Professional Documents
Culture Documents
If the reader has the opportunity, time, and patience to review the entire article, not just the title
and the abstract, some of the ambiguities can be resolved; however, the reader commonly has limited
time or access, allowing the analysis of only the
abstract of the article. It is therefore crucial for all
authors to use standardized eye injury terms, which
permit a single interpretation.
(Table 4)
Placing each of these injury types within the
0896-1549/02/$ see front matter D 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 8 9 6 - 1 5 4 9 ( 0 2 ) 0 0 0 0 4 - 4
140
Term [reference]
Interpretation
Clinical implication
Resolution
Table 1
Literature review: ocular trauma terms difficult to interpret
141
Table 2
Literature review: ocular trauma terms used inappropriately
Penetrating [9]
Penetrating [10]
Rupture [11,12]
Likely interpretation
by the reader
Original interpretation
in the article
Resolution
Injury with an
entrance wound
Injury with an
entrance wound
Table 3
Ocular trauma terminology: an ideal system versus reality
What should be the case
Table 4
Terms and definitions in BETT a
Term
Definition/interpretation
Explanation
Eyewall
Lamellar laceration
Rupture
Laceration
Penetrating injury
Some injuries remain difficult to classify (an intravitreal BB pellet) whereas technically an intraocular foreign body (IOFB)
injury is a blunt object that requires great force to enter the eye, involving an element of rupture. In such situations, the
ophthalmologist should describe the injury as mixed (ie, rupture with an IOFB) or select the most serious type of the
mechanisms involved.
142
Fig. 1. BETT. The thick boxes contain the diagnoses used in clinical practice.
References
[1] Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD, Heimann K, Jeffers
J, Treister G. A standardized classification of ocular
trauma terminology. Ophthalmology 1996;103:240 3.
143