Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nordic Psychology
Publication details, including instructions for
authors and subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rnpy20
University of Vigo
To cite this article: Mara Jos Prez-Fabello & Alfredo Campos (2011) The
dissociative experiences of Fine Arts students, Nordic Psychology, 63:1, 72-81
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1901-2276/a000028
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study
purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution,
reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form
to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can
be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
ARTICLE
Abstract
The study of dissociative experiences has witnessed significant advancements
since the publication of the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) for the assessment of dissociation. The DES, a self-report instrument, is one of the most extensively used scales and has become fertile ground for research in clinical and
nonclinical populations. The high level of dissociation observed in nonclinical
populations has been ascribed to factors such as age, personality and cognitive
factors. As certain types of activity or environments have been reported to be
conducive to dissociation, the purpose of this study was to assess dissociative
experiences in a sample of students from the Faculty of Fine Arts in comparison
to a sample of students from the Faculty of Psychology. Significantly higher scores
were obtained for students of Fine Arts. High scores were also observed in items
that could be associated to a greater tendency towards fantasizing, imagination
and absorption. The results are assessed in terms of the sociocognitive model.
Keywords: Dissociation; Dissociative experiences; Fine Arts students.
DOI 10.1027/1901-2276/a000028
73
74
and imagination (Lynn & Rhue, 1988; Merckelbach & Muris, 2001; Merckelbach,
Muris, Horselenberg, & Stougie, 2000; Rauschenberger & Lynn, 1995; Waldo &
Merritt, 2000, Wilson & Barber, 1983). It has been suggested that deviant sleep
experiences contribute to the overlap between fantasy proneness and dissociation (Giesbrecht & Merckelbach, 2006), and the greater degree of dissociation,
the greater the proneness to daydream or fantasize (Merckelbach & Jelicic,
2004; Waldo & Merritt, 2000). Merckelbach (2004), in a sample of university
students, found that a high propensity to fantasize (as measured by the Creative
Experiences Questionnaire, Merckelbach, Horselenberg, & Muris, 2001), was
correlated to high scores for dissociative symptoms on the DES (M = 28.22, SD
= 14.01). Conversely, low scores for fantasizing were matched by low scores for
dissociative experiences (M = 13.01, SD = 7.50), the difference being significant
(p < 0.01). Another sample studied confirmed the observation that high fantasy
prones had significantly higher dissociative levels than low fantasy prones, mean
DES-C scores (Wright & Loftus, 1999) being 45.41 (SD = 15.46) and 31.44 (SD
= 13.94), respectively (p < 0.01).
Giesbrecht, Geraerts, and Merckelbach (2007) in a sample of undergraduates
found that fantasy proneness was found to be related to high dissociators commission errors. Thus, it seems that a pattern of heightened emotional reactivity
and commission errors is typical for people with elevated dissociation scores.
Vannucci and Mazzoni (2006) have suggested that dissociation in the normal
population may be associated to specific cognitive styles based on the use of
mental imagery given that high dissociative experience scores were found to
generate mental imagery of uncertain future events. Other studies have observed
a positive relationship, though low, between dissociative experiences and absorption (Frischholz et al., 1991; Norton, Ross, & Novotny, 1990), and between
absorption and the openness to experiences, the latter often being closely associated to creativity (Wild, Kuiken, & Schopflocher, 1995). Parra (2007) observed
that the pronenes to fantasize was associated to psychological absorption, dissociative experiences, and hallucinatory experiences in nonclinical populations.
Individuals have a great capacity for absorption, intense vivid visual imagery,
intense sensorial and imaginary experiences, and a predisposition to hallucinatory experience, all under the umbrella of normal dissociation.
Butler (2004, 2006) proposes that normative dissociation fulfils general adaptive functions: a) Normative dissociation in the form of daydreaming enables
mental processing and working. In daydreaming individuals foresee, test, create,
plan, and recall things as well as imagine alternative ways of how to do things,
and problem solve. b) Dissociation involving absorbing activities or engaging
in fantasy are common forms of escapism. Externally derived absorption or
internally directed fantasies bring about adaptive benefits that alleviate through
Nordic Psychology 2011, Vol. 63(1), 72-81
Method
Participants
The simple consisted of 264 university students (136 students from the Faculty of
Psychology, and 128 from the Faculty of Fine Arts), of which 221 were women
and 43 men, mean age 19.51 yrs. (SD = 1.21, range 18 to 22 years). All participants were second year undergraduates from their respective faculty who freely
volunteered to participate in the study.
75
76
Results
The internal consistency of the scale was .90 for Fine Arts students, .89 for
Psychology students, and .91 for the entire sample (Cronbachs ). The results
are similar to those obtained in other studies (Ensink & Van Otterloo, 1989;
Giesbrecht et al., 2007; Giesbrecht & Merckelbach, 2006; Icarn et al., 1996;
Icarn, Colom, & Orengo-Garca, 1996).
To examine the differences in dissociative experiences between Fine Arts students and Psychology students, and between men and women, a mixed-factor
analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed with factors Faculty (2 levels) and
gender (2 levels). Significant differences were found between both groups of
students, F(1, 243) = 7.87, p < . 01, power = .80 (see Table 1). Fine Arts students
obtained significantly higher scores on the DES than the Psychology students.
However, no significant differences were observed between men and women,
F(1, 243) = .25, p > . 05, nor in terms of the interaction between Faculty and
gender, F(1, 243) = 3.55, p > . 05.
To determine which items on the test exhibited significant difference in terms
Table 1: Means and Standard Deviations for Men and Women, Fine Arts and Psychology
Students, and Total Students in DES Scores
Fine Arts
Psychology
Total
SD
SD
SD
Men
24.83
13.72
22.71
9.78
24.12
12.45
Women
28.03
14.49
17.21
10.78
21.99
13.63
Total
27.32
14.33
17.76
10.78
22.33
13.45
Figure 1: Mean Scores of Fine Arts and Psychology Students in the DES
60
FineArts
Psychology
MeanscoresDES
50
40
30
20
10
0
1
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Items
of the scores obtained by Fine Arts students and Psychology students (see Figure
1), a MANOVA was carried out with the Faculty (i.e., Fine Arts or Psychology)
as the independent variable, and each item of the DES as a dependent variable.
The Faculty was found related to dissociative experiences (Lambda de Wilks =
.76, F(28, 218) = 2.450, p < .001, power = 1). Subsequent univariate analysis
indicated that all of the items were significant p < .05, save items 3, 4, 10, 21, and
27. Fine Arts students obtained higher scores on each item than the Psychology
students.
Discussion
Fine Arts students obtained significantly higher scores on the DES than Psychology
students, and these scores were significantly higher for most of the items. It is
worth noting that the rate of increase in the scores for each item was similar in
both samples and the high scores mainly corresponded to items that are related
to the propensity to fantasize, imagination, and absorption. This may be due
to factors such as the age group, and that Fine Arts students are encouraged to
develop these qualities and aptitudes.
Strikingly, however, high scores were obtained in both samples, a finding
substantiated by previous studies (Candel, Merckelbach, & Kuijpers, 2003;
Icarn, Colom, & Orengo-Garca, 1996; Merckelbach, 2004). Icarn, Colom and
Orengo-Garca (1996), suggesting the variability of the high scores in nonclinical
population may be due to the way the items on the scale are interpreted by the
Nordic Psychology 2011, Vol. 63(1), 72-81
77
78
participants. Following the interviews with the university students, Icarn, Colom
and Orengo-Garca (1996) concluded that participants tended to normalize the
content of the items e.g., the item hear voices in your head was interpreted
as referring to a type of inner subvocal language which is unlike having hallucinatory experiences.
Of the different explicative models of Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) (the
posttraumatic model, PTM e.g., Putnam, 1989; Ross, 2000; and the sociocognitive model, SCM, e.g., McHugh, 1995; Pope, Oliva, Hudson, Bodkin, & Gruber,
1999; Spanos, 1996), the SCM fits best explanation with our findings. This model
posits that alterations arise as a consequence of a therapists influences, media
portrayals, and socio-cultural expectations. One would, consequently, expect
pathological dissociation to be absent in any culture free of contamination and
role demands for it to occur; whilst in cultures where pathological dissociation
does occur, it is caused by contamination and iatrogenesis.
Though in clinical terms SCM theory has been the subject of controversy (for
a review of different approaches see Gleaves, 1996; Manning & Manning, 2007;
Lilienfeld et al., 1999), it may prove to be useful for explaining the high scores in
nonclinical populations. As a continuous variable, dissociation (see Parra, 2007)
may be high in specific groups of the general population, stemming partly from
a conducive environment and have, in nonclinical environments with peculiar
circumstances. Fine Art students work in an environment where creativity is
fundamental, and where the type of methodology for achieving this knowledge
favours divergent thought and requires considerable personal commitment.
Absorption, the tendency to fantasize and daydreaming favour creative work
and enrich the artistic outcomes. The absence of previous studies underlines the
need for further studies with other populations to contrast and substantiate these
findings. Moreover, further research is required on nonclinical populations with
different sociocultural backgrounds.
References
Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual Thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bernstein, E. M., & Putnam, F. W. (1986). Development, reliability and validity of a dissociation scale. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174, 727-735.
Butler, L. D. (2004). The dissociations of everyday life. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation,
5, 1-11.
Butler, L. D. (2006). Normative dissociation. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 29, 45-62.
Candel, I., Merckelbach, H., & Kuijpers, M. (2003). Dissociative experiences are related
to commissions in emotional memory. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 719-725.
Carlson, E. B., Putnam, F. W., Ross, C. A., Torem, M., Coons, P., Dill, D. L., Loewenstein,
R. J., & Braun, B. G. (1993). Validity of the Dissociative Experiences Scale in screening
for multiple personality disorder: A multicenter study. American Journal of Psychiatry,
150, 1030-1036.
Chefetz, R. A. (2006). Why should you read these articles on dissociative processes?
Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 29, xii-xxi.
Ensink, B. J., & Van Otterloo, D. (1989). A validation study of the DES in the Netherlands.
Dissociation, 2, 221-223.
Frischholz, E. J., Braun, B.G., Sachs, R.G., Schwartz, D.R., Lewis, J., Shaeffer, D.,
Westergaard, C., & Pasquotto, J. (1991). Construct validity of the Dissociative Experiences
Scale (DES): I. The relationship between the DES and other self-report measures of dissociation. Dissociation, 4, 185-188.
Gershuny, B. S., & Thayer, J. F. (1999). Relations among psychological trauma, dissociative
phenomena, and trauma-related distress: A review and integration. Clinical Psychology
Review, 19, 631-637.
Giesbrecht, T., Geraerts, E., & Merckelbach, H. (2007). Dissociation, memory commission
errors, and heightened autonomic reactivity. Psychiatry Research, 150, 277-285.
Giesbrecht, T., & Merckelbach, H. (2006). Dreaming to reduce fantasy? Fantasy proneness,
dissociation, and subjective sleep experiences. Personality and Individual Differences,
41, 697-706.
Gleaves, D. H. (1996). The sociocognitive model of dissociative identity disorder: A reexamination of the evidence. Psycholgical Bulletin, 122, 42-59
Icarn, E., Colom, R., & Orengo, F. (1996). Experiencias disociativas: Una escala de medida.
Anuario de Psicologa, 70, 69-84.
Icarn, E., Colom, R., & Orengo-Garca, F. (1996). Estudio de validacin de la escala de
experiencias disociativas con muestra de poblacin espaola. Actas Luso-Espaolas de
Neurologa, Psiquiatra y Ciencias Afines, 24, 7-10.
Krlin, D., Edman, G., & Nybck, H. (2007).Reliability and validity of a Swedish version
of the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES-II). Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 61,126-42.
Lilienfeld, S. O., Lynn, S. J., Kirsch, I., Chaves, J. F., Sarbin, T. R., Ganaway, G. K., & Powell,
R. A. (1999). Dissociative identity disorder and the sociocognitive model: Recalling the
lessons of the past.Psycological Bulletin, 125, 507-523.
Ludwing, A. M. (1983). The psychobiological functions of dissociation. American Journal
of Clinical Hypnosis, 26, 93-99.
Lynn, S. J., & Rhue, J. W. (1988). Fantasy proneness: Hypnosis, developmental antecedents,
and psychopathology. American Psychologist, 43, 35-44.
Manning, M. L., & Manning, R. L. (2007). Legion theory: A meta-psychology. Theory
Psychology, 17, 839-862.
McHugh, P. R. (1995). Resolved: Multiple personality disorder is an individually and
socially created artefact. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent
Psychiatry,34, 957-963.
79
80
Merckelbach, H. (2004). Telling a good story: Fantasy proneness and the quality of fabricated memories. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1371-1382.
Merckelbach, H., Horselenberg, R., & Muris, P. (2001). The Creative Experiences
Questionnaire (CEQ): A brief self-report measure of fantasy proneness. Personality and
Individual Differences, 31, 987-995.
Merckelbach, H., & Jelicic, M. (2004). Dissociative symptoms are related to endorsement
of vague trauma items. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 45, 70-75.
Merckelbach, H., & Muris, P, (2001). The causal link between self-reported trauma and
dissociation: a critical review. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39, 245-254.
Merckelbach, H., Muris, P., Horselenberg, R., & Stougie, S. (2000). Dissociative experiences, response bias, and fantasy proneness in college students. Personality and Individual
Differences, 28, 49-58.
Moyano, O., & Claudon, Ph. (2003). Experiences dissociatives severes relevees dans un
groupe detudiants Francais: propos de la depersonnalisation. [Stern dissociative
experiences in a French post-graduate students group: On depersonalization]. Annales
Mdico Psychologiques, 161, 183-189.
Norton, G. R., Ross, C.A., & Novotny, M.F. (1990). Factors that predict scores on the
Dissociative Experiences Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 273-277.
Parra, A. (2007). Interrelacin entre disociacin, absorcin y propensidad a la fantasa con
experiencias alucinatorias en poblacin no-clnica. ALCMEON, 14, 61-71
Prez-Fabello, M. J., & Campos, A. (2007a). Influence of training in artistic skills on mental
imaging capacity. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 227-232.
Prez-Fabello, M. J., & Campos, A. (2007b). The influence of imaging capacity on visual
art skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 128-135.
Prez-Fabello, M. J., Campos, A., & Gmez-Juncal, R. (2007). Visual imaging capacity and
imagery control in fine arts students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104, 815-822.
Pope, H. G., Oliva, P. S. Hudson, J. I., Bodkin, J. A., & Gruber, A. J. (1999). Attitudes toward
DSM-IV dissociative disorders diagnoses among Board-Certified American Psychiatrists.
American Journal of Psychiatry, 156,321-323
Putnam, F. W. (1989). Diagnosis and treatment of multiple personality disorder. New York:
Guilford.
Rauschenberger, S. L., & Lynn, S. J. (1995). Fantasy proneness, DSM-III- R Axis I psychopathology and dissociation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 373-380.
Ross, C. A. (1989). Multiple personality disorder: Diagnosis, clinical feature, and treatment.
New York: Wiley.
Ross, C. A. (2000). The trauma model: A solution to the problem of comorbidity in psychiatry. Richardson, TX: Manitou Communications.
Ross, C. A. (2006). Dissociative identity disorder. Current Psychosis & Therapeutics Reports,
4, 112-116.
Ross, C. A., Joshi, Sh., & Currie, R. (1990). Dissociative experiences in the general population. American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 1547-1552.
Ross, C. A., Joshi, Sh., & Currie, R. (1991). Dissociative experiences in the general population: A factor analysis. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 42, 297-301.
Ross, C. A., Norton, G. R., & Anderson, G. (1988). The Dissociative Experiences Scale: A
replication study. Dissociation, 1, 21-22.
Ross, C. A., Ryan, L., Anderson, G., Ross, D., & Hardy, L. (1989). Disociative experiences
in adolescents and college students. Dissociation, 2, 239-242.
Ross, C. A., Ryan, L., Voigt, H., & Eide, L. (1991). High and low dissociators in a college
student population. Dissociation, 4, 147-151.
Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity. Theories and themes: research, development, and practice.
81