You are on page 1of 1
‘Tuming cirles can range from 10.2 for atypical small car 10 12.62m for a Rolls-Royce; for larger limousines it could be up to 150m. These are minimum kerb-o-ker> ‘uring circles and do not include body ovechangs and driver ability, Hence, practical tuming circle diameters fr large cars could range ffom 13.4m to 150m. A simple template of a _ large car is shown in Fig. 4. ‘The examination of new cars available inthe UK shows ‘hat the height of 95% of standard cars fall below 1.85m, Jusive of roof racksfbox. However, for MPVs and 44s, sam the 95 percentile increases to 2.05m. Adding a roof box increases the 95 percentile vehicle height to some 2.35m and 2.55m respectively. 43 Geometric requirements Parking arangements should be designed to allow drivers to ‘manoeuvre easly and safely and, where appropriate, to segregate vehicles from pedestrian areas and routes, The manoeuvring ease isa flmction of aise and bay widths, which also influence the dynamic capacity ofthe carpark. This is of particular importance fr shor-stay carparks Such as at retail cenzes where aise capacities are critical tothe operation car Fig 4.1 Swept path of a large saloon cor park Forlonger-stay ear pac, this is not co erica; therefore the bay dimensions could be reduced where customers are more familiar with the parking arangements suchas at office | Table 4.2 Car bay dimensions (Note 1) | or sation car pars Ie s Type of | Longa (en ‘Width (rm), Comment 43.1 Boy width and length ee pir Recommended practice isto design for normal use by the Pw"? _ |__| standard car and for occasional use by the lags ca However, | Med uso 480 240 Mixed occupancy consideration needs 10 be given to the requirements of 1 specials carparks, and to increased vehicle dimensions. | Shor stay 480 250 Typical les nan 2 Increased ead-coms may be applicable to carparks located in tourist aeas where a greater proportion of vehicles with | eae roof boxes are likly. Typical bay dimensions for standard | 4Or@Sey | 480 | 280 1g business ca park cars ae shown in Tale 42 ae BS 60 (fe 3) 43.2 Aisle width and bin width a lua | aes ee Guidance for aise and bin widths for various packing angles | P™ 2 with bays on each side ae shown in Table 43. These | Notes: 1, The dimensions are tobe dro any projections but se Section 4.3.4 prefered dimensions are clear of any strucure or edge details 2The prefree mension a 480m fra ox) ngs. However wi ested (but see Seeions 433, nd 43.4). Aisle widths ae designed Sena a Se (es le to accommodate ay overhang of vehicles beyond 48m, To 4. Tho bay with for use by dabled persons alows fr ho oro be ty sn ecard ees oe pti so panied to marove movement in and aut of the at and to provide groatar a eee odercsce pat | fom for assistance to be ven to these less moble.Adcvonal etal are ‘operations, variations to these dimensions can be considered. ‘Quen in Trae Acvieory Lonet S05" Parting for ieabiod and Buicing ‘Where this results in reduced dimensions the client should be Fregutations ‘for facies win and around buldings | sade fates eee te ae resting Hallaiend + Thay wit for use by part arch lows for fw coor be opered | such as restricted space between parked vehicles and more fan See ee dificult manoeuvring. Where comfort parking conditions are Tegured, asin retail parks, operators often specify greater | Table 4.3: Recommended aisle end bin wicths dimensions. a es Although they inreasethe dynamic capacity ofan sie, | paging ange | Profmedaise with | gay yign (ny | Profaned bin wish parking angles of less than 90° are tie used in underground mando [ty | armani) | teay length 480m) sea multi-storey ar parks asthe space requement pe bay eae t | increases and cot eficiency i reduced. AS a general guide, } a 1888 45° car parking reduces the ttl parking space by some 20% [ess compared with 90° packing. Hence, the parking angles and ;+—— . al associated isle widkhs ae provided for guidance, and One-way aisle circumstances may us using diferent wi a ea umsances may justify using trent widths a 433 Side clearance on structure 230 1498 Widths of end parking bays shouldbe increased where they | 60° 420 330 ue ae adjacent to walls or vehicle baer, This increase willbe | eee aess | subject to the edge detail form, but an addtional sie 230 1355 | clearance of some 30mm s suggested fom the bay marking os 360 2a 13.80 tothe edge del 250 188 cand underground car parks Se eae

You might also like