Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pediatrics 1980;65:375-461.
2. Boneva RS, Botto LD, Moore CA, Yang Q, Correa A, Erickson JD.
clinical presentation
The clinical presentation of oncogenic osteomalacia is reminiscent of that of the more common
disorder X-linked hypophosphatemia,2 which has
been studied intensively and serves as the prototypic hypophosphatemic disorder. Oncogenic osteo-
www.nejm.org
1705
The
evaluation
When these clinical features occur in an older child
or an adult, particularly in the absence of any relevant family history of disease, oncogenic osteomalacia should be suspected. A careful search for a tumor is an important step in the evaluation of such
patients. A substantial number of deaths can be
avoided by removal of the causative tumor, and in
some cases, an occult cancer may be identified. Tumors are often quite small and not detectable on
physical examination or routine radiography. There
appears to be a propensity for these tumors to arise
in the head and neck, and detailed computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the
sinuses and jaw areas is suggested. The occurrence
of tumors at skeletal sites is not uncommon in patients with oncogenic osteomalacia. Successful localization of causative tumors with the use of indium-111 pentetreotide or octreotide scintigraphy
has been demonstrated.3,4 Technetium-99 methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy has also been used
but is likely to reveal uptake of isotope in areas of
active osteomalacia, rather than to localize a tumor.
With increasing awareness of this syndrome, and
increasingly refined imaging techniques, we may
discover that such tumors are not as rare as they
were once thought to be.
The report by Jonsson et al. of a serum assay
for the tumor-derived factor FGF-23 will most likely
add to the armamentarium for the diagnosis of this
condition and may help to establish whether tumors have been completely removed by surgery. Circulating levels of FGF-23, however, are increased
in patients with X-linked hypophosphatemia; thus,
this measure does not appear to distinguish between the two conditions. Furthermore, it is not
clear whether the assay preferentially recognizes
the intact FGF-23 molecule or C-terminal fragments
of it. Specific identification of various molecular
1706
of
medicine
www.nejm.org
editorials
coma was discovered in a patient who had had oncogenic osteomalacia for many years before its source
was identified.10 Other patients have had recurrent
disease that has progressed and become fatal. Thus,
it is highly recommended that the surgeon establish
a margin of resection that is free of tumor, particularly in the case of tumors with substantial atypia or
mitotic elements.
FGF-23
pathophysiology and
candidate mediators
Despite improvements in our understanding of oncogenic osteomalacia and X-linked hypophosphatemia, the puzzle has not been completely solved.
Loss of function of the PHEX (phosphate-regulating gene with homologies to endopeptidases on the
X chromosome) protease determines the X-linked
hypophosphatemia phenotype, but how this occurs
remains a mystery.2 Specific mutations of FGF-23
result in autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic
rickets11; this may be due to a mutation-induced
inhibition of processing.12 The injection of FGF23transfected cells into mice results in the characteristic features of oncogenic osteomalacia.13 On
the other hand, other factors identified from tumors
responsible for oncogenic osteomalacia have been
implicated in phosphate homeostasis; these factors
include frizzled-related protein 4, matrix extracellular phosphoglycoprotein, and unidentified substances with small molecular weights.14 Figure 1
shows the central role of FGF-23 in the proposed
mechanisms underlying hypophosphatemic disorders.
A number of important questions remain. Does
PHEX degrade FGF-23, thereby accounting for increased levels in patients with X-linked hypophosphatemia? Is FGF-23 the direct mediator responsible for impaired transport of phosphate by the
renal tubules and the impaired regulation of vitamin D metabolism, or does another factor in a complex cascade of signals perform this function? Is
the bone disease simply a result of prolonged hypophosphatemia, or does FGF-23 or another tumorderived substance have a direct effect on the skeleton? What are the roles of frizzled-related protein
4 and matrix extracellular phosphoglycoprotein?
The finding that increased circulating FGF-23 levels
occur in X-linked hypophosphatemia as well as in
oncogenic osteomalacia argues that these two disorders do share a common pathophysiological pathway. Further clinical investigation made possible by
3. PHEX function
PHEX
Intermediate
?
mechanism?
Loss of
PHEX function
Phosphate wasting
Figure 1. Proposed Roles of Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 (FGF-23) in the Generation of Phosphate Wasting.
It is speculated that three mechanisms may occur. First, FGF-23 is a secretory
product of tumors associated with oncogenic osteomalacia, accounting for
increased circulating levels of FGF-23 in patients with oncogenic osteomalacia. The secreted form of the molecule is not known, but it is depicted here as
an intact protein. Second, specific mutations of arginine residues at position
176 or 179 of FGF-23 disrupt the sequence motif recognized by furin proteases, presumably resulting in altered processing or decreased degradation of
the protein the putative mechanism of disease in autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets. Third, the loss of function of PHEX (phosphate-regulating gene with homologies to endopeptidases on the X chromosome),
which occurs in X-linked hypophosphatemia, results in increased circulating
levels of FGF-23. Whether the PHEX protein functions as a protease to cleave
FGF-23 at the depicted site or elsewhere is unknown. It is not clear whether
FGF-23 acts directly on the renal tubule or whether another FGF-23mediated
signal is necessary. The putative cleavage site of FGF-23 between the arginine
residue at position 179 and the serine residue at position 180 is noted.
www.nejm.org
1707
editorials
this new assay may shed further light on the complex pathophysiology involved.
Dr. Carpenter reports having received consulting fees from Merck
and Genzyme and a grant from CuraGen.
From the Section of Pediatric Endocrinology, Yale University School
of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.
1. Jonsson KB, Zahradnik R, Larsson T, et al. Fibroblast growth
intravenous phosphate infusion in the palliative treatment of tumorinduced osteomalacia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:549-55.
8. Weidner N, Santa Cruz D. Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors:
a polymorphous group causing osteomalacia or rickets. Cancer
1987;59:1442-54.
9. Drezner MK. Tumor-induced osteomalacia. In: Favus MJ, ed.
Primer on the metabolic bone diseases and disorders of mineral
metabolism. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,
1999:331-7.
10. Cheng CL, Ma J, Wu PC, Mason RS, Posen S. Osteomalacia secondary to osteosarcoma: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989;
71:288-92.
11. The ADHR Consortium. Autosomal dominant hypophosphataemic rickets is associated with mutations in FGF23. Nat Genet
2000;26:345-8.
12. White KE, Carn G, Lorenz-Depiereux B, Benet-Pages A, Strom
TM, Econs MJ. Autosomal-dominant hypophosphatemic rickets
(ADHR) mutations stabilize FGF-23. Kidney Int 2001;60:2079-86.
13. Shimada T, Mizutani S, Muto T, et al. Cloning and characterization of FGF23 as a causative factor of tumor-induced osteomalacia.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:6500-5.
14. Schiavi SC, Moe OW. Phosphatonins: a new class of phosphateregulating proteins. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2002;11:423-30.
Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society.
1708
www.nejm.org