Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Study Guide For Exam 2 REVISED Fall 2016 Includes Cutlure and Community Policing
Study Guide For Exam 2 REVISED Fall 2016 Includes Cutlure and Community Policing
Note: Other material from the readings may be on the Exam, this should
serve only as a guide for what is most likely to be on the exam
4. Intergroup Communication
a. Intergroup communication
When we interact with people, we view them not just as individuals, but members
of social groups.
Cultural similarity and dissimilarity are both important to consider
Involves understanding intracultural communication
Intercultural communication has been studied in various ways and through
various lenses. E.g.
Cultural studies
Critical intercultural communication
Dialectic approaches
Intergroup approaches
Communication at the social identity level
Judge the behavior of self and others in terms of group membership
Determine ingroups and outgroups
Deindividuate both self and others (Makes collective activity possible
but can lead to intergroup bias and prejudice.)
Merits and Demerits
Makes collective activity possible
Can lead to intergroup bias and prejudice
Outgroup Homogeneity Effect : They are all the same
Social Categorization
A natural socio-psychological sense-making process
Foundation of stereotyping
The Filing Cabinet
Bringing a member or members of one social group into contact with members of another social
group with the goal of influencing attitudes and reducing prejudice
c. Accommodative processes
d. Communication patterns of groups in power
e. How can positive interactions between groups best be facilitated? What are the
necessary conditions for successful interactions?
f. Thick description
Show dont tell Dont tell us that a culture is sexist, show us that the organization is sexist. How
could this be done?
Focus on the symbols, stories, langue, and how organizational members communicate
Dig, dig, dig do not rely on superficial and easy answers dig to find what is really going on
Put another way, scholars viewed organizations as structures of meaning created through the everyday
symbolic acts of their members (Keyton, 2011; Martin, 1992; Putnam & Pacanowsky, 1983)
By studying communication phenomena such as stories, metaphors, and rituals, researchers developed
rich understandings of the ways members both constructed and made sense of their organizational
realities.
Tradition reviews say organizations working only as large bureaucracies. However, by the 1970s
and 1980s this view was becoming outdated. Large bureaucracies, like Ford and General Motors,
began to fail. Workers in these organizations reported feeling dehumanized.
For example, in the wake of the oil crises, Japanese automobile companies were quick to exploit
U.S. companies failure to produce fuel-efficient cars.
In this sense, intrinsic rewards and meaningful work that produced personal growth (a phrase
that would have been alien to the 1950s white-collar worker) became just as important as
extrinsic rewards.
In particular, some researchers were becoming critical of the dominant paradigm and its focus
only on effectiveness and productivity. Such an approach, it was argued, reflected a managerial
conception of what was important to study in organizations.
The cultural approach explained by Mike Pacanowsky and Nick ODonnell-Trujillo (1982),
The jumping off point for this approach is the mundane observation that more things are going
on in organizations than getting the job done. People in organizations also gossip, joke, knife
one another, initiate romantic involvements, cue new employees to ways of doing the least
amount of work that still avoids hassles from a supervisor, talk sports, arrange picnics. (p. 116).
what behaviors they expect of each other, how to score points and what it means to
be considered a good player.
What activities produce desirable results that will earn them notoriety and promotions?
What might be the disincentives for them in cooperating with the police?
Why does tension exist between members of minority communities and police?
Both believe that for change to be successful it must occur on the cultural, not individual level
d. Community policing
Policing also has rules and logic that makes certain actions the right things to do
and other actions the wrong things.
The current crisis in American policing requires dismantling the old law enforcement
game and starting anew.
This new approach emphasizes public safety outcomes, like strong, safe, thriving neighborhoods.
In Wilmington, Deleware police worked closely with residents to build relationships through block-by-
block organizing, regular neighborhood social events and collaborative problem solving.
Surveys of this neighborhood at that time reflected strong support for the police and the willingness of
residents to intervene as needed to prevent crime.