Professional Documents
Culture Documents
doi:10.1111/jpc.12526
Dear Editor,
SWEARING IN DUTCH
I read with interest your editorial about swearing.1 I thought you
might be interested in some commonly used Dutch profanities. It
may seem unusual for an Australian paediatric rheumatologist of
Scottish heritage to have a vast knowledge of profanities in
Dutch, but the combination of making lifelong friends with a
Dutch family as an adolescent and undertaking a medical elective
in orthopaedics in Holland has exposed me to this interesting
aspect of Dutch culture. As an expert in the field of infectious
diseases, you will be most interested that many Dutch profanities
stem from infectious diseases. Tyfus (typhoid fever), tering
(tuberculosis), kolere (cholera), pleuris (pleurisy) and pokke
(smallpox) are all considered unmentionable profanities. The
addition of the word lijer or sufferer allows the word to be used
an as insult and is roughly analogous to arsehole. The most
severe and shocking of Dutch expletives is the use of the word
kanker or cancer. The short use of the word, with intonation on
the first consonant, is said in the same tone as sh%t. Unfortunately, diseases from within my own subspecialty do not seem to
have the same degree of effectiveness. Shouting out lupus when
one hits ones thumb with a hammer or insulting someone with
a passing Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type 2 Sufferer
just does not seem to have the same degree of cathartic relief nor
level of insult. Given the inappropriateness of these words as
expletives in the first place, this is a shortcoming of my subspeciality I am more than happy to accept.
Reference
1 Isaacs D. Swearing. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2014; 50: 12.
Dr Damien McKay
Staff Specialist
Department of Rheumatology
The Childrens Hospital at Westmead
Westmead, New South Wales
Australia
Dear Editor,
EMOTIONAL IMPACT OF BELLS PALSY IN CHILDREN
Bells palsy is an acute lower motor neuron paralysis or weakness of facial musculature. Recent evidence-based reviews have
reported acyclovir to be ineffective in terms of recovery of function in Bells palsy, whereas corticosteroids conferred significant
Dr Michelle Lee1
Dr Mark Mackay24
Miss Lisa Blackbourn1,3
Dr Franz E Babl1,3,4
1
Emergency Department
Royal Childrens Hospital
2
Department of Neurology
Royal Childrens Hospital
3
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
4
The University of Melbourne
Melbourne, Victoria
Australia
245
bs_bs_banner
References
1 Lockhart P, Daly F, Pitkethly M, Comerford N, Sullivan F. Antiviral
treatment for Bells palsy (idiopathic facial paralysis). Cochrane
Database Syst. Rev. 2009; (4): CD001869.
2 Salinas RA, Alvarez G, Daly F, Ferreira J. Corticosteroids for Bells palsy
(idiopathic facial paralysis). Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2010; (3):
CD001942, doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001942.pub4.
3 Unvar E, Oguz F, Sidal M, Kili A. Corticosteroid treatment of
childhood Bells palsy. Pediatr. Neurol. 1999; 21: 81416.
4 Weir AM, Pentland B, Crosswaite A, Murray J, Mountain R. Bells palsy:
the effect on self-image, mood state and social activity. Clin. Rehabil.
1995; 9: 1215.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Dr Mariam Said and Dr Sharon Hall for
their help while teaching at Lister Hospital.
Dear Editor,
THE JUNIOR DOCTOR: AN UNTAPPED PAEDIATRIC TEACHING
RESOURCE?
I would like to bring your attention to the unrecognised potential of junior doctors to carry out effective paediatric teaching.
Junior house officers rarely carry out structured paediatric
teaching, and we were unable to find any reports on PubMed of
their involvement. In the UK, junior house officers often have
considerably more time available than senior paediatricians and,
having recently finished their medical school exams, are also
likely to be more aware of the demands of the paediatric students curriculum.1 Equally, non-cognitive attributes play a key
role in effective teaching. Teachers who are able to inspire,
support, actively involve and communicate with their students
are likely to be more effective, and although junior house officers may have a lesser level of clinical knowledge than consultants and registrars, they can certainly possess the above
attributes.2,3 In addition, although their level of knowledge
might not be as complete as that of senior paediatricians, teaching will replenish the knowledge of the junior house officers
themselves.
While a junior paediatric doctor at Lister Hospital, I was one
of a pair of doctors who carried out weekly teaching sessions
over a period of 3 months. After each session, all students were
asked to complete a questionnaire. The subjective feedback
received for the teaching programme was consistently positive
for both teachers, the majority of students reporting that it was
better than most other paediatric teaching received.
Both the doctors very much enjoyed the experience of teaching on a weekly basis and subjectively felt it contributed both to
their own knowledge and the knowledge of their students.
This is an anecdotal report, and it is difficult to obtain an
objective assessment of teaching effectiveness.4 Additionally,
only three groups of 56 students were assessed in total, and
only two teachers were involved. With a larger spread of students or teachers, the programme might have had different
results.
Dr Baneke is a Glaucoma Research Fellow at Guys and St Thomas Hospital,
London, UK. At the time of compiling the data for this article he was a junior
doctor in paediatrics at Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
Conict of interest: No funding was received for writing this article.
246
References
1 Peadon E. I enjoy teaching but . . .: paediatricians attitudes to
teaching medical students and junior doctors. J. Paediatr. Child Health
2010; 46: 64752.
2 Sutkin G, Wagner E, Harris I, Schiffer R. What makes a good clinical
teacher in medicine? A review of the literature. Acad. Med. 2008; 83:
45266.
3 Bannister SL, Raszka WV, Maloney CG. What makes a great clinical
teacher in paediatrics? Lessons learned from the literature. Pediatrics
2010; 125: 8635.
4 Conigliaro RL. Assessing the quality of clinical teaching: a preliminary
study. Med. Educ. 2010; 44: 37986.
Dear Editor,
DRGER BABYLOG 8000 PLUS NEONATAL
RESPONSES TO CIRCUIT DISCONNECTION
VENTILATOR: