Lucia Maldita filed a civil case against Marga Gantsa to collect a debt of 500,000 pesos that became due in February 2017. Maldita had been lending money to Gantsa over several months. Gantsa promised to pay the debt back in monthly installments of 100,000 pesos but failed to make any payments. Despite demands from Maldita, Gantsa refused to pay. Maldita is seeking payment of the full debt plus damages and attorney's fees from Gantsa for her delay in payment. Gantsa argues the agreement did not specify a due date so the debt was not yet demandable.
Lucia Maldita filed a civil case against Marga Gantsa to collect a debt of 500,000 pesos that became due in February 2017. Maldita had been lending money to Gantsa over several months. Gantsa promised to pay the debt back in monthly installments of 100,000 pesos but failed to make any payments. Despite demands from Maldita, Gantsa refused to pay. Maldita is seeking payment of the full debt plus damages and attorney's fees from Gantsa for her delay in payment. Gantsa argues the agreement did not specify a due date so the debt was not yet demandable.
Lucia Maldita filed a civil case against Marga Gantsa to collect a debt of 500,000 pesos that became due in February 2017. Maldita had been lending money to Gantsa over several months. Gantsa promised to pay the debt back in monthly installments of 100,000 pesos but failed to make any payments. Despite demands from Maldita, Gantsa refused to pay. Maldita is seeking payment of the full debt plus damages and attorney's fees from Gantsa for her delay in payment. Gantsa argues the agreement did not specify a due date so the debt was not yet demandable.
Central Visayas Judicial Region Branch 21, Cebu City
LUCIA MALDITA Civil Case No.: 000143
Plaintiff, FOR: Sum of Money -versus- MARGA GANTSA Defendant x----------------------x
MEMORANDUM OF PLAINTIFF
Plaintiff, through undersigned counsel, most respectfully
states before this Honorable Court:
Brief Statement of the Case
Plaintiff, Lucia Maldita filed the present action for
collection of sum of money, damages, and attorneys fees against defendant, Marga Gantsa for failure to pay her total debt of FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND PESOS (Php 500,000) which became due and demandable on February 2017. This makes defendant liable for Articles 1169 and 1170 of the New Civil Code.
Statement of Facts
1.) Plaintiff, Lucia Maldita, allowed defendant,
Marga Gantsa to borrow money throughout a period of months which now amounted to a grand total of FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND PESOS (Php 500,000)
2.) Defendant promised to pay her debt through
monthly installments of ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND PESOS (Php 100,000) each month. 3.) The said debt became due and demandable on February 2017, but despite oral and written demands from plaintiff, defendant refused to render any payment.
4.) This continued refusal promoted plaintiff to
file a collection suit against defendant, along with a prayer for payment of attorneys fees and damages.
5.) For her part, defendant explained that the
agreement for debt payment did not indicate a definite maturity date. Therefore, plaintiff cannot say that the debt was indeed due and demandable.
Issue
Whether or not defendants debt was already due and
demandable, and if plaintiff had the right to collect it already.
Exhibits
Exhibit Description Purpose
Exhibit A and B A copy of the oral These documents and written attest that plaintiff demands for did exerted his payment by right to demand plaintiff towards for a debt that is defendant. due to her by the defendant. These attached documents show that defendant was made known and aware of her obligation to pay debt owed to plaintiff, which became due on February 2017. Arguments and Discussion
I. Defendants debt is already due and demandable,
and she already incurred a delay in the delivery herein.
Article 1169 of the New Civil Code states that Those
obliged to deliver or to do something incur in delay from the time the obligee judicially or extrajudicially demands from them the fulfillment of obligation.
In this case, plaintiff already extrajudicially demanded
for the fulfillment of defendants obligation through her written and oral demands for payment (see Exhibit A and B). However, since the defendant still refused to render any payment, a judicial demand was filed as the case herein. This clearly indicates that defendants debt is rightfully due and demandable.
II. Aside from the payment of debt, defendant is
liable for payment of attorneys fees and damages.
Since it is clear that the defendant already incurred a
delay in the performance of her obligation to pay the debt owed to plaintiff, she is also liable to pay for damages and attorneys fees as indemnification for plaintiff who had to go through tedious processes just to recover the debt. The New Civil Code is clear in Article 1170, which says that Those who in the performance of their obligations are guilty of fraud, negligence, or delay, and those who in any manner contravene the tenor thereof, are liable for damages.
Prayer
WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed for before this
Honorable Court that judgment be rendered in favor of plaintiff, and that defendant should be ordered to pay the total debt amount which was already due and demandable on February 2017, through both extrajudicial and judicial demands.
Likewise, plaintiff also prays for payment of damages
and attorneys fees, including other costs for further relief as this Honorable Court deems just and equitable.
Cebu City, March 13, 2017
Attorney Grace Blanco
Counsel for Plaintiff Roll of Attorneys No. 00000 PTR No. 00001 - 1/3/2014 - MANDAUE CITY IBP No. 0000012 - CEBU TIN No. 123-678-321 MCLE Compliance No. AB12300 Contact No. 09331234567 Suite 14, Oakridge Offices, A.S. Fortuna, Mandaue City
Copy furnished: Atty. Mary Clare C. Coronado Counsel for Defendant