Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.ijser.in
ISSN (Online): 2347-3878, Impact Factor (2014): 3.05
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to establish the factors affecting the performance of the procurement function in government
organizations and specifically, the National Oil Corporation of Kenya. It was purposely selected due to the fact that the Corporation has
sound procurement system that purchases products locally and internationally thus investing more funds in acquiring goods and services.
Inefficiency and incompetence of overall administration and management of procurement function has contributed to excessive losses due
to poor procurement management practices leading to less than expected performance. The general objective of the study was to establish
the factors that affect procurement function in government organizations. The specific objectives of the study were; to find out the effect of
government regulations and bureaucracy on the performance of the procurement function. To determine the effect of E-procurement on
the performance of the procurement function. To find out the effect of tendering methods on the performance of the procurement function
and finally to investigate the effect of quality standards and specifications on the performance of the procurement function. In data
collection, qualitative and quantitative research designs were used. This entailed the use of structured questionnaires. The useful data was
also obtained from magazines, periodicals, journals and procurement analysis reports on the company. The target population was one
hundred and the sample size was fifty. The sample size of the target population consisted of the procurement section, Nairobi National oil
terminal, finance and logistics department. Purposive sampling technique was used because of the nature of the research, where the
respondents were identified before data collection. Data analysis was done with the help of Statistical Package for Social Sciences computer
program. The key findings of the study indicated that government regulations affected procurement performance such as following
procurement rules and regulations. Open tendering is the most advocated method of acquiring goods and services in government
organizations. The study established that there are various risks associated with e-procurement. For instance, hacking of confidential
information. In order to improve on procurement function and consequently organizational performance the following are the
recommendations. The recommendations entailed need to employ procurement officers with professional qualifications, offer training to
the workers and opportunities for further education, strong control of e-procurement system so as to improve flow and access of
information.
Procurement encompasses the whole process of acquiring The general objective of this research project was to
property and services. It begins when an agency has establish the factors that affect the performance of the
identified a need and decided on its procurement procurement function in government organizations in
requirement (Ebrahim, 2010). Procurement continues Kenya. A case study of National Oil Corporation of Kenya.
through the processes of risk assessment, seeking and
evaluating alternative solutions, contract award, delivery 1.4.2 Specific Objectives
and payment for the property or services and, where
relevant, the ongoing management of a contract and This study was guided by the following specific objectives;
consideration of options related to the contract.
Procurement also extends to the ultimate disposal of 1. To find out the effect of government regulations and
property at the end of its useful life (Leeders, 2006). Public bureaucracy on the performance of the procurement
procurement is concerned with how public sector function.
organizations spend taxpayers' money on goods and 2. To determine the effect of E-procurement on the
services (Hall, 2009). Globally, in many developed nations, performance of the procurement function.
government organizations across the world tend to spend 3. To find out the effect of tendering methods on the
between 8 per cent and 25 per cent of GDP on goods and performance of the procurement function.
services (Organization for Economic Co-operation and
Development, 2006); in the UK, public procurement 1.5 Research Questions
expenditure is approximately 150 billion (Department of
Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs, 2007). In Africa, 1. How does government regulations and bureaucracy affect
public procurement procedures are poorly executed and this the performance of the procurement function?
negatively affects realization of increased economic 2. How does E-procurement affect the performance of the
development in the region. In Nigeria for instance, high procurement function?
level of corruption and bureaucratic procedures in the 3. How does tendering methods affect the performance of
government are some of the key challenges responsible for the procurement function?
lack of development of road network infrastructure in the
northern parts of the country. 2. Research Design and Methodology
The inefficiency and incompetence of overall 2.1 Introduction
administration and management of Procurement function in
many Public institutions contributes to loss of Ksh 50 According to Kothari (2004) research commonly refers to
million annually (PPOA.2010). According to victor (2012) search for knowledge or a scientific and systematic search
Procurement expenditure could be minimized through for pertinent information on a specific topic. Research
implementation of effective Procurement practices. methodology on the other hand is a way to systematically
Enactment of Public Procurement Disposal Act PPDA solve the research problem or a science of studying how
(2005) and the Regulations 2006 as well as establishment of research is done scientifically (Flick, 2011). This chapter
Public Procurement Oversight Authority (PPOA) were sets out the various stages and phases that were followed in
Conceptual Framework
Coefficient Correlations
Government
Model Tendering Methods E- Procurement
Regulations
Government Regulations 1.000 .024 -.156
Correlations Tendering Methods .024 1.000 -.049
E- Procurement -.156 -.049 1.000
1
Government Regulations .014 .000 -.002
Covariances Tendering Methods .000 .011 -.001
E- Procurement -.002 -.001 .016
Coefficients
Correlations Collinearity Statistics
Model
Zero-order Partial Part Tolerance VIF
(Constant)
E- Procurement -.061 .005 .004 .974 1.027
1
Tendering Methods -.298 -.321 -.303 .997 1.003
Government Regulations -.327 -.344 -.328 .975 1.025
The tolerance levels were less than 1, which indicated lack The next item was to check the overall model fit. The
of multicollinearity. Lack of multicollinearity was sufficient following results were obtained from the SPSS software.
for us to retain the three independent variables in our study.
ANOVA
Coefficients
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients
Model Coefficients t Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) 2.499 .293 8.528 .000
E- Procurement .004 .128 .004 .029 .977
1
Tendering Methods -.227 .105 -.304 -2.169 .036
Government Regulations -.280 .119 -.332 -2.347 .024
From the output above, the Anova table showed a 3.4. Specific Objective 3: To find out the effect of
significance level of 0.027which was less than the standard tendering methods on the performance of the
probability value of 0.05.This implied that our study procurement function.
variables were quite significant. The R value of 44.6% was
a clear indication that that there exists other factors that From the regression analysis we found that Tendering
influence the performance of the procurement function, methods had significant effect on the performance of
other than those we considered in the study. We then fitted procurement function. This independent variable
a regression equation to magnitude of contribution of the (Tendering Methods) had a p-value of 0.036 which was less
independent variables. than the standard p-value of 0.05 hence implying it was
significant.
The equation was
References
yperformance = 2.499 0.004xE.procuerement
0.227xtendering methods 2.80xGovernment regulations . [1] Armstrong, M. (2008). Human Resource Management.
(5th Ed.). Washington DC: Kogan Page Publishers.
From this equation, Government regulations had greater [2] Andrew, M. (2008). Procurement Reforms in Kenya.
significant effect (coefficient=0.28). This was followed by Journal of Economics, 22(1), 23-50
Tendering methods (coefficient=0.227) and then E- [3] Bayens, B., Martell, M., (2007), Budget and
procurement (coefficient=0.004). organization reform: impact on Public procurement in
Belgium, in Knight, L., Harland, C., Telgen, J., Thai
The results were then reported according to the objectives [4] Best, J., & Khan, V. (2000).Research in education.
of the study. New Jersey: Prentice Hall
[5] Cox, A., (1997), Business Success and Critical Supply
3.2. Specific Objective 1: To find out the effect of Chain Assets: A way of Thinking about Strategy,
government regulations and bureaucracy on the critical Supply Chain Assets and Operational Best
performance of the procurement function. Practice, Ears gate press, Boston
[6] Cooper, D. R. and Schindler, P.S. (2003). Business
From the regression analysis we found that Government Research Methods. (8th Ed.), McGraw- Hill: New York
regulations had significant effect on the performance of [7] Dale L.F, Aziza S., (1990).Operational Audits of
corporation. This independent variable (Government Purchasing, Pitman. London
Regulation) had a p-value of 0.024 which was less than the [8] Driedonks, B., Gevers, J. & Van Weele, A.J.
standard p-value of 0.05 hence implying its significance. (2009).Managing Sourcing Team Effectiveness: The
need for a team perspective in purchasing, Journal of
3.3. Specific Objective 2: To determine the effect of E- Purchasing and Supply Management, Winter 2009
procurement on the performance of the procurement [9] Devaraja, S., Swaroop, V., &Zou, H., (1996). The
function. Composition of public Expenditure and Economic
Growth. Journal of Monetary Economics 37 (2): 313-
From the regression analysis we found that E-procurement 44
had no significant effect on the performance of procurement
function. This independent variable (E-procurement) had a
p-value of 0.977 which exceed the standard p-value of 0.05
hence implying no significance.