Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4. How do students in
FTL schools perform on
the state administered
achievement
test?
6. Mostly 6th grade High school Rural middle school Teachers K-12 students
Population students
Studied
7. Data mixed-methods Questionnaires true/false or multiple Likert-type scale, Frequency data and
Collection descriptive and quasi- choice questions survey questions, correlation data
Strategy experimental design needs assessment Performance indicator
that employed percentages
validated data Observation data
collection instruments
8. Data descriptive Average response for Percentage sorting Survey data Frequency data table
Analysis statistical techniques each question, the correlation data tables
Strategy including frequencies, desired response,
percentages, means, pretest and posttest
and standard variation from the
deviations desired response, and
the difference between
pretest and posttest
results
9. Findings Teachers like to lecture Factors such as Technological The most consistent There were negative
rather than use population, income proficiency increased finding of this study correlations between
technology as a source level, education significantly, especially was that teachers want the use of interactive
of instructional level, and distance for students from lower to have a choice of whiteboards and
delivery. It also proves influence a students socioeconomic what professional student engagement.
that students like to decision to choose backgrounds. Fewer development to attend.
and will use technology engineering disciplinary actions They also want to have
to present their as a freshman. were recorded, no numerous options to
knowledge if they have significant results for choose from.
to opportunity. academic achievement
10. Value of This is not the most After reading this This article is beneficial This article definitely This article lets me
this article valuable article I have article, I am much is the aspect of gives me an idea of know that strictly the
to your but it will certainly be more aware that allowing me the ability how many teachers use of interactive
project beneficial when income level and to understand how view the use and whiteboards to engage
focus discussing the need to distance from urban students in rural integration of students is not enough.
have more computers areas influence student settings may or may technology.
available to students in choices and outlooks not be as proficient in
all classroom settings. on technology usage. the use of technology
as those who live in
urban or metropolitan
areas.
Article Table Summary
Name Date
4. Journal Contemporary Issues Tech Trends Learning Disability Advances in Educ Inf Technol
Title in Education Research Quarterly Engineering Education
5. Research What factors in and What are effective (a) Do students have a) Is there a Research question #1
Question(s) outside the classroom ways difficulty activating relationship between What effects does a 1:1
that have resulted in to personalize prior knowledge? student and laptop initiative have
girls being turned away instruction? faculty use of the on student
from computer (b) Are students Tablet PC and desired academic performance
technology? How do you tailor reluctant to pose student learning based on perceptions
instruction or training questions or behaviors? of participating high
specifically to the conjectures? school students?
learner? b) Is there a difference
(c) Are students less in the self-regulated Research question #2
How can you align likely than peers to learning behaviors What effects does a 1:1
instructional needs have a systematic plan between students who laptop initiative have
directed towards to use the Tablet more on student
technology enhanced approach problems? frequently and those academic performance
teaching and learning? who use the Tablet less based on perceptions
(d) Do students frequently? of participating faculty?
struggle to take
instructor feedback
into account?
7. Data Observation data Correlation data Observation data Survey questions Likert-type scale that
Collection Observation data Survey questions ranged from 5 =
Strategy strongly agree to 1 =
strongly disagree.
8. Data meta-analyses Correlational data Observational data Descriptive and Frequency tables
Analysis tables tables multivariate statistics
Strategy Observational data Frequency data tables
tables Survey results
9. Findings There are many factors A strong connection Secondary students Students motivation to (90.7%) of the
in and outside the between social with disabilities often learn and engage participants indicated
classroom that have presence and improved rely on technology with engineering that they used their
resulted in girls being learning, interaction, more than their peers course content laptops on a
turned away from and satisfaction. without disabilities. increases in learning daily and weekly basis
computer technology. environments where to search for
The implications of Rich media can Students with LD: students make use of information
these factors include improve learning if Tablet PCs.
media depicting men they are used in ways (a) have difficulty (80.9%) used their
as experts in that promote effective activating prior laptops to complete
technology, societal cognitive processes in knowledge, homework
expectations of learners.
different goals for boys (b) are reluctant to (69.8%) to organize
and girls, the structure pose questions or information
of learning tasks, the conjectures,
nature of feedback in (67.4%) to
performance (c) are less likely than communicate using e-
situations, and the peers to have a mail or instant
organization of the systematic plan to messaging on a daily
classroom seating. approach problems, and
weekly basis
The research also (d) struggle to take
confirmed that home instructor feedback (76.9%) of the faculty
environments are an into account, stated that
important factor in engagement and
students developing (e) have difficulty interest level improved
an interest in computer making inferences as a
technology. during deductive and result of the integration
inductive reasoning of laptops into the
Gender differences processes, earning environment.
appeared in relation to
specific computer (f) seldom transfer (76.9%) of the faculty
activities knowledge across members indicated
contexts, that students ability to
work independently
(g) are less likely than improved during the
peers to be aware of laptop program
their metacognitive
processes. (69.2%) reported that
student
Students with motivation was
disabilities can improved as a result of
be successful in the use of laptops
science when they
receive instruction that (100%) of the
aligns with their unique faculty members
learning needs and indicated that they
processing abilities. observed no effect on
attendance as a result
technology-based of
games the laptop program
(a) can be more
effective than (76.9%) indicated no
traditional instruction effect on behavior or
the ability
(b) increase motivation to work in groups