Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I t F e e l s G o o d t o B e
M e a s u r e d
Nitin K. Ahuja
The author would like to thank Daniel Becker, Marcia Childress, David Morris, Jessica Polka, and
the anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedback.
442
13_ahuja 44251.qxp_02_51.3schwartz 320 12/3/13 2:16 PM Page 443
Nitin K. Ahuja
and Elliot 2012). Longstanding efforts in the clinical application of hypnosis, in-
cluding as analgesia for chronic pain, provide yet another potential mode of un-
derstanding the appeal of the exercise (Jensen and Patterson 2006).
In terms of basic mechanics, the use of functional brain imaging has allowed
social neuroscientists to begin explicitly defining the affective pathways accessed
by various forms of physical contact (Morrison et al. 2010). Psychological re-
search into sensory illusions (including a frequently reproduced experiment
wherein the visualized stroking of real and artificial limbs results in a subjects
perception of touch in a rubber hand) has already demonstrated the existence of
elaborate neural networks prone to various kinds of cross wiring (Botvinick and
Cohen 1998; Moseley, Gallace, and Spence 2011).
One aspect of the phenomenon that is not routinely emphasized is the phys-
ical disconnectedness of the individuals involved. ASMR in its virtual manifes-
tations entails no actual touch; all participants are, in reality, alone. It would of
course be presumptuous to label this community as categorically touch-starved,
but we do know that time spent in front of the computer is generally time spent
on ones own.
Isolation mediated by modernity is a relatively well-established idea, and one
that remains ubiquitous in contemporary public discourse (Foer 2013; Marche
2012; Turkle 2012). Yet it provides the basis for another, somewhat radical,
model for ASMRthat is, as a kind of hypersensitivity to touch in the setting
of its relative deficiency. For a conjectural analogy, we might turn to the over-
expression of certain receptors in basic negative feedback loops: cellular mem-
branes becoming ever more populated with molecules meant to capture a pro-
gressively infrequent stimulus. It bears mentioning that under this hypothesis,
the use of technology to relieve distress caused by a technological age contains
within it a tidy, almost homeopathic, paradox.
Nitin K. Ahuja
these videos, both emotional and somatic, emerge under circumstances similar
to those of Mores patients, namely, the pretense of careful examination.
Additional descriptions of the Lapsometers use yield still closer analogies to
the typical parameters of ASMR-directed performance. When undergoing his
own evaluation with the instrument, for instance, More reports: It feels like
barbers clippers (p. 179). This comparison is elaborated with an explicitly pos-
itive valence: Art [Immelmann] is at my head again, fiddling about, pressing
bony protuberances, measuring salients of my skull with a cold metal centime-
ter scale. It feels good to be measured (p. 180). As in the aforementioned web
videos, the back of the head represents a particularly sensitive focus for tactile
attention, and again it is a diagnostic process, this somewhat cartoonish phreno-
logical routine, that Percy highlights as operative.
Mores device begins to cause larger problems when it is augmented with in-
terventional capabilities, but his language for its attenuated use retains a quality
of holistic relaxation: At the first flicker of morning terror I . . . give myself a
light brain massage . . . . Instantly exhilarated! (p. 209). Intermittently the sen-
sation is accorded an explicitly tingling quality: The machine sings like a
tuning fork. My head sings with it, the neurones of Layer IV dancing in tune
(p. 288). Descriptions such as these, of course, are quite similar to accounts of
the ASMR experience. While such resonance may be the product of coinci-
dence, it suggests at least the possibility that Percy and ASMR enthusiasts might
be tapping into the same latent psychophysiologic reflex. Within Percys theo-
retical framework of the fragmented modern spirit, then, the Lapsometer offers
a metaphorical prototype for the present-day ASMR phenomenon: a device
derived from the clinical domain used for identifying and at least partially bridg-
ing the gaps by which we become stranded from ourselves.
Postmodern Hypersensitivity
There are in fact multiple circumstances in Love in the Ruins under which the
narrator attests to his head tingling. More is predisposed to allergic reactions,
particularly to the egg whites contained within drinks prepared for him by Lola,
one of his rotating lovers. The physical details of these reactions clearly overlap
with the Lapsometers effects: The gin fizz is good. Already the little albumen
molecules are singing in my brain. My neck is swelling. I take a pill to prevent
hives (p. 294). More often describes his scalp as airy and quilteddescrip-
tors that might serve tongue-tied ASMR enthusiasts well (p. 4). Indeed, the
doctors romantic interactions, at least when mediated by cocktails, appear often
to have an allergic component: A hive, a tiny red wheal, leaps out at the point
of touch, as if to keep touch. The touch of her is, as they say, a thrill (p. 79).
When More fails to maintain a balance between his ambient allergens and
pocket antihistamines, he eventually enters into full-scale anaphylaxis.
The pleasure of interpersonal connection is thus paired with an element of
Nitin K. Ahuja
danger, a risk of self-harm. The same risks are emblematized by the Lapso-
meters eventual disruption of the towns social order when applied indiscrimi-
nately and therapeutically to its residents. In Notes for a Novel, Percy explic-
itly asserts that the scientific age, and the modern psyche that it has bred, are
bidirectionally labile: What [the novelist] findsin himself and in other peo-
pleis a new breed of person in whom the potential for catastropheand
hopehas suddenly escalated (p. 112). For the technological society, self-de-
struction and self-realization are proposed as equally probable, two sides of the
same coin.
Scholar Martha Montello (1999) has traced the repeated failure of techno-
logical instruments in Percys novels to live up to the promise of salvation with
which they are initially presented. In the case of Love in the Ruins, there is a clear
threshold of usage that, when trespassed, transforms the Lapsometer from clini-
cal tool to psychic weapon. Internet videos in the service of ASMR, by con-
trast, perhaps demonstrate this transformation in reverse: they present a vision
of the problematized relationship between technology and modern loneliness
sorting itself out.
Mores allergic tendencies also function symbolically to set him apart as a
character with unique sensitivity to the world around him. To similar ends,
More is portrayed relative to colleagues and friends as distinctly perceptive of
both the existential roots of his patients symptoms and the burgeoning unrest
in his community. Percy addresses this idea as well in Notes for a Novel,
characterizing the apocalyptic novelist as possessing a unique but not always
articulable disquiet: Is it too much to say that the novelist, unlike the new the-
ologian, is one of the few remaining witnesses to the doctrine of original sin,
the imminence of catastrophe in paradise? (p. 106). Without projecting an in-
tellectual agenda onto the ASMR movement, one might view its variable dis-
tribution in similar terms, as a selectively evolved psychic outcropping, a sub-
liminal response to contemporary isolation.
Nitin K. Ahuja
remind us of the electric quality that persists beneath the least of our interac-
tions. At certain moments, in certain rooms, algorithm bleeds into ceremony,
and jargon becomes a kind of lullaby. Though clinicians may not know in
advance whether a patient is prone to goosebumps, or the extent to which she
is truly lonely or starved for touch, we learn repeatedly that the proximity of
two people in an unthreatening space can be an event of immediate synaptic
consequence. Such consequence need not be romanticized or rescued; simply
recognizing it as part of an encounters deeper foundations may help structure
the discourse to follow.
References
ASMR Research.org. 2012. ASMR research and support. http://www.asmr-research.
org.
Botvinick, M., and J. Cohen. 1998. Rubber hands feel touch that eyes see. Nature
391:756.
Cheadle, H. 2012. ASMR, the good feeling no one can explain. Vice Media. http://
www.vice.com/read/asmr-the-good-feeling-no-one-can-explain.
Collins, S. T. 2012. Why music gives you the chills. Buzzfeed, Sept. 10. http://www.
buzzfeed.com/theseantcollins/why-music-gives-you-the-chills-7ahd.
Elliott, C. 1999. Prozac and the existential novel: Two therapies. In The last physician:
Walker Percy and the moral life of medicine, ed. C. Elliott and J. Lantos, 5969. Durham:
Duke Univ. Press.
Foer, J. S. 2013. How not to be alone. NY Times, June 9.
Gordon, N. 2013. The dissociative bond. J Trauma Dissociation 14:1124.
Jensen, M., and D. R. Patterson. 2006. Hypnotic treatment of chronic pain. J Behav Med
29:95124.
Marche, S. 2012. Is Facebook making us lonely? Atlantic 309:6069.
Maruskin, L. A., T. M. Thrash, and A. J. Elliot. 2012. The chills as a psychological con-
struct: Content universe, factor structure, affective composition, elicitors, trait ante-
cedents, and consequences. J Person Soc Psychol 103:13557.
Montello, M. 1999. From ear to eye in Percys fiction: Changing the paradigm for clin-
ical medicine. In The last physician: Walker Percy and the moral life of medicine, ed. C.
Elliott and J. Lantos, 4658. Durham: Duke Univ. Press.
Morrison, I., et al. 2010. The skin as a social organ. Exp Brain Res 204:30514.
Moseley, G. L., A. Gallace, and C. Spence. 2012. Bodily illusions in health and disease:
Physiological and clinical perspectives and the concept of a cortical body matrix.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev 36:3446.
Nijenhuis, E. R. S., et al. The development and psychometric characteristics of the
Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire (SDQ-20). J Nerv Mental Dis 184:68894.
Percy, W. 1971. Love in the ruins. New York: Random House.
Percy, W. 1975. Notes for a novel about the end of the world. In The message in the bot-
tle, 10118. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Percy, W. 1961. The moviegoer. Repr. New York: Vintage Books, 1998.
Sartre, J.-P. 1938. Nausea, trans. L. Alexander. New York: New Directions, 1963.
Spiegel, D., et al. 2011. Dissociative disorders in DSM-5. Depression Anxiety 28: E17
E45.
Turkle, S. 2012. Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other.
New York: Basic Books.
TheWaterwhispers. 2012. ASMR. ~cranial nerve examination~ (request 105). Online
video clip. YouTube, Sept. 29. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oT5tuIdzCY4.