Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5 www.erpublication.org
Adaptive Handover Initialization Region
adjacent cells and with ensuring that this does not conflict Assume that the window dimensions length 2Km each cell
with existing calls on that cell and mobile switching Center well as three cells becomes the length of the window 6Km,
oversees (MSC) to such procedures [6]. and width 2Km represent in Fig. 2. in the x-axis and y-axis,
The responsibility of allocating channel resources for the and assuming that the number of users in each cell 100 users
mobile station is by MSC and BSs. the same set of channels distributors intracellular.
can be reused in another cell far from it so as not to overlap
between the channels. A simple interference can be neglected.
The distance between the two cells is defined as the minimum
distance can use channels a second nest is simple [7].
6 www.erpublication.org
International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research (IJETR)
ISSN: 2321-0869, Volume-2, Issue-9, September 2014
In case mobile stations movement from left to right and Movement in X position only and Direction it either left
the channel from the cell A. and or right. Assume that the movement direction is not changed
(5) during simulation.
No need to send a request for handover or handover request
equal zero. HO request = 0 B. Flow chart
As in the case of
=
=
The channel also from C, the handover process are necessary VI. SIMULATION RESULT
from cell C to cell B, so the handover is requested or handover
request equal one. HO request = 1 This section presents the simulation results and analysis.
But success depends on the handing over to be there in the in Fig.5.illustrate the mobile user position in cellular mobile
the vacant channel is not available in cell B. However if the system with random distribution, X axis represent length of
channel is not available in cell B fail handover. simulation area (distance in meter), Y axis represent width of
Whenever the direction of motion from right to left and simulation area (distance in meter).
channel from cell B if
Initial position for mobil
2000
Not need to send a request handover or handover request
1800
equal zero. HO request = 0
1600
As in the case of
1400
distance in meters
1200
The channel also from B, the handover process are necessary
1000
from cell B to cell A, so the handover is requested or handover
800
request equal one. HO request = 1 600
But success depends on the handing over to be there in the 400
vacant channel is not available in cell A. However if the 200
channel is not available in cell A fail handover. 0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
distance in meters
7 www.erpublication.org
Adaptive Handover Initialization Region
Fig 6.shows the duration of (inter arrival) calls to mobile users Average Call duration = 180 s, average speed = 30 m/s,
in the proposed model, X axis represent mobile index, Y axis User = 100 user/cell, channel = 30channel/cell, delta = 100m
represent interarriva time (s).
Interarrival Time
54
80
53.5
75
handover failure
53
70
65 52.5
Interarrival Time [s]
60 52
55
51.5
50
51
45
0 2 4 6
40
System Traffic (Erlang)
35
30
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Mobile Index Fig. 9. Handover failure vs. system Traffic
Fig. 6. Inter arrival Time
Fig. 7.shows the arrival times of calls generated by Poisson Fig. 10, 11. illustrates relation between speed and handover
distribution in the proposed model. failure when
Arrival Time
Average Call duration = 180s, System Traffic = 30 Erlang,
15000 User = 100 user/cell, channel = 30channel/cell, delta = 100m.
54
10000
53.5
. Handover failure
Arrival Time [s]
53
5000
52.5
52
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 51.5
Mobile Index
0 20 40 60
vehicle speed (m/s)
Fig. 7. Arrival Time
Fig. 8.Illustrates the call duration for users of mobile Fig. 10. Handover failure vs. vehicle speed
distributors randomly.
Call duration
220 60
210 50
200
40
handover failure
190
30
Call duration [s]
180
170
20
160 10
150 0
140 0 5 10 15
130 Speed (V(m/s))
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Mobile Index
8 www.erpublication.org
International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research (IJETR)
ISSN: 2321-0869, Volume-2, Issue-9, September 2014
Table 1: Simulation result for Relation between [5] G. Gupta and M. V. Yadav, Different types of handover in the gsm
system using matlab, vol. 1, no. 3, june 2012.
Delta and handover failure
[6] D. SudarshanSubhashraoSonawane and Dr.A.K.Sachan,Channel
allocation scheme in cellular system, Advanced Networking and
delta Handover failure Handover failure Applications, vol. 2, pp. 452457, June 2010.
v= 4(m/s) v=30(m/s) [7] P. Patnaik, Fuzzy assisted handoff algorithm for micro and macro
cellular system, Master, National Institute of Technology, Department
50 30 53 of Electronics & Communication Engineering National Institute of
100 28 53 Technology, Rourkela Orissa, India, may 2010.
200 25 52 [8] H. A. M. R. Cheng-Chung Lin, KumbesanSandrasegaran and R.
300 22 52 Basukala, Optimized performance evaluation of lte hard handover
algorithm average rsrp constraint, vol. 3, no. 2, April 2011, pages
400 21 51 1-16.
500 19 51 [9] P. F. Ming FEI, Position-assisted fast handover schemes for
In table (1) simulation results show when the change in the lte-advanced network under high mobility scenarios, vol. 20, no. 4,
December 2012, pages 268-273.
value of the delta in normal human speed and speed of the [10] P. Dhand and P. Dhillon, Eds., Handoff Optimization for Wireless and
vehicle and can clarify the relationship through figure (12). Mobile Networks using Fuzzy Logic, vol. 63, no. 14, International
Journal of Computer Applications, February 2013, pages. 31-35.
[11] V. B. Iversen, Teletraffic engineering and network planning,
60 Technical University of Denmark, Technical University of Denmark
52.8 52.4 52 51.7 51.3 51.1 Building 343, May 2010. [Online]. Available:
http://www.fotonik.dtu.dk
50
handover failure
REFERENCES
[1] T. S. Rappaport, Wireless Communications Principles and Practice,
2nd ed., New Jersey, 2002. pp. 3037.
[2] T. Dollente, cell breathing, search mobile computing, September
2005. [Online]. Available:
http://searchmobilecomputing.techtarget.com at 22/5/2014.
[3] W. Stallings, Wireless communication and Network,, 2nd ed., C. W.
Networks, Ed., New Jersey, 2005, pp 266 -274
[4] A. Sgora and D. D. Vergados, Handoff prioritization and decision
schemes in wireless cellular networks: a survey,vol. 11, no. 4, october
2009.
9 www.erpublication.org