This document provides solutions to 3 questions regarding portfolio risk and return calculations.
For question 1, the portfolio risk is calculated under the assumptions of perfect positive correlation, perfect negative correlation, and zero correlation. The analysis finds that perfect negative correlation results in the lowest portfolio risk of 0.55%.
Question 2 calculates the expected return of the portfolio as 11.38% based on the given stock weights and individual expected returns.
Question 3 recalculates the portfolio with equal 50% weights for each stock. Though the expected return decreases to 10.75%, the analysis finds that the expected risk is only 1% due to the negative correlation, which is the lowest level of risk. Therefore, the document recommends this equally
This document provides solutions to 3 questions regarding portfolio risk and return calculations.
For question 1, the portfolio risk is calculated under the assumptions of perfect positive correlation, perfect negative correlation, and zero correlation. The analysis finds that perfect negative correlation results in the lowest portfolio risk of 0.55%.
Question 2 calculates the expected return of the portfolio as 11.38% based on the given stock weights and individual expected returns.
Question 3 recalculates the portfolio with equal 50% weights for each stock. Though the expected return decreases to 10.75%, the analysis finds that the expected risk is only 1% due to the negative correlation, which is the lowest level of risk. Therefore, the document recommends this equally
This document provides solutions to 3 questions regarding portfolio risk and return calculations.
For question 1, the portfolio risk is calculated under the assumptions of perfect positive correlation, perfect negative correlation, and zero correlation. The analysis finds that perfect negative correlation results in the lowest portfolio risk of 0.55%.
Question 2 calculates the expected return of the portfolio as 11.38% based on the given stock weights and individual expected returns.
Question 3 recalculates the portfolio with equal 50% weights for each stock. Though the expected return decreases to 10.75%, the analysis finds that the expected risk is only 1% due to the negative correlation, which is the lowest level of risk. Therefore, the document recommends this equally
= {(75/100)2 (12%)2 + (25/100)2(14%)2 + 2[(75/100)(25/100)(12%)(14%)(0)]}0.5 = {(0.5625) (0.0144) + (0.0625) (0.0196) + 2[(0.003615) (0)]} 0.5 = {0.0081 + 0.001225}0.5 = (0.009325) 0.5 = 0.0966 = 9.66% Base on above calculation Perfect negative correlation is lowest. Question 2: Calculate the expected return of this portfolio based in given information of two securities. rP* = xA rA + xB rB = 12% (75/100) + 9.5% (25/100) = 9% + 2.375% = 11.38% Question 3: Here we suppose that weightage of stock A is 50% and weightage of stock B is also 50% of total investment. So rP* = rAXa + rBXB rP* = (0.12) (0.50) + (0.0950)(0.50) rP* = 0.0600 + 0.0475 rP* = 0.1075 or 10.75% As this calculation with equally weightage of 50% of both stocks that expected return of portfolio will decrease 5.54% however expected risk also has importance in decision making process of this portfolio investment. So here we will calculate expected risk with 50% weightage of each stock. P* = ((XA2)(A2) + (XB2)(A2) + 2(XA XB A B AB))1/2 P* = ((0.50)2 x (0.12)2 + (0.5)2 x(0.14)2 + 2(0.50 x 0.50x 0.12 x 0.14x(-1))1/2 P* = ((0.25) x (0.144) + (0.25) x (0.0196) + 2(-0.00472))1/2 P* = ((0.0036 + 0.0049)-0.0084)1/2 P* = (0.0085 0.0084)1/2 P* = (0.0001)1/2 P* = 0.0100 or 1% the calculation proves that though expected return is less than weightage of 75% and 25% but equally weightage of 50% of both stocks if are negative correlated then expected risk will only be 1% which is a lowest level. Therefore, this investment should be made.