You are on page 1of 2

EUROPEAN UROLOGY 61 (2012) 621626 623

249 (82%) were significant PCa, and 53 (18%) were nonsignifi- Another point of discussion concerns the population
cant PCa. The detection accuracy of significant PCa by targeted itself. Should prebiopsy MRI be performed for all patients
biopsies was higher than the detection accuracy of extended with suspected localized PCa? The authors did not exclude
systematic biopsies ( p < 0.001). Targeted biopsies also patients with intermediate- or high-risk cancers. Some of
detected 16% more grade IV/V cases. A targeted biopsiesonly these patients even had PSA values up to 100 ng/ml. The
strategy without extended systematic biopsies would have concept of biopsy-based insignificant cancer in these
necessitated a mean of 3.8 cores performed in only 63% of patients is highly questionable. Prebiopsy MRI and targeted
patients with positive MRI and avoided the potentially un- biopsies should probably be restricted to selected patients
necessary diagnosis of 13% (53 of 302) of nonsignificant PCa. with suspicion of low-risk PCa, who are really the patients at
risk of overdetection and overtreatment.
Experts comments:
In the era of overdetection of insignificant PCas, this study is Conicts of interest: The authors have nothing to disclose.
of major interest and draws attractive perspectives. As many
as half of the PCas in men aged >50 yr may be insignificant References
[1]. As suggested by the authors, MRI-targeted biopsies may
[1] Haas GP, Delongchamps NB, Jones RF, et al. Needle biopsies on
avoid unnecessary biopsies in almost 40% of patients and may
autopsy prostates: sensitivity of cancer detection based on true
avoid unnecessary diagnosis in >10% of patients harboring prevalence. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:14849.
insignificant cancers. Also, decreasing from 12 cores to 34 [2] Nam RK, Saskin R, Lee Y, et al. Increasing hospital admission rates
cores in a biopsy procedure may affect morbidity, especially for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided
by decreasing the risk of urinary tract infections [2]. prostate biopsy. J Urol 2010;183:9638.
Notwithstanding the quality of this work, some com- [3] Allan RW, Sanderson H, Epstein JI. Correlation of minute (05 mm or
ments should be made on the methodology. From our point less) focus of prostate adenocarcinoma on needle biopsy with
of view, choosing predictors of insignificancy on biopsy as a radical prostatectomy specimen: role of prostate specic antigen
surrogate for true insignificant cancers diagnosed on density. J Urol 2003;170:3702.
[4] Boccon-Gibod LM, Dumonceau O, Toublanc M, Ravery V, Boccon-
whole-mount analysis may engender significant bias in
Gibod LA. Micro-focal prostate cancer: a comparison of biopsy and
the results. As previously reported in many studies,
radical prostatectomy specimen features. Eur Urol 2005;48:8959.
prostate biopsies are subject to understaging. The detec-
tion of a low-grade microfocal cancer on biopsy is
Nicolas Barry Delongchamps, Marc Zerbib*
correlated with insignificant cancer in <60% of cases Urology Department, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University,
[3,4]. With this fact in mind, how can one choose biopsy as a 27 Fg St Jacques 75014, Paris, France
verification for MRI evaluation? Among the 302 cancers
detected in this series, at least some must have been treated *Corresponding author.
with radical prostatectomy, and we are somewhat frus- E-mail address: marc.zerbib@cch.aphp.fr (M. Zerbib)
trated at not finding a proper correlation analysis with the
specimen histologic findings. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.038

Re: A Prospective, Randomized Pilot Study Evaluating hemoglobin A1c that did not occur within the control arm.
the Effects of Metformin and Lifestyle Intervention on Other parameters including markers of lipids and insulin
Patients With Prostate Cancer Receiving Androgen resistance were not significantly different.
Deprivation Therapy
Nobes JB, Langley SE, Klopper T, Russell-Jones D, Laing RW Experts comments:
BJU Int. In press. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10555.x Hundreds of millions, perhaps billions, of dollars have been
spent over the past decade on attempting to discover the best
Experts summary: novel prescription or dietary supplement interventions for
This randomized 6-mo interventional versus standard-of-care prevention of PCa and biochemical recurrence and to mollify
(controls) preliminary trial included in each arm 20 men with side effects of PCa treatment. It is fascinating that it may turn
a mean age of 70 yr who were on androgen deprivation out that generic cost-effective (ie, cheap), heart-healthy, and
therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer (PCa). The intervention safe medications may have the optimal benefit to risk ratio
was a combination of metformin (850 mg daily for 2 wk compared to anything else proffered to patients [1]. Indeed,
and then 850 mg twice daily thereafter) with a low glycemic heart health appears tantamount to prostate health.
index diet and exercise encouragement. Metformin and lifestyle changes have a wonderful history
After 6 mo, men in the intervention arm experienced of safe and moderately effective weight loss in men and
significant reductions in waist circumference (WC), overall women and show an ability to reduce the risk of other
weight, body mass index, and systolic blood pressure metabolic syndromerelated issues and even diabetes [2].
compared to controls. Men in the intervention arm These beneficial effects are still being observed long term, for
also experienced a significant within-group reduction in at least a decade, with these simplistic and cost-effective
624 EUROPEAN UROLOGY 61 (2012) 621626

interventions. Metformin inhibits gluconeogenesis and limitless smile because if one were to peruse the medical
glucose absorption, controls insulin levels, and promotes literature right now, diet, exercise and lifestyle changes,
AMP-activated protein kinase, which discourages uncon- aspirin, cholesterol-lowering agents, and now metformin
trolled tumor growth [3]. Thus metformin is also being tested appear to be some of the more promising agents in PCa.
in multiple clinical trials as a potential neoadjuvant and They are all cost effective and safe, operate under some
adjuvant medication, and this includes a phase 3 trial in unique and common heart-healthy mechanisms, and may
breast cancer with survival as a primary end point. give clinicians and patients that much needed 2-for-1
Nobes et al should be praised not only for utilizing such a benefit. Indeed, heart health is tantamount to prostate
heart-healthy, safe, comprehensive lifestyle and medication health, and it seems that researchers are beginning to see
approach with ADT patients (no compliance or adverse multiple diverse forests over a few trees! Perhaps this
events were observed) but also for precisely mimicking the approach will reverberate to such an extent that it may even
specific metformin dosage that was effective from past resolve the controversy over prostate-specific antigen
cardiovascular clinical trials. Interestingly, past noteworthy screening [5].
cardiovascular studies have demonstrated that lifestyle
changes were actually more effective than metformin [2], Conicts of interest: Mark A. Moyad has received lecture and consulting
and this is one of the unanswered questions of this current honoraria from Abbott Labs.

preliminary study by Nobes et al. The intervention was a


combination of metformin and lifestyle changes, so the References
relative efficacy of each approach individually in men on
[1] Solomon KR, Freeman MR. The complex interplay between choles-
ADT is not known at this time. Past short-term studies of terol and prostate malignancy. Urol Clin North Am 2011;38:24359.
moderate lifestyle changes alone on ADT have been [2] Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. 10-year follow-up of
impressive [4], but long-term changes may require medi- diabetes incidence and weight loss in the Diabetes Prevention
cation such as Metformin to promote adequate synergy and Program Outcomes Study. Lancet 2009;373:167786.
tangible clinical efficacy. Regardless, Nobes et al should [3] Jalving M, Gietema JA, Lefrandt JD, et al. Metformin: taking away the
again be commended because their research team will also candy for cancer? Eur J Cancer 2010;46:236980.
apparently investigate the impact of these interventions [4] Galvao DA, Taaffe DR, Spry N, Joseph D, Newton RU. Combined
individually in a future, larger multicenter trial. resistance and aerobic exercise program reverses muscle loss in
men undergoing androgen suppression therapy for prostate cancer
The study by Nobes et al may be harbinger of a steady
without bone metastases: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin
paradigm shift in PCa research that is exciting. A past
Oncol 2010;28:3407.
obsession with novel and expensive agents in multiple
[5] Crawford ED, Grubb III R, Black A, et al. Comorbidity and mortality
areas of PCa has potentially led to an approach in which we results from a randomized prostate cancer screening trial. J Clin
cant see the forest for the trees, and this has not been Oncol 2011;29:35561.
healthy. Because cardiovascular disease is the number 1
cause of mortality in men with and without PCa, the ideal Mark A. Moyad
preventive or side effectameliorating agent should be one University of Michigan Medical Center, Department of Urology,
that, in the worst-case scenario, reduces the risk of the Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0330, USA
number 1 cause of death in men and, in the best-case E-mail address: moyad@umich.edu
scenario, provides a 2-for-1 benefit and beyond, so to speak.
Sitting at my computer and writing this review produces a DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.039

Re: Dutasteride Improves Outcomes of Benign Prostatic enrollment [1]. The article reviewed in this section of European
Hyperplasia When Evaluated for Prostate Cancer Risk Urology was a secondary analysis of men participating in the
Reduction: Secondary Analysis of the Reduction by REDUCE trial. In this particular cohort it evaluated the follow-
Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events Trial ing benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) outcome parameters:
Roehrborn CG, Nickel JC, Andriole GL, et al changes of prostate volume, lower urinary tract symptoms
Urology 2011;78:6417 assessed by IPSS, symptom burden assessed by IPSS question
8, and BPH Impact Index (BII), as well as the incidence of
Experts summary: acute urinary retention, BPH-related surgery, and urinary tract
The Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events infection.
(REDUCE) trial, an international multicenter randomized, dou- At baseline, mean values of the investigated men were
ble-blind 4-yr trial to determine the risk of incident prostate age 63 yr, total IPSS 8.6, question 8 of the IPSS questionnaire
cancer in men treated with dutasteride 0.5 mg or placebo once 2.1, BII 2.2, prostate volume 46 cm3, serum PSA 5.9 ng/ml,
daily, included male volunteers between 50 and 75 yr of age, maximum flow rate 15.3 ml/s, and postvoid residuals 46 ml.
with a serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration of Of the 8122 men investigated in this study, 3896 (48%) had
2.510 ng/ml, prostate volume 80 cm3, International Pros- no or only mild symptoms (IPSS 07), and 1581 (20%) had a
tate Symptom Score (IPSS) <25 (or <20 when using a1-block- prostate volume <30 cm3. At 4 yr, the following values were
ers), and negative biopsies for prostate cancer before trial noted:

You might also like