20161.

( A) 34

Teaching

Procedures Consistent with learning Curriculum &

Syllabus in Architectural Departments, AL-Nahrain University

Dr. Nawfal Joseph Rizqoo

Architectural Engineering Department, University of Al-Nahrain / Baghdad.
Email:Mahabanawfal@yahoo.com

Received on:8/7/2015

&

Accepted on:12/11/2015

ABSTRACT
The fact that today's world is passing through a stage of scientific development and massive
technological advances, this stage is Known by the scientific and technological Revolution,
which added to the human civilization huge toll of knowledge in many areas, that increasing
in quantity and quality day after day, and while the academic institutions is a social
institutions created by the community to establish a, scientific individuals to carry out their
responsibilities, and also are considered a tributary which supplies the community with
different scientific persons capable of advance the reality for the better, many efforts have
been made in the research and studies in the field of Curriculum in academic institutions,
given a big emphasis on the concept of Teaching Procedures Consistent with learning
Curriculum in searching for an active teaching away from the technique performance ( the
traditional one) which is not accomplish the real Understanding, and where the modern
educational studies set towards affirming on the necessity of activating the Role of the
Teaching Procedures as ways that gave the better teaching income which lead toward
accomplish the understanding and gaining the Knowledge from the students in simplest, faster
,and more efficient teaching procedure. The education studies have reached that this no ideal
procedure that can we use to teach which appropriate with all goals we want to accomplish
,but there is many procedures considered the teacher as the core in the learning process, while
other procedures we considered the teacher and the students playing both the big role in it. So
the research seeks to Diagnose the teaching Procedures that are consistence with the
Curriculum adopted in Architectural Departments with its Syllabus, and the research choose a
case study that was the Architectural Department in -AL-Nahrain University,and the research
has reviewed its syllabus compared with the teaching Procedures in the research body, the
research conclude that there is a connection between many syllabus in Curriculum with
special group of teaching Procedures and so when we adopt these teaching Procedures in
lectures we may save a lot of efforts ,time from both the lecturer and the student , and that
would contribute in understanding the syllabus lectures in simplest, faster ,and more efficient
way.

/
:


,
,
,
38

 34 ) (A20161.

- - .


.
,
.
, ) (
, .


.
" :
".
":
" .
]

) / (
.
(1
.
(2
.
(3
) / (

.1
.
.
.2
:
" ,
, -
".
.
:
,
.

.
,, , .
: , , , ,
... ,

, , ...

,
) ,1986,.(12
39

 34 ) (A20161.

:

) (
) ( Merril,1983 ) , 2000, (34 :
.

.
.

)(1

. ) /, 2000,.(34
) ,1993, (40 :
:

.
:

.
:

.
:

.
) ,1993,(40
, ) (1
.

) (2 . ) /
,1993,.(40
40

 34 ) (A20161.

) ,2004, (22


.
-1
:
.
: .
-2
:
-3
....
: .
-4

, .

),1997,:(72
.
-1
.
-2
.
-3
) (3

) (3 )/,1997,(72

,
,
) , , , ,(
,
.
) ,2004,:(24
)). :

,, , , , ..
/((.
)). :

, , , ... - /((
)). :

, - .. , - . /((.
)).

: .., . /((

41

 34 ) (A20161.

)) ,

: , .
/(( .
) (4 .

) (4
) ,2004,.(24
:
:
, , : , : ) ,
(.
,
, Teaching Method :
, , , , ...

, ),1979,.(41
,

- )
,1981,.(32
). (Weston & Carntion,1984, P:65

). (2000-
:

"
)
(
,
".
:
, , , ,,

, , , , , , , , ,
, , .
,
,
.
,
,

42

 34 ) (A20161.

, , , ,
, ,
,

) ,2000,. ( 24
:
,
,
,
.
,
) ,1993,:(12
: ,
,

,
,
...
, ) ,1993,.(13
:
, , ,

,
,
, ..
) ,2000,.(30
:
,


) ,2000,.(30
: ,
,
, ,
,
,
,
, ) ,2000,.(30
) ) ) (Syllabus (
.
. ( -
43

 34 ) (A20161.

:
,
.

,
) .
,1993,.(14
:
,


.

:
.1 .
.2 .
.3 .
.4 .. .
..
.


,
.
) ,1993,.(14
:
)
,2005,: ( 325
.1 .
.2
.
.3 , ,
.
.4 .
.5 .
.6 )
(.
.7 .
.8 .
.9 .
.10 , , ,
, ,
...
.11 , .
44

 34 ) (A20161.

.12
.
.13 ,
.
.14
.
.15 .
.16
.
) ( :
,
, .

,
.

, .
) ( Models of Teaching ,
.
) ,1998, . (36

,

) , , , (
,

.


,
) (Joyce & Weil ,1980,p:72
, :
.1 , ,
,
, ..
.
. , ) ( .
. , ) ( .
. , )(.
. , ) ( .
.2 ) (
.. .
.1 ) (.
.2 , ) (.
.3 , ) (,.
.4 , ) (.
45

 34 ) (A20161.

.5 ) (.
.6 , ) (.
.3 ,
,
.
.1 , ) (.
.2 , ) (.
.3 , )(.
.4 , ) (.
.4 , ,
,
, .
.1 ,
) (.
.2 ) (.
.3 ) ( .
:
) ,2002,: (18
:
, ) ( , , ,
, ....
:
: , , , ...
, ...
:
: , , , ... .
: , , , , , ,
....
:
:
....
, ,... .
, ,...,.
:
, , , ....
, , , , ....
.
:
) (5
) ,1998,: ( 52
.
.

46

 34 ) (A20161.

. . . - .

.
-

.
.
.
.
.

.

:
-

.

.
.

.
.

) (5 , ) /
,1998,.( 52
.
:
, :
.
.
.
.
.
: Lecture ...

.

.
:
) . ( :
.
. :

.
. :

.
. :

.
47

 34 ) (A20161.

. :
.
. :

.
. :

, .
. :

.
:
) (6 )( . ) / ,2002,(38

.1 :
.
.
.
.
. .
. .
.2
.
.3
.
.4
.
.5

.

.1 .
.2
.
.3
.
.4

.
.5 .
.6
.
.7
.
.8 .
.9
.
.10

.

:
,

.


) ,1998,.(45
:
.
.
.
.
) (7 :
48

 34 ) (A20161.

) (7 )( . )/ ,1998,.(45

.1
.
.2
.
.3
.
.4 .
.5
.
.6
.
.7
.

.1
.
.2 .
.3
.
.4

.
.5
.

:

,
,
,


,
) (
) ,2003,.(64
)(8 :
) (8 )( . )/,2003,.(64

.1
.
.2 .
.3
.
.4
.

.5
.

.1
.
.2
.
.3
,
.
.4

.
.5


.

49

 34 ) (A20161.

:
) ( )( , 1969 1960
.
) (
:
.1 ,
.
.2 ,
.
.
.3 , ) (
, Advanced Organizers

) ,1993,.(62
:
:
.
.
.
:

.
:
:
.
.
) ( ) (9:
) (9 ) ( . )/
,1993,.(62

.1
.
.2


.
.3
.
.4

.
.5
.
.6

.
.7

.

.1
.
.2

.
.3

.
.4
.
.5

.
.6
,
.
.7
.

50

 34 ) (A20161.

:
,
)( ,
,
,) ,1992,:(82
:
.
:
,:
) , , , ... ,(
: .
: ,
.
:

.
:
) (10 ) ( . )/ ,1992,(82

.

.

.


.

.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.. .

.
.

.

:
) ,2000, ( 57 ,
,
, :
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
51

 34 ) (A20161.

:

.

.


.
) ( , :

) (11 ) ( . )/ ,2000,(57

.

.


.
.

.

.

.

.
.

.1

.
.2

.
.3

.
.4

.

:

.


)/ ,2000,.( 58



:
.
.
.
.
.
.. :
52

 34 ) (A20161.

:
, ,
,
.
:
.
:


.

... :
) (12 ) ( . )/ ,2000,( 58

.1

.
.2


.
.3

.
.4

.
.5

.
.6

.
.7
.
.8
.
.9

.
.10
.
.11

.
.12
.
.13

.

.1
.
.2

.
.3


.
.4

.
.5

.

53

 34 ) (A20161.

:

.
)/ ,1992,:(84
.1 :
.
.2 :
..

.
:
) , , , .. (.
) , .., (.
) , .(..,
) , , .(..,
) .(...
:
) .(..
) (.

, .(..

,.(...
:
:

.
:
.
:
.
:
.
, :
) (13 ) ( . / )/
,1992,(84

1 .
2
3
.
4
.
5
.

54

.
.
.
,
,
.
.

 34 ) (A20161.

:

.
,



) ,1992,.(85
:
: ,
.
: .
: .
: .
:
.
:
.
:
.
:
) (14 )( . )/ ,1992,.(85

.1

.
.2
.
.3

.
.4
.
.5
.
.6

.
.7
.
.8
.

.1

.
.2



,
,
.
.3


.
.

:
. .
:
55

 34 ) (A20161.

10-5 ,
20-5
.
,

) ,1993,.(51
:
:


,
.
:

.
:

, .
:
) (15 ) ( . )/ ,1993,.(51

.1
.
.
.2
.
.
.3
.
,
.
, .
.4
.
.
.
:

6- 2 ,
,
,
,
) ,1986,.(62


.
:
56

 34 ) (A20161.

.
.

.
.

.
.
,
.
, .
:
) (16 ) ( . )/ ,1986,.(62

.1

.
.2

.
.3
.
.4

.
.5
)
, ,(.
.6
.
.7

.
.8

.

.1

.
.2
.
.3

.
.4
.
.5
.
.6
.
.7

.

) (
,
, ,

,

. : )
( ,: : )
( )
( ,

57

 34 ) (A20161.

.


...,
,

.
)/ (-1-3
) (17 ,
) , (-2-3 ) (22),(21), (20) , (19) , (18
,
, ) (DOT
.
) , ,
(
. ) (6
.


:
. . . - .

.
-

.
.
.
.
.
.

.

:
-

.

.


.

) ( 6 )(Syllabus
)./
) ,1998,.(52
:
, ) (17.

58

..

.

.

34 ) (A20161.

/

) (17 ,
)/( .

59

)(3DMAX

34 ) (A20161.

/

60

,
.

34 ) (A20161.

/

61

.
.
.
.

62

.
.
.
.
.
.

.


,,
) (concept

.

)
, ,

34 ) (A20161.

/

:
) (22-18.
) (18 ) (, )
() ,/( . -

 34 ) (A20161.

) (19 ) (, )
() ,/( . -

63

 34 ) (A20161.

) (20 ) (, )
( )/( . -

64

 34 ) (A20161.

) (21 ) (, )
() ,/( . -

65

 34 ) (A20161.

) (22 ) (, )
() ,/( . -

:

) . (22-18
,
.-
) : , , , , (,
.
: ) /
( ,
) (

: )
, , , , (,
) ( ) (.
) , ,, ,
(. (

:
, :
(1
,
66

 34 ) (A20161.

.
) ,(The Extensional Logic
) (Persuasion ). ( The Logic of Intension
(2 ,

, ,
.

,

.

].[1,, , , 1986,.
].[2 , , , :2000,.
].[3 , , , :1993,.
].[4 , , . , : 2004 ,.
].[5 , .
1997,.
].[6 , , , ,1 :2004,.
].[7 , , , : 1979 ,.
].[ 8 , , ,,15 :1981,.
].[9 , , , : 2000.
].[10, , , :1993,.
].[11 , , , , , 2005,.
].[12 , , ) ,( , :1998,.
].[13 , , . ,2 : , ,
2002.
].[14, , , :
,1998,.
].[15 , , , , 2003.
].[16 , , , : 1992,.
].[17 , , , ,2 : 2000 ,.
].[18 , , , :1993,.
].[19 , , ) ( , : 1986,.

[1].Weston, C., Crantion, P., Selecting instruction Strategies, Journal ofhigher
Education.1983.
[2].Joyce, B., Weil, M., Models of Teaching, Prentice Hall Inc. New Jersey, 1980.

67