are most sensitive to the data points that
lie beyond the common range.
It is obvious that Biots impact in several subject areas (e.g. porous media, wave propagation,
earthquake engineering, thermodynamics, nonlinear
elasticity) of applied mechanics is exceptional. The
fact that the number of citations his corresponding
papers received in most of these areas is also exceptionally high supports and reinforces Garfields hypothesis that counting citations can be a measure of
impact of ones published work.
The singular nature of Biots citations is apparent
from Fig. 4 and 5. He has more than three times the
number of citations of the most cited members of the
sample of the 51 faculty (Fig. 4) chosen for this relative comparison. His work in 21 papers on Porous
Media alone, places him by a factor of two above
the most cited members of the same sample of 51
faculty. Eliminating all of his contributions to the
subject of Porous Media and the associated citations,
would still place Biot above the highest cited members of the same (Earthquake Engineering) group
(Fig. 5).
Unexpected and disappointing for the author of
this article is that Biot received relatively small
number of citations for his work on the Response
Spectrum Method, Aeronautical Fluid Mechanics
and Supersonic Wings. It is difficult to explain this
outcome, and perhaps the reasons involve a combination of effects. What we do know is that uncitedness in engineering is high, approaching 80 percent
(78% in civil engineering, 77% in Aerospace engineering, 66% in chemical engineering; Hamilton,
1991a), relative to physics (37%) and geosciences
(46%). In early 2004 in category of engineering
HighlyCited.com
(Thomson/ISI;
www.thomson.com) had 212 names, but there was
no single Earthquake Engineer among them (Trifunac, 2005b). It seems that Earthquake Engineers are
not only ignoring the seminal contributions of M.A.
Biot, but also those of their own colleagues.
Finally it is hoped that this simple analysis of citations of M.A. Biot papers will inspire and influence young and future researchers to seek broad and
interdisciplinary education and in their writing of
papers to deemphasize quantity and focus on quality
and substance.
REFERENCES
Amin, A. and Mabe, B. (2000) Impact factors, use and abuse,
Perspectives in Publishing, No. 1, 1-6.
Biot, M.A. (1932) Vibrations of Buildings during Earthquakes,
Chapter II in Ph. D. Thesis No. 259 entitled Transient Oscillations in Elastic System, Aeronautics Department,
Calif. Inst. of Tech., Pasadena, California.
Bozeman, B. and Lee, S. (2003) The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity, Presented at Annual
Meeting of the American Association for Advancement of
Science, Denver, Co., February 2003.
Hagstrom, W.O. (1965) The Scientific Community. Basic
Books, New York.
Hamilton, D.P. (1991a) Research Papers: Whos Uncited
Now? Science, p. 25, 4 January 1991.
Hamilton, D.P. (1991b) Publishing by-and for? The Numbers, Science, p. 1331, 7 December 1991.
Krishna, J. (1981) On Earthquake Engineering, in State of the
Art in Earthquake Engineering, 1981, edited by O. Ergunay
and M. Erdik, Kelaynak Publishing House, Ankara, Turkey.
Lehman, H.C. (1953) Age and Achievement. Princeton University Press.
Mindlin, R.D. (1989) Maurice Anthony Biot, in Memorial
Tributes: Natl. Academy of Engineering, Volume 3, 31-35.
Scott, S. (1996) Connections: John E. Rinne, The EERI Oral
History Series, Earthquake Eng. Res. Institute, Publication
No. OHS-3, 499 14th Street, Ste 320, Oakland, California.
Tolstoy, I. (Editor) (1992) Twenty-one Papers by M.A. Biot,
Acoustics, Elasticity and Thermodynamics of Porous Media, Acoustical Society of America, 500 Sunnyside Blvd.,
Woodbury, New York.
Trifunac, M.D. (2003) 70th Anniversary of Biot Spectrum, 23rd Annual ISET Lecture, Indian Society of Earthquake
Technology Journal, Paper 431, Vol. 40, No. 1, 19-50.
Trifunac, M.D. (2005a) On publication rates in Earthquake Engineering, submitted for publication.
Trifunac, M.D. (2005b) On Citation Rates in Earthquake Engineering, submitted for publication.
Trifunac, M.D. and Lee, V.W. (2004) A study on the relative
ranking of twelve faculty of the USC Civil Engineering
Department Experiments with Science Citation Index Expanded, Dept. of Civil Eng. Report No. CE 04-03, Univ. of
Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Wanner, R.A., Lewis, L.S. and Gregorio, D.I. (1981) Research
Productivity in Academia: A comparative study of the sciences, social sciences, and humanities, Sociology of Education, Vol. 54, 238-253.