Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Development of Liquefaction Factor of Safety (FS) Certain corrections were presented by Idriss and
Boulanger (2004) for calculating the Cyclic Resistance
Numerous papers had been published to develop the Ratio (CRR). One of them is the SPT overburden
factor of safety against liquefaction most of which correction factor . They proposed that these
began from the works of Seed and Idriss who published simultaneous equations be used for calculating and
the simplified procedure (Seed and Idriss, 1971). In (1 )60 .
1996, the National Center for Earthquake Engineering
= ( ) 1.7
Research (NCEER) conducted a workshop convening a
group of 21 experts to improve the procedure (Youd Where = 0.784 0.0768(1 )60
and Idriss, 1996). The report presented that the factor (1 )60 = ()60 46
of safety against soil liquefaction shall be taken as, The evaluated SPT penetration resistance should also
be adjusted to an equivalent clean sand value as,
= / (1 )60 = (1 )60 + (1 )60
9.7 15.7 2
where FS is the factor of safety against liquefaction, CRR Where (1 )60 = (1.63 + ( ) )
as the cyclic resistance ratio of the soil, CSR as the cyclic
stress ratio of the quake. Finally, the Cyclic Resistance Ratio for coarse grained
soils can be calculated using the following expression,
Development of Cyclic Stress Ratio (CSR) for Coarse (1 )60 (1 )60
2
(1 )60
3
Grained Soils = { +( ) ( )
14.1 126 23.6
4
Recent developments on the evaluation of Cyclic Stress (1 )60
Ratio (CSR) had been performed and presented by Idriss +( ) 2.8}
25.4
and Boulanger (2004) in the proceedings of the 11th
Cyclic Failure Susceptibility of Fine Grained Soils
ICSDEE and 3rd ICEGE. Their semi-empirical procedures
added modifications to the stress reduction coefficient The methodology of Wang (1979) had been widely used
rd, and the magnitude scaling factor MSF. They also for decades in evaluating the liquefaction susceptibility
included another overburden correction factor K . of silts and clays.
Finally, their semi-empirical equation has been
proposed as, In 2004, Boulanger and Idriss presented new
1 developments on this matter. They observed the
()=7.5 = 0.65 ( )
behavior of fine grained soils while performing
where = peak ground acceleration monotonic and cyclic undrained shear loading and
= total vertical stress at depth z found out that these soils transition over a fairly narrow
= effective vertical stress at depth z
range of plasticity indices (PI). They proposed that silts
The modified stress reduction coefficient by Idriss and clays be separated into two categories such as
(1999) considered both depth and earthquake those that behave sand-like and clay-like. They
magnitude such that, recommended that the term liquefaction be reserved
( ) = () + () for describing the development of significant strains or
where M = earthquake moment magnitude strength loss in fine-grained soils with sand-like
() = 1.012 1.126sin(/11.73 + 5.133) behavior and the suggested the term cyclic softening