Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I. Introduction
A. The Development of Philippine Copyright Law, Christopher Lim, 46 Ateneo L.J. 369
(2001)
The Landscape of Copyright, Copyright Law by Joyce et. al. (7th Ed. 2006)
C. Intellectual Property and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Articles 17, 19,
27
D. Overview: Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works
Week 2
A. Definition of Copyright
Collective work is work which has been created by two (2) or more natural
persons at the initiative and under the direction of another with the understanding
that it will be disclosed by the latter under his own name and that contributing
natural persons will not be identified; Communication to the public or
communicate to the public means the making of a work available to the public by
wire or wireless means in such a way that members of the public may access these
works from a
place and time individually chosen by them;
Date of Publication is the earliest date when a copy of the first authorized edition
of the work was placed on sale, sold, distributed, or otherwise made available to
the public, by the copyright owner or his representative;
Decompilation means the reproduction of the code and the translation of the
forms of a computer program to achieve the inter-operability of an independently-
created computer program with other programs;
Fee refers to the amount prescribed by The National Library for the issuance of a
Certificate of Registration and Deposit to claim copyright or for the filing of
assignment or license, or for such other services or transactions as may be covered
by these Copyright Safeguards and Regulations;
Published work means work which, with the consent of the author, is made
available to the public by wire or wireless means in such a way that members of
the public may access the work from a place and time individually chosen by
them: Provided, That availability of such copies has
been such as to satisfy the reasonable requirements of the public, having regard to
the nature of the work; Publisher is one who produces and makes available for
circulation or distribution the published work;
SAR shall refer to these Copyright Safeguards and Regulations issued pursuant to
the IPC;
SCL refers to the Library of the Supreme Court of the Republic of the Philippines;
TNL Director refers to the head of The National Library of the Republic of the
Philippines;
Unpublished work means work that has not been disseminated, circulated or
distributed to the public prior to its registration with the Copyright Office;
171.1. "Author" is the natural person who has created the work;
172.2. Works are protected by the sole fact of their creation, irrespective
of their mode or form of expression, as well as of their content, quality and
purpose.
Originality:
Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony, 111 U.S. 53 (1884)
KEY FACTS: Sarony sued Burrow-Giles for violating his copyright over his photograph Oscar Wild No.
18. The lower court found that it was his original mental conception to which he gave visible form by
posing Oscar Wilde, selecting & arranging the costume, draperies and other various accessories in the
photograph, arranging the subject to present graceful outlines, arranging the light and shade, suggesting
and evoking the desired expression. Plaintiff took steps to secure the copyright by exhibiting the
following on the photo: Copyright, 1882, N. Sarony and lastly, photographs are among the things an
author/inventor/designer can copyright under 4952 of the Revised Statutes.
ISSUES: 1) Court below decided that congress has and has the constitutional right to protect
photographs and negatives by copyright 2) The sufficiency of the words Copyright, 1882, N. Sarony as
a notice of the copyright of NS under the act of congress on that subject.
HELD: With regard to this latter question it is enough to say that the object of the statute is to give
notice of the copyright to the public by placing upon each copy, in some visible shape, the name
of the author, the existence of the claim of exclusive right, and the date at which this right was
obtained. This notice is sufficiently given by the words Copyright, 1882, by N. Sarony, found
on each copy of the photograph. It clearly shows that a copyright is asserted, the date of which
is 1882, and if the name Sarony alone was used, it would be a* *56 sufficient designation of
the author until it is shown that there is some other Sarony. When, in addition to this, the initial
letter of the Christian name Napoleon is also given, the notice is complete.
On the constitutional issue, the argument is that a photograph is neither a writing nor the production of
the author because it merely states: to promote the progress of science and useful arts, by
securing, for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective
writings and discoveries. Later, acts of Congress included maps, engravings, etchings, cuts and
prints as objects capable of being a subject of a copyright and unless photographs can be
distinguished from this classification, it is difficult to see why congress cannot make them a
subject of copyright as well as others. The only reason why they were not included in the
extended list (in act 1802) is probably because they did not yet exist.
But it is said that an engraving, a painting, a print, does embody*59 the intellectual
conception of its author, in which there is novelty, invention, originality, and therefore comes
within the purpose of the constitution in securing its exclusive use or sale to its author, while a
photograph is the mere mechanical reproduction of the physical features or outlines of some
object, animate or inanimate, and involves no originality of thought or any novelty in the
intellectual operation connected with its visible reproduction in shape of a picture. We judge
photographs like patents, and judge on novelty, invention and originality. These elements are
found in this case.
Alfred Bell & Co. v. Catalda Fine Arts, Inc., 191 F.2d 99 (2d Cir. 1951)
Creativity:
Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991)
Muller & Co. v. New York Arrows Soccer Team Inc., 802 F.2d 989 (8th Cir., 1986)
Meshwerks, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. 528 F.3d 1258 (10th Cir. 2008)
Week 3
Section 2, PD 49
Article 5(2), Berne Convention for the Protection of Literacy and Artistic Works
Section 172 and 172.2, IPC
Rule 7, Sections 2, Copyright Safeguards and Regulations
D. Scope of Copyright
1. Original works
Article 2, Berne Convention for the Protection of Literacy and Artistic Works
Sections 172, 172.2, 173, 173.2, 174, IPC
Section 175, IPC
Section 176, IPC
Week 4
L. Batlin & Son, Inc. v. Snyder, 536 F.2d 486 (2d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 429
U.S. 857 (1976)
Entertainment Research Group, Inc. v. Genesis Creative Group, Inc., 122 F.3d 1211
(9th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1021 (1998)
Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991)
Roth Greeting Cards v. United Card Co., 429 F.2d 110 (9th Cir. 1970)
Mason v. Montgomery Data, Inc., 967 F.2d 135 (5th Cir. 1992)
E. Authorship
Section 178, Section 179, Section 174, IPC
178.2. In the case of works of joint authorship, the co-authors shall be the
original owners of the copyright and in the absence of agreement,
their rights shall be governed by the rules on co-ownership. If,
however, a work of joint authorship consists of parts that can be
used separately and the author of each part can be identified, the
author of each part shall be the original owner of the copyright in the
part that he has created;
178.3. In the case of work created by an author during and in the course of
his employment, the copyright shall belong to:
a. The employee, if the creation of the object of copyright is not a
part of his regular duties even if the employee uses the time,
facilities and materials of the employer.
b. The employer, if the work is the result of the performance of his
regularly-assigned duties, unless there is an agreement, express
or implied, to the contrary.
178.5. In the case of audiovisual work, the copyright shall belong to the
producer, the author of the scenario, the composer of the music, the
film director, and the author of the work so adapted. However,
subject to contrary or other stipulations among the creators, the
producer shall exercise the copyright to an extent required for the
exhibition of the work in any manner, except for the right to collect
performing license fees for the performance of musical compositions,
with or without words, which are incorporated into the work; and
178.6. In respect of letters, the copyright shall belong to the writer subject
to the provisions of Article 723 of the Civil Code. (Sec. 6, P.D. No.
49a)
The painter, sculptor or other artist shall have dominion over the product of his art
even before it is copyrighted.
The scientist or technologist has the ownership of his discovery or invention even
before it is patented. (n)
Art. 723. Letters and other private communications in writing are owned by the
person to whom they are addressed and delivered, but they cannot be published or
disseminated without the consent of the writer or his heirs. However, the court may
authorize their publication or dissemination if the public good or the interest of
justice so requires. (n)
1. Sole Authorship
2. Joint Authorship
Childress v. Taylor
Erickson v. Trinity Theatre, Inc., 13 F.3d 1061 (7th Cir. 1994)
Aalmuhammed v. Lee, 202 F.3d 1227 (9th Cir. 1999)
3. Works Made for Hire
4. Government Works
F. Duration of Copyright
Articles 7 and 7bis, Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic
Works
Section 213, Section 214, IPC