Professional Documents
Culture Documents
June 2019
The compositions of the gas mixture studied in this study are shown in Table 1.
May 2019
April 2019
Table 1. Water-saturated compositions of gas mixtures studied
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
Figure 1 presents the calculated hydrate formation curve (solid curve) and the dew point portion of the phase envelope of August 2017
a sweet natural gas (solid curve with the square). Figure 1 also presents the dew point and hydrate formation curves for
the same gas mixture containing 10 and 20 mole % CO2. Figure 1 indicates that as the CO2 mole % increases from 0 to July 2017
20 mole %, the hydrate formation curves shift slightly to the left, depressing the hydrate formation temperature. Note that
the points to the left and above the hydrate curves represent the hydrate formation region. From an operational point of June 2017
view, this region should be avoided/prevented. This figure also indicates, as CO2 mole % increases, the cricondenbar May 2017
decreases and the phase envelope shrinks.
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
http://www.jmcampbell.com/tip-of-the-month/2012/12/sour-gas-hydrate-formation-phase-behavior/ Page 1 of 5
Sour Gas Hydrate Formation Phase Behavior | Campbell Tip of the Month 05/08/2019, 3+04 PM
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
Figure 1. The impact of CO2 on the hydrocarbon dew point and hydrate formation curve. July 2014
June 2014
Similarly, Figure 2 presents the calculated hydrate formation curve (solid curve) and the dew point portion of phase
May 2014
envelope for the same sweet natural gas (solid curve with the square). Figure 2 also presents the dew point and hydrate April 2014
formation curves for the same gas mixture containing 10 and 20 mole % H2S. Figure 2 indicates that as the H2S mole %
increases from 0 to 20 mole %, the hydrate formation curves shift considerably to the right, promoting the hydrate March 2014
formation temperature. This is opposite to the effect of CO2 and it is more pronounced. From an operational point of view,
February 2014
this is undesirable because H2S expands the hydrate formation region to the right. Note that the points to the right and
below of the hydrate curve represent the hydrate-free region. Figure 2 also indicates, as H2S mole % increases, the January 2014
cricondenbar decreases and the phase envelope shrinks. The shrinkage of the phase envelope is less than that of CO2.
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
Figure 2. The impact of H2S on the hydrocarbon dew point and hydrate formation curve. May 2012
April 2012
Figure 3 presents the calculated hydrate formation curves for a sweet gas, a sour gas with 20 mole % CO2 and a sour gas
March 2012
with 20 mole % H2S. This figure clearly indicates that the impact of H2S is much bigger than the CO2 impact; CO2 February 2012
depresses (shifts to the left) the hydrate formation condition slightly but H2S promotes hydrate formation considerably. As
an example, at 1000 psia (6900 kPa), CO2 reduces hydrate formation temperature for this gas by about 5.5˚F (3˚C) while,
January 2012
H2S increase hydrate formation temperature by about 20˚F (11.1˚C). December 2011
November 2011
Conclusions: October 2011
September 2011
The presence of CO2 and H2S in natural gas has an opposite impact on the hydrate formation condition. While the impact
of CO2 is small, H2S has considerable impact on the hydrate formation condition. CO2 depresses hydrate formation (acts August 2011
as hydrate inhibitor and shifts the hydrate curve to the left) while H2S shifts the hydrate curve to the right, promotes
July 2011
hydrate formation conditions, and may cause severe operational problems.
June 2011
http://www.jmcampbell.com/tip-of-the-month/2012/12/sour-gas-hydrate-formation-phase-behavior/ Page 2 of 5
Sour Gas Hydrate Formation Phase Behavior | Campbell Tip of the Month 05/08/2019, 3+04 PM
To learn more about similar cases and how to minimize operational problems, we suggest attending our G40 May 2011
(Process/Facility Fundamentals), G4 (Gas Conditioning and Processing), P81 (CO2 Surface Facilities), and PF4
(Oil Production and Processing Facilities) courses. April 2011
John M. Campbell Consulting (JMCC) offers consulting expertise on this subject and many others. For more information March 2011
about the services JMCC provides, visit our website at www.jmcampbellconsulting.com, or email us at
consulting@jmcampbell.com.
February 2011
January 2011
By: Dr. Mahmood Moshfeghian
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
Figure 3. The opposite impact of CO2 and H2S on the hydrate formation curve.
May 2009
April 2009
Reference: March 2009
1. Campbell, J.M., “Gas conditioning and Processing, Vol 1: The Basic Principles”, 8th Edition, Edited by R.A. February 2009
Hubbard, John M. Campbell & Company, Norman, USA, 2001.
2. Parrish, W.R., and J.M. Prausnitz, “Dissociation pressures of gas hydrates formed by gas mixtures,” Ind. Eng.
January 2009
Chem. Proc. Dev. 11: 26, 1972. December 2008
3. Holder, G. D., Gorbin, G. and Papadopoulo, K.D, “Thermodynamic and molecular properties of gas hydrates from
mixtures containing methane. argon, and krypton,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund. 19(3): 282, 1980. November 2008
4. Gas Processors Suppliers Association; “ENGINEERING DATA BOOK” 13th Edition – FPS; Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, October 2008
2012.
September 2008
1. G. Soave, Chem. Eng. Sci. 27, 1197-1203, 1972.
August 2008
6. ProMax 3.2, Bryan Research and Engineering, Inc, Bryan, Texas, 2012.
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
Tweet 4 Did you enjoy this post? Do you have a question?
Leave us a Comment below! April 2008
Like
Want to read more articles like this? March 2008
Subscribe to our RSS Feed or visit the Tip of the Month Archives February 2008
for past articles.
January 2008
Posted on December 1, 2012 at 10:20 am
December 2007
November 2007
7 comments
October 2007
Categories: Gas Processing, Process Facilities
September 2007
Recieve new post updates: Entries (RSS)
Recieve follow up comments updates: RSS 2.0 August 2007
July 2007
Written by Dr. Mahmood Moshfeghian
June 2007
DR. MAHMOOD MOSHFEGHIAN is a Senior Technical Advisor and Senior Instructor. He is the author of most Tips of the May 2007
Month and develops technical software for PetroSkills. He has 40 years teaching experience in universities as well as for
oil and gas industries. Dr. Moshfeghian joined JMC in 1990 as a part time consultant and then as full time April 2007
instructor/consultant in 2005. Moshfeghian was Professor of Chemical Engineering at Shiraz University. Dr. Moshfeghian
is a senior member of AIChE and has published more than 125 technical papers on thermodynamic properties and March 2007
Process Engineering. Dr. Moshfeghian has presented invited papers in international conferences. He is a member of the
Editorial Board for the International Journal of Oil, Gas, and Coal Technology and a member of the GPSA Technical
February 2007
Committee Group F. He holds B.S. (74), M.S. (75) and and PhD (78) degrees in Chemical Engineering, all from Oklahoma January 2007
State University.
December 2006
View all posts by: Dr. Mahmood Moshfeghian
November 2006
« Previous post
October 2006
http://www.jmcampbell.com/tip-of-the-month/2012/12/sour-gas-hydrate-formation-phase-behavior/ Page 3 of 5
Sour Gas Hydrate Formation Phase Behavior | Campbell Tip of the Month 05/08/2019, 3+04 PM
http://www.jmcampbell.com/tip-of-the-month/2012/12/sour-gas-hydrate-formation-phase-behavior/ Page 4 of 5
Sour Gas Hydrate Formation Phase Behavior | Campbell Tip of the Month 05/08/2019, 3+04 PM
Suite 230
Norman, OK. 73072
http://www.jmcampbell.com/tip-of-the-month/2012/12/sour-gas-hydrate-formation-phase-behavior/ Page 5 of 5