Professional Documents
Culture Documents
352,, .
$SSOLFDWLRQ%ULHIV
May 2014
All rights reserved. No part of this documentation shall be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or
transmitted by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the
prior written permission of Invensys Systems, Inc. No copyright or patent liability is assumed with
respect to the use of the information contained herein. Although every precaution has been taken in the
preparation of this documentation, the publisher and the author assume no responsibility for errors or
omissions. Neither is any liability assumed for damages resulting from the use of the information
contained herein.
The information in this documentation is subject to change without notice and does not represent a
commitment on the part of Invensys Systems, Inc. The software described in this documentation is
furnished under a license or nondisclosure agreement. This software may be used or copied only in
accordance with the terms of these agreements.
For comments or suggestions about the product documentation, send an e-mail message to
ProductDocumentationComments@invensys.com.
All terms mentioned in this documentation that are known to be trademarks or service marks have been
appropriately capitalized. Invensys Systems, Inc. cannot attest to the accuracy of this
information. Use of a term in this documentation should not be regarded as affecting the validity of any
trademark or service mark. Invensys, Invensys logo, PRO/II, and SimSci are trademarks of Invensys
plc, its subsidiaries and affiliates.
Table of Contents
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Section 1: Gas Processing
G1 - Phase Envelope
Process Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-1
Methods and Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-1
Simulation Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-1
Input Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-2
Keyword Input File . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-5
Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-5
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-7
Output . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-7
G2 - DeEthanizer
Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-9
Process Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-10
Methods and Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-10
Simulation Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-10
Input Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-11
Keyword Input File . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-16
Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-17
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-17
Output . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-17
G3 - Refrigeration Loop
Process Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-21
Methods and Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-22
Simulation Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-22
Input Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-23
Keyword Input File . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-29
Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-31
Conclusions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-32
Output . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-32
G4 - Compressor Train
Process Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-35
G5 - Expander Plant
Process Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-45
Methods and Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-46
Simulation Model. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-46
Input Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-47
Keyword Input. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-50
Results. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-52
Output. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-52
Section 2: Refining
R1 - Crude Heating Curve
Process Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-119
Methods and Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-120
Simulation Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-121
Input Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-121
Keyword Input . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-126
Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-126
R2 - De-IsoButanizer Tower
Process Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-129
Methods and Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-130
Simulation Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-130
Input Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-130
Keyword Input . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-137
Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-138
R4 - Vacuum Column
Process Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-34
Methods and Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-35
Simulation Model. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-35
Input Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-36
Keyword Input File . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-42
Results. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-44
Output. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-44
R8 - Naphtha Splitter
Process Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-106
Methods and Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-107
Simulation Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-107
Input Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-107
Keyword Input File . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-113
Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-114
Conclusions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-114
Output . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-114
Section 3: PetroChemicals
P1 - C3 Splitter
ProcessData . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-2
Methods and Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-3
P2 - Aromatics Separation
Process Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-8
Methods and Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-8
Simulation Model. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-8
Input Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-9
Output. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-10
P3 - Ethylene Fractionator
Process Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-13
Methods and Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-16
Simulation Model. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-16
Input Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-18
Results. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-20
Conclusions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-21
Output. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-21
P4 - Cyclohexane Plant
ProcessData . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-31
Methods and Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-33
Simulation Model. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-34
Input Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-35
Results. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-39
Output. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-39
P5 - Naphthalene Recovery
ProcessData . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-47
Methods and Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-48
SimulationModel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-49
Input Data (Shortcut) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-49
Output (Shortcut) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-50
Input Data (Rigorous) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-55
Output (Rigorous) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-57
P6 - MTBE Separation
Process Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-62
Methods and Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-62
Simulation Model. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-63
P7 - Propylene Chlorination
Process Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-69
Methods and Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-70
Simulation Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-71
Input Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-72
Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-75
Conclusions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-75
Output . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-75
Use of Gibbs Reactor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-82
Gibbs Reactor Output . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-82
Section 4: Chemical
C1 - Dryer Column
Process Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-88
Methods and Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-88
Simulation Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-89
Input Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-89
Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-90
Conclusions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-91
Output . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-91
C2 - Ammonia-Acetone-Water Separation
Process Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-96
Methods and Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-96
Simulation Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-96
Input Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-97
Section 5: Solids
ToC - viii May 2014
S1 - p-Xylene Crystalization
Process Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-161
Methods and Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-162
Simulation Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-163
Input Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-164
Result. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-166
Output . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-167
Section 6: Advanced
A1 - Cascade Refrigeration
ProcessData . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-178
Methods and Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-178
SimulationModel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-178
Input Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-179
Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-182
Conclusions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-182
Output . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-182
A2 - Phenol Distillation
Process Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-191
Methods and Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-193
Simulation Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-193
Input Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-193
Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-196
Output . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-196
A5 - H2SO4 Alkylation
Process Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-245
Methods and Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-247
Simulation Model. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-248
Input Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-248
Results. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-259
Output. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-260
A6 - Ammonia Synthesis
Process Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-270
Methods and Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-271
Simulation Model. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-271
Input Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-280
Results. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-281
Conclusions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-281
Output. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-282
Section 7: Specialty
S1 - Upstream Calculations
Upstream Gas-Oil Ratio Calculations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-321
Upstream Liquid Dropout Calculations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-325
Upstream Relative Volume Calculations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-329
B2_Bioethanol_Process
Problem Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9-359
Overview of Solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9-360
Implementation Details . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9-361
Introduction
This manual contains Application Briefs illustrating the use of the
PRO/II simulation program to solve a wide range fo typical
industrial mass and energy balance problems. It is intended as a
compliment to the PRO/II Keyword Input Manual and the PRO/II
User Guide. It provides a reference source for detailed examples of
PRO/II features and output options.
For conveninece, the Application Briefs are divided into several
sections: Gas Processing, Refining, Petrochemical, Chemical,
Advanced, and Solids. The Table of Contents lists the applications
in each section. The Index of Features is a cross-reference of the
PRO/II features illustrated by each application.
Each application includes: a description of the process and
flowsheet, a discussion of the simulation model, samples of data
entry through the Graphical User Interface (GUI), and comments
on the results. Also included are a complete keyword listing of the
simulation input data and reprints of selected sections of the output
report of results.
1
PRO/II Application Briefs
2 May 2014
PRO/II Application Briefs
Process Data
Table G1 shows the composition of the gas stream. No additional
data are required to solve this problem.
Table G1: Gas Stream Composition
Simulation Model
Phase envelopes may be generated for any flowsheet stream
whether it is a defined feed stream or the product stream from a unit
operation. The phase envelope is a function of only the stream
composition.
All you need to do to generate the complete envelope is to select the
stream. No initial estimates are required. The critical point,
cricondentherm, and cricondenbar will be calculated.
Input Data
The program uses English units (default) for all the parameters.
Click Component to view the SIMSCI - Component Selection
dialog box. Select the components from the available databanks.
Lay down the gas stream and the phase envelope for the gas
mixture. To enter the details of the gas stream as shown in Table
G1, double-click stream 1. When the Stream Data dialog box
appears, click the Flowrate and Composition button and enter the
details. See Figure G3.
Results
To view the phase envelope curve of the stream, run the simulation
and select Phase Envelope from the Tools menu. Select the stream
from the drop-down list.
The following plot was generated from the simulation run in PRO/II
with PROVISION.
Conclusion
If temperatures below 28 F are possible, condensation could occur
in parts of the pipeline which are exposed to the atmosphere.
You will need to study the specific pipeline further to establish
whether heaters are required or if insulation will be sufficient.
Alternatively, you might consider removing more of the heavier
components in the gas treatment before the gas enters the pipeline.
Output
The plot shows the envelope with the lines of constant liquid
fraction at 1% and 5% superimposed on it. If you could accept up to
1% liquid in your line, there would be no problem unless the
temperature falls below -19 F.
Click the Generate Reports button on the toolbar. The tabular
temperature and pressure points for the phase envelope are printed,
and the critical point is identified. Similar tables are available for
the lines of constant liquid fraction.
F PSIA
CRICONDENTHERM 28.45 606.9
CRICONDENBAR -27.42 1328.6
CRITICAL POINT -95.15 853.1
MAX. TEMP AND PRES 28.45 1328.6
G2 - DeEthanizer
Description
This application could help design a deethanizer column to remove
C2 and lighter components from a light hydrocarbon gas stream.
99% of the propane in the feed must be recovered in the bottom
product. The bottoms purity is defined by an ethane to propane ratio
of 0.025.
The flowsheet is shown in Figure G7.
G2 - DeEthanizer 1-9
PRO/II Application Briefs
Process Data
This example calculates the diameter of a 20 theoretical tray
column operating at 82% of flood, with an 18-inch sieve tray
spacing. The diameters of the sections above and below the feed are
determined separately.
The gas stream composition and the process conditions are shown
in Table G2 and Table G3 respectively.
Simulation Model
The deethanizer is modeled as a conventional distillation column
with 20 theoretical stages including the condenser. A thermosiphon
reboiler is required; this is simulated by a pumparound heater on the
bottom tray, with a return stream vapor fraction of 0.35. The feed is
flashed at the feed tray pressure, the vapor rising under tray 9 and
the liquid dropping onto tray 10.
Input Data
The program uses English units (default) for all the parameters
except for pressure units and liquid volume units. To change the
pressure units to psig and liquid volume units to US gallons, click
the UOM button on the toolbar and make the required
changes.
Click Component to view the SIMSCI - Component Selection
dialog box. Select the components from the available databanks.
G2 - DeEthanizer 1-11
PRO/II Application Briefs
Figure G9: Thermodynamic Methods.
Lay down the PFD as shown in Figure G7. When dropping a new
column on the PFD, a dialog box requesting the number of
theoretical trays appears. Enter 20 which includes both the
condenser and the reboiler.
G2 - DeEthanizer 1-13
PRO/II Application Briefs
Click the Feeds and Products button to specify the vapor to be
above feed tray and the liquid below feed tray as shown in Figure
G12. The SEPARATE keyword on the FEED statement in the
Keyword Input File reflects the same. If not specified, the vapor
portion of a mixed phase feed would enter below the feed tray.
G2 - DeEthanizer 1-15
PRO/II Application Briefs
Click the Tray Hydraulics/Packing button and specify the column
trays operating at 82% of flood, with an 18-inch sieve tray spacing
as shown in Figure G15.
The pressure profiles across the column and the condenser duties
are specified in their respective dialog box. These dialog boxes are
accessed by clicking the Pressure Profiles and Condenser buttons
on the Column dialog box.
Results
The capital cost of the column depends on its height and diameter.
The height is a function of the number of trays. The diameters for
the 20 theoretical stages are 30 inches above the feed and 54 inches
below it.
Conclusion
This simulation shows the results of diameter and duties for one
specific column height. The column cost is obtained from the height
and diameter. The column duties determine the capital costs of the
condenser and reboiler, as well as representing the major operating
costs. You will need to run cases at other column heights to
determine the capital/operating cost relationship.
Output
Click Generate Report on the toolbar to generate a report for
the entire flowsheet.
The column summary output shows the details of the temperatures,
pressures, duties and flowrates in the column.
The tray sizing results show the calculated diameter for each tray. If
the calculated diameter is not sufficient to accommodate the tray
free area plus the downcomer area, a warning is printed and the
diameter is increased until the restriction has been overcome.
The largest tray diameter in each section is used to rate the whole
section, 30 inches in the top and 54 inches in the bottom of the
column. The flooding factor and downcomer backup are printed for
each tray.
Finally, part of the stream printout is presented with a summary of
the feed and product streams.
G2 - DeEthanizer 1-17
PRO/II Application Briefs
DEETHANIZER COLUMN OUTPUT
UNIT 1, 'D101', 'DEETHANIZER'
IN/OUT METHOD 5
COLUMN SUMMARY
PUMPAROUNDS
REFLUX RATIOS
-------- REFLUX RATIOS --------
MOLAR WEIGHT STD L VOL
--------- --------- ---------
REFLUX / FEED STREAM 1 0.3539 0.2857 0.3556
REFLUX / VAPOR DISTILLATE 0.5516 0.7247 0.6690
G2 - DeEthanizer 1-19
PRO/II Application Briefs
TRAY RATING CALCULATION OUTPUT
TRAY SELECTION FOR TRAY RATING
G3 - Refrigeration Loop
A refrigeration loop was originally designed to take advantage of a
low temperature stream from another process, to help condense the
refrigerant. Now it is proposed that some or all of this stream will
be used elsewhere in the plant. You must determine the effect on the
refrigeration loop of losing this auxiliary cooling duty.
Process Data
The process flowsheet is shown in Figure G16. The loop is closed
and operates with a fixed quantity of refrigerant. The liquid
refrigerant before being flashed through the valve, LETDOWN, is
cooled in the subcooler, SUBCOOL.
The two phases in the stream leaving the cooler are separated in the
flash, SEPARATOR, and the liquid portion is vaporized to provide
the required refrigerant duty. The two vapor streams are then
combined, recompressed, and condensed.
Simulation Model
The independent variable in this simulation is the flowrate of the
refrigerant. This flowrate is estimated for stream 1 based on the
latent heat of propane, and a feedback controller is used to calculate
it as shown in Figure G17. The vaporizer exit stream is set to its
dew point, and the controller varies the rate of stream 1 in order to
meet the required refrigerant duty.
Input Data
The program uses English units (default) for all the parameters
except for liquid volume units. To change the liquid volume units to
US gallons, click UOM button on the toolbar and make the
required changes.
Results
Figure G24: Simulation Results
Conclusions
The plant can operate at a reduced sub-cooler duty at the cost of
additional compressor power requirements. Due to increased
refrigerant circulation, the line and equipment sizing will need to be
validated at that rate.
This simulation shows the importance of considering the real
performance characteristics of process equipment. If the
compressor were specified with only a defined exit pressure, the
problem with increased flowrate might not have been detected until
a later and more costly stage.
Output
The output reports are generated for the case with the SUBCOOL
duty at 15.0 MM BTU/hr.
From the Tools menu, select Spreadsheet and generate reports for
the following:
n Stream properties
n Compressor Data report
n Heat Exchanger duties
G4 - Compressor Train
A plant has been designed to compress a gas stream from 450 kPa
to 6200 kPa, in three stages, for transportation using a pipeline. To
select the compressors you have to calculate the work required for
each stage. You also need the cooler duties and recycle rates in each
stage for utility calculations.
The compressed gas is to be cooled to 60 C after each stage, to
condense the heavier components. In order to maximize the gas
product rate, the liquid from each stage is recycled back to the
previous stage.
Process Data
The flowsheet is shown in Figure G28. Each stage consists of a
compressor, aftercooler, and a separator drum.
Simulation Model
Figure G29: Simulation Model
Input Data
The program uses SI units for all the parameters except for
temperatures. To change the temperature to Celsius from the default
Kelvin, click UOM button on the toolbar and make the
required changes.
Click Component to view the SIMSCI - Component
Selection dialog box. The pseudo-components are generated by
clicking the Petroleum button, and entering the data as shown in
Figure G30.
Output
From the Tools menu, select Spreadsheet and you can generate
reports for the following:
n Flash summary - feed and first two letdown stages.
n Compressor Data report
G5 - Expander Plant
The demethanizer in an expander plant removes methane from a
production gas stream, to maintain a methane/ethane volumetric
ratio of 0.015 in the column liquid product. A new feed gas stream
with a different composition is being brought on stream, and you
must ensure that the same purity specification can be maintained,
and that the new reboiler duty does not exceed the capacity of the
unit.
You also need to know what pressure recovery is possible on the
methane stream leaving the plant.
Process Data
The flowsheet is shown in Figure G36 and the new feed
composition is in Table G9.
The expander lets the pressure down to 125 psig, which is the
working pressure of the demethanizer column. 90% of the expander
work is utilized by the compressor. The expander efficiency is 80%
and the compressor efficiency is 75%.
Simulation Model
The demethanizer is modeled as a conventional distillation column
with 10 theoretical stages including the reboiler. The reboiler duty
is varied to achieve the specified methane/ethane standard liquid
volume ratio of 0.015 in the bottom product.
The compressor is linked to the work generated by the expander by
use of the DEFINE feature. The DEFINE feature allows the
expander to let down the gas to 125 psig capturing all of the work
possible at 80% adiabatic efficiency. 90% of that work is
transmitted to the compressor, which compresses the product gas to
whatever pressure can be achieved at 75% adiabatic efficiency.
The gas-gas exchanger E1 is specified to have a hot-in-cold-out
(HICO) temperature approach of 10 F.
Input Data
The problem will be solved using English units, which is default,
except for pressure which will be in psig. To change the pressure
units, click UOM button on the toolbar and make the required
changes.
In addition to a standard input units report, we also want to get an SI
units report with pressure units in bars. Select from the Output
menu, Report Format/Units of Measure
To enter the component slate as shown in Table G9, click the
Component button on the toolbar to view SIMSCI -
Component Selection dialog box shown in Figure G37. Select the
components from the available databanks.
Lay down the units and connect them with streams per Figure G39.
Double-click E1 to enter the pressure drops (10 psi on the inlet gas
and 5 psi on the residue gas) and a HICO specification of 10 F. The
chiller E2 has an outlet specification of -84 F with a 5 psi pressure
drop. The separator D1 is a simple adiabatic flash with duty set to
Keyword Input
TITLE PROJECT=G5, PROBLEM=APPBRIEFS, USER=SIMSCI
PRINT INPUT=ALL, RATE=M,LV
DIMENSION ENGLISH, PRES=PSIG
OUTDIMENSION ADD, SI, PRES=BAR
SEQUENCE SIMSCI
COMPONENT DATA
LIBID 1,NITROGEN/2,METHANE/3,ETHANE/4,PROPANE/5,IBUTANE/6,BUTANE/ &
7,IPENTANE/8,PENTANE/9,HEXANE/ &
10,HEPTANE, BANK=SIMSCI,PROCESS
ASSAY FIT=ALTERNATE, CONVERSION=API94, CURVEFIT=CURRENT, &
KVRECONCILE=TAILS
THERMODYNAMIC DATA
METHOD SYSTEM=PR, DENSITY(L)=LK, SET=PR01, DEFAULT
STREAM DATA
PROPERTY STREAM=INLET_GAS, TEMPERATURE=120, PRESSURE=588, PHASE=M, &
RATE(GV)=1.0167E6, COMPOSITION(M)=1,7.91/2,73.05/3,7.68/ &
4,5.69/5,0.99/6,2.44/7,0.69/8,0.82/9,0.42/10,0.31
PROPERTY STREAM=3, TEMPERATURE=-83.999, PRESSURE=573, &
REFSTREAM=INLET_GAS
NAME INLET_GAS,Methane Rich Gas Feed/RESIDUE_GAS,Residue gas/ &
Results
Figure G41: Results
Figure G41 shows the results from the simulation in the specified
input units. The demethanizer column can meet the purity
specification with the new feed stream as long as the 2.29 MM Btu/
hr found on this solution is available for the reboiler. The expander
produces 392.2 hp expanding the gas from 573 to 125 psig while
the compressor uses 353.0 hp to compress the product gas from 120
to 161.2 psig.
Output
Excerpts from the standard output report in SI units of measure are
given here. The demethanizer output shows the required duty as
well as the column temperatures and internal flowrates. The
expander and compressor output shows the isentropic and
theoretical calculation results, as well as the actual performance.
The stream component flowrates showing the feed and product
streams are presented in both molar and liquid volume units.
An output report for the entire flowsheet can also be generated by
clicking the Generate Report button .
IN/OUT METHOD 8
COLUMN SUMMARY
SPECIFICATIONS
Feeds 4
Products Mixed 7
OPERATING CONDITIONS
Feeds 10
OPERATING CONDITIONS
OPERATING CONDITIONS
Process Data
The flowsheet for the three stage process is shown in Figure G42.
The feed consists of water, pure hydrocarbons, and petroleum
fractions as shown in Table G10.
The first stage flash is at 300 psia and 200 F. The second stage is
adiabatic at 200 psia. The third stage is also adiabatic, but the
pressure is calculated in order to meet the TVP specification.
60% of the free water in stage 1 is removed from the process. The
remaining is removed from the following flashes. The compressor
outlets are cooled to 120 F, and the liquid portions are recycled to
the third stage flash.
The vapor from stages 2 and 3 are recompressed to 97 and 297 psia
respectively. The final product gas is produced at 297 psia.
Simulation Model
Figure G43: Simulation Model
Input Data
The problem will be solved using English units, which is default,
except for petroleum density units which will be in API. To change
the units, click UOM button on the toolbar and make the
required changes.
To select the components listed in Table G10, click the Component
button on the toolbar to view SIMSCI -Component Selection
dialog box. Click the Petroleum button to enter the petroleum
fraction properties given in Table G11.
Build the flowsheet as shown in Figure G43. Flash drums VAL1,
VAL2, and VAL3 (representing valves and separators) are all
specified as adiabatic flashes at their respective pressures (300 psia,
100 psia and 16.7 psia respectively). The pressure for VAL3 is an
estimate only. The final pressure will be determined by the
controller to achieve the desired TVP on the crude product. The
VAL1 data entry is shown in Figure G44.
Results
The gas product dry flowrate is 716,683 std. ft3/hr, and the oil
production is 2644.8 bbl/hr. The final stage pressure which gives
the required oil TVP is 35.95 psia.
The cooling water for the precooler HX-1 is 71,941 lb/hr. The
cooling water required by stages 1 and 2 is 102,017 and 161,943 lb/
hr, respectively (simulation output not shown here).
Conclusion
This simulation has provided all the necessary information. The
model could now be used to investigate if different letdown and/or
compressor conditions could improve the oil product rate.
Output
An output report for the entire flowsheet can also be generated by
clicking the Generate Report button .
Alternately, from the Tools menu, select Spreadsheet and you can
generate reports for the following:
n Flash Summary
n Compressor Data report
n Heat Exchanger duties
The flash drum summary shows the conditions in each letdown and
compression stage. The full details of the second stage compressor
and aftercooler appear on the compressor and heat exchanger
output. The aftercooler details show the cooling water requirement.
A portion of the stream property output showing the feed and
product streams is presented.
FEEDS 100 2 3
SW1 11
9
10
PRODUCTS VAPOR 20 21 22
LIQUID 2 3 105
WATER W1 W2 W3
STAGE 2 COMPRESSOR
UNIT 11, 'COM2'
Feeds 27
Products Vapor 28
OPERATING CONDITIONS
INLET ISENTROPIC OUTLET
----------- ----------- -----------
TEMPERATURE, F 120.00 209.32 235.14
PRESSURE, PSIA 97.00 300.00 300.00
ENTHALPY, MM BTU/HR 6.9119 8.0709 8.5677
ENTROPY, BTU/LB-MOL-F 56.5485 56.5485 57.3455
CP, BTU/LB-MOL-F 17.8165 21.2094
CV, BTU/LB-MOL-F 15.2610 17.8573
CP/(CP-R) 1.1254 1.1033
CP/CV 1.1674 1.1877
MOLE PERCENT VAPOR 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000
MOLE PERCENT LIQUID 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
MOLE PERCENT H/C LIQUID 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
MOLE PERCENT WATER 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
ACT VAP RATE, M FT3/MIN 0.9154
ADIABATIC EFF, PERCENT 70.0000
POLYTROPIC EFF, PERCENT 72.0603
ISENTROPIC COEFFICIENT, K 1.0690
POLYTROPIC COEFFICIENT, N 1.1301
ASME "F" FACTOR 1.0038
HEAD, FT
ADIABATIC 25212.30
POLYTROPIC 25954.38
ACTUAL 36017.57
WORK, HP
THEORETICAL 455.53
STAGE 2 AFTERCOOLER
UNIT 12, 'HX-3', 'COM2 COOLER'
OPERATING CONDITIONS
(1) STANDARD VAPOR VOLUME IS 379.49 FT3/LB-MOLE (60 F AND 14.696 PSIA)
(1) STANDARD VAPOR VOLUME IS 379.49 FT3/LB-MOLE (60 F AND 14.696 PSIA)
Process Data
The process flowsheet for the TEG dehydration system is shown in
Figure G49. The feed to this system is 39 MMSCFD of wet gas
(21.5 pounds of water per MMSCF of wet gas) at 80 F and
720 psig.
This feed stream is synthesized by mixing the hydrocarbon gas on a
dry basis (stream HC_FEED) with water (stream
WATER_FEED) to yield the actual wet gas feed (stream
WET_GAS). The Stream Data specifications consist of the
composition and thermal condition of the two feed streams (streams
HC_FEED and WATER_FEED) and the recycle stream (stream
LEAN_6):
Simulation Model
The TEG plant process flowsheet is shown in Figure G49. The
corresponding PRO/II simulation flow diagram is shown in Figure
G50:
Input Data
The units of measure for this problem are the default English units.
Enter the component slate given in Table G12 through the
Component Selection dialog box shown in Figure G51.
Results
The recycle loop converged in three iterations. The regenerator duty
is 0.49 MM Btu/hr, the glycol pump hydraulic horsepower is 4.6 hp
and the duties for the LR_HX1, LR_HX2, and
LEAN_COOLER heat exchangers are 0.194 MM Btu/hr, 0.235
MM Btu/hr, and 0.319 MM Btu/hr, respectively. The make-up TEG
flowrate is 0.014 lb mol/hr.
Conclusion
The natural gas stream is dehydrated from a water content of 21.5
pounds of water per MMSCF of gas to 2.6 pounds of water per
MMSCF of gas with a 10 gpm lean TEG flowrate to the contactor.
Annual TEG vaporization losses will be approximately 1995
gallons per year based on a 97% operating factor (excluding losses
due to entrainment or upsets in column operation).
Output
Partial results are shown from the simulation before.
The Flash summaries are generated from the Tools/Spreadsheet/
Flash menu selection
Figure G61: Stream Component Flow - Lean and Rich Glycol Circulation
Rates
Process Data
The flowsheet for this problem is shown in Figure G65. The natural
gas feed stream information is given in Table G13, and the process
information in Table G141.
Component lbmole/hr
CO2 149.9254
H2S 186.7203
CH4 9680.8887
C2H6 704.0451
C3H8 187.9284
iC4H10 19.8801
nC4H10 26.2507
iC5H12 7.5787
nC5H12 7.7983
C6H14 5.9310
C7H16 6.7000
H2O 4.9745
Rate (MMSCF/hr) 4.17
Temperature (F) 100.00
Pressure (psia) 200.00
Simulation Model
The MEA is calculated with the use of the Calculator unit operation
(you can use a Stream Calculator for the same purpose). The
Calculator uses a FORTRAN similar language to perform the
material balance. The losses from the product streams are summed
together. The MEA stream is then rate-adjusted to exactly balance
the loss. The resulting lean-amine solution is diluted to 15 wt %
MEA by adding make-up water. Here again, a Calculator unit
operation is used to calculate the correct amount of water.
The ACE (air-cooled exchanger) unit operation in design mode is
used to size the required air-cooler . A 10 degree temperature rise is
required on the air side. The air rate is adjusted using another
Calculator to achieve the required temperature rise.
Input Data
Standard English units are used for the simulation, except that
liquid volume is changed to gallons by clicking the UOM . The
components listed in the feed stream information Table G13 are
added to the component list by clicking the Component . In
addition, AIR is added to the component list to accommodate the
ACE unit. The Amine special thermodynamic package is selected
from the Thermodynamic data window which is accessed by
clicking Thermodynamics . The component threshold for
convergence is set to 0.00005 in the Recycle window by clicking
Recycle button . This allows PRO/II to test for trace
components when determining recycle convergence.
The simulation model is constructed as shown in Figure G66. The
valve, flash drum, and pump are specified according the values in
the simulation model. The simple heat exchangers are modeled
with the temperatures as shown, and with zero pressure drop.
The calculators are programmed to perform the material balances to
makeup MEA and water. CL-1 calculates the MEA makeup with
the code shown here in the calculator window. Note the necessity
to identify the streams present in the calculator for calculation
sequencing purposes.
The ACE unit uses defaults for design purposes. The outlet
temperature is specified at 115 F. The air flow is adjusted by
calculator CL-3 to achieve the desired 15 F temperature rise.
Results
The flowsheet converged in 4 recycle iterations. The concentrations
of the acid gases CO2 and H2S were reduced from 1.37 and 1.7
mole percent in the sour gas feed to less than 1 PPM in the treated
effluent gas.
Output
The following were extracted from Tools/Spreadsheet reports:
1. Absorber column tray properties for key trays.
2. Regenerator column tray properties for key trays.
3. Stream properties for key streams.
Process Data
The flowsheet is shown in Figure G76. The pump feed stream
conditions and flowsheet process conditions are also shown in this
figure.
Simulation Model
Figure G77: Simulation Model
Notice the flat portion of the graph. If the initial estimate for the
number of degrees of superheat is too high, the controller moves in
both directions along the flat portion and determines that the
manipulated variable has no effect in achieving the specification.
Input heat to the pseudoflash versus number of degrees of superheat
looks quite different as shown in Figure G79.
Input Data
Water is the only component and is specified in the component data
section . The thermodynamic set consists of SRK using
Keenan and Keyes steam tables. To enter this, select the thermo
button , and select Soave-Redlich-Kwong from the Most
Commonly Used sets and click on Modify. Click Water Options in
the Thermodynamics Data - Modification window. Select Keenan
and Keyes Steam Tables option as shown in Figure G80.
The flash unit is set to 99.5% vapor fraction with zero pressure
drop. The condenser is specified to a bubble point product with no
pressure drop. An air utility stream is specified with a temperature
rise from 90 to 110 F. The air flowrate will be calculated to achieve
this temperature rise.
Results
The results show that the turbine expander operating at 99.5%
efficiency produces 307.7 HP of work with a superheater cold side
outlet temperature of 1161 F and an estimated efficiency of 30.7%.
Parameter Value
Shaft Work (Turbine Expander) 307.7 HP (actual)
Outlet Steam Quality (Turbine Expander) 99.5%
Cold Side Outlet Temperature 1161 F
(Superheater HX)
Eta Efficiency (Efficiency and Balance 30.7%
Calculator)
Heat Balance (Efficiency and Balance 1 (cross check
Calculator) matches)
Duty (Pseudoflash Flash) 0
Conclusions
In conclusion, the results show that the plant will generate an
accetable amount of power while maintaining good overall
thermodynamic heat engine efficiency. Furthermore, these
conditions will not produce an exhaust steam output that would
result in damage to the turbine blades from suspected water
droplets.
Output
The flash drum summary output for the pseudoflash is followed by
pump and calculator summary output. Output for the reboiler and
condenser appears in the Heat Exchanger Output section.
Stream summary output is from the standard output report.
Feeds EXPANDED
Products FLASHED
Feeds CONDENSED
Products PRESSURIZED
Work, HP 4.87
Head, FT 4181.39
Efficiency 78.00 78.00
FT 1.00
LMTD*FT, F 41.2083
(1) STANDARD VAPOR VOLUME IS 379.49 FT3/LB-MOLE (60 F AND 14.696 PSIA)
Section 2: Refining
R1 - Crude Heating Curve
A flash vaporization curve is to be generated for a crude oil mixture
as the first step in the design of a crude unit. The design flowrate of
crude is 75,000 BBL/day.
Process Data
The light ends, API gravity, D2887 simulated distillation, and
molecular weight data are given in Table R1-1 through Table R1-4.
The following data needs to be entered as discussed in Input Data
section.
Table R1-1: Light Ends
78.38 800
87.94 990
Simulation Model
The HCURVE unit is used to compute 50 points at even enthalpy
increments over the range of temperature and pressure conditions
given in Table R1-6.
Table R1-6: Process Conditions
Input Data
Click Component to view SIMSCI - Component Selection
dialog box. Select and list the component slate.
Note: Pseudocomponents will be defined, when the stream assay
data are supplied.
Note: when you re-enter this window, the flowrate will be 3,125
bbl/hr. The default time unit for this simulation is in hours.
Click Define/Edit Assay and enter the assay data in Stream Data -
Assay Definition dialog box. D2887 and gravity data are entered as
shown in Figure R1-5. Click Molecular Weight and Lightends and
enter the relevant data given in Table R1-2 and Table R1-4.
Keyword Input
TITLE PROJECT=R1, PROBLEM=APPBRIEFS, USER=SIMSCI
DESC CRUDE OIL HEATING CURVE
PRINT INPUT=ALL, STREAM=ALL, RATE=M, TBP
DIMENSION ENGLISH, LIQVOL=BBL, XDENSITY=API
COMPONENT DATA
LIBID 1,ETHANE/2,PROPANE/3,IBUTANE/4,BUTANE/5,PENTANE
CUTPOINTS TBPCUTS=100,300,8/600.001,10/900,6/1500.01,6/1500.01,6,
THERMODYNAMIC DATA
METHOD SYSTEM=BK10, TRANSPORT=PETR, VISCOSITY(L)=LBC
STREAM DATA
PROPERTY STREAM=1, TEMPERATURE=375, PRESSURE=300, PHASE=M, &
RATE(LV)=3125.01, ASSAY=WT
D2887 STREAM=1, DATA=5.74,135/19.55,210/35.89,370/60.04,565/ &
69.82,665/78.38,800/87.94,990, TEMP=F
API STREAM=1, AVERAGE=45.37, DATA=8.33,80.01/16.89,62.9/ &
34.8,50.6/55.47,38.2/80.1,27.5
LIGHTEND STREAM=1, COMPOSITION(M)=1,0.1/2,1.4/3,0.65/4,3.15/ &
5,5.1, PERCENT(WT)=10.4, NORMALIZE
MW STREAM=1, AVG=162.9, DATA=18.92,99.5/33.4,135/48.4,184.7/ &
69.8,334.8/100,789
NAME 1,CRUDE FEED
UNIT OPERATIONS
HCURVE UID=HC1, NAME=HEATING CRV
ADIABATIC STREAM=1, TEMP=375,690, PRES=300,50, POINTS=50
PROPERTY ALL
END
Results
The following charts were generated using PRO/II's Spreadsheet
Tools utilities. To generate these, run the simulation and generate
output reports using the Report Generator . Next, click
Tools/Spreadsheet/Heating curve.
Note: Select the Heating/Cooling Curve unit operation before
generating the heating curve by clicking Tools/Spreadsheet/
Heating curve. PRO/II plotting defaults were set to Excel and
some minor reformatting was done in Excel for this publication.
R2 - De-IsoButanizer Tower
This example illustrates, designing a deisobutanizer for separating
isobutane and its lighter component from butane and its heavier
feed. It has a volumetric reflux ratio of 4.5 with respect to feed and
25 percent by volume of the feed recovered as overhead product. A
condensing curve is to be added for the preliminary condenser
design.
Process Data
The flowsheet and process conditions are given in Figure R2-1.
Simulation Model
The column is modeled as an ordinary distillation column with 66
theoretical stages including the condenser and reboiler. The feed is
introduced on tray 35. The condenser is modeled as a total
condenser at a temperature 10 F below the calculated bubble point.
The reboiler and condenser duties are varied to meet the
specifications.
The simulation uses the initial estimate generator model
CONVENTIONAL to generate temperature and flow profiles. This
model is recommended for conventional columns with reboiler and
condensers.
A heating/cooling curve is added to create the condensing curve.
Twenty one points will be evaluated (dividing the curve into 20
segments).
Note: Equal enthalpy/pressure increments are selected, whenever
phase change is expected in the system. This increment will provide
a superior representation of the actual process conditions than equal
temperature/pressure increments.
Input Data
The program uses English units (default) for all the parameters. To
change the liquid volume units from API barrels to cubic feet. Click
on the UOM to make the desired change.
Click Component to view SIMSCI - Component Selection
dialog box. Select and list the component slate.
In this example, the feed is located on tray 35. Lay down a feed
stream and double-click the stream to view Flowrate and
This completes the essential data for the column. Next, lay down a
heating/cooling curve on the flowsheet.
Double-click on the heating/cooling curve and select the
column under Units to be Evaluated. Click Enter Data to
view Heating/Cooling Curve for Column Internal Streams
dialog box. Here, select condenser, equal enthalpy and pressure
increments from the respective list. Enter the evaluation points
as 21 as shown in the Figure R2-10.
Keyword Input
TITLE PROJECT=R2, PROBLEM=APPBRIEFS, USER=SIMSCI
DIMENSION ENGLISH, LIQVOL=BBL
COMPONENT DATA
LIBID 1,PROPANE/2,IBUTANE/3,BUTANE/4,IPENTANE
THERMODYNAMIC DATA
METHOD SYSTEM=GS, ENTHALPY(L)=LK, ENTHALPY(V)=LK
STREAM DATA
PROPERTY STREAM=1, TEMPERATURE=140, PRESSURE=200, PHASE=M, &
RATE(LV)=629.999, COMPOSITION(LV)=1,1.4/2,33.8/3,64.6/4,0.2
NAME 1,FEED/2,OVERHEAD/3,BOTTOMS
UNIT OPERATIONS
COLUMN UID=T-1, NAME=DEISOBUT
PARAMETER TRAY=66,IO
FEED 1,35
PRODUCT OVHD(M)=2, BTMS(M)=3,1200, SUPERSEDE=ON
Results
The column material balance results are shown in Figure R2-11.
Figure R2-11: Column Material Balance
COLUMN SUMMARY
SPECIFICATIONS
ADIABATIC COOLING CURVE FOR UNIT 1, 'T-1 ', HEATER NO. 1, TRAY NO. 1
TOTAL DUTY = -7.69700E+01 MM BTU/HR
Type Valve
Diameter 162 inches
Tray Spacing 24 inches
Number of flow paths 4
Deck thickness 14 guage
System Load Factor 1.0
Number of valves/trays 1170
Valve diameter default
Valve wall thickness default
Valve material default
Weir height 2 inches
Downcomer clearence 1.5 inches
Downcomer widths
Side 13.5 inches
R2A Results
After executing, generate the output report and see that the column
loading is acceptable based on Flooding Factor and Downcomer
Backup. Selected trays of output are shown below:
TRAY RATING RESULTS
PRES DOWNCOMER
TRAY VAPOR LIQUID VLOAD DIAM FF DROP GPM/LWI BACKUP, PCT
CFS HOTGPM CFS IN PSI GPM/IN TRAY SPACING
---- ----- ------ ----- ------ ---- ------ -------- ------------
2 112.9 2446. 26.34 162.0 73.6 0.082 4.5 36.30
3 113.0 2459. 26.43 162.0 73.9 0.082 4.6 36.44
R2B Results
The following data taken from PRO/II Stream Property Tables
compares the product streams for the deisobutanizer simulator with
and without the propane product.
Table R2-2: Base Case Stream Propertirs of Product Streams
With a TVP of 173.3 psia, a good design pressure for the propane
condenser would be 175 psia. Working backwards, retaining the
same pressure drops that is used in the base case, the deisobutanizer
condenser is at 180 psia, and the top of the column is at 185 psia.
Inserting these new conditions results in a simulation with the
following specifications
Table R2-4: Specifications for Adjusted Revamp Case
Pressure Valve
Condenser 180 psia
Top 185 psia
Column Pressure Drop 8.5 psi
Specifications
Reboiler duty 79.055 MM Btu/hr
Isobutane recovery 95%
Propane purity 90% (molar)
R2C Results
Figure R2-16 shows the Stream Property Table report for the
product streams at the adjusted column operating pressure.
PROPANE -- 28.5
IBUTANE 729.77 737.5
NBUTANE 1467.64 1431.4
Component flows IBUTANE
stream, lb-moles/hr
Propane 35.5 9.8
Isobutane 687.8 687.8
Normal butane 6.49 39.9
Normal pentane 0.00 0.00
TVP, IBUTANE stream, psia 75.0 70.4
Conclusions
The following observations can be made comparing the adjusted
revamped case with the base case
l The tray loadings in the revamped case are essentially at or
below the tray loadings for the base case.
l The volatility of the IBUTANE stream is decreased.
l Around 28.5 moles of marketable LPG product is
produced.
l The reboiler duty and total condenser duties are at or below
the base case.
l A small condenser must be located and installed to handle
the propane product.
l Both the condenser and reboiler will have higher required
UAs to accommodate the smaller temperature differential.
A higher quality steam might be required to drive the
reboiler.
l The column must be rated to operate at the higher pressure.
l The column must be reconfigured to include a side draw.
l The feed pump must be rated to operate at the higher pres-
sure.
l There will be less normal butane as product. More normal
butane will go with the isobutane stream which may
impact downstream processing.
The crude oil has been analysed as an atmospheric TBP curve and
defined lightend components as shown in Table R3-2.
Table R3-2: Crude Oil Data
The laboratory data for the TBP curve are supplied only up to the
80% point. A typical value is assumed for the 100% point to assist
the extrapolation of the curve.
Simulation Model
The first step in the simulation is to ensure that it is possible to
produce the specified products from the crude oil feed and establish
the material balance. The multidraw shortcut distillation model
(MODEL = REFINE) is a quick and easy tool for these
calculations. This model uses the Fenske calculation method and
considers the column to be a series of two-product columns as
shown in Figure R3-2. The condenser is simulated with an external
flash drum.
The specifications chosen for the shortcut model define the
separation in each section. For this simulation, the 95% distillation
points and 5-95% gaps are used. The data are taken from Table R3-
1.
Five percent and 95% points should always be used instead of
initial and end points, as they are generally more accurate. The
simulated end points are affected by the number of petroleum cuts,
the parameter TBPEP (on the ASSAY statement in Component
Data) which defaults to 98%, and the Fenske model itself, which
tends to overfractionate on the product tails. In addition, the
shortcut simulation ignores the sidestrippers, which also affect the
ends of the curves.
Input Data
The shortcut crude unit model uses default English units of
measure, except for liquid volume where API barrels is specified
instead of cubic feet. Click on the UOM button to make this
change.
Click on the Component to enter the component slate. Note
the pseudocomponents shown in Figure R3-3 initially are not
present. They will be generated after the stream assay data are
supplied.
Click the Products button and enter the product rate estimates
and set the phases and pressure of the product streams.
The keyword input listing that follows contains all the data used in
this example.
COMPONENT DATA
LIBID 1,H2O/ 2,C2/ 3,C3/ 4,IC4/ 5,NC4/ 6,IC5/ 7,NC5 &
BANK = SIMSCI, PROCESS
ASSAY CURVEFIT = IMPR, CONVERSION = API94
CUTPOINTS TBPCUTS=100,800.001,70/1200,20/1600,8,DEFAULT
THERMODYNAMIC DATA
METHOD SYSTEM=GS, VISCOSITY(L)=API, VISCOSITY(V)=PETR, &
CONDUCTIVITY(L)=PETR, CONDUCTIVITY(V)=PETR, SET=GS01
STREAM DATA
PROPERTY STREAM=CRUDE, TEMPERATURE=450, PRESSURE=14, &
PHASE=M, RATE(LV)=4999.99, ASSAY=LV
TBP STREAM=CRUDE, TEMPERATURE=F, PRESSURE(MMHG)=760 &
DATA= 3,97 / 5,149/ 10,208/ 20,330/ 30,459/ &
40,590/ 50,690/ 60,770/ 70,865/ 80,980/ &
100,1600
API STREAM=CRUDE, AVERAGE=29.2
LIGHTEND STREAM=CRUDE, PERCENT(LV)=3, NORMALIZE, &
COMP(LV)=2,0.1/3,0.2/4,0.3/ 5,0.7/ 6,0.5/7,1.2
PROPERTY STREAM=STEAM, TEMPERATURE=600, PRESSURE=60, &
PHASE=M, COMPOSITION(WT,LB/H)=1,20000
NAME CRUDE,CRUDE FEED/ NAPH,NAPHTHA/ KERO,KEROSENE/ &
DIES,DIESEL/ GASOIL,GAS OIL/ TOPPED,TOPPED CRUDE
UNIT OPERATIONS
SHORTCUT UID=SC01, NAME=CRUDE TOWER
FEED CRUDE,STEAM
PROD STREAM=OVER, CUTPOINT(LV)=25, PHASE=M, PRESS=8.4999
PROD STREAM=KERO, CUTPOINT(LV)=40, PHASE=L, PRESS=11.8
PROD STREAM=DIES, CUTPOINT(LV)=55, PHASE=L, PRESS=12.5
PROD STREAM=GASOIL, CUTPOINT(LV)=75, PHASE=L, PRESS=13.3
PROD STREAM=TOPPED, PHASE=L, PRESSURE=14.4
CONDENSER TYPE=MIX, TEMPERATURE=110
EVALUATE MODEL=REFINE, TRIAL=50
FINDEX 2,3,2,2
SPEC STREAM=OVER, D86(95,F), VALUE=340
SPEC STREAM=KERO, D86(5,F), MINUS, STREAM=OVER, &
D86(95,F), VALUE=40
SPEC STREAM=KERO, D86(95,F), VALUE=520
SPEC STREAM=DIES, D86(5,F), MINUS, STREAM=KERO, &
D86(95,F), VALUE=10
SPEC STREAM=DIES, D86(95,F), VALUE=665
Output
The shortcut column results are shown on the next page. The
shortcut model predicts the minimum number of trays, calculated at
total reflux, needed to meet the specified separations. Typical
values for crude oil separations for each column section are shown
in Table R3-4.
Table R3-4: Typical Shortcut Trays
Column Section Index Estimate
Naphtha - Kerosene 3.5 - 5.0
Kerosene - Diesel 2.5 - 3.5
Diesel - Gas Oil 2.0 - 3.0
Gas Oil - Topped Crude 1.3 - 1.8
SPECIFICATIONS
Lay down the main column and feed streams; then complete the
PFD as previously shown in Figure R3-10.
Results
The simulation shows that the column can be operated to produce
the required products. The yield of each product is shown in the
Table R3-5 and Table R3-6.
The pumparound rates, furnace and condenser duties have also been
calculated along with the actual temperature of the oil leaving the
furnace.
The flash output below shows that the furnace outlet temperature is
721.7 F, while the column output shows that the flash zone is at
719.9 F.
Output (Rigorous)
The column summaries show the output for the main column and
the sidestrippers. Tables may also be produced with vapor and
liquid rates, densities and transport properties, as explained in the
Results section.
The stream component output was suppressed and only the stream
summaries are printed. A sample of the stream summary is show for
both wet and dry basis properties. Part of the distillation curve
output is shown for the feed and some product streams. All pure
water streams are omitted from this output.
Finally, a comparison is presented of the analyses of the shortcut
and rigorous products.
FEEDS 1REF
PRODUCTS MIXED 1A
TEMPERATURE, F 721.719
PRESSURE, PSIG 12.500
PRESSURE DROP, PSI 1.500
MOLE FRAC VAPOR 0.79123
MOLE FRAC TOTAL LIQUID 0.20877
MOLE FRAC H/C LIQUID 0.20877
MOLE FRAC FREE WATER 0.00000
DUTY, MM BTU/HR 318.06263
FLASH TYPE ADIABATIC-P
COLUMN SUMMARY
---------- NET FLOW RATES ----------- HEATER
TRAY TEMP PRESSURE LIQUID VAPOR FEED PRODUCT DUTIES
DEG F PSIG LB-MOL/HR MM BTU/HR
------ ------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------- ------------
1C 110.0 5.30 3124.3 2898.5L -148.1739
1076.5W
2 276.1 8.50 10572.4 7099.4 4978.1P -50.0000
3 316.1 8.75 5979.2 9569.3 4978.1P
4 345.0 9.00 5908.0 9954.3
5 362.1 9.25 5718.2 9883.0
6 376.2 9.50 5398.2 9693.2
7 392.1 9.75 4875.2 9373.2 470.8V
8 415.3 10.00 2939.0 8379.5 1255.5L
9 448.7 10.25 6590.2 7698.8 2392.9P -50.0000
10 481.9 10.50 3924.1 8957.1 2392.9P
11 515.7 10.75 3412.7 8683.9 449.5V
12 546.9 11.00 2002.1 7723.0 879.2L
13 579.2 11.25 4011.4 7191.5 1381.2P -39.9997
14 610.2 11.50 2434.7 7819.7 1381.2P
15 637.4 11.75 2012.9 7624.2 169.5V
16 662.5 12.00 510.0 7032.8 852.5L
17 697.6 12.25 129.6 6382.4
18 719.9 12.50 1458.9 6002.0 6549.4M 318.0626
19 716.5 12.75 1340.3 781.9
20 710.2 13.00 663.4 555.1V 1232.1L
SIDESTRIPPER SS01
1/ 21 400.4 11.80 1140.8 1255.5L 470.8V
2/ 22 384.4 11.80 356.1 222.0V 1006.8L
SIDESTRIPPER SS02
1/ 23 533.3 12.50 785.2 879.2L 449.5V
2/ 24 517.2 12.50 355.5 249.8V 679.5L
SIDESTRIPPER SS03
1/ 25 659.4 13.30 816.5 852.5L 169.5V
2/ 26 653.4 13.30 133.5 83.3V 766.2L
SIDESTRIPPER SS01
FEED 15 LIQUID 21 1.0000 1255.50 42.4484
FEED 5 VAPOR 22 0.0000 222.04 5.3216
PROD 14 VAPOR 21 470.78 16.2356
PROD KERO LIQUID 22 1006.76 31.5354
SIDESTRIPPER SS02
FEED 17 LIQUID 23 1.0000 879.17 58.0059
FEED 4 VAPOR 24 0.0000 249.79 5.9868
PROD 16 VAPOR 23 449.46 20.8956
PROD DIES LIQUID 24 679.50 43.0980
SIDESTRIPPER SS03
FEED 19 LIQUID 25 1.0000 852.47 95.2713
FEED 3 VAPOR 26 0.0000 83.26 1.9956
PROD 18 VAPOR 25 169.51 11.1690
PROD GASOIL LIQUID 26 766.22 86.1003
PUMPAROUNDS
(1) STANDARD VAPOR VOLUME IS 379.49 FT3/LB-MOLE (60 F AND 14.696 PSIA)
(1) STANDARD VAPOR VOLUME IS 379.49 FT3/LB-MOLE (60 F AND 14.696 PSIA)
R4 - Vacuum Column
The problem involves preparing a base case simulation model for
an existing vacuum column by matching measured test run data.
This model will then be used for carrying out further studies on the
column performance as part of a revamp exercise.
The flowsheet for the column is illustrated in Figure R4-1.The
column is of two sections, each with a total draw and a pumparound
returning cooled liquid to the top of the section. The slop wax is
part of the heavy gas oil draw that is mixed with the feed before it
enters to the furnace.
Process Data
Table R4-1 shows the analysis of the topped crude feed to the unit.
The steam feed is at 330 C and 8000 mm Hg.
Table R4-1: Feed Assay (ASTM D1160 at 2mmHg)
The product balance for the test run is shown in Table R4-2.
Table R4-2: Product Balance
Simulation Model
The column is modeled as a refinery column with 7 theoretical trays
as shown in Figure R4-1. Each packed section is assumed to be 2
theoretical trays. The number of trays may also be obtained from a
previous shortcut simulation. Tray 6 represents the furnace and
flash zone, where the slop wax and fresh feed are mixed and heated.
The furnace is included in the column model to calculate the duty
and ensure that a heat balance is obtained. The slop wax stream is
the liquid runback from the tray above the flash zone.
The temperature of the feed from the furnace will not be the same as
the flash zone temperature. It is calculated in a separate flash drum
by adding the furnace duty to the feed and the slop wax streams.
Thermal cracking usually occurs in the furnace, producing some
light gases. The only effect of these is on the temperature at the top
of the column, and it can be ignored unless this temperature is
important. For this simulation, we will match the top temperature
by adding a small quantity of ethane and propane to the feed to
represent the cracked gases (stream CRACK_GASES). For
subsequent simulations we may wish to adjust the cracked gases
stream to reflect the actual yield of vacuum overhead. To keep the
overall weight of feed constant, we can subtract the weight of
cracked gas from the topped crude, which is done automatically
Input Data
Click Input/Unit of Measure.. or Click to view the Unit of
Measure (UOM) specified for this problem.
Figure R4-2: UOM Selection
Results
The calculated results should be compared with all the available
measured data. If the match is not considered good enough, then it
may be necessary to try different specifications or alter the number
of theoretical trays. Only when the base case is satisfactory should
it be used to investigate changes in the column operation.
In this example, the calculated tray temperatures show good
agreement with the measured values shown in Table R4-3.
Output
The result of the feed temperature calculation is shown on the flash
output in Figure R4-9. The temperature of the feed stream is
370.109 C compared with the flash zone temperature of 368.8 C
shown on the column summary.
The extract from the stream summary output shows the properties
for the product streams.
Column Summary
UNIT 2, 'C1', 'VAC COLUMN'
TOTAL NUMBER OF ITERATIONS
IN/OUT METHOD 13
COLUMN SUMMARY
---------- NET FLOW RATES ----------- HEATER
TRAY TEMP PRESSURE LIQUID VAPOR FEED PRODUCT DUTIES
DEG C MM HG KG-MOL/HR M*KCAL/HR
------ ------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------- ------------
1 67.0 74.00 87.2 82.8P 103.2V -0.8991
0.0W
2 134.6 78.80 0.1 107.6 82.8P
25.2L
3 223.2 83.60 305.8 128.5 217.1P -5.2885
4 277.2 88.40 27.5 217.1 217.1P
107.6L
5 345.2 93.20 7.4 263.6
6 368.8 98.00 90.8 243.4 264.7M 4.8314
7 363.1 115.00 62.1 50.4V 79.1L
Process Data
The new operation product slate for the 15,000 barrels/day design
basis charge is shown in Table R5-1 and Table R5-2. The column
feed is the FCC reactor effluent which is synthesized by blending
these product streams together with the 3000 lb/hr of reactor
stripping steam.
The main fractionator is sized for single pass valve trays on 24-inch
spacings at 75% of flood. The actual column contains 24 trays, not
counting the baffles in the quench zone.
The sidestripper has eight actual trays and is represented by two
trays for the simulation.
Simulation Model
The details of the simulation model are shown in Figure R5-2.
Input Data
The program uses English units (default) for all the parameters
except for pressure (psig) and liquid volume units (API barrels). To
change the liquid volume units to US gallons, click the UOM
button on the toolbar and make the required changes.
Figure Figure R5-3 illustrates the data entry window used to specify
these units of measure.
Component Selection
Click Component to view the SIMSCI - Component Selection
dialog box. Select the components shown in Figure R5-4 (and in
Table R5-1) from the available databanks.
All the products from the up stream reactor process are defined in
the Stream Data Section and blended in a flash drum to obtain a
single combined column feed, stream 1, Reactor Eff. The only other
external feed is stream 5, utility steam.
to specify the vapor to be above feed tray and the liquid below feed
tray as shown
Click OK to save the data and exit the data entry window.
In the PRO/II - Column data entry window, click the Convergence
Data button to access the Column - Convergence data entry
window. Enter the damping factor as illustrated by Figure R5-10.
The keyword listing that follows includes all the data necessary to
fully specify the side-stripper used in this example.
THERMODYNAMIC DATA
METHODS SYSTEM=BK10, COND=PETR, SURF=PETR, &
VISC(V)=PETR, VISC(L)=API, SET=BK1001
STREAM DATA
PROP STREAM=1A, TEMP=980, PRES=35, PHASE=V, &
COMP(W)=1,3000/ 2, 120/ 3, 246/ 4, 317/ 5, 545/ &
6,3935/ 7,4218/ 8,3290/ 9,2876/10,1047/ &
11, 161/12, 463/13, 586/14, 168/16, 260/ &
17, 104
PROP STREAM=1B, TEMP=980, PRES=35, PHASE=V, &
COMP(W)= 9,6364 /10,2765/11,2358/12,6658/ &
13,7191 /14,2521/16, 194/17, 25
PROP STREAM=1C, TEMP=980, PRES=35, &
COMP(W)=11, 324./12, 560/13, 34/14, 451/ &
15,1793 /16,8755/17,1668
PROP STREAM=1D, TEMP=980, PRES=35, PHASE=V, &
RATE(V)=258.13, ASSAY=LV
D86 STREAM=1D, PRES(MMHG)=760, &
DATA= 0,175/ 5,177/ 10,179/ 30,215/ 50,266/&
70,322/ 90,441/ 95,492/100,537
API STREAM=1D, AVG=47
PROP STREAM=1E, TEMP=980, PRES=35, PHASE=V, &
RATE(V)=62.67, ASSAY=LV
D86 STREAM=1E, PRES(MMHG)=760, &
DATA= 0,370/ 5,470/10,512/ 30,567/ 50,601/ &
70,637/90,694/95,723/100,745
API STREAM=1E, AVG=18.4
PROP STREAM=1F, TEMP=980, PRES=35, PHASE=V, &
RATE(V)=83.54, ASSAY=LV
TBP STREAM=1F, PRES(MMHG)=760, &
DATA= 0, 483/ 5, 705/ 10, 777/ 30, 879/ &
50, 976/ 70,1080/ 90,1250/ 95,1391/100,1439
API STREAM=1F, AVG=8.1
PROP STREAM=S1, PRES=150, PHASE=V, & $ water
Results
The simulation solution confirms that the column can meet the new
service so long as the pumparound cooler duties shown on the
column summary are available.
The largest tray is the draw tray for the top pumparound at 126
inches diameter. If the existing column is less than this, then the
throughput must be reduced to avoid flooding in the top section.
Output
Click Generate Report on the toolbar to generate a report for
the entire flowsheet. Alternately, from the Tools menu, select
Spreadsheet and you can generate reports for the unit operations
and streams. The column summaries for the main fractionator and
light cycle oil stripper are shown. The tray sizing results for the
main fractionator show the required diameter of each tray. The
column is rated with the largest required standard tray size, and the
output shows the flooding factor for each tray.
Selections of the stream summary output and the distillation curve
printout are shown.
COLUMN SUMMARY
---------- NET FLOW RATES ----------- HEATER
TRAY TEMP PRESSURE LIQUID VAPOR FEED PRODUCT DUTIES
DEG F PSIG LB-MOL/HR MM BTU/HR
------ ------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------- ------------
1C 120.0 15.00 18.8 1520.9V -26.1607
669.2L
133.2W
2 334.5 20.00 5.8 2342.0
3 339.6 20.50 1462.0 2329.0 1095.1P -20.0000
4 403.4 21.00 431.8 2690.1 1095.1P
5 460.9 21.50 407.3 2755.0
6 482.8 22.00 356.0 2730.5 36.0V
7 498.1 22.50 280.8 2643.2
8 516.2 23.00 77.0 2568.0 98.7L
9 543.0 23.50 35.6 2462.9
10 555.0 24.00 474.1 2421.6 355.9P -10.0000
11 598.1 24.50 112.5 2504.1 355.9P
12 629.4 25.00 85.3 2498.4
13 640.9 25.50 36.8 2471.3
14R 655.7 26.00 2422.8 27.8V 407.1P -43.2437
2425.8M 67.6L
407.1P
SIDESTRIPPER T2
1/ 15 513.3 23.00 95.0 98.7L 36.0V
2/ 16 504.1 23.00 32.3 27.8V 90.5L
SIDESTRIPPER T2
FROM TO LIQUID FLOW RATES HEAT RATES
TYPE STREAM PHASE TRAY TRAY FRAC LB-MOL/HR MM BTU/HR
----- ------------ ------ ---- ---- ------ ------------ ------------
FEED 6 LIQUID 15 1.0000 98.72 5.8750
FEED S2 VAPOR 16 0.0000 27.75 0.6005
PROD 5 VAPOR 15 36.00 1.1357
PROD 7 LIQUID 16 90.47 5.3401
PUMPAROUNDS
SPECIFICATIONS
(1) STANDARD VAPOR VOLUME IS 379.49 FT3/LB-MOLE (60 F AND 14.696 PSIA)
Process Data
The process flowsheet for the sour water stripper is shown in Figure
R6-1 together with the sour water conditions.
Simulation Model
The stripper is modeled as an ordinary column with seven
theoretical stages. The sour water is fed to stage one and the
stripping steam is fed to stage seven. The stripping steam rate is
varied to meet the column performance specification of 0.02 weight
percent ammonia in the stripped water product.
The Inside/Out (I/O) algorithm is selected for rigorous solution of
the sour water stripper. The maximum number of iterations is
increased from the default of 15 to 25 because of the non-ideal
nature of the sour water system. A damping factor of 0.5 is
specified to facilitate column convergence for the same reason.
Input Data
The column is laid down and the column data is entered through the
Column dialog box. Seven trays are specified. The condenser and
reboiler are removed by unchecking their check boxes in their Data
Entry Windows. Two feed streams are connected and supplied with
the data shown in Figure R6-1. An overhead and a bottoms product
also are connected. The purity of ammonia in the bottoms product,
which is the primary performance specification, is entered in the
Specifications and Variables dialog box shown in Figure R6-3.
Results
The sour water stripper solves in 14 iterations. The top temperature
is 212 F and the bottom temperature is 235 F.
The sour water method correctly predicts the distribution of sour
water and hydrocarbon components. Note that the gasoline
(represented by nC6 and nC9) is stripped completely. The trace
quantity of HCN in the feed is not correctly distributed in the model
because it is not a part of the sour water package. In an actual plant,
significantly more than 10-15 lb-mole/hr of HCN would be present
Conclusion
5436 lb/hr of 50 psia saturated stripping steam is required to reduce
the ammonia content in the sour water to 0.02 weight percent.
Output
Partial results are shown below for the simulation input given
above.
Figure R6-4: Column Summary
Process Data
The flowsheet for this problem is shown in Figure R6-9. The feed
sour water stream composition is the same as in the original sour
water - R6 problem. The caustic feed to the stripper is 50% NaOH
in water.
Simulation Model
The sour water caustic stripper is modeled, as in R6, as a 7 tray
column. The electrolytic algorithm is used, along with a damping
factor of 0.3, and the electrolytic initial estimate model is selected.
The casestudy option is used to vary the amount of caustic in the
feed. The concentration of CO2, H2S, NH3 and HCN in the stripped
water is traced against amount of caustic added. Ionic strength and
pH is also recorded.
Input
The starting point of the simulation is generally with the
Thermodynamic dialog box .
The input data for the electrolyte simulation is similar as for the
sour water package simulation with some key differences
highlighted here. When selecting an electrolyte thermodynamic
system, PRO/II automatically generates the component slate.
The Electrolyte category of thermodynamic systems is chosen. The
electrolyte system is the Sour Water, and then the particular model
is the SW01 model. Note that for backwards compatibility the
SW0156 model is available. SW0156 is the same as SW01 on
PRO/II v5.61 and earlier. After clicking OK back to the flowsheet,
PRO/II will generate the component slate which can be viewed in
the Component dialog box .
Note that the components listed are not ionic species, but rather
pure component species which could form if the water was absent.
The electrolyte engine will determine what ionic species are
actually present during the simulation.
The streams are constructed as with the earlier simulation. A
caustic stream containing 50 wt% NaOH is added. For the base
case and for the initial case study, a rate of 0 lb moles/hr is desired.
However, PRO/II will not accept a zero rate external stream. You
can use a splitter to create that stream, or you can do what is done in
this case - simply make the stream a negligible but positive rate.
Results
The results are presented in Figure R6-15 and Figure R6-15. As can
be expected, acidic gases (H2S, CO2 and HCN) are captured by the
additional caustic and more of them exit with the stripped water.
However, the ammonia content of the stripped gas is significantly
reduced.
Process Data
The flow sheet is shown in Figure R7-1. The column has a kettle
reboiler and a bubble point condenser.
Simulation Model
The stabilizer is modeled as a conventional distillation column with
21 theoretical stages (including condenser and reboiler). The feed
enters at tray 17 and the overhead product is at its bubble point. The
condenser and reboiler duties are varied to achieve the RVP and C5
loss specifications.
Input Data
The dimensional units and print options are left as the default
values. This means that the dimensional units are the standard
English set.
The column and streams are laid down on the PFD as shown in
Figure R7-1.The components shown for the feed are supplied in the
component Data dialog box. Double-click the stream flow diagram
to populate the composition, flowrate and thermal properties.
No solution method is specified for the column, so it defaults to the
Inside-Out method. No estimate data are required other than for the
overhead product.
The specification on the C5 loss in the overhead is that the sum of
the i-pentane and n-pentane (components 5 and 6) must be 0.3 lb
mole/hr. The API nomograph for naphtha is used for the RVP
specification.
Double-click on the column to enter the column data. The pressure
profile is entered. Stream FD feeds the column on tray 17. An initial
estimate for the stream OV is given as 93 lb-mole/hr. The
specifications are supplied as shown in Figure R7-2.
All other column input data, including algorithm type and initial
estimate procedures assume the default value.
THERMODYNAMIC DATA
METHOD SYSTEM=GS
STREAM DATA
PROPERTY STREAM=FD, TEMPER=100, PRESSURE=100, &
PHASE=M, RATE(M)=956.001, &
COMPOSITION(M)=1,1 / 2,5 / 3,100/ 4,100/ &
5,150/ 6,175/ 7,200/ 8,100/ &
9,75 /10,50, NORMALIZE
UNIT OPERATIONS
COLUMN UID=STAB, NAME=STABILIZER
PARAMETER TRAY=21, IO
FEED FD,17
PRODUCT OVHD(M)=OV,93.0001, BTMS(M)=BT, &
SUPERSEDE=ON
CONDENSER TYPE=BUBB, PRESSURE=65 $ = tray 1
REBOILER TYPE=KETTLE
DUTY 1,1,,CONDENSER
DUTY 2,21,,REBOILER
PRINT PROPTABLE=PART
ESTIMATE MODEL=CONVENTIONAL, RRATIO=3
PRESSURE 2,70/21,75
SPEC ID=COL1SPEC1, STREAM=OV, RATE(LBM/H), &
COMP=5,6, WET, VALUE=0.3
SPEC ID=COL1SPEC2, STREAM=BT, RVP, VALUE=12
VARY DNAME=CONDENSER, REBOILER
END
Results
Table R7-3: Stabilizer Column Summary
Input
Starting with the same file given in R7, add an optimizer unit
operation to adjust the feed tray location to minimize the reboiler
duty, keeping all other specifications and column conditions the
same.The Figure R7-6 shows the optimizer unit.
THERMODYNAMIC DATA
METHOD SYSTEM=GS
STREAM DATA
PROPERTY STREAM=FD, TEMPER=100, PRESSURE=100, &
PHASE=M, RATE(M)=956.001, &
COMPOSITION(M)=1,1 / 2,5 / 3,100/ 4,100/ &
5,150/ 6,175/ 7,200/ 8,100/ &
9,75 /10,50, NORMALIZE
UNIT OPERATIONS
COLUMN UID=STAB, NAME=STABILIZER
PARAMETER TRAY=21, IO
FEED FD,17
PRODUCT OVHD(M)=OV,93.0001, BTMS(M)=BT, &
SUPERSEDE=ON
CONDENSER TYPE=BUBB, PRESSURE=65 $ = tray 1
REBOILER TYPE=KETTLE
DUTY 1,1,,CONDENSER
DUTY 2,21,,REBOILER
PRINT PROPTABLE=PART
ESTIMATE MODEL=CONVENTIONAL, RRATIO=3
PRESSURE 2,70/21,75
SPEC ID=COL1SPEC1, STREAM=OV, RATE(LBM/H), &
COMP=5,6, WET, VALUE=0.3
SPEC ID=COL1SPEC2, STREAM=BT, RVP, VALUE=12
VARY DNAME=CONDENSER, REBOILER
OPTIMIZER UID=OPT1, NAME=OPTIMIZER
VARY ID=VARY_4, COLUMN=STAB, FTRAY(1), MINI=2, MAXI=20, &
STEPSIZE=1
OBJECTIVE COLUMN=STAB, DNAME(BTU/HR)=2, MINUS,8.5, &
MINIMIZE
OPTPARAMETER IPRINT=ALL
END
Results
The optimum feed location is found to be between trays 15 and 16,
resulting in a minimum reboiler duty of 8.832 MMBtu/hr. This
minimum is a reduction of 2.3% from the original duty of 9.037
MMBtu/hr.
R8 - Naphtha Splitter
A column splits out the C5 components from a naphtha stream for
use as an isomerization feedstock. Recent analyses have found an
excessive amount of heavier components in the isomerization feed
which has an adverse effect on the process. You must determine the
operating conditions which will meet the required specifications
and calculate the C5 product flowrate.
Process Data
The flowsheet and process conditions are shown in Figure R8-1.
The isomerization feed is the product from the sidestripper.
The feed composition and conditions are listed in Table R8-1.
Table R8-1: Feed Stream Information
Specification Value
i-Pentane in overhead product (LV%) 1.3
2-Methlypentane in bottom product (LV%) 5.0
Butane in sidestripper product (LV%) 1.5
Hexane in sidestripper product (LV%) 4.0
Simulation Model
The main column has 31 theoretical stages, including the reboiler
and bubble point condenser. The reboiled sidestripper contains 8
theoretical stages. The column and sidestripper are modeled as
conventional columns and use the default IO solution method which
calculates them simultaneously. The duties and the rates between
the column and sidestripper are calculated to meet the purity
specifications.
Input Data
English units are used for this simulation. The pressure units are
reset to psig and the standard liquid volume units are reset to US
barrels on the Units of Measure dialog box .
The components shown in Table R8-1 are selected on the
Component Data dialog box . As previously mentioned, the
C8+ component is defined as decane, and renamed to C8+ shown in
Figure R8-2.
Because the main column and sidestripper are integrated and solved
as a single solution matrix, the specifications and variables for both
appear on the same dialog box to assure a matching set - in this
case, four specifications and four variables. The specifications
given in Table R8-2 are entered under Specifications. The three
duties are varied, as well as the draw from the main column to the
sidestripper.
The sidestripper is entered. The pressure profiles are provided as
shown in Figure R8-1, and a return vapor estimate of 450 lb-mol/hr
is entered.
Results
The column can meet the required specifications on the C5 product
with column and sidestripper reboiler duties of 12.8 and 2.7 MM
Btu/hr, respectively. The condenser duty is -14.3 MM Btu/hr.
The flowrate of the C5 product is 16835 lb/hr.
Conclusions
Unless there are hydraulic restrictions, the existing configuration
can produce the required isomerization feedstock if the calculated
duties are available. If the column does not meet the specification
with these operating conditions, then it will be necessary to
investigate the column for mechanical problems such as tray
fouling.
Output
The column summaries show the internal flowrates in the columns,
as well as the duties required to meet the specifications. The weight
flowrates and compositions are also shown for the feed and product
streams.
Column Summary
Rigorous Column 'SPLT', 'SPLITTER COL'
COLUMN SUMMARY
SIDESTRIPPER SS1
SPECIFICATIONS
Section 3: PetroChemicals
P1 - C3 Splitter
Propane/propylene is to be split in a conventional fractionator with
149 theoretical trays including condenser and reboiler. VLE data is
available at the column thermal conditions, from which Peng-Rob-
inson interaction coefficients were regressed, using the REGRESS,
a program included with the Thermo Data Manager that may be
installed with PRO/II. The flowsheet is shown in Figure P1-1.
ProcessData
The feed composition is as follows:
Table P1-1: C3 Feed Composition
Component lb moles/hr
Ethane 0.3
Propylene 550.0
Propane 200.0
Butane 5.0
The feed is pumped from grade to the feed tray. This accomplished
by an external pump that is ignored in this column simulation.
SimulationModel
The propane/propylene splitter is modeled as a conventional distil-
lation column with 149 theoretical stages, including the condenser
and reboiler. The column has a bubble point condenser and tight
composition specifications on the top and bottom products.
Input Data
The input data follows below. English dimensional units are used
throughout the simulation. The KIJ is entered following the
KVALUE statement in the thermo data section.
Input Data File
Output
Selected trays from the column summary are shown here. Note the
excellent overall material balance on the Stream Component Flow
Rates Summary, despite the large number of trays.
Column Summary
UNIT 1, 'C3SP'
TOTAL NUMBER OF ITERATIONS
IN/OUT METHOD 3
COLUMN SUMMARY
---------- NET FLOW RATES ----------- HEATER
TRAY TEMP PRESSURE LIQUID VAPOR FEED PRODUCT DUTIES
DEG F PSIA LB-MOL/HR MM BTU/HR
------ ------- -------- -------- -------- ------- --------- ----------
1C 97.1 220.00 8658.4 543.3L -52.5309
2 98.9 225.00 8737.1 9201.7
3 99.0 225.17 8739.5 9280.4
10 99.4 226.36 8754.7 9295.8
20 100.1 228.06 8776.3 9317.4
30 100.7 229.76 8798.3 9339.3
40 101.4 231.46 8820.6 9361.6
50 102.1 233.16 8843.6 9384.5
60 102.9 234.86 8868.1 9408.9
70 103.7 236.56 8894.7 9435.2
80 104.7 238.27 8922.8 9463.2
90 105.7 239.97 8952.0 9492.3
100 107.0 241.67 8982.4 9522.6
110 108.4 243.37 9764.5 9551.3 755.3M
120 110.7 245.07 9805.2 9588.8
130 114.7 246.77 9851.4 9634.6
140 119.0 248.47 9898.1 9681.6
146 120.9 249.49 9912.8 9703.0
147 121.3 249.66 9902.0 9700.7
148 121.9 249.83 9872.0 9690.0
149R 123.0 250.00 9659.9 212.0L 52.4173
Specifications
SPECIFICATION PARAMETER TRAY COMP SPECIFICATION SPECIFIED CALCULATED
NUMBER TYPE NO NO TYPE VALUE VALUE
------------- --------- ---- ------ ------------- ---------- ----------
1 (ACTIVE) STRM BOTS 149 2 LV FRACTION 4.000E-02 3.999E-02
2 (ACTIVE) STRM TOPS 1 3 WT FRACTION 4.000E-03 4.000E-03
P2 - Aromatics Separation
Distillation column BTB shown in Figure P2-2-1 has been designed
to remove toluene and biphenyl impurities from a predominantly
benzene stream. The benzene is the overhead product with the
biphenyl in the bottoms. The toluene product is a vapor side draw
(stream 3) from the column.
This simulation intends to demonstrate that the design satisfies all
the required product specifications.
Process Data
The process flow diagram and the column operating conditions are
shown in Figure P2-2-1. The column has 39 theoretical trays
including the reboiler and total condenser. The vapor side draw is
taken from tray 32.
The state variables of feed stream 1 are listed in Table P2-3.
Table P2-3: BTB Feed Information
Component kg moles/hr
Benzene 302
Toluene 16
Biphenyl 14
Temperature, K 380
Pressure, kPa 180
The column must meet the three purity specifications which are
shown in Table P2-4.
Table P2-4: Column BTB Process Conditions
Specification Value
Benzene mole % in overhead product 2 99.5
Toluene mole % in side draw (stream 3) 95.0
Biphenyl mole % in bottoms product 4 95.5
Simulation Model
The column is simulated as a conventional fractionator and uses the
default IO solution method.
Input Data
SI units are used throughout (see the DIMENSION statement), and the
stream compositions are printed as percentages by entering the
PRINT PERCENT statement (after the TITLE statement).
The condenser and reboiler duties and the side draw rate are varied
to meet the purity specifications.
DESC -
DESC -- Input file name is P2G.inp --
DESC -- Problem P2 Aromatics Separation --
DESC - Alternate column Specifications were removed.
DESC -
COMPONENT DATA
LIBID 1, BENZENE/ 2, TOLUENE/ 3, BIPHENYL, &
BANK = SIMSCI, PROCESS
THERMODYNAMIC DATA
METHODS SYSTEM=GS
STREAM DATA
PROP STREAM=1, TEMP=380, PRES=180, COMP=1,302/ 2,16/ 3,14
NAME 1, FEED/ 2, BENZENE/ 3, TOLUENE/ 4, BIPHENYL
UNIT OPERATIONS
COLUMN UID=BTB, NAME=AROMATIC TWR
PARAM TRAY=39
FEED 1, 19
COND TYPE=TFIX, PRESS=129, TEMP=343
PROD OVHD=2, BTMS=4, 14, VDRAW=3, 32, 16
HEAT 1,1/2,39
VARY HEAT=1, 2, DRAW=3
PSPEC TOP=150, DPCOL=41
ESTI CTEMP=343,RRATIO=1
SPEC STREAM=2, FRAC, COMP=1, VALUE=0.9995, RTOL=2.5E-4
SPEC STREAM=3, FRAC, COMP=2, VALUE=0.95, ATOL=0.001
SPEC STREAM=4, FRAC, COMP=3, VALUE=0.955, RTOL=0.001
END
Output
Column Summary Output
UNIT 1, 'BTB', 'AROMATIC TWR'
IN/OUT METHOD 4
COLUMN SUMMARY
---------- NET FLOW RATES ----------- HEATER
TRAY TEMP PRESSURE LIQUID VAPOR FEED PRODUCT DUTIES
DEG K KPA KG-MOL/HR M*KJ/HR
------ ------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------- ------------
1C 343.0 129.00 295.2 301.4L -19.6622
2 367.1 150.00 328.3 596.6
3 367.4 151.11 328.1 629.6
4 367.7 152.22 327.9 629.5
5 368.0 153.32 327.8 629.3
6 368.3 154.43 327.5 629.1
7 368.6 155.54 327.3 628.9
8 368.9 156.65 327.1 628.7
9 369.3 157.76 326.8 628.4
10 369.6 158.86 326.5 628.2
11 369.9 159.97 326.2 627.9
12 370.3 161.08 325.8 627.6
13 370.6 162.19 325.4 627.2
14 371.0 163.30 325.0 626.8
15 371.4 164.41 324.5 626.4
16 371.8 165.51 324.0 625.9
17 372.2 166.62 323.4 625.4
18 372.7 167.73 319.8 624.7
19 374.4 168.84 455.9 621.2 332.0M
20 374.7 169.95 456.0 425.3
21 375.1 171.05 455.8 425.4
22 375.6 172.16 455.1 425.2
23 376.4 173.27 453.5 424.5
24 377.8 174.38 450.3 422.9
25 380.2 175.49 444.8 419.7
26 384.1 176.59 437.7 414.2
27 389.5 177.70 431.2 407.1
28 395.4 178.81 427.6 400.6
29 400.6 179.92 427.0 397.0
30 404.3 181.03 427.7 396.3
31 406.6 182.14 428.6 397.1
32 408.0 183.24 429.3 398.0 16.0V
33 408.8 184.35 429.8 414.7
34 409.4 185.46 430.2 415.2
35 409.8 186.57 430.3 415.6
36 410.2 187.68 424.8 415.7
37 413.3 188.78 348.3 410.2
38 455.8 189.89 229.3 333.7
39R 539.4 191.00 214.7 14.6L 13.8091
SPECIFICATIONS
REFLUX RATIOS
P3 - Ethylene Fractionator
The ethylene reactor effluent from your ethylene plant is quenched
in a primary fractionator with heavy fuel oil. You wish to determine
the product split from the fractionator for an alternate plant operat-
ing case which will result in a modified reactor effluent stream
feeding the fractionator.
Process Data
The process flowsheet for the ethylene plant primary fractionator
and water quench system is shown below in Figure P3-1.
The system consists of the primary fractionator, a gas oil side strip-
per, a heavy fuel oil side stripper, and a water quench tower.
The ethylene reactor effluent enters below the bottom tray of the
primary fractionator and is quenched with heavy fuel oil, a portion
of which is combined with the effluent feed and the remaining por-
Products from the primary fractionator include a gas oil side prod-
uct and a heavy fuel oil bottoms product. Products from the water
quench tower include the raw gas overhead product and the liquid
product which is separated into gasoline and water products in a
two-phase liquid separator. A large portion of the gasoline product
provides reflux to the primary fractionator.
Product rates are estimated as follows:
Table P3-3: Product Rate Estimates
Stream Rate, lb mole per hr
Raw Gas 20,640
Water 600,000
Gasoline 500
Gas Oil 325
Heavy Fuel Oil 530
Simulation Model
The simulation flowsheet is shown above in Figure P3-2.
Results
The multivariable controller solves in eight cycles. The temperature
of the primary fractionator ranges from 231 F on the top tray to 420
F on the bottom tray (as specified). The top temperature of the gas
oil stripper is 267 F and the bottom temperature is 246 F, while the
top temperature of the heavy fuel oil stripper is 401 F and the bot-
tom temperature is 370 F. The primary fractionator reflux ratio (gas-
oline reflux rate/gasoline product rate) is 16.96.
Conclusions
The product split from the ethylene plant primary fractionator is:
Raw Gas 186.4 MMSCFD
Gasoline 4240 BPD
Gas Oil 3133 BPD
Heavy Fuel Oil 8517 BPD
Output
Partial results are shown below for the simulation input given
above.
SURE METHOD 64
COLUMN SUMMARY
PUMPAROUNDS
SPECIFICATIONS
SURE METHOD 42
COLUMN SUMMARY
STREAM ID 1 3 4 9
NAME REACT EFF RAW GAS GASOLINE FUEL OIL
PHASE WET VAPOR WET VAPOR WET LIQUID WET LIQUID
THERMO ID PR01 PR01 PR01 PR01
Multivariable Controller
UNIT 3, 'MVC1'
BEST CYCLE = 7
VARIABLE SPECIFIED CALCULATED RELATIVE RELATIVE
VALUE VALUE VALUE TOLERANCE ERROR
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
1 4.74647E+04 1.05000E+02 1.04969E+02 9.52381E-04 -2.99917E-04
2 2.24048E+04 1.25000E+02 1.24976E+02 8.00000E-04 -1.93320E-04
3 7.26148E+04 1.45000E+02 1.44990E+02 6.89655E-04 -6.59429E-05
4 4.19911E+05 1.75000E+02 1.74995E+02 5.71429E-04 -2.77060E-05
CONVERGENCE HISTORY
CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 CYCLE 4 CYCLE 5
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
VARY 1 4.5000E+04 4.9500E+04 4.5000E+04 4.5000E+04 4.5000E+04
VARY 2 2.2000E+04 2.2000E+04 2.4200E+04 2.4200E+04 2.4200E+04
VARY 3 7.8000E+04 7.8000E+04 7.8000E+04 8.5800E+04 7.8000E+04
VARY 4 4.1300E+05 4.1300E+05 4.1300E+05 4.1300E+05 4.5430E+05
SPEC 1 1.0618E+02 1.0265E+02 1.0465E+02 1.0117E+02 9.7001E+01
REL ERR 1.13E-02 -2.24E-02 -3.31E-03 -3.65E-02 -7.62E-02
SPEC 2 1.2564E+02 1.2272E+02 1.2380E+02 1.1945E+02 1.1395E+02
REL ERR 5.09E-03 -1.82E-02 -9.64E-03 -4.44E-02 -8.84E-02
SPEC 3 1.4487E+02 1.4331E+02 1.4400E+02 1.4003E+02 1.3474E+02
REL ERR -8.98E-04 -1.16E-02 -6.92E-03 -3.43E-02 -7.08E-02
SPEC 4 1.7563E+02 1.7511E+02 1.7536E+02 1.7431E+02 1.6946E+02
REL ERR 3.57E-03 6.54E-04 2.08E-03 -3.96E-03 -3.16E-02
SUM SQ ERR 1.6658E-04 9.6785E-04 1.5613E-04 4.4945E-03 1.9619E-02
CYCLE 6 CYCLE 7
----------- -----------
VARY 1 4.7072E+04 4.7465E+04
VARY 2 2.2701E+04 2.2405E+04
VARY 3 7.3668E+04 7.2615E+04
VARY 4 4.1806E+05 4.1991E+05
SPEC 1 1.0499E+02 1.0497E+02
REL ERR -8.59E-05 -3.00E-04
SPEC 2 1.2487E+02 1.2498E+02
REL ERR -1.04E-03 -1.93E-04
SPEC 3 1.4491E+02 1.4499E+02
REL ERR -6.53E-04 -6.59E-05
SPEC 4 1.7514E+02 1.7500E+02
REL ERR 7.88E-04 -2.77E-05
SUM SQ ERR 2.1282E-06 1.3244E-07
P4 - Cyclohexane Plant
A plant to produce cyclohexane by the hydrogenation of benzene
has been designed. To obtain good heat control, three reactors are
used in series. The process has a large recycle of unreacted hydro-
gen, a small quantity being purged to control the buildup of inerts in
the system. The recycle is typically five times the fresh hydrogen
feed to the process, and so it plays a major part in the costs of oper-
ating the process.
The simulation calculates the recycle rate in order to size the com-
pressor and the associated pipework. It also computes the vent rate
to ensure that the flare header can handle it.
ProcessData
The process flow sheet is shown in Figure P4-4-1.
The feed conditions are shown in Table P4-4-1. The feed and recy-
cle stream compositions are listed in Table P4-4-2.
Cooling water -- 60 --
Steam -- -- 300
Exchanger E-1 has 1 shell pass and 2 tubeside passes with an over-
all heat transfer coefficient of 110 BTU/hr -ft2-F.
The reaction stoichiometry for all three reactors is:
C6H6 + 3H2 <=> C6H12 (P4-2)
and the heat of reaction at 77 F is -87000 Btu/lb mole benzene. The
conversions are shown in Table P4-4-4.
Table P4-4: Reactor Conversions
Reactor Conversion, %
RX-1 90
RX-2 67
RX-3 97
Simulation Model
The simulation model flow sheet shown in Figure P4-4-3 differs
from the actual process flow diagram in Figure P4-4-1 due to the
addition of mixer and splitter units.
Mixers are needed to combine the feed and the recycle streams to
reactor RX-1 and the reactor RX-2, effluent with the benzene feed
to reactor RX-3.
Splitter units have been added to control splitting of both the cyclo-
hexane and hydrogen rich products from the separator D-1 and the
cyclohexane recycles to reactors RX-1 and RX-2.
The required amount of hydrogen entering the first reactor is
known, and it is set by a controller which adjusts the rate of the
recycle hydrogen stream.
Input Data
English units are used except that LIQVOL=BBL changes the default
liquid volume units of ft3 to barrels. The default pressure units are
also changed from psia to psig.
By default, the recycles are converged when no component changes
by more than the tolerance of 1% between trials. When the recycle
is largely made up of one component, as in the hydrogen recycle, a
tighter tolerance is required to ensure that components present in
small amounts converge correctly. This example uses the TOLER-
ANCE statement in the General Data section of keyword input to
tighten the stream component tolerance to 0.3%.
The STCALC unit calculates the hydrogen in the purge by difference
from the feeds and products and the amount consumed in the reac-
tors. The FEED statement specifies the stream labels with the factors
to apply to each stream rate. Streams with a factor of unity (+1.0)
are added; those with a factor of (-1.0) are subtracted. The unit sub-
P4 - Cyclohexane Plant Petrochemicals 3-35
PRO/II Application Briefs
tracts the product (stream 17) from the feed (stream 4). The hydro-
gen consumed in the reactors is the difference between reactor
product stream 12 and feed streams 7 and 19.
Finally, all components except hydrogen are removed from the
stream calculator product stream, XSH2. This is accomplished by
using a factor of zero on the FOVHD statement. Stream XSH2, cre-
ated by the stream calculator, contains the rate of excess hydrogen
which must be purged. The purge stream is set by splitter S3 by ref-
erence to stream XSH2.
The lower limit (WEGL) for the Wegstein recycle acceleration is set
to -100, rather than the default of -5. For stable systems, this speeds
the convergence considerably; but could lead to oscillation and
instability for some applications.
PUMP UID=P1,NAME=PUMP
FEED 16
PROD L=18
OPER PRES=615
STCALC UID=BLD1
FEED 4S,1/12S,1/7S,-1/17S,-1/19S,-1
OVHD STREAM=XSH2
BTMS STREAM=DUM1
FOVHD 1,1.0/2,4,0.0
Results
The recycle converges with a hydrogen recycle rate of 7322 lb
mole/hr. This compares with a hydrogen feed to the process of 1423
lb mole/hr. The vent gas rate is 308 lb mole/hr.
The work required by the recycle compressor to increase the pres-
sure by 86 psi is 882HP.
The flowsheet does not solve using the default substitution conver-
gence method, but does solve using Wegstein acceleration. With the
default value for WEGL, 20 trials are required. Reducing WEGL to (-
100) brings this down to 14 trials.
Output
PRO/II establishes the number of recycles and identifies the recycle
streams. These are shown in the Calculation Sequence and Recycle
report.
The compressor details were required and so the output is shown.
The reactor results are also presented.
The final page of the stream summary shows the total feed (31) and
product (32). The mass flow rates are the same within the recycle
tolerance. The format of the following output results has been
edited slightly to better fit the aspect ratio of this guide.
Calculation Sequence
SEQ UNIT ID UNIT TYPE SEQ UNIT ID UNIT TYPE
--- ------------ ---------- --- ------------ ----------
1 FEED MIXER 10 D1 FLASH
2 M1 MIXER 11 S1 SPLITTER
3 CON1 CONTROLLER 12 P1 PUMP
4 RX1 CONV REAC 13 S2 SPLITTER
5 RX2 CONV REAC 14 BLD1 STRM CALC
6 M2 MIXER 15 S3 SPLITTER
7 E1 HX 16 RC1 COMPRESSOR
8 RX3 CONV REAC 17 E2 HX
9 E3 HX 18 PROD MIXER
Recycle Loops
--------------- LOOPS ----------- ------- TEAR STREAMS -------
ID FIRST UNIT LAST UNIT ID FROM UNIT TO UNIT
---------- ---------- ----------- -------- ---------- --------
LOOP1 M1 E2 19 S2 RX2
20 S2 M1
23 RC1 M1
7 E2 RX1
Compressor Output
UNIT 16, 'RC1', 'REC COMP'
Feeds 22
Products Vapor 23
Reactor Results
UNIT 5, 'RX1', 'CONREACTOR 1'
OPERATING CONDITIONS
REACTOR TYPE ISOTHERMAL REACTOR
DUTY, MM BTU/HR 0.1112
TOTAL HEAT OF REACTION AT 77.00 F, MM BTU/HR -15.3686
INLET OUTLET
----------- -----------
FEED 7
VAPOR PRODUCT 8
TEMPERATURE, F 295.00 485.00
PRESSURE, PSIG 474.0000 464.0000
REACTION DATA --------- RATES, LB-MOL/HR ---------- FRACTION
COMPONENT FEED CHANGE PRODUCT CONVERTED
------------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
1 HYDROGEN 7772.5001 -520.1376 7252.3624 0.0669
2 METHANE 843.9029 0.0000 843.9029
3 BENZENE 192.6436 -173.3792 19.2644 0.9000
4 CH 384.7966 173.3792 558.1758
TOTAL 9193.8431 -520.1376 8673.7055
LB-MOL/HR FRACTION
BASE COMPONENT REACTION CONVERTED CONVERTED(1)
------------------ ----------- ----------- ------------
3 BENZENE 1 173.3792 0.9000
(1) FRACTION CONVERTED BASED ON AMOUNT IN FEED
INLET OUTLET
----------- -----------
FEED 2
8
19
VAPOR PRODUCT 9
TEMPERATURE, F 354.72 450.00
PRESSURE, PSIG 464.0000 454.0000
LB-MOL/HR FRACTION
BASE COMPONENT REACTION CONVERTED CONVERTED(1)
------------------ ----------- ----------- ------------
3 BENZENE 1 98.7489 0.6700
(1) FRACTION CONVERTED BASED ON AMOUNT IN FEED
OPERATING CONDITIONS
INLET OUTLET
----------- -----------
FEED 11
VAPOR PRODUCT 12
TEMPERATURE, F 320.00 410.00
PRESSURE, PSIG 449.0000 434.0000
LB-MOL/HR FRACTION
BASE COMPONENT REACTION CONVERTED CONVERTED(1)
------------------ ----------- ----------- ------------
3 BENZENE 1 97.1024 0.9700
(1) FRACTION CONVERTED BASED ON AMOUNT IN FEED
Stream Summary
STREAM ID 22 23 31 32
NAME RC HYDROGEN
PHASE VAPOR VAPOR MIXED MIXED
THERMO ID GS01 GS01 GS01 GS01
(1) STANDARD VAPOR VOLUME IS 379.49 FT3/LB-MOLE (60 F AND 14.696 PSIA)
P5 - Naphthalene Recovery
A three column distillation scheme to produce a 97% by weight
pure naphtalene stream has been proposed. The first column
removes anthracene as the bottoms product, and 1,2,4 methyl ben-
zene is separated out as the overhead in the second. A small loss of
naphthalene is allowed in this column. The final column produces
high purity naphthalene. The purpose of this simulation is to design
the columns to meet the product purity specifications.
ProcessData
The flowsheet is shown in Figure P5-1.
All the columns operate at 780 psia with condensers at 760 psia.
The feed composition is shown in Table P5-1, and the required
product recoveries and purities are listed in Table P5-2.
SimulationModel
The first step is to establish the number of stages and the feed tray
locations using shortcut models for the columns. The shortcut
colums use the Fenske method to calculate the minimum trays at
total reflux for the specified products.
Output (Shortcut)
Selected results are shown for each shortcut column. Feed tray loca-
tion, number of theoretical stages, reflux ratios, condenser and
reboiler duties have been calculated for a variety of operating
points. The number of trays used in the rigorous model will be
twice the minimum.
SPECIFICATIONS
SPECIFICATIONS
SPECIFICATIONS
STREAM ID 5 6 7
NAME
PHASE LIQUID VAPOR LIQUID
THERMO ID GS01 GS01 GS01
Output (Rigorous)
Partial results for column C3 are shown here. The molar component
flow rates are also presented for all the streams.
SPECIFICATIONS
P6 - MTBE Separation
An existing distillation column that recovers MTBE (methyl ter-
tiary-butyl ether) from the feed is shown in Figure P6-1.
Process Data
The column operates with a bubble point condenser, and hydraulic
factors limit the overhead reflux ratio to 0.8. The feed stream condi-
tions are listed in Table P6-1.
Table P6-1: Feed Stream Information
Simulation Model
The conventional column model is used for this simulation. As no
solution method is specified, the default IO algorithm is used.
The feed is flashed into the column and some vapor is produced.
The SEPARATE option specifies that the vapor portion is fed to the
tray above the feed tray. The default would put the liquid on top of
the feed tray and the vapor beneath it.
The column specifications are the MTBE recovery in the bottom
product and the reflux ratio limit of 0.8. The default tolerance on a
specification is 1%. This is clearly too loose for the recovery speci-
fication, so instead specify an absolute tolerance of 0.0001. The
reboiler and condenser duties are varied to satisfy the specifica-
tions.
Input Data
The default English dimensional units are used throughout this sim-
ulation. As we are interested in the product purity, component per-
centage printout is requested.
Input Data File
TITLE PROJECT=APPBRIEFS, PROBLEM=P6, &
USER=SIMSCI, DATE=NOV_2008
DESC MTBE Recovery Column
PRINT PERCENTAGE, INPUT=ALL
COMPONENT DATA
LIBID 1,PRLN/ 2, C3/ 3, IC4/ 4,IBTE/ 5,BUT1/ &
6,13BD/ 7,NC4/ 8,BTT2/ 9,BTC2/10,MEOH/ &
11,IC5/12,MTBE/13, TBA/14,MTAE, &
BANK = SIMSCI, PROCESS
THERMODYNAMIC DATA
METHOD SYSTEM=UNIFAC,PHI=SRK, TRANS=NONE
KVALUE POYNTING=YES
STREAM DATA
PROP STREAM=1,TEMP=160,PRES=150,RATE=3143.48, &
COMP=1,116.6/ 2,88.26 / 3,978.2/ 4, 8.75/ &
5,343.8/ 6, 6.02 / 7,433.8/ 8,400.5/ &
9, 268 /10,142.1 /11,33.07/12,321.8/ &
13, 0.55/14, 2.17
UNIT OPERATIONS
COLUMN UID=C1,NAME=MTBE
PARAM TRAY=34
FEED 1,15,SEPARATE
COND TYPE=BUBBLE,PRESS=116
PROD OVHD=2,BTMS=3,350
P6 - MTBE Separation Petrochemicals 3-63
PRO/II Application Briefs
HEAT 1,1,-50/2,34,50
PSPEC TOP=121,DPCOL=15
ESTI MODEL=CONVENTIONAL,RRATIO=0.8
SPEC COLUMN=C1,RRATIO,VALUE=0.8
SPEC STREAM=3,RATE,COMP=12,RATIO, &
REFFEED,VALUE=0.998,ATOL=0.0001
VARY HEAT=1,2
END
Results
The column solves with the 99.8% MTBE recovery (in bottoms
product stream 3, specification 2) at the limiting reflux ratio of 0.8
(specification 1). The condenser and reboiler duties are -41.49 and
40.90 MM Btu/hr respectively. The bottom product (stream 3) is
99.3% pure MTBE.
Conclusions
The simulation demonstrates that the column can meet the new ser-
vice as long as the duties can be met, and that an MTBE purity of
99.3% is attainable.
Output
The column summary is presented together with the stream compo-
nent flow rates and compositions.
MTBE Column Summary
UNIT 1, 'C1', 'MTBE'
TOTAL NUMBER OF ITERATIONS
IN/OUT METHOD 6
COLUMN SUMMARY
---------- NET FLOW RATES ----------- HEATER
TRAY TEMP PRESSURE LIQUID VAPOR FEED PRODUCT DUTIES
DEG F PSIA LB-MOL/HR MM BTU/HR
------ ------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------- ----------
1C 133.2 116.00 2256.1 2820.2L -41.4878
2 144.4 121.00 2312.5 5076.3
3 147.9 121.47 2319.5 5132.6
4 149.9 121.94 2314.3 5139.7
5 151.4 122.41 2304.5 5134.5
6 152.9 122.88 2292.3 5124.7
7 154.3 123.34 2277.7 5112.5
8 155.9 123.81 2259.5 5097.8
9 157.6 124.28 2236.1 5079.6
SPECIFICATIONS
REFLUX RATIOS
P7 - Propylene Chlorination
Your propylene chlorination plant reacts chlorine with propylene to
produce allyl chloride (3-chloropropene), 1,2-dichloropropane, and
1,3-dichloropropene. The reaction takes place in a continuous
stirred tank reactor and the resulting products are separated in a
fractionation section downstream of the reactor. Most of the unre-
acted propylene is recycled back to the reactor. You wish to develop
a model of this plant to determine the product rates for a proposed
increase in the propylene feed stream rate.
Process Data
The process flowsheet for the propylene chlorination plant is shown
below in Figure P7-1.
The system consists of the reactor, main separator, hydrochloric acid scrubber, allyl
chloride column, propylene recycle drier and compressor, and the associated pump and
heat exchangers. Plant feeds include propylene and chlorine.
Cl 2 + C 3 H 6 C 3 H 5 Cl + HCl
11 27009.6
Rate = 2.1 10 e ---------------------- ( C Cl2 ) ( C C3 H 6 )
RT
Cl 2 + C 3 H 6 C 3 H 6 Cl 2
7 6811.98
Rate = 1.19 10 e ---------------------- ( C Cl2 ) ( C C3 H6 )
RT
Cl 2 + C 3 H 5 Cl C 3 H 4 Cl 2 + HCl
14 42300
Rate = 4.69 10 e ------------------ ( C Cl2 ) ( C C3 H5 Cl )
RT
Note: Reaction rates are lb moles per cubic foot per hour.
Activation energies are Btu per lb mole.
Simulation Model
The simulation flowsheet is shown in Figure P7-1. Pure chlorine
and the combined propylene feed stream (pure feedstock and the
recycle stream) are fed to the reactor which is maintained at 800 F
and has a volume of 10 cubic feet. The reactor products are mixed
with some of the recycled chlorinated propylenes and cooled to 56
F before entering the main separator.
The main separator is modeled as a shortcut distillation column.
Propylene is the overhead product and chlorinated propylenes are
the bottoms product. Seventy percent of the bottoms product is
Input Data
A molar flow estimate is provided for the overhead from the first
shortcut column (Note 2). This estimate is based on zero recycle
initially (the estimate must always be less than the feed to the short-
cut column or failure will occur). In the RECYCLE data section, the
Wegstein acceleration method is applied (Note 1).
COMPONENT DATA
LIBID 1,HCL / 2,CL2 / 3, PROPYLEN / 4, ALLYLCL / &
5, 12DCLPRP / 6, 13DCLPRE &
BANK= SIMSCI, PROCESS
THERMO DATA
METHODS SYSTEM=SRK, DENSITY(L)=COSTALD
STREAM DATA
PROP STREAM=PRPL, TEMP=60, PRES=200, COMP=3,100
PROP STREAM=CL2, TEMP=80, PRES=100, COMP=2,113.88
NAME CL2, CHLORINE / PRPL, PROPYLENE / &
S6, MAIN RECYCLE / S14, ALCL RECYCLE / &
S4, HCL PRODUCT / S10, DRIER LOSS / &
ALCL ,ALLYL CHLOR / DICL, DICHLORIDES
UNIT OPERATIONS
COMPRESSOR UID=10
FEED S6
PROD V=S6A
OPER PRESSURE=88.8
MIXER UID=1
FEED PRPL,S6A
PROD M=S9
CSTR UID=CST1
RXCALC REFPHASE=V
FEED CL2,S9
PROD V=S13
OPER VOLUME=10.0, PHASE=V, TEMP=800, PRES=73.5
STOI 3,-1,1 / 2,-1,1 / 4,1,0 / 1,1,0
BASE PEXP=2.1E11, ACTIVATION=27.0096, COMP=2
STOI 3,-1,1 / 2,-1,1 / 5,1,0
BASE PEXP=1.19E7, ACTIVATION=6.81198, COMP=2
STOI 4,-1,1 / 2,-1,1 / 6,1,0 / 1,1,0
BASE PEXP=4.69E14, ACTIVATION=4.23E1, COMP=2
HX UID=3
HOT FEED=S13,S14,L=S1
OPERATION HTEMP=50
SPLIT UID=5
FEED S2
PROD L=S12,L=S11
SPEC STREAM=S11, RATE, RATIO, REFFEEDS, &
VALUE=0.7, ATOL=0.0001
PUMP UID=6
FEED S11
PROD L=S11A
OPER PRES=100
HX UID=6A
HOT FEED=S11A,M=S14
OPERATION HTEMP=20
RECYCLE DATA
3-74 Petrochemicals P7 - Propylene Chlorination
PRO/II Application Briefs
ACCEL TYPE=WEGS, START=3, WEGL=-50 $NOTE 1
END
Results
The recycle loop converged in 29 iterations. Single pass conversion
rates are as follows:
Propylene 7.5 percentChlorine51.3 percent
The reactor effluent cooler and main separator bottoms cooler
duties are 25.8 MM Btu/hr and 0.95 MM Btu/hr respectively. The
propylene recycle compressor hydraulic horsepower is 813 hp.
Conclusions
The plant product yields for this propylene feed rate are:
Hydrochloric Acid3600 lb/hrAllyl Chloride3900 lb/hrDichlorides
4200 lb/hr
Output
Partial results are shown below for the simulation input given
above. On the following pages, output is shown for:
1. CSTR Reactor
2. Shortcut Columns
3. Stream Calculators
4. Stream Molar Component Flowrates
CSTR Summary
UNIT 3, 'CST1'
OPERATING CONDITIONS
REACTOR TYPE ISOTHERMAL
DUTY, MM BTU/HR 14.2151
TOTAL HEAT OF REACTION AT 77.00 F, MM BTU/HR -5.8633
VOLUME, FT3 10.0000
SPACE-TIME, HR AT OUTLET CONDITIONS 3.890E-05
SPACE-VELOCITY, /HR AT OUTLET CONDITIONS 2.571E+04
INLET OUTLET
----------- -----------
FEED CL2
S9
VAPOR PRODUCT S13
TEMPERATURE, F 125.13 800.00
PRESSURE, PSIA 88.8000 73.5000
LB-MOL/HR/FT3 FRACTION
BASE COMPONENT REACTION CONVERTED CONVERTED -E/RT
------------------ --------- ---------- ----------- -----------
2 CL2 1 -7.5123 0.3433 -10.7971
2 CL2 2 -1.3665 0.0624 -2.7231
2 CL2 3 -2.3893 0.1092 -16.9095
SPECIFICATIONS
PARAMETER COMP. SPECIFICATION SPECIFIED CALCULATED
TYPE NUM TYPE VALUE VALUE
----------------- ------- ------------- ---------- ----------
STRM S3 3 MOL RATIO 9.990E-01 9.990E-01
STRM S2 4 MOL RATIO 9.000E-01 8.999E-01
(1) STANDARD VAPOR VOLUME IS 379.49 FT3/LB-MOLE (60 F AND 14.696 PSIA)
SPECIFICATIONS
PARAMETER COMP. SPECIFICATION SPECIFIED CALCULATED
TYPE NUM TYPE VALUE VALUE
----------------- ------- ------------- ---------- ----------
STRM ALCL 4 MOL RATIO 9.900E-01 9.900E-01
STRM DICL 5 MOL RATIO 9.900E-01 9.900E-01
(1) STANDARD VAPOR VOLUME IS 379.49 FT3/LB-MOLE (60 F AND 14.696 PSIA)
STREAM ID S1 S2 S3 S4
NAME HCL PRODUCT
PHASE MIXED LIQUID VAPOR VAPOR
THERMO ID SRK01 SRK01 SRK01 SRK01
With:
GIBBS UID=GIB1
FEED CL2,S9
PROD V=S13
OPER PHASE=V,TEMP=800,PRES=73.5
ELEM REAC=1/2/3/4/5/6
CONV PERCENT=2,60.0
The lower limit of the Wegstein acceleration factor (WEGL) is
increased to -10 in the recycle data since the faster acceleration is
not necessary in this case (the WEGL keyword could be omitted
since the default value of -5 is acceptable, but the WEGL specifica-
tion is retained here for purposes of illustration).
INLET OUTLET
----------- -----------
FEED CL2
S9
VAPOR PRODUCT S13
TEMPERATURE, F 75.94 800.00
PRESSURE, PSIA 88.8000 73.5000
REACTION DATA
--------- RATES, LB-MOL/HR ---------- FRACTION
COMPONENT FEED CHANGE PRODUCT CONVERTED
------------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
1 HCL 0.0000 112.1781 112.1781
2 CL2 188.3769 -113.0261 75.3508 0.6000
3 PROPYLEN 372.7489 -97.1576 275.5914 0.2607
4 ALLYLCL 29.3812 80.4410 109.8221
5 12DCLPRP 8.933E-04 0.8480 0.8489
6 13DCLPRE 2.138E-03 15.8686 15.8707
STREAM ID S1 S2 S3 S4
NAME HCL PRODUCT
PHASE MIXED LIQUID VAPOR VAPOR
THERMO ID SRK01 SRK01 SRK01 SRK01
Section 4: Chemical
C1 - Dryer Column
You have been asked to design a distillation column to separate
methanol out of a methanol/water mixture. A schematic of the col-
umn is shown in Figure C1-1.
Process Data
The condenser operates at the bubble point of the overhead. Table
C1-1 lists the composition of the feed.
Table C1-1: Feed Stream Information
Component Rate, kg-moles /hour
Methanol 420
Water 1010
Temperature bubble point
Pressure, mmHg 760
Constants for use by the NRTL equation are regressed from the
pressure-temperature-liquid and vapor composition data using Sim-
sci's REGRESSTM program (described in the Thermo Data Manager
User Guide installed with PRO/II). NRTL will accurately model
Simulation Model
The first step in any column design is to establish the number of
theoretical trays and the location of the feed. You know from past
experience that between 10 and 20 theoretical trays are usually
required for this type of separation, with the feed located near the
middle of the column. The initial column model will therefore con-
tain 15 trays, including the condenser and reboiler, with the feed to
tray 8.
The column is modeled as a conventional fractionator using the
default IO solution method. The specifications are the required
methanol purity and recovery, and the condenser and reboiler duties
are varied to meet them.
The tray sizing option calculates the diameter of each tray to meet
the design flooding factor. All the trays are then automatically rated
at the largest calculated diameter.
Input Data
In the input file listing below, metric dimensional units are used for
this simulation with the pressure changed to mmHg. Components
are declared on the LIBID statement so methanol is component 1 and
water is component 2. The BANK entry always is required on the
LIBID statement to unambiguously declare toe order of searching
component data banks. Percentage printout is requested in order to
show the component purities in the product streams.
Results
The column (as configured in the listing file above) meets the
required specifications. The condenser duty is -7.9644 Gcal/hr, and
the reboiler duty is 8.2297 Gcal/hr (see Heater Duties in the Col-
umn Summary section of the output listing below). The required
column diameter is 2.286 m (i.e.; the largest tray as selected in the
Tray Rating Calculation Output section of the results listing).
Conclusions
Although the specifications are met by this configuration, it is
worthwhile investigating different numbers of trays in the column
and different feed tray locations, as there may be a more cost effec-
tive solution.
Using more trays increases the capital cost, but the duties and,
therefore, the operating costs will be lower. The optimum design
always is a compromise between capital and operating costs.
Output
The Column Summary shows the required duties and the reflux to
the column. The L/D reflux ratio is the ratio of the liquid from tray
1 and the overhead product rate. In this example, it is 501.6/437.1 =
1.14756. The required diameter for each tray is shown on the tray
sizing output. This is followed by the rating results using the largest
calculated diameter.
The stream output shows the component rates and purities. The
water product is 99.96% pure.
Column Summary Output
UNIT 1, 'N-1', 'MEOH DRYER'
TOTAL NUMBER OF ITERATIONS
IN/OUT METHOD 6
COLUMN SUMMARY
---------- NET FLOW RATES ----------- HEATER
TRAY TEMP PRESSURE LIQUID VAPOR FEED PRODUCT DUTIES
DEG C MM HG KG-MOL/HR M*KCAL/HR
------ ------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------- ------------
1C 65.1 760.00 501.6 437.1L -7.9644
2 66.0 760.00 496.5 938.7
3 67.2 760.00 490.0 933.5
4 68.7 760.00 482.0 927.0
5 70.6 760.00 472.6 919.0
6 73.0 760.00 462.6 909.7
7 75.7 760.00 453.5 899.6
8 78.2 760.00 1877.2 890.6 1430.0L
9 80.1 760.00 1862.8 884.2
10 84.4 760.00 1842.4 869.9
11 91.1 760.00 1832.4 849.4
12 96.5 760.00 1833.9 839.5
13 98.9 760.00 1836.2 841.0
14 99.7 760.00 1837.1 843.3
15R 99.9 760.00 844.2 992.9L 8.2297
SPECIFICATIONS
C2 - Ammonia-Acetone-Water Separation
A pure ammonia stream is to be produced from an ammonia-ace-
tone-water mixture. In addition, an acetone-rich side draw stream,
and a bottoms stream composed primarily of water are to be pro-
duced. The flowsheet for this problem is shown in Figure C2-1.
Process Data
A listing of the feed stream information appears in Table C2-1, and
column configuration information is in Table C2-2.
Table C2-1: Feed Stream Information
Component Rate, kg-moles per hour
1 Ammonia 3702.77
2 Acetone 17.93
3 Water 126.55
Temperature, K 473.00
Pressure Feed tray pressure
Simulation Model
The separation column is modeled as an ordinary distillation col-
umn with 18 theoretical stages (including the condenser and
reboiler). The feed is introduced on stage 14 at the column pressure.
The overhead condenser is modeled as a total condenser with a bub-
ble point product. The side draw rate off stage 6 is set on the PROD-
UCT statement. Performance specifications are used for the
overhead product rate and the molar reflux flow rate. The reboiler
and condenser duties are variables calculated to meet these specifi-
Input Data
SI dimensions are used for the simulation. The standard input
reprint summary is suppressed.
COMPONENT DATA
LIBID 1, AMMONIA/ 2, ACETONE/ 3, WATER &
BANK=SIMSCI, PROCESS
THERMODYNAMIC DATA
METHOD SYSTEM=NRTL, ENTH=PURE, TRANSPORT=PURE
STREAM DATA
PROP STRM=1,TEMP=473, &
COMP(M)= 1, 3702.77/ 2, 17.93/ 3, 126.55
NAME 1, FEED/ 2, BOTTOMS/ 3, OVERHEAD/ 4, SIDE DRAW
UNIT OPERATIONS
COLUMN UID=NAH, NAME=NAH TOWER
PARA TRAY=18, CHEM=20
FEED 1, 14, NOTSEPARATE
COND TYPE=BUBB, PRES=1555
PROD OVHD=3,3702,BTMS=2,LDRAW=4,6,18
DUTY 1, 1, -78/ 2, 18, 10
ESTI MODEL=CONV, REFLUX=2500
VARY DUTY=1, 2
PSPEC TOP=1565, DP=1.5
PRINT ITER=ESTI, PROP=PART, KVALUES, COMP=M
SPEC REFLUX, VALUE=2500
SPEC STREAM=3, RATE, VALUE=3702
END
Because the thermodynamic METHOD set declares methods for
transport properties, stream thermal conductivities, viscosities, and
surface tensions are reported as part of the stream summary.. Print
CHEM METHOD 11
COLUMN SUMMARY
---------- NET FLOW RATES ----------- HEATER
TRAY TEMP PRESSURE LIQUID VAPOR FEED PRODUCT DUTIES
DEG K KPA KG-MOL/HR M*KJ/HR
------ ------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------- ------------
1C 313.3 1555.00 2500.0 3702.0L -116.1191
2 314.0 1565.00 2483.4 6202.0
3 318.6 1566.50 2355.5 6185.4
4 342.1 1568.00 2085.0 6057.5
5 374.1 1569.50 2123.7 5787.0
6 387.3 1571.00 2186.8 5825.7 18.0L
7 390.8 1572.50 2211.6 5906.8
8 391.7 1574.00 2215.3 5931.6
9 391.9 1575.50 2212.6 5935.3
10 391.9 1577.00 2206.6 5932.6
11 391.8 1578.50 2197.0 5926.6
12 391.8 1580.00 2182.0 5917.0
13 392.0 1581.50 2159.9 5902.0
14 393.5 1583.00 1881.0 5879.9 3847.3V
15 427.3 1584.50 1770.3 1753.8
16 438.3 1586.00 1542.3 1643.1
17 456.2 1587.50 1401.0 1415.0
18R 471.2 1589.00 1273.7 127.2L 44.7686
REFLUX RATIOS
-------- REFLUX RATIOS --------
MOLAR WEIGHT STD L VOL
--------- --------- ---------
REFLUX / FEED STREAM 1 0.6498 0.6422 0.6529
REFLUX / LIQUID DISTILLATE 0.6753 0.6753 0.6753
TRAY 1 TRAY 2
COMPONENT X Y X Y
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
1 AMMONIA 0.99948 0.99998 0.98593 0.99948
2 ACETONE 5.2476E-04 1.9171E-05 0.01407 5.2476E-04
3 WATER 6.5492E-10 5.8947E-13 6.8269E-07 6.5492E-10
TRAY 3 TRAY 4
COMPONENT X Y X Y
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
1 AMMONIA 0.86533 0.99404 0.46357 0.94731
2 ACETONE 0.13450 0.00596 0.53227 0.05262
3 WATER 1.6794E-04 2.7441E-07 0.00416 6.5295E-05
TRAY 5 TRAY 6
COMPONENT X Y X Y
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
1 AMMONIA 0.20537 0.80639 0.14338 0.70999
2 ACETONE 0.78336 0.19211 0.84062 0.28590
3 WATER 0.01127 0.00150 0.01599 0.00411
TRAY 9 TRAY 10
COMPONENT X Y X Y
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
1 AMMONIA 0.13125 0.67208 0.13497 0.67307
2 ACETONE 0.83780 0.31864 0.82516 0.31534
3 WATER 0.03095 0.00928 0.03987 0.01159
TRAY 11 TRAY 12
COMPONENT X Y X Y
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
1 AMMONIA 0.14089 0.67500 0.15089 0.67807
2 ACETONE 0.80537 0.31010 0.77117 0.30192
3 WATER 0.05374 0.01489 0.07793 0.02000
TRAY 13 TRAY 14
COMPONENT X Y X Y
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
1 AMMONIA 0.17032 0.68314 0.21251 0.69227
2 ACETONE 0.70105 0.28800 0.52023 0.26043
3 WATER 0.12863 0.02886 0.26726 0.04730
TRAY 15 TRAY 16
COMPONENT X Y X Y
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
1 AMMONIA 0.06022 0.22785 0.02124 0.06480
2 ACETONE 0.53492 0.55749 0.31095 0.57583
3 WATER 0.40486 0.21465 0.66781 0.35937
Tray K-Values
UNIT 1, 'NAH', 'NAH TOWER' (Continued)
COMPONENT TRAY 1 TRAY 2 TRAY 3 TRAY 4
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
1 AMMONIA 1.0005E+00 1.0137E+00 1.1487E+00 2.0435E+00
2 ACETONE 3.6532E-02 3.7292E-02 4.4341E-02 9.8864E-02
3 WATER 9.0007E-04 9.5932E-04 1.6340E-03 1.5702E-02
TEMPERATURE, DEG K 313.293 314.000 318.637 342.094
PRESSURE, KPA 1555.000 1565.000 1566.500 1568.000
Process Data
The flowsheet for this problem is shown in Figure C3-1.
Simulation Model
The separation column is modeled as an ordinary distillation col-
umn with 21 theoretical trays (including a bubble point condenser
and reboiler). The feed is introduced on stage 6. The presence of
two liquid phases in the separation column requires that the CHEM-
DIST algorithm be used . VLLE thermodynamics is chosen initially
only for the condenser. However, the VLLECHECK statement is
used to allow for a switch from VLE to VLLE thermodynamics,
should the presence of two liquid phases be detected on any of the
subsequent stages. The water-rich phase from the condenser is
totally withdrawn, and all of the toluene-rich phase is returned as
reflux to the column. A performance specification is used to set the
toluene-rich phase reflux rate equal to zero, the condenser duty
being the variable calculated to meet this specification. The reboiler
duty is used as the variable calculated to meet the specification on
the water content of the dry bottoms product. The initial estimate
Input Data
English units are used for the simulation, with stream component
weight percentages selected for the output. Note how the total
reflux specification on the toluene-rich liquid phase (Note 1) and
how the column bottom product specifications are met (Note 2).
The print option for the column tray molar compositions is
selected.Two separate NRTL thermodynamic sets (VLE and VLLE)
are selected, with the VLLECHECK statement used to switch trays
from VLE to VLLE if necessary (Note 3).
COMPONENT DATA
LIBID 1,MEK/ 2,H2O/ 3,TOLUENE, BANK = SIMSCI, PROCESS
$ Use BANK=PROCESS, SIMSCI to match the
$ default order prior to V8.0
THERMODYNAMIC DATA
METHOD KVALUE(VLE)=NRTL, ENTH(V)=SRKM, ENTH(L)=IDEAL, &
DENS(V)=SRKM, DENS(L)=IDEAL, SET=SET01, DEFAULT
KVALUE(VLE) BANK= ALCOHOL, SIMSCI
STREAM DATA
PROP STREAM=3, TEMP=190, PRES=760, PHASE=M, &
COMP(M)= 1,27.4/ 2,2.22/ 3,135.49
NAME 3,FEED/ 7,WATER LAYER/ 5,DRY PRODUCT
UNIT OPERATIONS
Results
The reboiler duty (heat input) is 0.2490 MM Btu/hr, while the con-
denser duty (heat removed) is 0.1688 MM Btu/hr. Two liquid
phases are found to exist on the condenser and the next four lower
trays.
Output
The following data were extracted from the PRO/II output.
Column Summary
UNIT 1, 'W-10', 'DEHYD COL'
TOTAL NUMBER OF ITERATIONS
CHEM METHOD 31
COLUMN SUMMARY
---------- NET FLOW RATES ----------- HEATER
TRAY TEMP PRESSURE LIQUID VAPOR FEED PRODUCT DUTIES
DEG F MM HG LB-MOL/HR MM BTU/HR
------ ------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------- ------------
1C* 169.5 760.00 8.9 1.9L -0.1688
2* 169.7 760.00 8.9 10.8
3* 170.2 760.00 8.8 10.7
4* 171.3 760.00 8.6 10.7
5* 173.7 760.00 8.5 10.5
6 181.2 760.00 168.1 10.4 165.1M
7 181.2 760.00 168.1 4.9
8 181.2 760.00 168.1 4.9
9 181.2 760.00 168.1 4.9
10 181.2 760.00 168.1 4.9
SPECIFICATIONS
REFLUX RATIOS
TRAY 3 TRAY 4
COMPONENT X Y X Y
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
1 MEK 0.47868 0.45319 0.37577 0.40047
2 H2O 0.29357 0.40024 0.32209 0.41211
3 TOLUENE 0.22775 0.14658 0.30214 0.18742
RATE, LB-MOL/HR 8.78 10.74 8.64 10.66
TRAY 5 TRAY 6
COMPONENT X Y X Y
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
1 MEK 0.25654 0.31500 0.16888 0.21665
2 H2O 0.31357 0.43705 0.01501 0.43160
3 TOLUENE 0.42989 0.24794 0.81611 0.35175
RATE, LB-MOL/HR 8.50 10.53 168.14 10.39
TRAY 7 TRAY 8
COMPONENT X Y X Y
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
1 MEK 0.16888 0.21665 0.16888 0.21665
2 H2O 0.01501 0.43160 0.01501 0.43160
3 TOLUENE 0.81611 0.35175 0.81611 0.35175
RATE, LB-MOL/HR 168.14 4.92 168.14 4.92
TRAY 9 TRAY 10
COMPONENT X Y X Y
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
1 MEK 0.16888 0.21665 0.16888 0.21665
2 H2O 0.01501 0.43160 0.01501 0.43160
3 TOLUENE 0.81611 0.35175 0.81611 0.35175
RATE, LB-MOL/HR 168.14 4.92 168.14 4.92
TRAY 2
RATE, LB-MOL/HR COMPOSITION
COMPONENT L1 PHASE L2 PHASE L1 PHASE L2 PHASE
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
1 MEK 0.0149 4.7835 0.034255 0.568275
2 H2O 0.4214 2.0596 0.965636 0.244684
3 TOLUENE 4.786E-05 1.5744 0.000110 0.187041
TRAY 3
RATE, LB-MOL/HR COMPOSITION
COMPONENT L1 PHASE L2 PHASE L1 PHASE L2 PHASE
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
1 MEK 0.0316 4.1689 0.030107 0.539699
2 H2O 1.0189 1.5572 0.969779 0.201593
3 TOLUENE 1.195E-04 1.9984 0.000114 0.258708
TRAY 4
RATE, LB-MOL/HR COMPOSITION
COMPONENT L1 PHASE L2 PHASE L1 PHASE L2 PHASE
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
1 MEK 0.0451 3.2007 0.024158 0.472813
2 H2O 1.8229 0.9592 0.975729 0.141694
3 TOLUENE 2.115E-04 2.6096 0.000113 0.385492
C4 - Azeotropic Separation
Isobutanol is being separated from acetic acid in a distillation col-
umn. The isobutanol product is removed overhead and the acetic
acid is taken as the bottoms. To enhance the separation, water is fed
onto the top tray and distributes between the two main components.
The flowsheet is shown in Figure C4-1.
Figure C4-1: Azeotropic Tower
ProcessData
The column shown in Figure C4-1 has 10 theoretical stages includ-
ing the reboiler and bubble point condenser. There is a conventional
reflux to the column from the condenser, and the water feed is
added on the top tray. The details of the new feed are shown in
Table C4-1.
Table C4-1: Feed Stream Information
Primary Feed, Water Reflux,
Component lb/hr lb/hr
Isobutanol 525 --
Acetic Acid 2095 --
Water -- 900
Temperature, F 292 120
Pressure, psig 26.1 24.3
Simulation Model
The column model is configured to meet two operating specifica-
tions:
The reflux ratio is maintained at the current value of 10:1.
The overhead weight rate is specified as 894 lb/hr.
The condenser and reboiler duties are allowed to be varied to meet
these specifications.
The effect of the increased flow rates in the column will be seen in
the tray flooding factors and the downcomer backups. These param-
eters are calculated from the tray configuration by the tray rating
option.
Input Data
This simulation uses the default English set of units. The PRINT
option requests output of weight flow rates because the feed and
specified product rates are in lb/hr.
The unit is modeled as a conventional column and uses the default
IO solution method. The tray rating calculations are specified with
the TRATE statement which supplies the mechanical details of the
trays.
The CHEMDIST algorithm can be used in place of the IO. This
method solves more difficult, non-ideal applications, although run
times may be longer. Both algorithms produce virtually identical
results. The input listing follows.
THERMO DATA
METHOD KVALUE=VANLAAR, ENTHALPY=LIBRARY, &
DENS(L)=IDEAL, DENS(V)=IDEAL
KVALUE
VANLAAR 1,2,-1.16,-0.463/1,3,3.63,1.14/2,3,.130,0.618
STREAM DATA
PROP STREAM=1, TEMP=292, PRES=26.1, PHASE=L, &
COMP(W)=525/2095
PROP STREAM=2, TEMP=120, PRES=24.3, PHASE=L, &
COMP(W)=3,900
NAME 1,FEED/ 2,SEC FEED/ 3,OVERHEAD/ 4,BOTTOMS
UNIT OPERATIONS DATA
COLUMN UID=C-47,NAME=AZEO COL
FEED 1,8/2,2
PARA TRAY=10
PROD OVHD=3,22,BTMS=4
PSPEC TOP=23.7,DPCOL=2.4
COND TYPE=BUBB,PRES=20.7
HEAT 1,1/2,10
SPEC RRATIO,VALUE=10
SPEC STREAM=3,RATE(W),VALUE=894
VARY HEAT=1,2
ESTI MODEL=CONV,RRATIO=10
TRATE VALVE, SPACING=22, DIAM=28, NUMBER=55, &
DIAM(VALVE)=1.875, WEIR=1.8, &
DCC=1.4, DCW=2.15
END
Results
The column produces an acetic acid/water product from the bottom
of the column (stream 4) that contains about 0.015 weight % isobu-
tanol. The overhead isobutanol product (stream 3) contains about
0.6 weight % acetic acid. See Stream Weight Component Percents
in the output report listing.
The condenser and reboiler duties are approximately -5.35 and 4.91
MM Btu/hr respectively (see the Column Summary section of the
output report). The highest flooding factor is 80.7% on tray 8. The
Conclusions
The column can handle the increased throughput as long as the cal-
culated duties are available. The increased internal flow rates will
not cause flooding.
Output
The column summary shows the duties and the liquid and vapor
rates. The tray vapor and liquid rate output gives the densities and
the volume and weight rates.
The tray rating output shows the calculated loads, flooding factors,
pressure drops, and downcomer backups for each tray in the col-
umn.
The stream output shows the feed and product compositions and
conditions.
IN/OUT METHOD 5
COLUMN SUMMARY
SPECIFICATIONS
REFLUX RATIOS
-------- REFLUX RATIOS --------
MOLAR WEIGHT STD L VOL
--------- --------- ---------
REFLUX / FEED STREAM 2 5.4432 9.9333 11.3295
REFLUX / FEED STREAM 1 6.4793 3.4122 3.8601
REFLUX / TOTAL FEED 2.9581 2.5398 2.8792
REFLUX / LIQUID DISTILLATE 10.0000 10.0000 10.0000
Process Data
The process flowsheet for the phenol extraction system is shown in
Figure C5-1on the next page.
After extraction the spent solvent is heated and depressured through
a let-down valve. It is then distilled to recover 99.5% pure phenol as
a bottom product and a purified benzene stream for recycle. A list
ing of feed stream information appears in Table C5-1. .
Table C5-1: Feed Stream Information
Component Rate, lb-moles/hr
1 Benzene 0.1001
2 Phenol 1.9059
3 Water 160.6000
4 Benzoic Acid 0.0002
Temperature, F 86.0
Pressure, psia 21.3
Simulation Model
The phenol extraction process flowsheet shown in Figure C5-1 is
modelled by the PRO/II key word input listing shown on the fol-
lowing pages. The liquid-liquid extractor is modeled as a column
with four theoretical stages. The aqueous feed is introduced on the
top stage and benzene solvent on the bottom stage.
The heat exchanger heats the spent solvent stream to 200 F in order
to reduce the duty of the rerun column reboiler.
The rerun column is modeled as a conventional distillation column
with 10 theoretical stages, (a condenser and a reboiler in addition to
8 trays in the column proper). Both condenser and reboiler duties
are varied to achieve the specified reflux ratio and phenol recovery
purity.
Calculator C1 determines the amount of benzene carried over from
the recycle stream. The excess is discharged from splitter S1 to
maintain the overall mass balance.
Input Data
The phenol recovery specification is met by varying the reboiler
duty (Note 1) and the VLE system is specified using the METHOD
keyword (Note 2).
THERMODYNAMIC DATA
METHOD SYSTEM(VLLE)=NRTL, TRANS=PURE, PHI=IDEA, &
SET=SET01, DEFAULT
KVALUE(VLE) FILL=UNIF
KVALUE(LLE) FILL=UNIF
METHOD SYSTEM(VLE)=NRTL, TRANS=PURE, PHI=IDEA, SET=SET02
KVALUE(VLE) FILL=UNIF
UNIT OPERATIONS
COLUMN UID=T-1, NAME=LLEX
PARAM TRAY=4, LLEX=30
FEED 1,1/ 8,4
PROD OVHD=3 , BTMS=2,162
PSPEC PTOP=60, DPCOL=10
TOLERANCE LLE=0.0005, COMP=0.0005
HX UID=HX-1, NAME=PREHEATER
COLD FEED=3, L=4, DP=5
OPER CTEMP=200
UTIL STEAM, TSAT(C)=200
VALVE UID=V-1,NAME=LET-DOWN
FEED 4
PROD V=5
OPER PRES=20
Results
The flowsheet solves in three recycle trials. The liquid-liquid
extraction column removes 99.5% of the phenol. The recycled rate
converges to 60.10 lbmole/hr of solvent to the extraction column.
The rerun column can purify the spent benzene solvent to 99.33%
purity for recycling and recover 99.5% pure phenol in the bottom
product stream.
LLEX METHOD 7
COLUMN SUMMARY
COLUMN SUMMARY
---------- NET FLOW RATES ----------- HEATER
TRAY TEMP PRESSURE LIQUID VAPOR FEED PRODUCT DUTIES
DEG F PSIA LB-MOL/HR MM BTU/HR
------ ------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------- ------------
1C 100.0 12.00 300.6 60.1L -5.7332
2 177.1 15.00 359.8 360.7
3 179.8 15.62 360.9 420.0
4 182.1 16.25 361.4 421.0 3.1V
5 184.7 16.88 421.9 418.4 59.0L
6 187.0 17.50 422.2 420.0
7 190.0 18.13 410.1 420.3
8 206.1 18.75 310.1 408.2
9 303.7 19.38 245.7 308.2
10R 374.4 20.00 243.8 1.9L 5.5425
SPECIFICATIONS
REFLUX RATIOS
-------- REFLUX RATIOS --------
MOLAR WEIGHT STD L VOL
--------- --------- ---------
REFLUX / FEED STREAM 5 4.8464 4.8153 4.8480
REFLUX / LIQUID DISTILLATE 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000
Stream Summary
STREAM ID 1 2 3 4
NAME WASTE WATER
PHASE LIQUID LIQUID LIQUID LIQUID
THERMO ID SET01 SET01 SET01 SET01
STREAM ID 5 6 6X 7
NAME
PHASE MIXED LIQUID LIQUID LIQUID
THERMO ID SET01 SET02 SET01 SET02
Stream Summary
STREAM ID 8 8B
NAME SOLVENT
PHASE LIQUID LIQUID
THERMO ID SET01 SET01
Process Data
The feed stream information is given in Table C6-1, and the process
information in Table C6-2.
Table C6-1: Feed Stream Information
Component Rate, lb-moles/hr
1 Di-isoproply ether 20.0
2 Isopropanol 60.0
3 Water 900.0
4 Butanol 20.0
Total 1000.0
Temperature, F 140.0
Pressure, psia 20.0
Simulation Model
The separation column is modeled as an ordinary distillation col-
umn with 11 theoretical trays (including the condenser and
reboiler). The feed enters on stage 5. The presence of two liquid
phases in the separation column is handled by the CHEMDIST algo-
rithm.
Rigorous VLLE stage-by-stage calculations are CPU intensive and
in this case, unnecessary (except in the condenser). For this reason,
the overhead bubble point condenser model uses VLLE thermody-
namics, while the rest of the column uses VLE thermodynamics.
Input Data
English units are used for the simulation.
The initial estimate generator MODEL=CHEM is used with tray
temperature estimates.
Reporting column tray molar compositions is requested using-
PRINT COMP=M. (Note 1).
Note how to specify the reflux ratio of the DIPE-rich phase
(Note 2).
The purity specification of column bottom product may be
instructive (Note 3).
Separate thermodynamic sets are selected: VLLE in the con-
denser, and VLE in the remainder of the coulmn (Note 4).
Results
The column solves in 6 iterations. The reboiler duty required is
1.6146 MM Btu/hr, while the condenser duty is 0.7544 MM Btu/hr.
Output
The following results were extracted from the PRO/II output:
Column Summary
Unit 1, 'COL1', 'COLUMN'
TOTAL NUMBER OF ITERATIONS
CHEM METHOD 7
COLUMN SUMMARY
---------- NET FLOW RATES ----------- HEATER
TRAY TEMP PRESSURE LIQUID VAPOR FEED PRODUCT DUTIES
DEG F PSIA LB-MOL/HR MM BTU/HR
------ ------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------- ------------
1C* 146.1 15.50 24.5 24.5L -0.7836
6.0L
2 147.6 15.50 24.8 55.0
3 148.7 15.56 24.7 55.3
4 150.0 15.61 26.6 55.3 12.4V
5 133.8 15.67 995.0 44.7 987.6L
6 144.6 15.72 1004.8 25.6
7 169.9 15.78 1031.2 35.3
8 185.5 15.83 1049.0 61.7
9 189.1 15.89 1053.1 79.5
10 190.1 15.94 1053.8 83.6
11R 192.0 16.00 84.4 969.5L 1.5343
* Trays with two liquid phases
SPECIFICATIONS
SPECIFICATION PARAMETER TRAY COMP SPECIFICATION SPECIFIED CALCULATED
NUMBER TYPE NO NO TYPE VALUE VALUE
------------- --------- ---- ------ ------------- ---------- ----------
C6- Decant Column Chemical 4-137
PRO/II Application Briefs
1 (ACTIVE) STRM 4 11 1 MOL RATIO 1.000E-04 1.001E-04
2 (ACTIVE) UNIT COL1 1 MOL RRATIO 1.000E+00 1.000E+00
TRAY 3 TRAY 4
COMPONENT X Y X Y
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
1 DIPE 0.85731 0.74191 0.83983 0.74556
2 IPA 0.07825 0.08766 0.07473 0.08334
3 H2O 0.05280 0.16859 0.05141 0.16562
4 BUTANOL 0.01164 0.00183 0.03402 0.00547
RATE, LB-MOL/HR 24.73 55.31 26.59 55.26
TRAY 5 TRAY 6
COMPONENT X Y X Y
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
1 DIPE 0.01734 0.76008 0.01304 0.67492
2 IPA 0.06037 0.07498 0.06509 0.10723
3 H2O 0.90169 0.15037 0.90056 0.19756
4 BUTANOL 0.02061 0.01457 0.02131 0.02029
RATE, LB-MOL/HR 995.02 44.72 1004.77 25.55
TRAY 7 TRAY 8
COMPONENT X Y X Y
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
1 DIPE 0.00517 0.37081 0.00101 0.08637
2 IPA 0.07638 0.22881 0.08318 0.34741
3 H2O 0.89553 0.36007 0.89184 0.50716
4 BUTANOL 0.02291 0.04032 0.02397 0.05906
RATE, LB-MOL/HR 1031.17 35.30 1048.97 61.70
TRAY 9 TRAY 10
COMPONENT X Y X Y
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
1 DIPE 1.5157E-04 0.01336 2.1019E-05 0.00189
Process Data
The crude gas feed (stream 1) is mixed with steam (stream 2) before
being fed to the shift reactor RX-1. This product gas is cleaned and
dried to remove water, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide. It then
serves as the feed to the methanator reactor. Both the shift and
methanator reactors operate adiabatically.
Table C7-2 lists the initial conditions of the steam utility that mixes
with the feed to the shift reactor.
Table C7-2: Steam Stream 2 Information
Component lb-mole/hr
Water 60.4
Temperature, F 435
Pressure, psia 340
Simulation Model
The shift reactor operates with an equilibrium temperature approach
of 50 F.
The gas clean-up is modeled in a stream calculator unit fed by the
reacted product of the shift reactor. Most of the excess water is
removed by specifying the fraction of each component that passes
to the methanator.
The methanator reactor models both the shift and methanation reac-
tions at 95% of the equilibrium conversion.
Input Data
Default English units are used to create the following keyword
input file.The OUTDIMENSION statement after the TITLE statement
requests printing the output report using metric units in addition to
the default English units.
The shift and methanator reactor options are specified on the
RXCALCULATION and STOICHIOMETRY statements to retrieve
the stored reaction data.
Input Data File
TITLE PROJECT=APPBRIEFS, PROBLEM=C7, USER=SIMSCI
DESC Ref: HC Processing, Apr 1981, P. 115
OUTDIMENSION METRIC
PRINT INPUT=ALL
COMPONENT DATA
LIBID 1,H2O/ 2,CO/ 3,H2/ 4,CO2/ 5,C1/ 6,N2/ 7,H2S &
, BANK = SIMSCI, PROCESS
THERMODYNAMIC DATA
METHOD SYSTEM=SRK,TRANS=PURE
KVALUE BANK=SIMSCI
STREAM DATA
PROP STREAM=1,TEMP=600,PRES=340,&
COMP=0.0/54.9/28.9/3.4/7.1/4.4/0.5
PROP STREAM=2,TEMP=435,PRES=340,COMP=60.4
UNIT OPERATIONS
EQUREACTOR UID=RX-1,NAME=SHIFT
FEED 1,2
PROD V=3
RXCALC MODEL=SHIFT
OPER ADIABATIC,DP=5
REAC SHIFT
APPROACH DT=50
STCALC UID=STC1,NAME=GAS CLEAN-UP
FEED 3
OVHD STREAM=5,DP=5,TEMP=450.
BTMS STREAM=4,DP=5,TEMP=240.
FOVHD 1,,0.01/2,3,1./4,,0.01/5,6,1.0/7,,0.0001
EQUREACTOR UID=RX-2,NAME=METHANATOR
FEED 5
PROD V=6
RXCALC MODEL=METHANATION
OPER ADIA,DP=10,DUTY=-1.75
REAC SHIFT
APPROACH FRACTION=0.95
REAC METHANATION
APPROACH FRACTION=0.95
Results
Most of the carbon monoxide and hydrogen in the feed is converted
to methane. Less than 2% of the feed carbon monoxide remains in
the product gas stream. The carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide
are removed with the water from the clean-up section.
Output
The output is shown for both the reactors and for the stream calcula-
tor unit. The stream output shows the details of all the streams in the
flow sheet. All the output is shown in the alternate (metric) units.
INLET OUTLET
----------- -----------
FEED 1
2
VAPOR PRODUCT 3
TEMPERATURE, F 510.83 915.15
PRESSURE, PSIA 340.0000 335.0000
REACTION DATA
--------- RATES, LB-MOL/HR ---------- FRACTION
COMPONENT FEED CHANGE PRODUCT CONVERTED
-------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
1 H2O 60.4000 -34.0431 26.3569 0.5636
2 CO 54.9000 -34.0431 20.8569 0.6201
3 H2 28.9000 34.0431 62.9431
4 CO2 3.4000 34.0431 37.4431
5 C1 7.1000 0.0000 7.1000
6 N2 4.4000 0.0000 4.4000
7 H2S 0.5000 0.0000 0.5000
TOTAL 159.6000 0.0000 159.6000
LB-MOL/HR FRACTION
BASE COMPONENT REACTION CONVERTED CONVERTED(1)
-------------- ----------- ----------- ------------
2 CO SHIFT 34.0431 0.6201
INLET OUTLET
----------- -----------
FEED 5
VAPOR PRODUCT 6
TEMPERATURE, F 450.00 588.24
PRESSURE, PSIA 330.0000 320.0000
REACTION DATA
--------- RATES, LB-MOL/HR ---------- FRACTION
COMPONENT FEED CHANGE PRODUCT CONVERTED
-------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
1 H2O 0.2636 19.5591 19.8227
2 CO 20.8569 -19.8134 1.0435 0.9500
3 H2 62.9431 -58.9316 4.0116 0.9363
4 CO2 0.3744 0.1272 0.5016
5 C1 7.1000 19.6862 26.7862
6 N2 4.4000 0.0000 4.4000
7 H2S 5.00000E-05 0.0000 5.00000E-05
TOTAL 95.9381 -39.3725 56.5656
LB-MOL/HR FRACTION
BASE COMPONENT REACTION CONVERTED CONVERTED(1)
---------------- ----------- ----------- ------------
2 CO METHANATION 19.6862 0.9439
2 CO SHIFT 0.1272 6.09697E-03
Process Data
Table C8-1 lists the feed stream information for the simulation.
Stream FEED_STREAM
Rate 15000 kg/hr
Acetone 46% by weight
Acetic Acid 27% by wieght
Acetic Anhydride 27% by wieght
Pressure 101.325 kPa
Temperature 348 K
Column STILL_TOWER
Number of Trays 8
Feed Tray 4
Molar Reflux Ratio 1:1
Overhead Product Initial Rate
Estimate 6750 kg per hour
Purity, Acetone in Overhead 99.9 +- 0.0001 Acetone
Condenser Temperature 303 K
Top Tray Pressure Same as feed stream
Pressure drop across column Minimal
The components present in the system are acetone, acetic acid, and
acetic anhydride. The NRTL thermodynamic system with the VLE
active option is chosen because it has interaction pair data that will
more accurately model the non-idealities in the mixture. The
Hayden-O'Connell vapor fugacity option will be used to account for
dimers of the carboxylic (acetic) acid. However, not all binary inter-
action pairs are immediately available. Any pairs not available in
the SimSci databanks will be estimated using the UNIFAC group
contribution method.
Simulation Model
The feed stream enters the column on tray 4. This simulation man-
dates that half the molar flowrate into the condenser be withdrawn.
Scoping calculations predict that approximately 6750 kg/hr of over-
head product will leave the system. This column operates with a
minimal pressure drop across it. The column simulation model uses
the inside-out algorithm to perform the tray-by-tray calculations.
The boiling point of acetone is 303K at 101.325 kPa, and the over-
head purity specification makes it safe to assume that it is the con-
denser temperature.
The overhead product of the column is run through an attached heat
exchanger that performs the condenser calculations. The condenser
uses a simple heat exchanger model that has a water utility on its
cold side. The cooling water enters at 283 K and exits at 293 K.
The bottoms product of the column is run through an attached heat
exchanger that models the reboiler. The reboiler uses a simple heat
exchanger model that has a saturated steam utility on its hot side.
The steam is pressurized to 1101.3 KPA.
Input Data
SI units are used throughout the simulation. The keyword input data
file is shown on the following page.
UNIT OPERATIONS
COLUMN UID=STILL_TOWER, NAME=Main Column
PARAMETER TRAY=8, IO=15
FEED FEED_STREAM,4
$ OVERHEAD PRODUCT RATE ESTIMATED FROM OVERALL MASS BALANCE
PRODUCT OVHD(WT)=OVHD_STREAM,6750,BTMS(M)=BTMS_STREAM
CONDENSER TYPE=TFIX, TEMPERATURE=303
HEATER=1,1/2,8
PRINT COMPONENT=M, WT, KEYLIGHT=1,1, KEYHEAVY=2,3
PLOT SFACTOR
$ ESTIMATE RRATIO=1, TTEMP=329, RTEMP=398
$ REFLUX RATIO MANDATED AS 1
$ DISTILLATE PURITY MANDATED AS
$ 0.999 MOLE FRACTION ACETONE
SPEC RRATIO, VALUE=1
SPEC STREAM=OVHD_STREAM, FRACTION, COMP=1, &
VALUE=0.999, ATOL=1E-4
VARY DUTY=1,2
DEFINE PTOP AS STREAM=FEED_STREAM, PRESSURE
Results
Table C8-4: Summary of Selected Results
Conclusions
The simulation has produced a reasonable analysis of the material
energy balances in the column and its attached heat exchangers.
Product flowrates corresponded well to the estimates. The separa-
tion factor plot for the acetone/acetate split is shown in Figure C8.2.
Had the number of trays been too great, the graph would have
shown flat areas or even inflection points. It should be noted that
the separation factor plot can be a useful tool in finding an optimum
value for the number of theoretical trays. This is done by running
and reviewing the output file iteratively.
Output
Column separation factors by tray are shown in Figure C8-2. This
plot is in addition to the line printer plot requested by the PLOT
statement of keyword input for the column. This plot was generated
in PROVISION by navigating to the Output menu, Generate Plot ...
option. Highlight STILL TOWER (Column) in the Units for Selec-
tion list; then select Separation Factor from the Available Plots list.
The listings that follow are representative extracts from the output
report that PRO/II produces, and are not complete. In particular, the
requested listings of tray compositions have been omitted and are
not shown here.
The column summary output shows the tray flowrates, tempera-
tures, and pressures. Details for the reboiler and condenser appear
on the heat exchanger output.
The stream molar component flowrates generated by PRO/II are
included, Also, Figure C8-3 presents an example of a Stream Table
Material Balance List (generated by PROVISION).
IN/OUT METHOD 10
COLUMN SUMMARY
SPECIFICATIONS
OPERATING CONDITIONS
OPERATING CONDITIONS
Section 5: Solids
S1 - p-Xylene Crystalization
p-xylene is separated from a xylene stream by crystallization. This
demonstration simulates the process requirements to achieve 65%
p-xylene recovery at 95% (by weight) purity.
Process Data
The crystallization process is shown in Figure S1-1 is based on the
work of Haines, Powers and Bennet1. The flowsheet contains two
crystallization stages with associated auxiliary separation equip-
ment. A concentrated p-xylene liquor is recycled from the second
unit back to the first unit. The final crystalline product contains 95
% p-xylene.
Component lb/hr
Toluene 2040
p-xylene 5372
m-xylene 13464
o-xylene 6800
Ethylbenzene 6325
Temperature( F ) 75
Pressure( psia ) 20
The mixed xylene feed is interchanged with the mother liquor from
the first crystallization section. The cooled feed is then sent into a
scraped surface heat exchanger chilled with ethylene to -95 F. For
the purpose of simulation, the scraped surface exchanger is sepa-
rated into an exchanger(FCO1) and crystallizer unit(CR1). The
mother liquor is then sent into a centrifuge(CEN1) to separate the
mother liquor from the crystalline product.
The mother liquor is recycled to cool down the feed. The crystal
product is dissolved and sent to the second stage cooler, chilled with
propane to 0 F and sent to the second stage crystallizer. The crystal
slurry is separated in the second centrifuge where the mother liquor
is recycled back to the feed and the final crystal product is sent to a
dissolver.
Simulation Model
The simulation flowsheet is represented in Figure S1-2. The first
crystallization stage is explained in detail to demonstrate some of
PRO/II's solids capabilities. The second stage is nearly identical to
the first stage with the exception of the final melt unit described
below.
Input Data
The following is a complete input file for the p-xylene crystalliza-
tion process.
Result
The product specifications of 95 weight percent p-xylene purity and
65% recovery are met, as shown in the stream output. The recycle
stream has a flowrate of 1222 pounds per hour and 43 weight per-
cent p-xylene.
Output
Selected PRO/II output is shown below. Output selected highlight
solids capabilities.
Operating Conditions
Temperature, F -95.0000
Pressure, PSIA 16.0000
Average Particle Diameter, MIC 52.3298
Average Solid Density, LB/FT3 62.8024
Total Solid Feed Mass Flow Rate, LB/HR 3984.3071
Surface tension, DYNE/CM 39.7657
Volume Flow Rate of Filtrate, FT3/HR 515.7526
Particle Sphericity 0.7500
Physical Configuration
Bowl Diameter, FT 1.7000
Radius of Liquid Surface / Radius of Bowl 0.7380
Radius of Cake / Radius of Bowl 0.7900
Height of Bowl / Radius of Bowl 0.9545
RPM 1000.0000
Basket Height, FT 0.8113
Selected Bowl Radius, FT 0.8500
Centrifuge Type Not Specified
Cake Properties
Mass Fraction of Solid in Cake 0.8053
Cake Thickness, MIC 5.441E+04
Cake Resistance, FT/LB 2.976E+06
Filter Medium Resistance, 1/FT 6.096E+05
Porosity if Cake 0.4500
Feeds 5
Products Liquid 6
OPERATING CONDITIONS
FEED TEMPERATURE, F -95.00
DISSOLVER TEMPERATURE, F 75.00
TEMPERATURE CHANGE ACROSS DISSOLVER, F 170.00
PRESSURE, PSIA 16.00
PRESSURE DROP, PSIA 0.00
DUTY, MM BTU/HR 0.5559
DISSOLVER DATA
VOLUME, FT3 19.2638
RESIDENCE TIME, HR 0.1181
CRYSTAL DISSOLUTION RATE, LB/HR 3984.307
WT FRACTION OF CRYSTALS DISOLVED 1.000
SLURRY PROPERTIES
CRYSTAL COMPONENT 2 PXYLENE
MOTHER LIQUOR DENSITY, LB/FT3 53.205
PRODUCT STREAM MAGMA DENSITY, LB/FT3 0.000
VOL FRAC OF LIQ IN FEED SLURRY 0.557
VOL FRAC OF LIQ IN PRODUCT SLURRY 1.000
FEED SLURRY VOLUMETRIC RATE, FT3/HR 143.271
PRODUCT SLURRY VOLUMETRIC RATE, FT3/HR 163.055
OPERATING CONDITIONS
TEMPERATURE, F -95.00
PRESSURE, PSIA 16.00
HEAT EXCHANGER DUTY, MM BTU/HR -0.2227
VOLUME, FT3 200.5204
RESIDENCE TIME, HR 0.3367
CRYSTAL PRODUCTION RATE, LB/HR 3984.307
TEMPERATURE CHANGE IN HEAT EXCHANGER, F N/A
SLURRY RECIRCULATION RATE, FT3/HR N/A
AGITATOR RPM 100.000
CRYSTALLIZER DATA
CRYSTAL COMPONENT 2 PXYLENE
SUPERSATURATION 7.6883E-03
CRYSTAL SHAPE FACTOR 1.000
SLURRY PROPERTIES
FEED SLURRY LIQUID VOLUME FRACTION 1.000
FEED SLURRY VOLUMETRIC RATE, FT3/HR 600.354
PRODUCT SLURRY LIQUID VOLUME FRACTION 0.893
PRODUCT SLURRY VOLUMETRIC RATE, FT3/HR 595.582
PRODUCT SLURRY MAGMA DENSITY, LB/FT3 6.690
KINETICS DATA
GROWTH RATE, FT/SEC 3.7772E-08
NUCLEATION RATE, NUMBER/HR/FT3 6.1507E+11
OPERATING CONDITIONS
TEMPERATURE, F 75.00
PRESSURE, PSIA 15.00
PRESSURE DROP, PSI 0.00
DUTY, MM BTU/HR 0.3325
MOLE FRAC VAPOR 0.0000
MOLE FRAC TOTAL LIQUID 1.0000
MOLE FRAC MW SOLID 0.0000
MELTING/FREEZING DATA
COMPONENTS MELTED FRACTION MM BTU/HR F
--------------------- -------- ----------- -------
2 PXYLENE 1.0000 0.2334 55.87
2 PXYLENE
PSD, MIC
0.000 - 10.00 4.020E-03 4.020E-03 0.0000 2.408E-05
10.00 - 25.00 0.1055 0.1055 0.0000 1.224E-03
25.00 - 50.00 0.4129 0.4129 0.0000 0.0138
50.00 - 75.00 0.3186 0.3186 0.0000 0.0399
75.00 - 100.0 0.1457 0.1457 0.0000 0.0684
100.0 - 250.0 0.0132 0.0132 0.0000 0.6325
250.0 - 500.0 1.293E-07 1.293E-07 0.0000 0.2409
0.500 - 1.000 E+03 4.413E-18 4.413E-18 0.0000 3.327E-03
1.000 - 5.000 E+03 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7.048E-19
5.000 - 10.00 E+03 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
STREAM ID 9
NAME
PHASE MIXED
THERMO ID IDEA01
2 PXYLENE
PSD, MIC
0.000 - 10.00 2.408E-05
10.00 - 25.00 1.224E-03
25.00 - 50.00 0.0138
50.00 - 75.00 0.0399
75.00 - 100.0 0.0684
100.0 - 250.0 0.6325
250.0 - 500.0 0.2409
0.500 - 1.000 E+03 3.327E-03
1.000 - 5.000 E+03 7.048E-19
5.000 - 10.00 E+03 0.0000
Section 6: Advanced
A1 - Cascade Refrigeration
A natural gas stream is cooled by two linked refrigeration circuits,
the first using a propane refrigerant and the second using ethane.
The flowsheet is shown in Figure A1-1.
Figure A1-1: Cascade Refrigeration Flow Sheet
ProcessData
The gas stream is cooled by the two refrigeration units, COO1 and
COO2, as well as by its own vapor. It is then flashed to remove a
high purity methane stream and reduce the temperature of the liquid
for storage. The ethane circuit is cooled by exchange with the pro-
pane, and heat is removed from the propane by an air cooled
exchanger.
The refrigeration units operate with a temperature approach
between the hot inlet and cold outlet of 3 F. The hot outlet/cold inlet
temperature approach on the exchanger HXT is 20 F and the hot
inlet/cold outlet approach is 130 F. The air cooler outlet temperature
is set at its winter value of 75 F.
The composition and conditions of the natural gas feed stream are
shown in Table A1-1.
Table A1-1: Feed Stream 1 Information
Component Rate, % Component Rate, %
Methane 90.93 n-Butane 0.57
Ethane 5.04 iso-pentane 0.18
Propane 1.90 n-Pentane 0.20
iso-Butane 0.52 n-Hexane 0.79
Rate, lb-moles/hour 100.00
Temperature, F 100.00
Pressure, psia 700.00
SimulationModel
The process shown in Figure A1-1 contains two closed refrigeration
loops, each equipped with a compressor and let-down valve. Closed
loops can be modeled by PRO/II. Each loop must be initialized at
some point, and the conditions and flow rate are then calculated to
meet performance specifications on the units.
Input Data
This simulation uses the default set of English dimensional units.
The reference stream facility in the Stream Data Section sets the
composition and rate of streams 3 and 5 equal to those of stream 1.
The flowrates of streams 10 and 18 (the propane and ethane loop
initializations) entered on the PROP statements are only estimates
which will be changed during the calculation.
In the ethane circuit, the circulation rate is controlled with CNT1 to
meet the temperature approach specification between streams 5 and
19. Stream 19 is vaporized in heat exchanger COO2 and stream 20
is set to its dew point. When both a liquid fraction and a flow rate
are to be specified for an exchanger, it is good practice to specify
the flowrate, rather than the liquid fraction, with the controller.
In the propane circuit, controller CNT2 calculates the propane rate
to meet the approach temperature between streams 3 and 13, and
CNT3 determines the split ratio to meet the approach specification
between streams 15 and 17.
Results
The flowsheet solves in two recycle trials. The reordering of the
calculation described above reduces the computation time to less
than 20% of that required if the simulation starts at unit HX1.
Conclusions
A base case model has been set up to model the existing perfor-
mance, and the refrigerant rates have been established. These rates
can now be fixed for studies of other operating conditions. Alterna-
tively, the existing model can be used to determine how much
refrigerant would be required for other cooling duties.
Output
Selected PRO/II output is shown below. This includes the flash
summaries, which show the throttle valves, the compressors, the
gas refrigeration exchangers, and the stream output.
Flash Summary
FLASH ID F1 C2V C3V HXT1
NAME PREFLASH C2 THROTTLE C3 THROTTLE AIR COOLER
FEEDS 5 18 10 9
PRODUCTS MIXED 19
VAPOR 21 11A
LIQUID 6 11 10
FLASH ID F2
NAME NGL SEPARATR
FEEDS 6
PRODUCTS VAPOR 7
LIQUID 8
TEMPERATURE, F -158.747
PRESSURE, PSIA 250.000
PRESSURE DROP, PSI 420.000
MOLE FRAC VAPOR 0.39805
MOLE FRAC LIQUID 0.60195
MOLE FRAC MW SOLID 0.00000
DUTY, MM BTU/HR 0.00000
FLASH TYPE ADIABATIC-P
Products Vapor 17
OPERATING CONDITIONS
STREAM ID 5 6 7 8
NAME
PHASE MIXED LIQUID VAPOR LIQUID
THERMO ID PR01 PR01 PR01 PR01
STREAM ID 12 13 14 15
NAME
PHASE LIQUID LIQUID VAPOR VAPOR
THERMO ID PR01 PR01 PR01 PR01
STREAM ID 20 21 22 23
NAME
PHASE VAPOR VAPOR VAPOR VAPOR
THERMO ID PR01 PR01 PR01 PR01
FLUID RATES, LB-MOL/HR
1 C1 0.0000 25.4544 25.4544 25.4544
2 C2 41.8747 0.4141 0.4141 0.4141
3 C3 0.0000 0.0599 0.0599 0.0599
4 IC4 0.0000 8.0672E-03 8.0672E-03 8.0672E-03
5 NC4 0.0000 6.3451E-03 6.3451E-03 6.3451E-03
6 IC5 0.0000 8.0746E-04 8.0746E-04 8.0746E-04
7 NC5 0.0000 8.6218E-04 8.6218E-04 8.6218E-04
8 NC6 0.0000 1.3649E-03 1.3649E-03 1.3649E-03
TOTAL RATE, LB-MOL/HR 41.8747 25.9458 25.9458 25.9458
A2 - Phenol Distillation
A new set of operating conditions has been proposed for an existing
distillation train to produce a 99.95 weight % pure phenol product
from a feed containing predominantly acetone, phenol, and water.
You have been asked to establish the feasibility of the new condi-
tions and to determine the material and heat balances.
Process Data
The separation is carried out in five distillation columns as shown in
the flowsheet in Figure A2-1.
Most of the acetone is removed in the vapor product from the first
column, T1, and the water is removed in column T3. The other
unwanted components are removed in columns T2 and T4.
The phenol product is the taken overhead from T5. To obtain the
required product purity, a considerable amount of phenol remains in
the bottom product of T5, and recycles back to T2.
Simulation Model
The performance specifications in Table A2.2 are imposed directly
on the relevant column. The reboiler and condenser duties are cal-
culated to satisfy the specifications.
The phenol loss in columns T2 and T4 is specified as the ratio of the
flow rate of phenol in the product to the rate in the feed to the flow-
sheet. All the reflux specifications are with respect to the feed to the
column rather than to the distillate rate.
Input Data
The simulation uses metric units with pressure as torr. Weight flow
rate and composition outputs are requested, as all specified rates are
in kg/hr.
The estimate for the recycle stream is supplied to reduce the calcu-
lation time.
The PROPTABLES=BRIEF option is used in all the columns to
limit the output to column summary only.
Results
The simulation meets all the specifications, and therefore verifies
the proposed operating conditions are feasible as long as the column
duties can be met.
Output
Results are included for flash drum F1, which maintains a constant
temperature and pressure of the recycle. The output for columns T1
and T5 and the stream weight rates and component weight rates are
shown. These give the required heat and material balances on the
flowsheet.
FEEDS 2
4
PRODUCTS MIXED 5
TEMPERATURE, C 114.000
PRESSURE, TORR 100.000
PRESSURE DROP, TORR 0.000
MOLE FRAC VAPOR 0.07345
MOLE FRAC LIQUID 0.92655
MOLE FRAC MW SOLID 0.00000
DUTY, M*KCAL/HR -0.03331
FLASH TYPE ISOTHERMAL
VALVE SUMMARY
VALVE ID V1
NAME VALVE
FEEDS 11
PRODUCTS VAPOR 14
LIQUID 13
TEMPERATURE, C 121.225
PRESSURE, TORR 100.000
PRESSURE DROP, TORR 180.000
MOLE FRAC VAPOR 0.12900
MOLE FRAC LIQUID 0.87100
MOLE FRAC MW SOLID 0.00000
Column T1 Output
Unit 1, 'T1', 'COLUMN 1'
TOTAL NUMBER OF ITERATIONS
CHEM METHOD 9
SPECIFICATIONS
Column T5 Output
Unit 7, 'T5', 'COLUMN 5'
TOTAL NUMBER OF ITERATIONS
CHEM METHOD 17
STREAM ID 10 11 12 13
NAME T3 BTMS T4 BTMS T4 OVHD T5 LIQ FD
PHASE LIQUID LIQUID LIQUID LIQUID
THERMO ID NRTL01 NRTL01 NRTL01 NRTL01
FLUID RATES, KG/HR
1 ACETONE 0.0320 9.4733E-09 0.0320 3.8993E-09
2 PHENOL 12238.6603 12190.9408 47.7200 10594.2777
3 MO 0.4047 1.4247E-06 0.4047 7.5550E-07
4 CUMENE 203.4113 0.0661 203.3452 0.0451
5 AMST 162.8172 8.5267E-03 162.8087 5.4524E-03
6 ACPH 682.2970 682.2957 7.5067E-04 623.2662
7 2P2P 31.8798 31.8797 3.2321E-06 29.6785
8 D-A-METHSTYR 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
9 PCPHENOL 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
10 H2O 8.7606E-04 1.4383E-14 8.7606E-04 2.0145E-15
TOTAL RATE, KG/HR 13319.5032 12905.1908 414.3122 11247.2729
TEMPERATURE, C 132.2447 149.4935 125.0302 121.2252
PRESSURE, TORR 160.0000 280.0000 280.0000 100.0000
ENTHALPY, M*KCAL/HR 0.9251 1.0309 0.0237 0.7124
MOLECULAR WEIGHT 95.8033 95.2775 115.6898 95.3357
WEIGHT FRAC VAPOR 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
WEIGHT FRAC LIQUID 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
Process Data
The process flowsheet is shown in Figure A3-1. The reactor oper-
ates adiabatically and the product stream is used to preheat the feed.
A small quantity of the recycle gas is purged to prevent the buildup
of inert components in the system.
For the reactor to operate properly, its feed stream must contain 63
mole % hydrogen. This is achieved by controlling the flow rate of
the recycle hydrogen stream, 5.
Simulation Model
The feed to the reactor must be 63 mole % hydrogen. This is fixed
by a controller that varies the total flow rate of the recycle (stream
5).
A stream calculator (STCALC) unit is used to determine the purge
gas rate for splitter unit S2. The STCALC unit subtracts product
stream 11 from feed stream 2. To account for the hydrogen con-
sumed in the reactor, the difference between streams 8 and 9 is
added. Finally, all components except hydrogen are removed from
the product stream, H2, using a factor of zero on the FOVHD state-
ment. The flow rate of stream H2, created by the stream calculator,
is the rate of excess hydrogen which must be purged. The purge
stream is set by splitter S2, using stream H2 as the reference stream
for its specification.
The recycle (stream 5) is given an initial estimate in order to speed
the convergence. It is defined as pure hydrogen. The value of the
estimate for the flow rate is not important, as it is reset by the con-
troller. Wegstein acceleration is applied to the recycle.
Input Data
English units are used for the simulation. Stream output is requested
in both molar and weight units with percentages as well as flow
rates.
Stream 7, the feed to heater F1, is defined by reference to stream 6,
which allows the heater and reactor to execute before solving the
feed preheat exchanger, EX.
The available reactor data include the actual number of moles/hr of
each component consumed or created in the reactor. These are
entered directly as the stoichiometric coefficients. No base compo-
nent for the conversion is defined, which indicates to PRO/II that
these coefficients are the absolute number of moles that react.
The air cooler is not modelled separately, but is simulated as if it
were combined with the high pressure flash in unit F2.
Stream Calculator unit CAL1 computes the purge rate. Each compo-
nent in the streams on the FEED statement is multiplied by the asso-
ciated factor. This is +1 for streams being added and -1 for streams
being subtracted. The FOVHD statement defines the fraction of each
component going to the OVHD product. The splitter, S2, specifies
the hydrogen rate in the purge stream is the same as in stream H2.
Input Data File
TITLE PROJECT=AppBrief, PROBLEM=A3, USER=SIMSCI
DESC - HYDRODESULFURIZATION UNIT
DESC - REACTOR & HIGH PRESSURE FLASH
DESC -
DESC - MODIFIED TO USE REFSTREAMS TO AVOID REUSING STREAMS
DESC - 2, 8 AND 9.
DESC -
PRINT INPUT=ALL, RATE=M,W, PERCENT=M,W
COMPONENT DATA
LIBID 1,H2/2,C1/3,C2/4,H2S/5,C3/6,IC4/7,NC4/8,IC5/9,NC5 &
, BANK = SIMSCI, PROCESS
PETRO 10,NBP 220,101,60, 220/ 11,NBP 260,112,54.7,260/&
12,NBP 290,121,51.5,290/ 13,NBP 310,127,49.5,310/&
14,NBP 328,134,47.9,328/ 15,NBP 340,138,46.7,340/&
16,NBP 352,143,45.5,352/ 17,NBP 364,148,44.6,364/&
18,NBP 376,153,43.8,376/ 19,NBP 392,160,42.6,392/&
20,NBP 410,167,41.3,410/ 21,NBP 431,176,40, 431/&
22,NBP 470,195,37.6,470/ 23,NBP 515,216,35.3,515/&
24,NBP 550,235,32.7,550
ASSAY CURVEFIT = IMPR, CONVERSION = API94
STREAM DATA
PROP STREAM=1,TEMP=380,PRES=715,RATE=1470,&
COMP=10,0.57/11,3.9/12,11.46/13,8.149/14,15.37/&
15,9.679/16,33.95/17,18.96/18,110.5/19,142.7/&
20,223.4/21,206.6/22,503.5/23,141/24,40.2
PROP STREAM=5,TEMP=170,PRES=715,COMP=10000
PROP STREAM=7,REFS=6,TEMP=565,PRES=710
PROP STREAM=2,TEMP=115,PRES=715,COMP=300/32.813/&
19.916/14.071/3.148/3.793/1.525/0.872/3.111
NAME 1,FEED HC/14,RECYCLE GAS/2,TOTAL MAKEUP/6,COMB FEED/&
5,RECYCLE GAS/8,RX INLET/9,RX PRODUCT/&
12,SEPARAT GAS/13,EXCESS-VENT/11,SEP NET LIQ
PROPERTY STREAM=2R, REFSTREAM=2
PROPERTY STREAM=8R, REFSTREAM=8
PROPERTY STREAM=9R, REFSTREAM=9
RXDATA
RXSET ID=1
REACTION ID=1
STOI 1,-61/14,-0.03/15,-0.02/4,4.66/16,-0.07/17,-0.04/&
18,-0.22/19,-0.29/20,-0.45/21,-0.41/10,0.11/&
22,-1/11,0.66/23,-0.28/12,1.88/24,-0.08/13,1.39
UNIT OPERATIONS
MIXER UID=M1
FEED 1,2,5
PROD M=6
CONTROLL UID=CON1
SPEC STREAM=6,FRAC,COMP=1,VALUE=0.63,RTOL=0.001
VARY STREAM=5,RATE
STCALC UID=CAL1
FEED 2R,1/11,-1/9R,1/8R,-1
OVHD STREAM=H2,PRES=100,TEMP=100
BTMS STREAM=DUM1,PRES=100,TEMP=100
FOVHD 1,,1/2,24,0
OPER STOP=ZERO
RECYCLE DATA
ACCEL TYPE=WEGS,START=2
END
Results
The hydrogen recycle flow rate is 3072.6 lb mole/hr compared with
a hydrogen make-up flow of 379.2 lb mole/hr. The initial recycle
estimate of 10000 lb mole/hr is reduced to the correct value by the
controller in the first recycle trial.
The cooling duty is calculated by the high pressure flash as -63.1
MM Btu/hr. The compressor raises the pressure from 525 psia to
715 psia, and the work required is 601 HP.
Output
Selected portions of the PRO/II output show flash and splitter, recy-
cle compressor, HDS reactor, feed preheater, and stream component
output.
Flash Summary
FLASH ID F1 F2
NAME FEED HEATER HP FLASH
FEEDS 7 10
PRODUCTS MIXED 8
VAPOR 12
LIQUID 11
Splitter Output
Unit 8, 'S2', 'VENT GAS'
------- RATES ------
STREAM ID FRACTION LB-MOL/HR LB/HR
--------- ---------- --------- ---------
FEED 12 3270.567 11861.945
TEMPERATURE, F 100.0000
PRESSURE, PSIA 525.0000
PRESSURE DROP, PSIA 0.0000
Recycle Compressor
Unit 9, 'COMP', 'RECY COMP'
Feeds 14
Products Vapor 5
OPERATING CONDITIONS
HDS Reactor
Unit 4, 'RX13', 'HDS REACTOR'
OPERATING CONDITIONS
REACTOR TYPE ADIABATIC REACTOR
DUTY, MM BTU/HR 0.0000
TOTAL HEAT OF REACTION AT 77.00 F, MM BTU/HR -0.0728
INLET OUTLET
----------- -----------
FEED 8
MIXED PRODUCT 9
TEMPERATURE, F 635.00 631.06
PRESSURE, PSIA 725.0000 625.0000
REACTION DATA
-------- RATES, LB-MOL/HR ------- FRACTION
COMPONENT FEED CHANGE PRODUCT CONVERTED
------------- --------- --------- ----------- ---------
1 H2 3085.8854 -61.0000 3024.8854 0.0198
2 C1 225.3572 0.0000 225.3572
3 C2 62.6839 0.0000 62.6839
4 H2S 36.9943 4.6600 41.6543
5 C3 5.5886 0.0000 5.5886
6 IC4 5.4169 0.0000 5.4169
7 NC4 1.8947 0.0000 1.8947
8 IC5 0.9638 0.0000 0.9638
9 NC5 3.3437 0.0000 3.3437
10 NBP 220 0.5752 0.1100 0.6852
11 NBP 260 3.9164 0.6600 4.5764
12 NBP 290 11.4870 1.8800 13.3670
13 NBP 310 8.1621 1.3900 9.5521
14 NBP 328 15.3849 -0.0300 15.3549 1.94997E-03
15 NBP 340 9.6864 -0.0200 9.6664 2.06475E-03
16 NBP 352 33.9706 -0.0700 33.9006 2.06060E-03
17 NBP 364 18.9691 -0.0400 18.9291 2.10869E-03
18 NBP 376 110.5422 -0.2200 110.3222 1.99019E-03
19 NBP 392 142.7404 -0.2900 142.4504 2.03166E-03
20 NBP 410 223.4459 -0.4500 222.9959 2.01391E-03
21 NBP 431 206.6299 -0.4100 206.2199 1.98422E-03
22 NBP 470 503.5425 -1.0000 502.5425 1.98593E-03
23 NBP 515 141.0080 -0.2800 140.7280 1.98570E-03
24 NBP 550 40.2019 -0.0800 40.1219 1.98995E-03
Feed Preheater
Unit 5, 'EX', 'FEED PREHEAT'
OPERATING CONDITIONS
TOTAL RATE,
LB-MOL/HR 379.2490 3049.1416 4898.3909 4898.3909
TOTAL RATE,
LB-MOL/HR 4898.3909 4898.3909 4843.2009 4843.2009
TOTAL RATE,
LB-MOL/HR 4843.2009 1572.6337 3270.5672 221.4256
TEMPERATURE, F 100.0000
PRESSURE, PSIA 525.0000
ENTHALPY, MM BTU/HR 1.6363
MOLECULAR WEIGHT 3.6269
MOLE FRAC VAPOR 1.0000
MOLE FRAC LIQUID 0.0000
Process Data
The process recovers gas liquids from a natural gas feed stream
(stream FD00) while maintaining a gross heating value of 100 Btu/
SCF in the residue gas. The feed stream composition is given in
Table A4-1.
Simulation Model
The flowsheet is modeled as shown in Figure A4.1. The heat
exchangers HX01, HX04 and HX05 are configured with area and
overall heat transfer coefficient values obtained from a base case
simulation model. This allows the model to accurately predict the
heat transfer performance of these heat exchangers as the optimizer
calculations are performed.
The heat exchanger HX03 serves as the deethanizer condenser on
one side and heats the cold flash product gas on the other. This
exchanger is specified with the ATTACH COLUMN statement in
place of the usual hot or cold side specifications. The hot side feed
and product information are therefore retrieved from the internal
column which connects automatically to the heat exchanger. The
pressure drop in the exchanger is also automatically set to the col-
umn condenser pressure drop.
The OPTIMIZER unit maximizes a CALCULATOR result based
on the overall plant profit using a set of product values for the sales
gas and NGL product streams, utility costs for the column reboiler,
compressors, coolers as well as the cost of the feed gas. The optimi-
zation variables used are the feed split between the two inlet heat
exchangers and the expander discharge pressure. DEFINE state-
ments set the cold separator and deethanizer column pressures equal
to the expander outlet pressure minus 5 psia via a second CALCU-
LATOR unit.
Solution Strategy
During an optimization, the process flowsheet is solved repeatedly
at different values of the optimization variables. Each optimization
cycle involves a base case flowsheet solution and one perturbation
solution for every optimization variable. Therefore, for our applica-
tion involving 2 optimization variables, each optimization cycle
involves 3 solutions. The perturbation solutions evolve from the
base case and are used to calculate finite difference approximations
to the derivatives of the optimizer specifications, constraints and
objective function. This has 2 important consequences:
Merging Units
To save calculation time and simplify the flowsheet, we merge the
expander EXP1 with the adiabatic flash that follows it.
If the split fraction variable appears first, the optimizer resolves all
the units from the splitter to perturb the split fraction and then all
the units from the expander to perturb the discharge pressure.
If, on the other hand, the discharge pressure is placed before the
split fraction, then the optimizer must return to the expander during
both perturbations. The units between the expander and splitter
Input Data
English units are used for the simulation. The default liquid volume
units are changed from ft3 to barrels.
The keyword EQUILIBRIUM should be changed to BUBBLE for
PRO/II version 3.51 and earlier. (Note 1)
COMPONENT DATA
LIBID 1,NITROGEN/2,METHANE/3,ETHANE/4,PROPANE/5,IBUTANE/ &
6,BUTANE/7,IPENTANE/8,PENTANE/9,HEXANE/10,HEPTANE, &
BANK = SIMSCI, PROCESS
ASSAY CURVEFIT = IMPROVED, CONVERSION = API94
A4 - Turbo-Expander Gas Plant Optimization Advanced 6-227
PRO/II Application Briefs
THERMODYNAMIC DATA
METHOD KVAL(VLE)=SRK, ENTHALPY(L)=SRK, ENTHALPY(V)=SRK, &
DENSITY(L)=LK, DENSITY(V)=SRK, ENTROPY(L)=SRK, &
ENTROPY(V)=SRK, SET=SET01, DEFAULT
STREAM DATA
PROPERTY STREAM=FD00, TEMP=120, PRESSURE=510, PHASE=M, &
RATE(GV)=625000, COMPOSITION(M)=1,0.62/ 2,89.23/ &
3,6.96/ 4,2.23/ 5,0.29/ 6,0.47/ 7,0.09/ &
8,0.07/ 9,0.03/10,0.01
PROPERTY STREAM=FD05, TEMPERATURE=-40, REFSTREAM=FD00
OUTPUT FORMAT=GAS, STREAM=FD00, RG08, NGL3
UNIT OPERATIONS
FLASH UID=FL01, NAME=HOT FLASH
FEED FD05
PROD V=HF01, L=HF02
ADIA PRESSURE=505
HX UID=HX01, NAME=FEED-SEP HX
HOT FEED=FD02, M=FD04
COLD FEED=HF02, M=HF04
CONFIG COUNTER, U=50, AREA=53.326, TPASS=1, SPASS=1
HX UID=HX02, NAME=FD-PROD HX
HOT FEED=FD01, M=FD03
COLD FEED=RG03, M=RG04
CONFIG COUNTER, TPASS=1, SPASS=1
OPER CTEMP=110, TOL=1E-5
END
Results
The maximum daily profit for the plant is found to be $688.12. This
is the value of the objective function of optimizer OPT1 (specified
as RESULT 8, PROFIT, from calculator CAL1) obtained in the 6th
of 7 optimization cycles.
The optimum outlet pressure of expander EXP1 (optimizer variable
2) is about 231 psia and the feed split (splitter SP01, optimizer vari-
able 1) is at its upper bound, with 15% being sent as the hot-feed to
heat exchanger HX02. At these conditions, the temperature of
stream FD05 satisfies the flowsheet heat balance with a value of -
40.9 F.
The optimizer report shows that the shadow prices for variable 1
and the specification are non-zero. Shadow prices reflect the sensi-
tivity of the objective function to changes in specification values or
to changes in variable bounds or constraints that are binding at the
solution of the optimization. They are interpreted as follows:
For a positive shadow price, increasing its right hand side
(MINI, MAXI or VALUE) will increase the value of the objec-
tive function.
For a negative shadow, increasing its right hand side (MINI,
MAXI or VALUE) will decrease the value of the objective
function.
Here, the optimal solution has variable 1 at its upper bound with a
positive shadow price. Allowing the feed split to increase beyond
15% would further increase the profit. Not surprisingly, the shadow
price for the specification is also nonzero, indicating that the profit
would increase if we did not have to satisfy the energy balance!
Output
The following data were extracted from the PRO/II output:
Flowsheet Mass Balance
Optimizer Search History
Calculator CAL1 Summary
Exchanger HX01 Summary
Exchanger HX02 Summary
Exchanger HX03 Summary
Expander EXP1 Summary
6-232 Advanced A4 - Turbo-Expander Gas Plant Optimization
PRO/II Application Briefs
Compressor CMP1 Summary
Column COL1 Summary
Gas Format Stream Compositions
Flowsheet Mass Balance
FEED STREAMS: FD00 FD05
Optimizer Summary
UNIT 16, 'OPT1', 'OPTIMIZER'
BEST OBJECTIVE FUNCTION = 6.88121E+02 AT CYCLE NUMBER 6
*** MAXIMUM VALUE OF VARIABLE 1 IS LIMITING
*** FRACTIONAL RELATIVE CHANGE IN OBJECTIVE IS LESS THAN 1.0000E-04 ***
Calculator Summary
UNIT 3, 'CAL2', 'PRES CALC'
Result Name Value Result Name Value
------- ------------ ------------ ------- ------- ----------
1 COL1_TopPres 2.26155E+02 2- 200 Undefined
OPERATING CONDITIONS
OPERATING CONDITIONS
INLET ISENTROPIC OUTLET
--------- ---------- ---------
TEMPERATURE, F -41.37 -101.92 -100.47
PRESSURE, PSIA 505.00 231.15 231.15
ENTHALPY, MM BTU/HR 0.8094 0.0123 0.0522
ENTROPY, BTU/LB-MOL-F 42.6054 42.6054 42.6744
MOLE PERCENT VAPOR 100.0000 96.2206 96.4323
MOLE PERCENT LIQUID 0.0000 3.7794 3.5677
MOLE PERCENT MW SOLID 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
WEIGHT PERCENT TOTAL SOLID 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
ACT VAP RATE, M FT3/MIN 0.1935
ADIABATIC EFF, PERCENT 95.00
WORK, HP
THEORETICAL 313.27
ACTUAL 297.61
OPERATING CONDITIONS
INLET ISENTROPIC OUTLET
----------- ---------- ---------
TEMPERATURE, F 110.00 145.52 162.25
PRESSURE, PSIA 226.15 296.28 296.28
ENTHALPY, MM BTU/HR 3.4424 3.9361 4.1997
ENTROPY, BTU/LB-MOL-F 46.9770 46.9770 47.2443
CP, BTU/LB-MOL-F 9.4565 9.8474
CV, BTU/LB-MOL-F 7.1533 7.5284
CP/(CP-R) 1.2658 1.2526
CP/CV 1.3220 1.3080
MOLE PERCENT VAPOR 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000
MOLE PERCENT LIQUID 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
MOLE PERCENT MW SOLID 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
WEIGHT PERCENT TOTAL SOLID 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
ACT VAP RATE, M FT3/MIN 0.7061
ADIABATIC EFF, PERCENT 65.1900
POLYTROPIC EFF, PERCENT 66.3139
ISENTROPIC COEFFICIENT, K 1.2892
POLYTROPIC COEFFICIENT, N 1.5113
HEAD, FT
ADIABATIC 13776.40
POLYTROPIC 14013.90
ACTUAL 21132.69
WORK, HP
THEORETICAL 194.01
POLYTROPIC 197.36
ACTUAL 297.61
FEED AND PRODUCT STREAMS FROM TO LIQUID FLOW RATES HEAT RATES
TYPE STREAM PHASE TRAY TRAY FRAC LB-MOL/HR MM BTU/HR
----- ------------ ------ ---- ---- ------ ------------ ------------
FEED CF05 MIXED 6 0.9961 57.44 -0.1712
FEED HF04 MIXED 12 0.4371 36.87 0.0881
PROD RG01 VAPOR 1 54.39 0.1148
PROD NGL1 LIQUID 16 39.93 0.1492
A5 - H2SO4 Alkylation
For years a sulfuric acid alkylation plant has operated with little
consideration for revamp or modernization. This demonstration
takes a fresh look at how this plant will be best utilized in the era of
reformulated, low RVP, low aromatics gasoline.
One possiblity for revamp is to change the conventional deisobuta-
nizer into an iso-stripper operation. This tends to increase the recy-
cle rate which, in turn, results in a higher isobutane content in the
reactor. The bottom line is higher alkylate quality and lower acid
consumption at the cost of a larger settler and increased mixing
costs. You have been asked to establish the process conditions for
this new operation.
Process Data
The flowsheet is illustrated in Figure A5-1. For the purpose of
establishing the process conditions, the various caustic wash units
(for removal of H2SO4) are not considered. Also, for simulation
purposes, the acid is considered to be pure H2SO4. Typically, 96 wt
% acid is used in the actual plant. The feed streams are given in
Table A5-1.
H2SO4 Alkylation
The saturated feed is depropanized. A supplemental isobutane feed
is added to the bottoms and chilled in the economizer. The chilled
liquid enters the first reactor chamber, along with isobutane recycle
and acid. Twenty-five percent of the olefin is injected adjacent to
the impeller blades in each reaction chamber. In the presence of
excess isobutane, all of the olefin reacts to form primarily isooctane
alkylate.
This particular alkylation reactor has an autorefrigeration feature.
Alkylation is an exothermic reaction. However, as the hydrocarbon
is cascaded from one reaction chamber to the next, sufficient vapor-
ization takes place to keep the mixture at temperatures low enough
(40-50 F) to prevent acid runaway (increase in acid consumption).
The vapors are collected and recycled through a refrigeration cir-
cuit. The reactor effluent is stripped of isobutane (which is recy-
cled), and debutanized to an RVP of 12.0.
ethane 10.0 -- --
propene -- 9.0 --
isobutene -- 14.0 --
2-butene -- 175.0 --
1-butene -- 56.0 --
isopentane -- 5.0 --
Input Data
English units are used, with barrels for liquid volume units and spe-
cific gravity for standard density. Liquid volume rate printout is
requested. The special alpha formulation that predicts the acid heat
capacity is provided on the SA06 statement in the Thermodynamic
COMP DATA
LIBID &
1,C1 /2,C2 /3,C3 /4,IC4 /5,NC4 / &
6,PROPENE/ 7,ISOBUTENE/8,T2BUTENE,,2BUTENE/ &
9,1BUTENE/10,IC5 /11,23DMB /12,24MP / &
13,23MP /14,224MPN /15,24HX /16,23HX / &
17,234MP /18,225MHX, BANK = SIMSCI, PROCESS
LIBID 24,H2SO4, BANK = SIMSCI, PROCESS
TC(K) 24,924
PC(BAR) 24,64
PETRO 19,C9s, 128.26, 0.73, 280 / &
20,C10s, 142.28, 0.74, 325 / &
21,C11s, 156.31, 0.75, 365 / &
22,C12s, 170.34, 0.76, 395 / &
23,C13s, 184.36, 0.77, 425
ASSAY CURVEFIT = IMPROVED, CONVERSION = API94
THERMODYNAMIC DATA
METHOD SYSTEM=SRK, SET=SRK
ENTHALPY ALPHA=SIMSCI
SA06 24,1.81341,1.25196,0.566576
STREAM DATA
$ SATURATE FEED
PROP STREAM=1, TEMP=100, PRES=400, &
COMP(LV)=1, 2/ 2,10 / 3,100/ &
4,187.5/ 5,100.
$ OLEFIN FEED
PROP STREAM=2, TEMP=100, PRES=215, &
STCALC UID=F1X,NAME=3_PHASE
$ SEPARATOR/FLASH FOR 1ST STAGE REACTOR
FEED 24X
OVHD V=24A,L=25A
BTMS STREAM=25AX
FOVHD 1,23,1.0/24,0.0
STCALC UID=F1Y,NAME=3_PHASE
$ SEPARATOR/FLASH FOR 2ND STAGE REACTOR
FEED 24Y
OVHD V=24B,L=25B
BTMS STREAM=25BX
FOVHD 1,23,1.0/24,0.0
STCALC UID=F1Z,NAME=3_PHASE
$ SEPARATOR/FLASH FOR 3RD STAGE REACTOR
FEED 24Z
OVHD V=24C,L=25C
BTMS STREAM=25CX
FOVHD 1,23,1.0/24,0.0
REACTOR UID=RX1D, NAME=4TH_STAGE
FEED 20D,25C,25CX
PROD M=24ZZ
OPERATION PRES=27,ADIABATIC
RXCALC CONV $,REFPHASE=L,REFTEMP=45
$ PROPENE - ISOBUTENE REACTION
STOIC 4, -12.3461/ 6, -12.3008/ &
10, 0.5541/ 11, 0.5553/ 12, 2.3756/ &
13, 5.9539/ 14, 0.4574/ 15, 0.0731/ &
16, 0.1062/ 17, 0.3969/ 18, 0.0821/ &
19, 0.0594/ 20, 0.6688/ 21, 0.4325/ &
22, 0.0468/ 23, 0.0315
BASE COMP=6
CONVERSION 1.0
A5 - H2SO4 Alkylation Advanced 6-255
PRO/II Application Briefs
$ ISOBUTENE - ISOBUTANE REACTION
STOIC 4, -8.5683/ 7, -10.5445/ &
10, 1.2706/ 11, 0.5925/ 12, 0.3827/ &
13, 0.2638/ 14, 2.5703/ 15, 0.3627/ &
16, 0.5101/ 17, 2.1523/ 18, 0.3998/ &
19, 0.2074/ 20, 0.2754/ 21, 0.2134/ &
22, 0.5173/ 23, 0.0239
BASE COMP=7
CONVERSION 1.0
$ 2-BUTENE - ISOBUTANE REACTION
STOIC 4,-10.9924/ 8, -11.3233/ &
10, 0.6347/ 11, 0.6261/ 12, 0.2832/ &
13, 0.1703/ 14, 3.3018/ 15, 0.4360/ &
16, 0.5566/ 17, 4.6514/ 18, 0.1852/ &
19, 0.0782/ 20, 0.0891/ 21, 0.0799/ &
22, 0.2831
BASE COMP=8
CONVERSION 1.0
$ 1-BUTENE - ISOBUTANE REACTION
STOIC 4,-11.5763/ 9, -9.9587/ &
10, 0.6877/ 11, 0.5870/ 12, 0.3016/ &
13, 0.1730/ 14, 3.1778/ 15, 0.5271/ &
16, 0.6466/ 17, 4.2314/ 18, 0.1686/ &
19, 0.0984/ 20, 0.0720/ 21, 0.0761/ &
22, 0.2674/ 23, 0.0079
BASE COMP=9
CONVERSION 1.0
STCALC UID=F1ZZ,NAME=3_PHASE
$ SEPARATOR/FLASH FOR 4TH STAGE REACTOR
FEED 24ZZ
OVHD V=24D, L=25D
BTMS L=25DX
FOVHD 1,23,1.0/ 24,0.0
HX UID=FB4X,NAME=EFFL_ALKY
COLD FEED=251, L=253X, DP=5
OPER CTEMP=110
HX UID=CON1, NAME=DIC4_COND
HOT FEED=30, L=301, DP=5
UTIL WATER TIN=70,TEMP=80
OPER HLFRAC=1.0
HX UID=FT1, NAME=EFFL_RECL
COLD FEED=251, L=252, DP=5
HOT FEED=301, L=30R, DP=5
OPER HTEMP=62
$
HX UID=FB4,NAME=EFFL_ALKY
COLD FEED=252, L=253, DP=5
HOT FEED=33, L=331, DP=5
OPER CTEMP=110
HX UID=CL4,NAME=ALKY_CLR
HOT FEED=331, L=332, DP=5
UTIL WATER TIN=70, TEMP=80
OPER HTEMP=100
$
$ The deethanizer is solved outside the loop
PUMP UID=P3
FEED 11
PROD L=11A
OPERATION PRES=600
HX UID=FB1
COLD FEED=11A,L=11B,DP=5
HOT FEED=41,L=41A,DP=5
OPERATION HOCO=5
6-258 Advanced A5 - H2SO4 Alkylation
PRO/II Application Briefs
HX UID=CL1
HOT FEED=41A,L=41B,DP=5
UTIL WATER TIN=70,TOUT=80
OPERATION HTEMP=100
$
$ Compressor requirements are calculated after
$ THE RECYCLE LOOPS ARE SOLVED
$
VALVE UID=SCTN, NAME=SUCTION
FEED 24
PROD V=240
OPERATION PRES=23
Results
The recycle loop 1 converges in 16 trials, and recycle loop 2 con-
verges after 2 trials. The plant produces 1.75 barrels of alkylate per
barrel of olefin feed. This is calculated by summing the C5+ content
of the alkylate stream (stream 332), subtracting the C5 content
already present in the olefin feed (stream 2), and dividing the result
by the olefin present in the olefin feed. The overall material balance
is summarized by the feed stream and product stream user-defined
reports.
Output
Excerpts from the output report are given here. Note that the tem-
perature reported in each reactor stage is not correct because the
REACTOR module does not support three phase equilibrium. The
correct temperature is reported in the stream calculator report where
the acid phase is split off, and a true vapor-liquid equilibrium flash
is performed.
REACTION DATA
--------- RATES, LB-MOL/HR ---------- FRACTION
COMPONENT FEED CHANGE PRODUCT CONVERTED
------------ ----------- --------- ----------- ---------
1 C1 4.18022E-14 0.0000 4.18022E-14
2 C2 2.12889E-05 0.0000 2.12889E-05
3 C3 1028.0516 0.0000 1028.0516
4 IC4 10221.6518 -243.4754 9978.1764 0.0238
5 NC4 2568.8713 0.0000 2568.8713
6 PROPENE 9.7206 -9.7206 0.0000 1.0000
7 ISOBUTENE 13.1199 -13.1199 0.0000 1.0000
8 2BUTENE 166.9924 -166.9924 0.0000 1.0000
9 1BUTENE 52.4294 -52.4294 0.0000 1.0000
10 IC5 48.1430 14.9997 63.1427
11 23DMB 9.8309 13.4999 23.3308
12 24MP 2.6443 8.1178 10.7622
13 23MP 2.0386 8.4556 10.4942
14 224MPN 12.0381 68.9835 81.0217
15 24HX 1.1509 9.7141 10.8649
16 23HX 1.1858 12.3313 13.5171
17 234MP 10.1084 93.8660 103.9744
18 225MHX 0.2958 4.1812 4.4770
19 C9s 0.0845 1.9763 2.0608
20 C10s 0.0416 2.5643 2.6058
21 C11s 0.0143 2.1863 2.2006
22 C12s 0.0204 6.2635 6.2838
23 C13s 1.51294E-04 0.0962 0.0964
24 H2SO4 10195.8123 0.0000 10195.8123
25DX 1.000
TOTAL RATE, LB-MOL/HR 10195.812
TEMPERATURE, F 46.131
PRESSURE, PSIA 27.000
MOLECULAR WEIGHT 98.0795
MOL FRAC VAPOR 0.00000
MOL FRAC TOTAL LIQUID 1.00000
MOL FRAC MW SOLID 0.00000
ENTHALPY, MM BTU/HR -28.71277
OPERATING CONDITIONS
INLET ISENTROPIC OUTLET
----------- ---------- ----------
TEMPERATURE, F 44.20 69.89 75.22
PRESSURE, PSIA 23.00 37.94 37.94
ENTHALPY, MM BTU/HR 36.9463 38.9139 39.4058
ENTROPY, BTU/LB-MOL-F 106.0820 106.0820 106.3100
CP, BTU/LB-MOL-F 21.5300 22.8538
CV, BTU/LB-MOL-F 19.2324 20.3743
CP/(CP-R) 1.1016 1.0952
CP/CV 1.1195 1.1217
MOLE PERCENT VAPOR 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000
MOLE PERCENT LIQUID 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
MOLE PERCENT MW SOLID 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
WEIGHT PERCENT TOTAL SOLID 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
ACT VAP RATE, M FT3/MIN 15.1728
ADIABATIC EFF, PERCENT 80.0000
POLYTROPIC EFF, PERCENT 80.4876
ISENTROPIC COEFFICIENT, K 1.0588
POLYTROPIC COEFFICIENT, N 1.0866
ASME "F" FACTOR 1.0008
HEAD, FT
ADIABATIC 6725.25
POLYTROPIC 6766.24
ACTUAL 8406.57
WORK, HP
THEORETICAL 773.27
POLYTROPIC 777.98
ACTUAL 966.59
OPERATING CONDITIONS
INLET ISENTROPIC OUTLET
---------- ---------- ---------
TEMPERATURE, F 70.20 119.36 119.36
PRESSURE, PSIA 37.94 91.91 91.91
ENTHALPY, MM BTU/HR 51.8757 56.6623 56.6623
ENTROPY, BTU/LB-MOL-F 105.5114 105.5114 105.5114
CP, BTU/LB-MOL-F 22.5417 25.1987
CV, BTU/LB-MOL-F 20.0536 21.9196
CP/(CP-R) 1.0966 1.0856
CP/CV 1.1241 1.1496
MOLE PERCENT VAPOR 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000
MOLE PERCENT LIQUID 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
MOLE PERCENT MW SOLID 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
WEIGHT PERCENT TOTAL SOLID 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
ACT VAP RATE, M FT3/MIN 12.6806
ADIABATIC EFF, PERCENT 100.0000
POLYTROPIC EFF, PERCENT 100.0000
ISENTROPIC COEFFICIENT, K 1.0206
POLYTROPIC COEFFICIENT, N 1.0206
ASME "F" FACTOR 1.0037
HEAD, FT
ADIABATIC 12297.74
POLYTROPIC 12297.74
ACTUAL 12297.74
WORK, HP
THEORETICAL 1881.20
POLYTROPIC 1881.20
ACTUAL 1881.20
REFLUX RATIOS
OVERALL
MOLE BALANCE, (FEEDS - PRODUCTS) -4.4057E-13
HEAT BALANCE, (H(IN) - H(OUT)) 0.0455
SPECIFICATIONS
Product Streams
STREAM ID 40 41B 32 332
NAME FUEL GAS HD5 PROPANE BUTANE ALKYLATE
PHASE VAPOR LIQUID LIQUID LIQUID
THERMO ID SRK SRK SRK SRK
NAME FUEL GAS HD5 PROPANE BUTANE ALKYLATE
PHASE VAPOR LIQUID LIQUID LIQUID
STD. LIQ. VOL. RATES, BBL/DAY
1 C2+ 132.2988 155.7006 0.0000 0.0000
2 PROPANE 139.4165 2485.1627 2.1779E-11 5.4879E-15
3 I-BUTANE 1.0680E-03 0.2233 573.9812 145.4003
4 N-BUTANE 1.3053E-05 5.0906E-03 2294.0657 1582.4236
5 PROPENE 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
6 BUTENES 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
7 PENTANE 1.1382E-13 5.0231E-10 32.5755 561.1895
8 C6+ 0.0000 0.0000 8.3056E-04 10217.4627
RATE, BBL/DAY 271.7164 2641.0917 2900.6232 12506.4761
TEMPERATURE, F 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
PRESSURE, PSIA 420.000 425.000 80.000 80.000
A6 - Ammonia Synthesis
Ammonia is produced from a mixture of hydrogen and nitrogen by
passing it through a bed of Fe-Al2O3-K2O catalyst at high temper-
ature and pressure. Pressures of over 300 atmospheres are typically
used in order to achieve acceptable conversions. Even at high pres-
sure, the conversion of hydrogen is less than 30% per pass. A large
recycle is therefore required in order to return unreacted feed to the
convertor. The flowsheet for the synthesis loop is shown in Figure
A6-1.
Process Data
The main ammonia product is more than 99.5% pure. The feed to
the synthesis comes from reformed natural gas and is equivalent to
a natural gas consumption of 6 million SCFD. The composition and
thermal condition of the feed to the loop are shown in Table A6-1.
Table A6-1: Feed Information (Stream 28)
Component Rate, lb mole/hour
Hydrogen 2424.30
Nitrogen 807.50
Argon 9.58
Methane 15.16
Temperature, F 95.0
The compressed synthesis gas is mixed with the recycle stream and
introduced into the synthesis loop after the recycle compressor. The
compressor operates with an outlet pressure of 4950 psig. The gas
mixture is chilled to 40 F and liquid ammonia is removed from the
secondary separator. The vapor is heated and passed to the ammo-
nia converter. The feed is preheated inside the convertor before
entering the catalyst bed.
The ammonia synthesis reaction is:
N 2 + 3H 2 2NH 3 (A6-1)
Simulation Model
The simulation flowsheet for the ammonia synthesis process is
shown in Figure A6.2. Simulation Flowsheet for Ammonia Synthe-
sis Loop
Let us first consider the thermal recycle loop involving X-4 and D-
7. Typically, we would solve the mixer MX1 followed by heat
exchanger X-4 (hopefully we would have an initial estimate for tear
stream 32) and then separator D-7. X-4 and D-7 would be solved
A6 - Ammonia Synthesis Advanced 6-273
PRO/II Application Briefs
repeatedly until convergence. However, it is clear that the flowrate
and composition of stream 30 is the same as for stream 29. Further,
whether we know the temperature and pressure of stream 30 does
not affect the product streams of D-7 since this isothermal flash unit
has a fixed outlet temperature and pressure. We can therefore define
stream 30 as being REFERENCED to stream 29 and provide an ini-
tial estimate for its temperature and pressure. The result of this is
that the flowrate and composition of stream 30 will be automati-
cally updated whenever the conditions of stream 29 change. We can
therefore solve D-7 before X-4 and these two units can be incorpo-
rated into the outer loop from CP-4 to SP1. The temperature and
pressure of stream 30 converge simultaneously with the mass recy-
cle loop.
The above arguments can also be applied to the thermal recycle
loop involving the feed preheater (FDEF) and the converter (RX-7).
Here, stream 34 is referenced to stream 33 and initial estimates for
it's temperature and pressure are provided.
Using the reference streams, the thermal recycle loops are effec-
tively merged with the mass recycle loop. Thus the problem is
reduced to two loops; one large recycle loop which is converged at
every trial of the controller, and the controller loop.
Input Data
The simulation uses English units with the pressure changed to
psig. A plant mass balance summary output is requested. An initial
estimate is provided for the mass recycle stream. A user-defined
Results
The synthesis loop solves with an ammonia product purity of
99.76%. When the inert concentration in the reactor feed is
increased to 16%, the flowrate of the ammonia product stream
increases by 1.2%. It's purity is now 99.74% A higher concentration
of inerts in the reactor feed stream increases the reactor conversion.
However, a higher recycle flowrate also produces corresponding
increases in the recycle compressor work and in the separator
duties.
Clearly, the value of the increased ammonia must be set against the
increased operating costs in order to determine if the higher inerts
concentration is a better operating strategy.
The simulation can be solved using either solution strategy. Both
approaches yield comparable results. For this flowsheet, the simul-
taneous solution strategy (strategy II) only takes about 20% of the
solution time to solve both the 12% and the 16% case as compared
to the time required by the first strategy. Note however that if the
simulation involved many more components, the first solution strat-
egy would be more efficient.
Conclusions
The model can be used to quantify the effects of any operating
changes although economic analyses are required to identify the
optimum conditions. Other parameters which might be investigated
are: the purity of the feed gas; ratio of recycle to fresh feed; hydro-
gen/nitrogen ratio in the feed; synthesis loop pressure; and the vari-
ous temperature levels in the loop.
Output
The flowsheet is first solved with 12% inerts in the reactor feed.
Using solution strategy I, the simulation converges at the third con-
troller iteration. Each controller iteration involves several recycle
trials. Using solution strategy II, 15 multivariable controller itera-
tions are required to converge the flowsheet. Selected portions of
the output using solution strategy II (for 12% inerts only) are pre-
sented on the following pages. When the inert fraction specification
is changed to 16% and the flowsheet is resolved, strategy I takes 5
controller iterations (again, each of these involves numerous recy-
cle trials), while solution strategy II again requires 15 MVC itera-
tions.
MVC Summary
UNIT 10, 'CTL1'
BEST CYCLE = 14
VARIABLE SPECIFIED CALCULATED RELATIVE RELATIVE
VALUE VALUE VALUE TOLERANCE ERROR
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
1 6.09840E+03 1.20000E-01 1.20001E-01 8.33333E-03 5.89989E-06
2 1.98503E+03 1.00000E+00 1.00003E+00 1.00000E-04 2.61307E-05
3 7.44375E+02 1.00000E+00 1.00003E+00 1.00000E-04 2.72351E-05
4 8.43490E+02 1.00000E+00 1.00001E+00 1.00000E-04 8.91922E-06
5 8.45601E+02 1.00000E+00 1.00000E+00 1.00000E-04 8.00576E-07
6 6.71307E+01 1.00000E+00 9.99960E-01 1.00000E-04 -3.96374E-05
CONVERGENCE HISTORY
CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 CYCLE 4 CYCLE 5
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
VARY 1 6.0000E+03 6.0600E+03 6.0600E+03 6.0600E+03 6.0600E+03
VARY 2 2.0000E+03 2.0000E+03 2.0200E+03 2.0200E+03 2.0200E+03
VARY 3 5.0000E+02 5.0000E+02 5.0000E+02 5.0500E+02 5.0500E+02
VARY 4 1.0000E+03 1.0000E+03 1.0000E+03 1.0000E+03 1.0100E+03
VARY 5 1.0000E+03 1.0000E+03 1.0000E+03 1.0000E+03 1.0000E+03
VARY 6 7.0000E+01 7.0000E+01 7.0000E+01 7.0000E+01 7.0000E+01
SPEC 1 1.1487E-01 1.1434E-01 1.1416E-01 1.1449E-01 1.1514E-01
REL ERR -4.28E-02 -4.72E-02 -4.87E-02 -4.59E-02 -4.05E-02
SPEC 2 1.0009E+00 9.9918E-01 9.9853E-01 9.9840E-01 9.9795E-01
REL ERR 9.03E-04 -8.21E-04 -1.47E-03 -1.60E-03 -2.05E-03
SPEC 3 1.0007E+00 9.9905E-01 9.9831E-01 9.9818E-01 9.9773E-01
REL ERR 6.85E-04 -9.49E-04 -1.69E-03 -1.82E-03 -2.27E-03
SPEC 4 1.0054E+00 1.0055E+00 1.0055E+00 1.0053E+00 1.0053E+00
REL ERR 5.41E-03 5.45E-03 5.47E-03 5.28E-03 5.29E-03
SPEC 5 9.9603E-01 9.9608E-01 9.9610E-01 9.9611E-01 9.9597E-01
REL ERR -3.97E-03 -3.92E-03 -3.90E-03 -3.89E-03 -4.03E-03
SPEC 6 8.4133E-01 8.4418E-01 8.4592E-01 8.4641E-01 8.4793E-01
REL ERR -1.59E-01 -1.56E-01 -1.54E-01 -1.54E-01 -1.52E-01
SUM SQ ERR 2.7051E-02 2.6553E-02 2.6161E-02 2.5749E-02 2.4819E-02
MVC Summary
UNIT 10, 'CTL1' (Cont)
CYCLE 6 CYCLE 7 CYCLE 8 CYCLE 9 CYCLE 10
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
VARY 1 6.0600E+03 6.0600E+03 6.2408E+03 6.1150E+03 6.1022E+03
VARY 2 2.0200E+03 2.0200E+03 2.0689E+03 2.0229E+03 1.9813E+03
VARY 3 5.0500E+02 5.0500E+02 5.1636E+02 5.8330E+02 7.1981E+02
VARY 4 1.0100E+03 1.0100E+03 1.0646E+03 1.0043E+03 8.6846E+02
VARY 5 1.0100E+03 1.0000E+03 8.4410E+02 8.6471E+02 8.3686E+02
VARY 6 7.0000E+01 7.0700E+01 6.9926E+01 6.4348E+01 5.8051E+01
SPEC 1 1.1514E-01 1.1514E-01 1.1741E-01 1.1940E-01 1.2002E-01
REL ERR -4.05E-02 -4.05E-02 -2.16E-02 -5.00E-03 1.55E-04
SPEC 2 9.9794E-01 9.9788E-01 9.8889E-01 9.9530E-01 1.0004E+00
REL ERR -2.06E-03 -2.12E-03 -1.11E-02 -4.70E-03 3.94E-04
SPEC 3 9.9772E-01 9.9766E-01 9.8868E-01 9.9512E-01 1.0004E+00
REL ERR -2.28E-03 -2.34E-03 -1.13E-02 -4.88E-03 4.06E-04
SPEC 4 1.0053E+00 1.0052E+00 1.0054E+00 1.0037E+00 1.0013E+00
REL ERR 5.27E-03 5.22E-03 5.38E-03 3.69E-03 1.31E-03
SPEC 5 9.9592E-01 9.9590E-01 9.9613E-01 9.9732E-01 1.0004E+00
REL ERR -4.08E-03 -4.10E-03 -3.87E-03 -2.68E-03 3.81E-04
SPEC 6 8.3952E-01 8.4787E-01 1.0312E+00 9.9262E-01 1.0128E+00
REL ERR -1.60E-01 -1.52E-01 3.12E-02 -7.38E-03 1.28E-02
SUM SQ ERR 2.7449E-02 2.4837E-02 1.7322E-03 1.4626E-04 1.6479E-04
OPERATING CONDITIONS
INLET ISENTROPIC OUTLET
----------- ----------- -----------
TEMPERATURE, F 85.00 94.30 94.80
PRESSURE, PSIG 4660.00 4950.00 4950.00
ENTHALPY, MM BTU/HR 10.1904 11.0129 11.0562
ENTROPY, BTU/LB-MOL-F 33.8060 33.8060 33.8135
CP, BTU/LB-MOL-F 8.2395 8.2505
CV, BTU/LB-MOL-F 5.3627 5.3907
CP/(CP-R) 1.3176 1.3170
CP/CV 1.5364 1.5305
MOLE PERCENT VAPOR 99.9995 100.0000 100.0000
MOLE PERCENT LIQUID 0.0005 0.0000 0.0000
MOLE PERCENT MW SOLID 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
WEIGHT PCT TOTAL SOLID 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
ACT VAP RATE, M FT3/MIN 0.2595
ADIABATIC EFF, PERCENT 95.0000
POLYTROPIC EFF, PERCENT 95.0418
ISENTROPIC COEFFICIENT, K 1.9354
POLYTROPIC COEFFICIENT, N 1.9915
ASME "F" FACTOR 1.0000
HEAD, FT
ADIABATIC 5095.26
POLYTROPIC 5097.51
ACTUAL 5363.44
WORK, HP
THEORETICAL 323.25
POLYTROPIC 323.39
ACTUAL 340.26
INLET OUTLET
----------- -----------
FEED 34
VAPOR PRODUCT 35
TEMPERATURE, F 565.49 926.56
PRESSURE, PSIG 4760.0000 4730.0000
LB-MOL/HR FRACTION
BASE COMPONENT REACTION CONVERTED CONVERTED(1)
--------------- --------- ----------- ------------
2 N2 1 788.5274 0.2825
STREAM ID 32 33 34 35
NAME SEC SEP RX FEED
PHASE VAPOR VAPOR VAPOR VAPOR
THERMO ID SRKM01 SRKM01 SRKM01 SRKM01
STREAM ID 40 40R 41 42
NAME RECYCLE LET DWN GAS
PHASE VAPOR MIXED VAPOR VAPOR
THERMO ID SRKM01 SRKM01 SRKM01 SRKM01
TEMPERATURE, F 80.6403
PRESSURE, PSIG 350.0000
ENTHALPY, MM BTU/HR 1.7092
MOLECULAR WEIGHT 17.0306
MOLE FRAC VAPOR 0.0000
MOLE FRAC LIQUID 1.0000
Process Data
A simplified schematic of the process flowsheet is shown in Figure
A7-1.1 The feed stream information is given in Table A7-1.
Table A7-1: Feed Stream Information
C4s Feed MeOH Feed Recycle
Stream 2 Stream 1 Stream 20
Component kg mole/hour kg mole/hour kg mole/hour
1) N-Butane 76.5 -- --
2) Iso-Butane 348.5 -- --
3) 1-Butene 59.5 -- --
4) 2-cis-Butene 34.0 -- --
5) 2-trans-Butene 51.0 -- --
6) iso-Butene 280.5 -- --
7) MTBE -- -- --
8) Methanol -- 277.5 --
9) tert-Butyl Alcohol -- -- 7.0
10) Water -- -- 0.2
Total 850.0 277.5 7.2
Temperature, C 16.0 16.0 44.0
Pressure, kPa 1620.0 1620.0 1724.0
The feed stream is preheated to 43.5 C before being sent to the reac-
tor where the three reactions shown in Table A7-2 take place. In the
main reaction, 96% of the methanol reacts with IBTE to form
MTBE.
Table A7-2: Reaction Stoichiometry
Reaction Base Comp. Conversion, %
2 IBTE <=> DIB IBTE 0.25
IBTE + H2O <=> TBA H2O 100.00
SimulationMethods
The feed preheater is modeled by a simple heat exchanger (HX-1).
The heated feed stream is then sent to the conversion reactor (RX-1)
where all three reactions specified in Table A7.2 occur at their spec-
ified conversion levels. The column feed heat exchanger loop is
effectively removed by referencing the column feed stream 4 to the
2. The kinetic expressions presented here are intended to be used only for
purposes of demonstration.
A7 - MTBE Synthesis-reactive Distillation Advanced 6-293
PRO/II Application Briefs
reactor product stream 5. This means that stream 4 takes its compo-
sition and rate from 5, but its temperature and pressure are calcu-
lated by the heat exchanger after the MTBE column when both
streams are known.
The heat exchanger product is fed onto tray 23 of the 40 tray MTBE
column. Reaction of the IBTE and MeOH to MTBE occurs in the
liquid phase on the tray above the feed, tray 22. The liquid volume
on tray 22 is specified, while the reaction rate is calculated via in-
line kinetics in a Procedure Data Section.
Input Data
The simulation uses SI units. A plant mass balance summary output
is requested. Note how the reaction tray in the MTBE column is
specified (Note 1). The catalyst concentration in g/l is specified
using a DEFINE statement (Note 2).
THERMO DATA
METHOD SYSTEM=NRTL, TRANSPORT=PURE, SET=S1,DEFAULT
KVALUE(VLE) FILL=UNIFAC
STREAM DATA
PROP STRM= 1, TEMP=16, PRES=1620, COMP=8,277.5
RXDATA
$
$ REACTION DATA FOR REACTORS
$
RXSET ID=MTBE
REACTION ID=1
STOIC 6,-2 / 11,1 $ IBTE + IBTE => DIB
REACTION ID=2
STOIC 10,-1 / 6,-1 / 9,1 $ H2O + IBTE => TBA
REACTION ID=3
STOIC 6,-1 / 8,-1 / 7,1 $ IBTE + MEOH => MTBE
$
$ COLUMN REACTION DATA
$
RXSET ID=COLMTBE
REACTION ID=MTBE
STOICH 6, -1/8, -1/7, 1
PROCEDURE DATA
PROCEDURE(RXKINE) ID=MTBE, NAME=MTBE KINETIX
PARA MAXNOR=1
PDATA GCAT
CODE
REAL K , KA , KC , KS , LITRES
INTEGER IBTE , MEOH , MTBE
R = 8.314
TK = ((RTEMP-32.0)/1.8) + 273.15
IBTE = 6
MTBE = 7
MEOH = 8
LITRES = RLVOLU * 1000.0
GCATX = GCAT * LITRES
$
$ Calculate surface reaction rate constant, KS,
$ and equilibrium adsorption constants KA and KB.
$ Activation energy is in J/gram mole.
$ Units: KS - (Ggram mole/gm catalyst)**1.5 /hour
$ KA - gm catalyst / mole
A7 - MTBE Synthesis-reactive Distillation Advanced 6-295
PRO/II Application Briefs
$ KC - gm catalyst / mole
$
KS = 6.0E+16 * EXP(-87900.0/(R * TK))
KA = 5.1E-13 * EXP( 97500.0/(R * TK))
KC = 1.6E-16 * EXP(119000.0/(R*TK))
$
$ ---- CALCULATE THE EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANT.
$
$ UNITS - (GM-MOLES/GM-CATALYST)/HOUR
$ PHASE - LIQUID PHASE REACTION
$
K = EXP(-17.31715 + (7196.776 / TK))
$
RHOA = (XLCONC(MEOH)/GCAT)
RHOB = (XLCONC(IBTE)/GCAT)
RHOC = (XLCONC(MTBE)/GCAT)
$
$ CALCULATE DENSITY IN MOLES / VOLUME
$
RDEN = 1.0 + ( KA * RHOA ) + ( KC * RHOC )
$
$ -- RATE EQUATION
$
FACT1 = KS * KA / RDEN
FACT2 = RHOA*RHOB**0.5 - ((RHOC**1.5)/ K)
RATE = FACT1 * FACT2
RRATES(1) = RATE * GCATX * 1000.0 / LITRES
RETURN
UNIT OPS
FEED 5, 23
PROD OVHD=6, BTMS=7,280
HX UID=HX-2B, NAME=FEED-BTMS
COLD FEED=4, L=5X, DP=34.5
HOT FEED=7, L=8, DP=34.5
OPER CTEMP=72
END
Results
Overall, 98.8% of the IBTE was converted to MTBE, with 96% of
that occuring in the reactor and the remainder in the MTBE reactive
distillation column. The MTBE product stream was over 99.5%
pure.
Output
The following data were extracted from the PRO/II output:
1. Reactor summary
2. MTBE reactive distillation column summary
3. Stream output for selected streams.
4. Plot of column compositions
A7 - MTBE Synthesis-reactive Distillation Advanced 6-297
PRO/II Application Briefs
INLET OUTLET
---------- -----------
FEED 3
LIQUID PRODUCT 4
TEMPERATURE, C 43.50 55.00
PRESSURE, KPA 1585.5000 1516.5000
KG-MOL/HR FRACTION
BASE COMPONENT REACTION CONVERTED CONVERTED(1)
-------------- -------- ----------- -----------
6 IBTE 1 0.7012 2.50000E-03
10 H2O 2 0.2000 1.0000
8 MEOH 3 266.4000 0.9600
(1) FRACTION CONVERTED BASED ON AMOUNT IN FEED
COLUMN SUMMARY
---------- NET FLOW RATES ----------- HEATER
TRAY TEMP PRESSURE LIQUID VAPOR FEED PRODUCT DUTIES
DEG C KPA KG-MOL/HR M*KJ/HR
------ ------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------- ------------
1C 43.5 621.00 585.7 585.7L -22.8381
2 52.8 656.00 623.3 1171.4
3 53.4 657.09 622.4 1209.0
4 53.8 658.18 621.7 1208.1
*** Report omitted for trays 5-20 ***
21 73.1 676.75 458.7 1089.5
22 81.5 677.84 430.5 1044.4
23 86.0 678.93 1163.6 1020.2 867.7M
24 107.9 680.03 1196.6 885.6
25 121.3 681.12 1256.3 918.6
*** Report omitted for trays 26-37 ***
38 129.1 695.32 1304.7 1025.7
39 129.1 696.41 1305.7 1026.7
40R 129.2 697.50 1027.7 278.0L 23.3580
SPECIFICATIONS
SPECIFICATION PARAMETER TRAY COMP SPECIFICATION SPECIFIED CALCULATED
NUMBER TYPE NO NO TYPE VALUE VALUE
------------- --------- ---- ------ ------------- ---------- ----------
1 (ACTIVE) STRM 7 40 MOL RATE 2.780E+02 2.780E+02
2 (ACTIVE) UNIT T-1 1 MOL RRATIO 1.000E+00 1.000E+00
STREAM ID 8 20
NAME MTBE MEOH RECYC
PHASE LIQUID LIQUID
THERMO ID S1 S1
FLUID RATES, KG-MOL/HR
1 NC4 8.3687E-07 0.0000
2 IC4 8.6708E-10 0.0000
3 1BUTENE 1.7726E-09 0.0000
4 BTC2 4.3351E-08 0.0000
5 BTT2 1.2209E-08 0.0000
6 IBTE 1.2543E-10 0.0000
7 MTBE 270.4512 0.0000
8 MEOH 1.3969E-06 0.0000
9 TBA 7.1982 7.0000
10 H2O 0.0000 0.2000
11 DIB 0.3506 0.0000
TOTAL RATE, KG-MOL/HR 278.0000 7.2000
TEMPERATURE, C 84.8694 44.0000
PRESSURE, KPA 663.0000 1724.0000
ENTHALPY, M*KJ/HR 4.5498 0.0670
MOLECULAR WEIGHT 87.8168 72.5643
MOLE FRAC VAPOR 0.0000 0.0000
MOLE FRAC LIQUID 1.0000 1.0000
The air fed to the bottom of the HP Column is precooled to its dew
point by exchange with the gaseous products. Ten percent of the
feed air is split off and fed to the LP Column at 5K above its dew
point.
Because the main uses of nitrogen are to exclude oxygen, the nitro-
gen product must contain very little oxygen. In this process, the
amount of oxygen in the nitrogen product must not exceed 10ppm.
Impurities in the oxygen product are not as tightly controlled but the
purity must be greater than 99.5%.
Argon is also used to exclude oxygen and may also contain only
very small amounts of oxygen as an impurity.
Simulation Model
The focus of this exercise is the separation of constituent gases from
the air, and not the utility costs. This allows some simplifications,
such as omitting models of compressors and expanders that exist in
an actual plant.
The calculations start by solving the HP Column, and then setting
the products to the pressures and liquid fractions for the LP Column
feeds. The LP and Argon Columns next solve along with the recy-
cle they comprise. After the recycle converges, the E1E2 exchanger
solves. To ensure that there are no temperature crossovers, the sim-
ulation includes heat exchanger models for the HP Column con-
denser, LP Column reboiler, and the Argon Column condenser.
Input Data
The simulation uses Metric units with temperatures in Kelvin and
pressures in atmospheres. The threshold limit for recycle conver-
gence is tightened to ensure that the small amount of nitrogen in the
recycle is checked when determining the convergence (Note 1). In
order to check the overall material balance, the PRINT MBAL
option instructs PRO/II to print out an overall balance over the
flowsheet.
An initial estimate must be supplied for the return stream to the LP
Column from the Argon column because the argon product flowrate
is low compared to the return stream - about 4% of the feed.
Because the argon product purity is controlled by the operation of
the LP Column, a recovery specification is used on the Argon Col-
umn. A third of the argon in the feed is typically recovered over-
head and the condenser duty can be varied in order to meet this. The
expected argon product purity is in the region of 98%.
Once the distillation columns have been solved, the exchangers
between the HP and LP Columns can be calculated. The simulation
flowsheet is shown in Figure A8.2. The exchangers E1 and E2 are
combined into the LNGHX unit E1E2.
Exchangers E3 and E4 are the Argon and HP Column condensers.
The streams AV1 and HPV are created from the vapor flow into the
condensers using the TFLOW statement. LPL is created from the
liquid flow into the LP Column reboiler which is the other side of
the HP Column condenser. These exchangers are modeled in order
to enable PRO/II to check that the temperature levels are correct -
i.e. there are no crossovers.
The duty on the first stream in exchanger E1E2 is set equal to that
calculated in E1 when setting the LP Column feed condition. The
duty on the second stream in E1E2 is defined as the duty of E2
minus the duty of the Argon Column condenser. The condenser
duty is actually negative so it is added to the E2 duty on the
DEFINE statement to give the cooling duty in E1E2 (Note 2).
The duties of E3 and E4 are simply defined as the same as that of
the corresponding column condenser. If temperature crossovers
occur, PRO/II will automatically print an error message.
COMPONENT DATA
LIBID 1,NITROGEN/2,ARGON/3,OXYGEN, &
BANK=simsci, Process
THERMODYNAMIC DATA
$ Low pressure data
METHOD SYSTEM=SRK, DENS(L)=IDEAL, SET=1, DEFAULT
KVAL(VLE)
SRK 1,3, -0.00694/ 1,2, 0.0056/ &
2,3, 0.01574
$ High pressure data
METHOD SYSTEM=SRK, DENS(L)=IDEA, SET 2
KVAL(VLE)
SRK 1,3, -0.01089/ 1,2, 0.0/ &
2,3, 0.01697
STREAM DATA
PROP STRM=1, TEMP=278, PRES=6, RATE=9386, &
COMP=78.11/0.93/20.96
$ RECYCLE FROM ARGON COLUMN - INITIAL ESTIMATE
PROP STRM=16, PHASE=L, PRES=1.32, &
COMP=0.0/10/90,RATE=1800
NAME 1,AIR FEED/ 8,HP BTMS / 12,HP OVHD/&
15,ARG FEED/ 16,ARG BTMS/ 17,AR PRODUCT/ &
21,O2 LIQUID
UNIT OPERATIONS
$ ************** Column Section **************
SPLITTER UID=SPL1,NAME=FEED SPLIT
FEED 1
PROD M=2,M=3
SPEC STRM=3,RATE,RATIO,STRM=1,VALUE=0.1
METHOD SET=2
FLASH UID=DEW
FEED 2
PROD V=5
DEW DP=0
HX UID=DTAD
HOT FEED=3, M=7, DP=4.6
OPER HDTAD=5
VALVE UID=V2
FEED 9
PROD M=10
OPER DP=4.55
HX UID=E3,NAME=AR CONDENSER
COLD FEED=10, M=11A
HOT FEED=AV1, L=AL1
DEFINE DUTY AS -1.0000 MULTIPLY COLU=ARG DUTY(1)
Results
The HP Column solves with a condenser duty of 10.46GCal/hr. The
overhead product is 99.83% nitrogen with the remainder mostly
argon. The LP Column reboiler duty is the same as that of the HP
Column condenser. The nitrogen product contains slightly more
argon than the HP Column product and is 99.72% pure. The oxygen
content is the same in both column products at the 10ppm which
was specified.
7.6% of the oxygen is produced as liquid. The purity of the liquid
and gas products are 99.7% and 99.6% respectively. These are both
above the desired value of 99.5%.
The argon product is 97.6% pure with 1.8% oxygen and 0.6% nitro-
gen. The product rate is 3.2% of the feed from the LP Column. The
condenser duty is 2.96GCal/hr.
All the exchangers solve correctly which confirms that there are no
temperature crossovers. The nitrogen into the HP Column con-
denser is at a temperature of 96.2K and the oxygen into the LP Col-
umn reboiler is at 94.8K. Because the streams are changing phase,
there is very little temperature change through the exchanger.
A8 - Air Separation Plant Advanced 6-309
PRO/II Application Briefs
The argon entering the Argon Column condenser is at 88.9K and is
exchanging with the LP Column oxygen product. This oxygen
stream is heated from 84.0K to 85.5K within the condenser.
The nitrogen product from the LP Column is heated from 79.1K to
96.3K in the LNGHX unit E1E2.
Conclusions
The base case model successfully simulates the current perfor-
mance. The amount of liquid oxygen is not specified directly but is
determined by the overall heat balance of the system. The addi-
tional cooling required for more liquid product will require reduc-
ing the enthalpy of the column feeds.
These studies can now be carried out to investigate the feasibility of
more liquid products.
Output
Selected PRO/II output is shown below. This shows the overall
mass balance, the condenser/reboiler between the HP and LP col-
umns and the intercolumn LNG exchanger output.
The summary output is shown for the LP Column. The concentra-
tion plot shows that the argon product is drawn from the LP Column
where the argon concentration is at its maximum.
Finally, the stream component molar fractions are shown for all the
streams in the flowsheet, including the column pseudo-product
streams.
PRODUCT STREAMS: 17 21 22
13 19 AL1
11A HPV1 LPL1
HP Condenser/LP Reboiler
UNIT 12, 'E4', 'HP CONDENSER'
OPERATING CONDITIONS
Feeds 18
Products Vapor 19
Vaporization,KG-MOL/HR 0.000
Duty, M*KCAL/HR 0.9870
LP Column Summary
Unit 7, 'LP', 'LP COLUMN'
TOTAL NUMBER OF ITERATIONS
IN/OUT METHOD 16
COLUMN SUMMARY
---------- NET FLOW RATES ----------- HEATER
TRAY TEMP PRESSURE LIQUID VAPOR FEED PRODUCT DUTIES
DEG K ATM KG-MOL/HR M*KCAL/HR
------ ------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------- ------------
1 78.9 1.17 3533.3 3941.3M 7359.6V
2 79.0 1.18 3528.4 6951.6
3 79.0 1.18 3522.4 6946.7
4 79.2 1.19 3515.2 6940.7
5 79.3 1.19 3506.6 6933.5
*** This listing omits trays 6 to 24, normally included in this report ***
*** This listing omits trays 35 to 41, normally included in this report ***
*** This listing omits trays 48 to 64, normally included in this report ***
SPECIFICATIONS
STREAM ID 8_R1 9 10 11
NAME
PHASE MIXED LIQUID MIXED MIXED
THERMO ID 1 1 1 1
STREAM ID 14 15 16 17
NAME ARG FEED ARG BTMS AR PRODUCT
PHASE MIXED VAPOR LIQUID VAPOR
THERMO ID 1 1 1 1
Section 7: Specialty
This section contains examples of a diverse variety of features
available in PRO/II.
S1 - Upstream Calculations
A natural gas stream is cooled by two linked refrigeration circuits,
the first using a propane refrigerant and the second using ethane.
The Upstream Unit Operation of useful utility calculations that
allows properties to be calculated for typical pipeline calculation
methods. These include:
GOR Output
At 60 F and 1 atmosphere, the GOR =66.4 on a volume/volume
basis.
Feeds 1
COMPONENT DATA
LIBID 1,N2/ 2,CO2/ 3,C1 / 4,C2 / 5,C3 / &
6,IC4/ 7,NC4/ 8,IC5/ 9,NC5/10,NC6, &
BANK=SIMSCI,PROCESS
PETRO 11,C07,96,56.4149
PETRO 12,C08,106,54.4395
PETRO 13,C09,118,50.1431
PETRO 14,C10,132,48.2967
PETRO 15,C11,149,48.0685
PETRO 16,C12,163,45.5964
PETRO 17,C13,175,41.0611
PETRO 18,C14,194,38.7767
PETRO 19,C15,203,38.3679
PETRO 20,C16,217,37.3544
PETRO 21,C17,235,37.7583
PETRO 22,C18,247,36.5522
PETRO 23,C19,255,34.5798
PETRO 24,C20+,396,31.7065
ASSAY CONVERSION=API94, CURVEFIT=CURRENT, &
KVRECONCILE=TAILS
THERMODYNAMIC DATA
METHOD SYSTEM=PR, SET=1
STREAM DATA
PROPERTY STREAM=FEED, TEMP=300.02, PRESSURE=7600, &
PHASE=M, COMPOSITION(M,KGM/H)= 1, 0.39/ 2, 3.47/ &
3,80.17/ 4, 6.28/ 5, 2.75/ 6, 0.43/ 7, 0.88/ &
8, 0.31/ 9, 0.35/ 10, 0.54/ 11, 0.72/ 12, 0.88/ &
13, 0.55/ 14, 0.33/ 15, 0.24/ 16, 0.2 / 17, 0.21/ &
18, 0.18/ 19, 0.15/ 20, 0.11/ 21, 0.12/ 22, 0.09/ &
23, 0.08/ 24, 0.57
UNIT OPERATIONS
UPST UID=REFP_5800
FEED FEED
OPER DROP,DP=400,PEND=500, REFP=5800
DROP 5300, 0.1/ 4900, 3.8/ 4500, 5.8/ 4100, 6.9/ &
3700, 8.5/ 3300, 9.2/ 2900, 9.5/ 2500, 9.8/ &
2100, 9.7/ 1700, 9.6/ 1300, 9.4/ 900, 8.7
END
Dropout(Cal.) Dropout(Exp.)
Pressure 100 * Liq Vol 100 * Liq Vol
Point PSIA / Ref Vol / Ref Vol
----- ----------- ------------- -------------
1 500.0000 7.846508 -Missing-
2 900.0000 8.833914 8.700000
3 1300.0000 9.427558 9.400000
4 1700.0000 9.791493 9.600000
5 2100.0000 9.978125 9.700000
6 2500.0000 10.00383 9.800000
7 2900.0000 9.794900 9.500000
8 3300.0000 8.962030 9.200000
9 3700.0000 7.981347 8.500000
10 4100.0000 6.781447 6.900000
11 4500.0000 5.236407 5.800000
12 4900.0000 3.113861 3.800000
13 5300.0000 0.000000 0.1000000
14 5700.0000 0.000000 -Missing-
15 5800.0000 0.000000 -Missing-
**********************************************************
Zero DROPOUT values may occur if the DEW POINT PRESSURE is
EXCEEDED.
Retrograde condensation may produce a second DEW POINT.
**********************************************************
Dew Point Pressure, PSIA 5289.8731
Reference Pressure, PSIA 5800.0000
Reference Temperature, F 300.0200
Data Points 12
Absolute Error 1.399336
Relative Error 1.049594
COMPONENT DATA
LIBID 1,N2 / 2,CO2/ 3,C1 / 4,C2 / 5,C3 / &
6,IC4/ 7,NC4/ 8,IC5/ 9,NC5/10,NC6, &
BANK=SIMSCI, PROCESS
ASSAY CONVERSION=API94, CURVEFIT=CURRENT, &
KVRECONCILE=TAILS
THERMODYNAMIC DATA
METHOD SYSTEM=PR, DENSITY(L)=PR, SET=1
STREAM DATA
PROPERTY STREAM=FEED, TEMPERATURE=752, &
PRESSURE=4351.1, PHASE=M, &
COMPOSITION=1,35/ 2,3/ 3,4/ 4, 6/ 5,4/ &
6, 3/ 7,5/ 8,5/ 9,30/ 10,5
UNIT OPERATIONS
UPST UID=EXP_DATA
FEED FEED
OPER REFT=250, REFP=1800, RELV, &
PSTART=1000, PEND=3000, POINTS=11
RELVOL 1200 1.49/ 1300, 1.32/ 1600, 1.25/ &
1800,1.0 / 2000,0.905
END
Feeds FEED
DATA POINTS 5
ABSOLUTE ERROR 0.2099108E-01
RELATIVE ERORR 0.1333499E-01
END
Point Pressure Gas Volume Cum. Gas Vol Gas MW Liquid Volume
PSIA FT3/HR FT3/HR BBL/HR
----- ----------- ----------- ------------ ---------- -------------
1 5000.0000 0.00000 0.00000 25.2037 2.64343
2 4800.0000 2159.10 2159.10 24.6143 3.48373
3 4600.0000 2466.39 4625.49 24.1221 4.15292
4 4400.0000 2667.82 7293.31 23.7011 4.70175
5 4200.0000 2816.92 10110.2 23.3341 5.16194
6 4000.0000 2938.99 13049.2 23.0089 5.55455
7 3800.0000 3046.29 16095.5 22.7169 5.89411
8 3600.0000 3145.13 19240.6 22.4520 6.19053
9 3400.0000 3237.64 22478.3 22.2098 6.45101
10 3200.0000 3324.34 25802.6 21.9876 6.68068
11 3000.0000 3222.50 29025.1 21.7835 6.70724
12 2800.0000 3306.54 32331.7 21.5966 6.69897
13 2600.0000 3387.24 35718.9 21.4264 6.66193
14 2400.0000 3459.14 39178.1 21.2733 6.59897
15 2200.0000 3519.97 42698.0 21.1378 6.51282
16 2000.0000 3567.69 46265.7 21.0211 6.40615
7-334 Speciality S1 - Upstream Calculations
PRO/II Application Briefs
17 1800.0000 3600.62 49866.3 20.9253 6.28159
18 1600.0000 3617.59 53483.9 20.8529 6.14172
19 1400.0000 3618.02 57101.9 20.8084 5.98893
20 1200.0000 3602.01 60703.9 20.7985 5.82529
21 1000.0000 3570.43 64274.4 20.8351 5.65232
22 800.0000 3525.03 67799.4 20.9409 5.47050
23 600.0000 3468.92 71268.3 21.1649 5.27823
24 400.0000 3408.52 74676.8 21.6404 5.06843
25 200.0000 3366.54 78043.4 22.9312 4.81044
26 100.0000 1687.92 79731.3 25.1835 4.63761
Overview
Biodiesel can be produced from various seed oils, such as: corn oil,
palm oil, and soybean oil. The main technologies for these
processes include: dewatering, free fatty acid esterification,
triglyceride esterification, methanol recovery, and glycol recovery.
The U.S. Department of Energy National Renewable Energy
Laboratory provides process and production technology support to
the private sector to create the needed biodiesel infrastructure. This
biodiesel application is based on the process as described in NREL
report # SR-510-36244.
Chemistry Involved
Natural seed oils are a mixture of various proportions of fatty acids
on a glycerol backbone, known generically as a triglyceride. The
basic reaction required to produce biodiesel is to substitute a methyl
group from methanol in place of the glycerol backbone, creating
methyl esters of the fatty acids. A molecule of glycerol is produced
for each triglyceride molecule converted to fatty acid methyl esters
(FAME) or biodiesel. The general reaction is summarized as:
Process Description
There are many process technology options for production of
biodiesel based on different feed stocks and qualities, desired
production capacity, and differing catalyst and alcohol recovery
options. All of these process options share a general set of
capabilities that must be modeled. Here is an example process
flowsheet for a continuous biodiesel operation:
The SIM4ME Portal Case study tool runs each oil configured in
the designed process, and extracts the needed information to allow
operational comparisons, and economic evaluations of various feed
stocks available for the biodiesel process.
This process can be more efficient in large plants due to the time
required for settling and the inherent batch processing required by
typical centrifuge operations. Low pressure flashing is a quick, and
continuous dewatering operation that will integrate better with large
continuous biodiesel operations. The flash conditions modeled are:
The simulation provides these results for the flash operation. The
composition and flow of the WATER2 stream can then be used to
design and size methanol recovery and recycle operations.
Triglyceride Esterification
The dewatered oil stream continues to the triglyceride esterification
process. The excess methanol ratio is corrected to 6:1 mole ratio to
the triglyceride flow. The caustic catalyst, NaOH, is again set to a
0.01 mole ratio using the same calculator process as in the free fatty
acid esterification process. The esterification reaction is relatively
fast and the reaction rate is controlled primarily by mass transport
phenomena in the reactor section.
Biodiesel Refining
Standard unit operations model the downstream separation
processes to refine the FAME produced into saleable fuel grade
material. A low pressure flash tank is used to produce an improved
methanol stream for recycle to the process inlet.
Separating glycol from FAME is another key process. The
efficiency of this operation can impact the quality of the FAME as
biodiesel and the value of the glycol by-product stream, which can
be an important component to the overall economics. This process
is modeled as an ideal phase separation in a flash tank using the
SRKM thermodynamics package, a SimSci customized version of
standard SRK. Tests with pilot plant data show that this method
matches the actual phase separation performance very well and can
be used as a predictive tool for this unit operation in a continuous
biodiesel operation.
Economic Analysis
Once the process is modeled, it is very easy to use the SIM4ME
Portal to do economic and operational analysis using the PRO/II
simulation to generate the key process parameters, such as the
flows, duties, and equipment requirements. Enter the operational
costs for materials, utilities, and manpower as shown in the
simplified following example, and it becomes an easy task to
compare different feedstocks and operational methods.
Solution Benefits
This example provides a beginning point for anyone interested in
exploring the design and operation of a biodiesel facility. As the
process design is developed, additional details can be added to this
model to provide information for equipment sizing, project costing,
and full economic analysis of the biodiesel process. The techniques
provided in this example give the user all the base capability needed
to complete this work in an efficient and effective manner.
B2_Bioethanol_Process
Problem Description
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is promoting the
development of ethanol from biomass feedstocks as an alternative
to conventional petroleum-based transportation fuels. The National
Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) has modeled many
potential process designs and estimated the economics of each
process. Several technology demonstration plants have been built
and operated to verify technical feasibility and economic viability
of the technology in the current energy market. Ethanol is an
important additive to oxygenate gasoline which increases the octane
rating in light of the recent ban on the MTBE additive.
Ethanol can be produced from various bio-mass sources, such as:
corn fiber, sugar cane bagasse, grain straws, wood, and paper
wastes. The main technologies for these processes include: thermo-
chemical pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, and fermentation via
a variety of natural and recombinant microbes and distillation.
NREL provides funding and technology transfer packages to assist
the private sector in creating the needed biomass to ethanol
capability.
Computer simulation is an essential tool in the design and economic
analysis of new bio-ethanol technologies. This application brief
demonstrates the use of PRO/II in the simulation of a bio-ethanol
process based on the DOE Bio-ethanol Pilot Plant design.1 This
simulation includes material recycles and thermal integration, as
well as techniques to customize unit operations and integrate user
created models of the hydrolysis and fermentation processes.
http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy00osti/28397.pdf
Overview of Solution
PRO/II provides the tools and flexibility to model the bio-ethanol
process with high fidelity, integrate proprietary correlations and
reaction models. This simulation includes these processing steps:
Dilute acid hydrolysis of long chain carbohydrates to sugars
Fermentation of sugars to alcohols
Separate unit operations (UOPs) are used to provide several
examples of integrating custom reactions and kinetics
Recovery of alcohols via distillation and drying through
molecular sieves
The Excel UOP provides the customization platform for the xylose
fermentation. The conversion reactor is used for the hydrolysis
process and the conversion reactor and a calculator UOP provides
the customization for glucose fermentation.
Implementation Details
Hydrolysis Processes
There are several technologies for hydrolysis, but all convert the
long chain carbohydrates (cellulose and hemicellulose) to sugars
and soluble oligomers for microbial digestion. This simulation
simplifies the hydrolysis reactions down to the two main sugars
produced: xylose (from hemicellulose), and glucose (from
cellulose). The dilute acid process is modeled by the addition of
dilute sulfuric acid to the biomass feed and heating the reaction
mass to 437 F (225 C), this drives the reaction and releases the
sugars.
Typically this phase uses multiple staged reactors to optimize the
production of sugars and minimize by-products. Additional heat
exchangers and reactors can be added to match process
requirements. The "strong acid" process can be modeled in this
same way, as can the much less energy intensive enzymatic
hydrolysis process.
The hydrolysis reaction is modeled by the conversion reactor.
Fermentation Processes
The xylose and glucose streams are split for demonstration
purposes. In many process, co-fermentation is done to consume
both sugars in the same process vessel. Typically different
microbes are used to digest each type of sugar, 5-carbon and 6-
carbon.
Glucose Fermentation
Glucose fermentation is carried out in a standard conversion reactor
unit operation. Its reactions are defined in the PRO/II reactions data
entry window (DEW):
The reaction set is referenced in the conversion reactor
configuration. This allows multiple UOPs on the same flowsheet to
use the same reaction set. This not only reduces data entry tasks,
but also ensures that a consistent set of reactions are used
throughout the flowsheet to prevent data entry errors.
Xylose Fermentation
Xylose fermentation is modeled using customized kinetics in the
Excel UOP conversion reactor template. Its reactions are defined in
the Excel reactor model in the same way as the hydrolysis process.
However, the conversion rates for the four reactions are calculated
based on inputs from the Excel UOP and a kinetics model in the
Excel workbook. The base reaction rates are specified in the
parameters section of the PRO/II Excel UOP. The ratios between
the different reactions are set and passed to Excel.
Separation Processes
Standard unit operations model the downstream separation
processes to refine the alcohols produced into saleable fuel grade
material. A low pressure flash tank is used to produce an improved
water stream for recycle to the process inlet, followed by a
distillation column to provide the bulk of the material separations.
Energy integration operations are modeled quite easily with the
simple heat exchanger unit operation by connecting process streams
to both the hot and cold sides. Calculated duties can also be linked
between heat exchangers where it is impractical to show the process
streams connected to the same heat exchanger.
The polishing process for final water removal is a molecular sieve
tower. Note that the water removal from the sieve tower is during
the regeneration process, and is a batch operation. The stream
calculator UOP is a good approximation of this process in a steady
state simulator, and provides the data on water load required to size
the actual equipment.
Solution Benefits
This example provides a beginning point for anyone interesting in
exploring the design and operation of a bio-ethanol facility. As the
process design is developed, additional details can be added to this
model to provide information for equipment sizing, project costing,
and full economic analysis of the bio-ethanol process. The
techniques provided in this example give the user all the base
capability needed to complete this work in an efficient and effective
manner.
C F
Centrifuge 1-164 FEED 1-14
Column
Methanol dryer 1-87
Condensing Curve 2-141
L
conventional distillation 1-10
CRUDE HEATING CURVE 1-119 Liquid Fraction and Latent Heat Plot 1-127
Crude Heating Curve
API gravity 1-119
D2887 1-119
M
HCURVE 1-121
Lohrenz-Bray-Clark method 1-121 Melter 1-164
Spreadsheet Tools utilities 1-126 Methanol
CRUDE OIL DISTILLATION 3-1 Dryer column 1-87
Crystalization
Solid 1-161
Crystallizer 1-164
P
Performance Specifications 1-14
D PHASE ENVELOPE 1-1
condensation 1-7
DEETHANIZER 1-9 cricondenbar 1-1
Capital cost 1-9 cricondentherm 1-1
Gas Stream 1-10 Generate Reports 1-7
Lee-Kesler 1-10 Peng-Robinson 1-1
Phase Envelope 1-4
DEISOBUTANIZER REVAMP 2-144
Soave-Redlich-Kwong 1-2
alkylation unit 2-144
Rerun 2-144 Phase Envelope 1-7
DEISOBUTANIZER TOWER 2-129 Pressure and Enthalphy plot 1-127
Grayson-Streed method 2-130 propane recovery 1-14
Density Plot 1-128 PROVISION 1-6
Dryer Pumparounds 1-15
Methanol Dryer 1-87
S
E
SEPARATE 1-14
Envelope Separation
Phase See Phase Envelope 1-7 Methanol dryer column 1-87
Solid
Crystallization 1-161
Solubility
T vant Hoff
Solubility 1-163
Viscosity Plot 1-128
TBP curve 3-2
TBPCUTS 1-121
thermosiphon reboiler 1-10 X
transport properties 1-10
Xylene
p-Xylene 1-161
Index-ii
Invensys Systems, Inc.
26561 Rancho Parkway South
Lake Forest, CA 92630
United States of America
http://iom.invensys.com